Do you see any issue with my downgrading #810158 (again!). With usrmerge
not even in testing I don't see why this is an issue.
-04 17:24:15.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+maradns (1.4.12-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Resolved use of undefined environment variable in maintenance
+scripts. Thanks to Andreas Beckmann and Adam Barratt for pointing
+this out
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Sun, 04 Nov
curious I didn't notice that. Anyway please don't remove it and I'll
have another look.
On 02/11/12 19:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 18:32 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Is CFG_TEMPLATE used before it's getting defined?
$ grep -n TEMPLATE
installed below /usr/share/maradns
+- ucf used to install and purge the config file
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:16:08 +
+
maradns (1.4.12-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Improved changelog parsing to work with binNMUs (Closes: #675392)
diff -Nru maradns
It looks like the debdiff is too large to send via normal means. You'll
either have to review it yourself or give me specific instructions for
delivering it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mysql-5.5
14 CVE's fixed. As usual for this package we are not able to cherry pick the
changes.
(include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing)
unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Debian Release Team,
Please could I have a stay of execution on maradns? I am somewhat
overwhelmed with stuff at the moment but I am steadily working my way
through it (including the Debian stuff). And the maradns RC bug came
fairly
On 25/10/12 22:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-10-25 23:21, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Dear Debian Release Team,
Please could I have a stay of execution on maradns? I am somewhat
overwhelmed with stuff at the moment but I am steadily working my way
through it (including the Debian stuff
required.
+- debian/config: removed '-e' from shebang and final 'exit 0'
+ * Removed gross copy/paste stupidity from long description
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:03:48 +0100
+
w3c-linkchecker (4.81-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated Czech translation
in debian/rules
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:01:11 +0100
+
mysql-5.5 (5.5.24+dfsg-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated debian/copyright after analysis from development version
diff -Nru mysql-5.5-5.5.24+dfsg/debian/control mysql-5.5-5.5.24+dfsg/debian/control
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gforth
FTBS bug. #672616
Diff attached either now or later
unblock gforth/0.7.0+ds1-7
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
severity 685072 important
tag 685072 -moreinfo
merge 686803 685072
thanks
I cannot reproduce the issue but I have a theory what is required is
adding a breaks clause to mysql-server-core-5.5
Breaks: mysql-server-5.5 ( ${binary:Version})
As far as I undersyand it the background is that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mysql-5.5
Slovak debconf translation and corrections to debian/copyright.
unblock mysql-5.5/5.5.24+dfsg-8
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT
+ and innotop scripts
+- Removed duplicate entries from Files listings
+- Added clause for files licensed under BSD (4-clause)
+- Clarified 'BSD (3 clause) GPL-2' as being 'BSD (3 clause) or GPL-2'
+ * Updated Slovak debconf translation (Closes: #684644)
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho
(Closes: #683733)
+ * Use xz compression for binary packages (Closes: #684146)
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:02:27 +0100
+
mysql-5.5 (5.5.24+dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated Czech debconf translation (Closes: #681711)
diff -Nru mysql-5.5-5.5.24+dfsg
On 10/08/12 09:23, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 08/08/2012 10:43 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have not finished testing your patch but I have a few questions.
Firstly it raises a new lintian error requiring a Pre-Depends on dpkg
(= 1.15.6~). I know that this is more of an issue
Ansgar,
I have not finished testing your patch but I have a few questions.
Firstly it raises a new lintian error requiring a Pre-Depends on dpkg
(= 1.15.6~). I know that this is more of an issue for Ubuntu and that
Ubuntu won't in this case be syncing from wheezy, so I guess we
Ansgar,
I have not finished testing your patch but I have a few questions.
Firstly it raises a new lintian error requiring a Pre-Depends on dpkg
(= 1.15.6~). I know that this is more of an issue for Ubuntu and that
Ubuntu won't in this case be syncing from wheezy, so I guess we
(Closes: #681711)
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:04:46 +0100
+
mysql-5.5 (5.5.24+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Spanish debconf translation (Closes: #679053)
diff -Nru mysql-5.5-5.5.24+dfsg/debian/po/cs.po mysql-5.5-5.5.24+dfsg/debian/po/cs.po
--- mysql-5.5
to bring the NMU forward as fast as possible and hopefully the
release team would accept it in wheezy. That way you have more time to
make the next release and you can throw away or incorporate my changes
as you wish.
On 14/07/12 08:41, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Phillip,
If the copyright issues
in another
hour), or should I let you take care of it?
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Nicholas Bamber
nicho...@periapt.co.uk mailto:nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote:
Phillip,
I only just realized you have picked it up again. Sorry. I
should have
subscribed
On 14/07/12 02:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk (13/07/2012):
This vesion is not ready yet. So far it just consists of a
single Spanish debconf translation (#679053). I am holding off
uploading in case something else turns up. Christian Perrier
really wants
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package brewtarget
An NMU for #679437 is in preparation. It turns out that the problematic images
are easily replaced.
I'll attach a debdiff a soon as the NMU is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
This vesion is not ready yet. So far it just consists of a single Spanish
debconf translation (#679053).
I am holding off uploading in case something else turns up. Christian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The Debian/upstream maintainer says:
SD has fallen from my priorities, and to have it be worth keeping in
Debian at this point, I think someone else will need to step up and work
on maintenance upstream.
I've asked in #debian-perl but noone has
On 11/07/12 23:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
On 11/07/12 21:31, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
On 11/07/12 20:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 09:29:55 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
There was a mistake in the slibs for mysql 5.5.24+dfsg-1 and
asteisk built against it. Once 5.5.24+dfsg
On 11/07/12 20:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 09:29:55 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
There was a mistake in the slibs for mysql 5.5.24+dfsg-1 and
asteisk built against it. Once 5.5.24+dfsg-2 has finished
building asterisk should be built again.
You need to give more
On 11/07/12 21:31, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
On 11/07/12 20:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 09:29:55 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
There was a mistake in the slibs for mysql 5.5.24+dfsg-1 and
asteisk built against it. Once 5.5.24+dfsg-2 has finished
building asterisk should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/12 01:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello,
Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk (03/07/2012):
I cannot reproduce the crash but there is a patch if someone
can. Else can this bug be downgraded to important.
I was thinking of raising
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reassign 665296 debhelper
thanks
On 09/07/12 01:41, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk (03/07/2012):
This is one I raised and people are asking me to upgrade the w3c
stuff which requires fixing it. It probably just
This is one I raised and people are asking me to upgrade the w3c stuff
which requires fixing it. It probably just requires a slight application
of xargs, but the XML world in Debian is pretty dead and quite a lot is
going on already and XML is not my top focus. So altogether I would
rather look at
The broken packages have been removed from arm* testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff3489b.7040...@periapt.co.uk
tags 679350 +moreinfo +unreproducible
thanks
I cannot reproduce the crash but there is a patch if someone can. Else
can this bug be downgraded to important.
I was thinking of raising an NMU but I'm not sure if I feel comfortable
for just one bug.
And of course I have copied the maintainer.
--
Dirk,
Given the approaching freeze do you think we could raise a ticket to
have rmysql removed on arm*? Or do you think you can get it fixed in the
next day or two?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Javier,
I have just uploaded a 2-day NMU based upon Gregor's patch to fix the
snort FTBS. It it works Gregor is owed any credit. If it causes an
issues send the blame my way. And of course you still have two days to
intervene.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 22/06/12 22:43, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
Thanks for the NMU, I did not have time this week to make an upload myself.
Regards
Javier
PS: If I have time I might make an upload soon with the same changes,
in order to acknowledge the NMU
Javier,
I could actually bring
On 22/06/12 23:05, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
On 22/06/12 22:43, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
Thanks for the NMU, I did not have time this week to make an upload myself.
Regards
Javier
PS: If I have time I might make an upload soon with the same changes,
in order to acknowledge the NMU
On 20/06/12 22:50, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
You still didn't address that in your reply.
Steven,
You seem to have three issues:
1.) feature based tests rather than platform based tests.
I totally get the desirability of this. It means new OS 's or
improvements to OS's get picked up
On 21/06/12 11:14, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 21/06/12 08:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
3.) You seem to see it fit to willfully cause an FTBS on Hurd, to make a
point.
To willfully allow an existing FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, to become a more
explanatory FTBFS, which would someday go away and keep
I discussed this briefly with Adam Conrad whom knows a fair bit more
about GCC than I do.
He assured me that 4.4's i386 code would be mostly identical to 4.7's,
so there shouldn't be risk of performance regression.
So, if 4.4 is indeed staying, then it sounds like a good option to just
/if_dl.h on kfreebsd (Closes: #675836)
-
- -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:15:42 +0100
-
pmacct (0.14.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -Nru pmacct-0.14.0/debian/control pmacct-0.14.0/debian/control
--- pmacct-0.14.0/debian/control2012
On 20/06/12 11:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Jamie,
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after that
I'll upload with a 2-day delay
On 20/06/12 12:27, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 20/06/12 11:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after
on Hurd (Closes: #675836)
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:15:42 +0100
+
pmacct (0.14.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -Nru pmacct-0.14.0/debian/control pmacct-0.14.0/debian/control
--- pmacct-0.14.0/debian/control2012-02-10 02:33
On 20/06/12 22:04, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 20/06/12 15:59, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Based upon the feedback I have received (including #debian-hurd) I am
attaching a new debdiff.
This debdiff doesn't address the main point of my original mail:
sockaddr_dl and net/if_dl.h are not (k
We need to deal with this issue before the release (and preferably
freeze). We have finally managed to get oracle to verify the issue and
now we are awaiting triage. However obviously that is not going to help
us in the short term.
We have now identified two options - both of which are restricted
On 19/06/12 11:45, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 19/06/12 09:10, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
1.) compile against gcc-4.5 and g++-4.5
2.) set the magic TAOCRYPT_DISABLE_X86ASM thingy causing SSL connections
on those platforms to be slower.
Hi,
Did you try yet with gcc-4.4?
Just trying
I have tested with gcc-4.4 and it seems to work okay. So that is an option.
On 19/06/12 11:58, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
On 19/06/12 11:45, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 19/06/12 09:10, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
1.) compile against gcc-4.5 and g++-4.5
2.) set the magic TAOCRYPT_DISABLE_X86ASM
On 19/06/12 19:08, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of 2012-06-19 08:35:29 -0700:
I have tested with gcc-4.4 and it seems to work okay. So that is an option.
We should do some general performance benchmarks with 4.4 vs. 4.7 before
we consider this option. It would
Jaldhar,
We really need to get dovecot compiled on the non-linux platforms to
progress with the mysql migration. The systemd dependency puzzles me
somewhat as systemd is not available on non-linux platforms and dovecot
has previously compiled on those platforms.
So at the very
On 17/06/12 07:58, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Jaldhar,
We really need to get dovecot compiled on the non-linux platforms to
progress with the mysql migration. The systemd dependency puzzles me
somewhat as systemd is not available on non-linux platforms and dovecot
has previously compiled
Tollef,
Thanks for the response. What about the libsystemd-daemon-dev package?
Is that required (on Linux)?
On 17/06/12 09:02, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Nicholas Bamber
However, whilst I don't know anything about systemd, this still looks
like a little broken. I am puzzled
-daemon.h is a way to do that. Well that file is available in
libsystemd-daemon-dev, and the current package as a dependency on
systemd rather than libsystemd-daemon-dev. It might be right but it does
not feel right.
On 17/06/12 09:52, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Nicholas Bamber
Tollef
and uncontroversial.
On 17/06/12 11:26, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Nicholas Bamber
Hi,
I would be most grateful if you quoted the way is usually done on email
lists.
I would be very grateful if you could have a look. Andreas Barth has
basically repeated the point I made in the third paragraph
I: unmounting proc filesystem
I: unmounting sys filesystem
I: cleaning the build env
I: removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//13737 and its
subdirectories
On 17/06/12 12:15, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Tollef,
Thanks for your responses. Based upon them I wail upload an NMU with a
2
and quickfix could easily be removed from
testing?
On 17/06/12 00:47, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 20:42:48 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I suppose I had better look at that.
Well it doesn't really matter. Fixing the remaining reverse deps should
be a higher priority IMO
There was a mistake in the slibs for mysql 5.5.24+dfsg-1 and asteisk
built against it. Once 5.5.24+dfsg-2 has finished building asterisk
should be built again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Julien,
The patch was not as bad as I thought.
00022340 gDF .text 01b5 libmysqlclient_18 my_connect
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-mysql/mysql-5.5/branches/unstable/debian/patches/versioned_symbols.patch?view=markup
and installed upstream changelog
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Fri, 18 May 2012 17:36:37 +0100
+
mysql-5.5 (5.5.23-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Stopped overriding the -j build parameter (Closes: #512964)
diff -Nru --exclude mysql.info --exclude 'repack.*' --exclude
'*.lintian-overrides
That should be trivial. We need only remove all the other binary
stanzas, right?
On 21/05/12 20:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:34:16 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
mysql-common 5.5 will break 5.1 because there are new configuration
options used in /etc/mysql/my.cnf that
dependencies from 5.1 to 5.5 and needs to do so in Debian.
On 19/05/12 16:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:18 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
On May 8, 2012, at 2:04, Julien Cristaujcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 22:52:22 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote
On 15/05/12 09:49, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Nicholas Bamber
nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote:
Thomas,
I attach a patch to enbale libdbi-drivers to build against the latest
Are you sure this is right?
Shouldn't the headers and libs still be found
.
+ * Pick up multi-arch libraries for MySQL (Closes: #672928)
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Mon, 14 May 2012 23:06:51 +0100
+
libdbi-drivers (0.8.3-1+s-3) unstable; urgency=low
[ Thomas Goirand ]
diff -Nru libdbi-drivers-0.8.3-1+s/debian/control
libdbi-drivers-0.8.3-1+s/debian
, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
*sigh* apparently you uploaded this to sid without even waiting for an
answer, so we now have an uncoordinated libmysqlclient SONAME bump on
our hands...
That's an awfully long list to be breaking without coordination. I'm
not amused.
Cheers,
Julien
will look again at debian/rules but I think it is good
to get rid of unnecessarty dependencies.
On 08/05/12 10:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 08.05.2012 10:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 22:52:22 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
At some point we need to transition from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. We
would like to do this before the freeze though we appreciate that time
is now short. We arrived at this position as
On 26/04/12 08:38, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
To make your life easier Nicholas couldnt you pull the 5.5 packages from
ubuntu and start transitioning using those packages?
Jonathan,
I am working on modernizing debian/rules and generally understanding
the package and triaging etc. People who
Another approach is to hedge our bets a bit.
1.) complete nysql-5.5 going into unstable
2.) migrate dependents onto 5.5 (which AFAIK if it is just a rebuild is
a job for the release team) and kick off the translation process.
3.) Then take a view on whether drop 5.1 or fix the RC bugs in 5.1
Release team,
We are debating whether to
a.) allow both mysql-5.1 and mysql-5.5 to go into wheezy
or
b.) whether to try and effect a transition to 5.5
Arguments for b.)
-
1.) More effort (such as it is) is already going into mysql-5.5
2.) 5.1 will not be supported for
Joey,
On 20/04/12 01:38, Joey Hess wrote:
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
one does not. Still I see it showing up as a Provides in PTS. I am not
sure if something needs to be done in some mysterious Debian server to
resolve
Joey,
Please send me instructions for how it working fine and not afterwards
because I tried to test it.
On 19/04/12 22:46, Joey Hess wrote:
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I am just about to upload w3c-sgml-lib that also generates
w3c-dtd-xhtml (which will depend on w3c-sgml-lib and consist
Joey,
Also what happens when you force through the installation of
w3c-dtd-xhtml version 1.2-2 and w3c-sgml-lib? Does wdg-html-validator
behave itself for you then?
On 20/04/12 00:51, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Hmm well the old vesion of w3c-dtd-xhtml provided w3c-dtd-xhtml. This
one does
I am just about to upload w3c-sgml-lib that also generates w3c-dtd-xhtml
(which will depend on w3c-sgml-lib and consist of links). I have
endeavoured to fix all conflicts and ensure that nsgmls,
wdg-html-validator, w3c-markup-validator still work. I have to put a
caveat on that. As far as I
wrote:
On 15.01.2012 20:39, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
unstable/testing [CVE-2012-0024, CVE-2011-5055]: This was fixed in
1.4.09-1 but Sam has issued one further release, 1.4.10 with a last
tweak. For this version all the three CVE tickets are fundamentally the
same issue.
stable [CVE-2012-0024
Moritz,
Actually it is acknowledged to be present in 2.0.04-*.
On 24/01/12 19:05, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:32:29PM +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Second attempt at preparing a fix for this issue.
By the way CVE-2011-5055, as far as I can see, only applies
Oh and I should have been talking about CVE-2011-5056 anyway. But I do
think CVE-2011-5055 is resolved.
On 24/01/12 20:14, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Moritz,
Actually it is acknowledged to be present in 2.0.04-*.
On 24/01/12 19:05, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:32
were passed up before I
became maintainer.
I am not sure what to do now apart from issuing 1.4.10-1. Do I raise new
bug reports?
On 14/01/12 12:18, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 22:55:10 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Julien,
Comments below. What is the next step
to get some clarification.
On 14/01/12 12:18, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 22:55:10 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Julien,
Comments below. What is the next step?
On http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/maradns I
see three issues: CVE-2011-5055, CVE
This is getting a bit tedious but we have a clarification:
http://woodlane.webconquest.com/pipermail/list/2012-January/001050.html
On 14/01/12 12:18, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 22:55:10 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Julien,
Comments below. What is the next step
Julien,
Comments below. What is the next step?
On 12/01/12 21:40, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 17:52:21 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Julien,
The attached file is a debdiff for 1.4.03-1.1 - 1.4.03-1.2. I have not
run an FTBS test on it but I wanted to know if I
Any feedback on this?
On 31/12/11 14:30, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
As per the attached email, I wonder if you would be interested in point
releases for the old versions of maradns to fix #653838 and what the
relevant timescales would be.
There is also the question of unarchiving and fixing
Julien,
The attached file is a debdiff for 1.4.03-1.1 - 1.4.03-1.2. I have not
run an FTBS test on it but I wanted to know if I was on the right lines.
On 31/12/11 15:00, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 14:30:04 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
As per the attached email, I
.
---BeginMessage---
Hi Nicholas,
Op vrijdag 30 december 2011 20:18:16 schreef Nicholas Bamber:
As per this email I am preparing 1.4.08-1 of the maradns package. I am
wondering what your view would be about the old versions of maradns. It
dies not look like a very large patch.
Thanks. You should indeed
Julien,
Thanks. That schedule seems elatively comfortable.
On 31/12/11 15:00, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 14:30:04 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
As per the attached email, I wonder if you would be interested in point
releases for the old versions of maradns to fix
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Okay I am not actually the maintainer so I understand if this has to be checked
with jald...@debian.org.
I did so a few weeks back but did not get an answer on that occasion.
I have worked with Jaldhar on a number of related packages.
--
To
On 11/07/11 18:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 19:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:06:50 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Okay I am not actually the maintainer so I understand if this has to be
checked
Please note UNSTABLE not STABLE. I was about to raise a fresh ticket.
On 11/07/11 18:54, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Okay I am not actually the maintainer so I understand if this has to
be checked with jald
On 11/07/11 19:02, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 18:55 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
PLEASE I MEANT UNSTABLE not STABLE.
*Now* I know that. I replied to the mail thread on debian-release,
where it wasn't clear at the time that the distribution was a typo.
Regards,
Adam
The following packages are stuck in unstable:
libio-async-perl
libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
libio-async-loop-glib-perl
As far as I can see, if we had been less efficient in keeping the
packages uptodate, everything would now be okay.
However as it is., the first is blocking the last two and the
Adam,
Thanks.
On 02/03/11 22:54, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:34 +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
The following packages are stuck in unstable:
libio-async-perl
libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
libio-async-loop-glib-perl
As far as I can see, if we had been less efficient
]
+ * Remove Conflicts: libsoap-perl.
+
+ [ Nicholas Bamber ]
+ * Applying patch to fix hash reference crash (Closes: #602056)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:32:20 -0400
+
libsoap-lite-perl (0.712-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Franck Joncourt ]
diff -Nru libsoap
Thanks
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 11/07/2010 11:08 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
The latest release of libsoap-lite-perl fixes #602056. This was
marked grave because it renders package unusable. I am not sure if
this warrants a freeze exception. I would appreciate an opinion and
appropriate
Mehdi,
Thanks
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/23/2010 01:19 AM, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:26 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
Ernesto, Nathan, do you have objections against removing
libxml-rsslite-perl from testing? It has one RC bug (#600806),
another one
an NMU of his own package?
I prepared the release and as I was not an uploader it came up as an NMU.
Version 0.2
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/14/2010 12:01 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
I have prepared an file and hopefully Jaldhar will upload it into
unstable and we can proceed from
Needless to say these changes have no effect on the binary package
(apart from changelogs etc) only the source package.
I include a debdiff between 0.11-3 and 0.15+dfsg-1.
Nicholas
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/22/2010 10:39 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Over a year ago concerns over the license status
Mehdi,
It just occurs to me that you might like to take #443629 into
consideration as well. That is confirmed in both 0.11 and 0.15 and there
is no fix at present.
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1
Mehdi,
Did you look at #443629?
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 22/10/2010 11:50, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
If we are going with basing it off the current testing version ,
i.e. 0.11~dfsg-1 then the changes are
1.) Removing t/02rss.t, t/journal.rss and t/sampleRSS.xml
2.) Removing
Mehdi,
Please could we have some progress on this. Sadly I am aware of
another copyright issue (and probably another if I dared looking) but I
will only handle one at a time.
Nicholas
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
We now have a 0.1+nmu1 . Please could this now be granted
All different packages of course.
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
Please could we have some progress on this. Sadly I am aware of
another copyright issue (and probably another if I dared looking) but
I will only handle one at a time.
Nicholas
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
We now
to Uploaders
+ * Upped standards version to 3.9.1
+ * Refreshed patches
+ * Refreshed copyright
+
+ -- Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:19:12 +0100
+
libjavascript-perl (1.16-2) unstable; urgency=low
* add a patch fixing tests for double numbers evaluation.
diff -Nru
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
