On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:11:17PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Is there a reason you don't have contrib and non-free enabled for most of
> those sources?
Perhaps the problem is that SUA 252-1 only mentions main:
> Upgrade Instructions
>
>
> You can get the updated
ingw-w64 (10.4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Apply upstream patch to fix an internal error. Closes: #1029841.
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt Wed, 03 May 2023 08:49:22 +0200
+
binutils-mingw-w64 (10.3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Drop another failing codeview test.
diff -Nru binutils-mingw-w64-10.3/debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: Matthias Klose
Dear release team,
Please binNMU binutils-mingw-w64 and gdb-mingw-w64:
nmu binutils-mingw-w64_10.3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for outdated
Built-Using"
) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * Control device access with uaccess instead of making everything
+world-writable. Thanks to Xavi Drudis Ferran for the report!
+Closes:#1024998. (CVE-2022-46338.)
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt Wed, 30 Nov 2022 08:24:25 +0100
+
g810-led (0.4.2-1) unstable; urgency
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:35:52 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 15:08 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to upload the backported fix for gcc-mingw-w64’s
> > #989862 to Buster? The debdiff is attached; it’s a minimal, ta
linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
commit f319345c3caf1dedbfc87654e1853762af3b6d77
Author: Stephen Kitt
Date: Tue Jun 15 22:18:31 2021 +0200
Fix gcov handling
When gcov is supported in a cross-compiler setup, GCC assumes
we have headers, without
> +telling it where, and then we need to correct its default assumption
> +about where they are. Closes: #989682. LP: #1883933, #1920988.
> +
> + -- Stephen Kitt Sat, 12 Jun 2021 18:54:10 +0200
Oops, nice catch, thanks!
> Other than that, please g
=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
commit 332aa0b9869ab48e4a4d80710d89c58c60b33c07
Author: Stephen Kitt
Date: Tue Jun 15 22:18:31 2021 +0200
Fix gcov handling
upload (Salzburg BSP).
* CVE-2021-3496: check access boundaries in ProcessCanonMakerNoteDir().
Closes: #986923.
* Check IPTC lengths. Closes: #968999.
* Allocate extra room when reading JPEG sections to avoid overflows.
Closes: #972617.
-- Stephen Kitt Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:59:38 +0200
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:33:55 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2021-03-29 21:16:32, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
>
+
+ * Updated German debconf template translation, thanks to Helge
+Kreutzmann. Closes: #980877.
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:14:16 +0200
+
rocksndiamonds (4.2.2.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
diff --git a/debian/po/de.po b/debian/po/de.po
index
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 10:34:06 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2021-03-04 07:06:05, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: binnmu
> >
> > Dear release
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
libzstd1 used to provide an over-enthusiastic symbols file, which has
resulted in dependencies which are too relaxed. The library API isn’t
determined by its exported
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
Please schedule a binNMU for gcc-mingw-w64, for
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-isl.html
nmu gcc-mingw-w64_24 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for libisl
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:51:47 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> also, binutils-mingw64 might need a sourceful upload.
A binNMU would have worked, but I had some changes queued up so I uploaded
them. There’s also binutils-djgpp now ;-).
Regards,
Stephen
pgpWHgyv7GT1D.pgp
Description: OpenPGP
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:21:24 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> Thanks. Please go ahead.
Uploaded, thanks!
Regards,
Stephen
pgpWMHl7mSxUb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:35:49 -0300, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On 2019-07-13 15:52, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: stretch
>
> I assumed you meant buster here and fixed that up.
Ah, yes, thanks!
> >
@@
+gcab (1.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Apply upstream patch to fix corruption when extracting.
+Closes: #931487. LP: #1835589.
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:18:07 +0200
+
gcab (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Avoid needing PATH_MAX, so we can build on Hurd. Closes
tag 930715 - moreinfo
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:07:57 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Please note that you didn't use the correct usertag. Please do so in the
> future to avoid the bug getting missed.
Noted, thanks.
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:27:46AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>
) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Ship the Voodoo and e1000 plugins; thanks to Christian Ehrhardt for
+the patch. Closes: #930770. LP: #1830094.
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:37:44 +0200
+
bochs (2.6.9+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Discard .note.gnu.property section explicitly
support correctly; thanks Alexey Izbyshev!
+Closes: #928214.
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:59:34 +0200
+
gcc-mingw-w64 (21.2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Apply upstream dllimport fix for static data members.
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 0b55196..e9e4416 100755
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Le 13/04/2019 16:31, Ivo De Decker a écrit :
I had a look at the patches, and they seem like something that would be
acceptable for buster. Please go ahead with the upload to unstable and
remove
the moreinfo tag from this bug once the builds are done.
The builds
Hi Ivo,
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 13:22:01 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:26:04AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > I have a couple of fixes pending upload for gcc-mingw-w64, and I’m
> > wondering if they’d pass muster for Buster. The attached patches fi
It’s always better *with* the patches...
Stephen
From 4b854c788af23f01c01afbd35a3befb060536297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Kitt
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:01:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Apply upstream dllimport fix for static data members
Closes: #923214
---
debian/changelog
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I have a couple of fixes pending upload for gcc-mingw-w64, and I’m
wondering if they’d pass muster for Buster. The attached patches fix,
in order:
* #923214 — an ICE hit with external
rom df5828dec76e021606af958aaf84ba5c83da1e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Kitt
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:34:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Build mkkey using the build CC when cross-compiling
Closes: #924291
---
debian/changelog | 7 +++
debian/cont
:00 2001
From: Stephen Kitt
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:53:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add dependency from -dev to library package
Closes: #924191
---
debian/changelog | 8
debian/control | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
rocksndiamonds currently has a manual block in Adam’s hints file,
related to #879667 which caused the package to end up in main and
contrib. The package has been rebuilt since (a
: #1678463).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> Mon, 05 Jun 2017 16:39:05 +0200
+
wput (0.6.2+git20130413-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Switch to https: VCS URIs (see #810378).
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index f03e232..bdcfcda 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 06:38:00 +, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote:
> Stephen Kitt:
> > unblock lgogdownloader/3.1-2
> > [...]
> Ack, please go ahead.
Uploaded, thanks! (And I fixed the version in the unblock above.)
Regards,
Ste
fixing the ability to list games if a game
+has {'updates': null} (Closes: #857691)
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org> Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:58:18 +0200
+
lgogdownloader (3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
diff --git a/debian/patches/Fix-crash-in-W
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
Please binNMU gdb-mingw-w64 now that gdb 7.12 is in testing:
nmu gdb-mingw-w64_10.4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild using gdb 7.12."
Thanks,
Stephen
-- System
Hi Emilio,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:10:03PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/08/16 18:02, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > The abi is complex and depends on multiple things. We do not wish to
> > maintain same boost series (1.61) with multiple abi builds. Due to fixes
> > to the c++11
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
I'd appreciate it if you could binNMU gdb-mingw-w64:
nmu gdb-mingw-w64_10.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with gdb 7.10."
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
Would it be possible to binNMU gcc-mingw-w64?
nmu gcc-mingw-w64_16 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with gcc-5 5.3.1-3."
Thanks in advance,
Stephen
-- System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
Would it be possible to binNMU binutils-mingw-w64?
nmu binutils-mingw-w64_6.5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with binutils
2.25.90.20151209-1."
Thanks in advance,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
Would it be possible to binNMU binutils-mingw-w64 to rebuild with the
new binutils 2.25.1?
nmu binutils-mingw-w64_6.2 . ALL . unstable . -m Rebuild with binutils 2.25.1.
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:59:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 22:33 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
binutils-mingw-w64/5.2 in Jessie suffers from #787162: ld breaks with
DLLs and libraries built with Visual Studio. This makes the mingw-w64
toolchain
On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:33:15 +0200, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
binutils-mingw-w64/5.2 in Jessie suffers from #787162: ld breaks with
DLLs and libraries built with Visual Studio. This makes the mingw-w64
toolchain in Jessie effectively useless for people working with such
files
Hi Simon,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:21:20 +0100, Simon McVittie s...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 at 21:55:53 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Some of the changed symbols are part of the API. I'm attaching a patch
which allows the package to build, at least on amd64, and implements
-mingw-w64 (5.2+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Apply upstream fix to handle Visual Studio DLLs (Closes: #787162).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org Thu, 04 Jun 2015 07:17:38 +0200
+
binutils-mingw-w64 (5.2) unstable; urgency=high
* Rebuild against binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1 or later
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
The isl transition needs rebuilds of gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-mingw-w64;
binNMUs are sufficient. Could the following be queued?
nmu gcc-mingw-w64_15.1 . ALL . -m Rebuild with isl 0.14.
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 09:19:34 +0100, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:35:54PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I would like to update binutils-mingw-w64, to rebuild against binutils
2.25 with the security fixes for DSA-2013. The debdiff
-2014-8504, CVE-2014-8737, CVE-2014-8738 (Closes:
+#775165).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:32:41 +0100
+
binutils-mingw-w64 (5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Increase the testsuite timeout (the build fails on mipsel otherwise).
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian
=medium
+
+ * Build-depend on libebook1.2-dev (closes: #775620).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:39:34 +0100
+
mail-notification (5.4.dfsg.1-12) unstable; urgency=medium
* Merge patch from Ubuntu to stop linking with bsd-compat, which is no
diff -Nru mail-notification
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
My earlier binNMU in wheezy-security wasn't appropriate, but
binutils-mingw-w64 still needs fixing in jessie and sid, and I'm
wondering whether to do sourceful uploads or
Le 12/01/2015 08:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 06:47 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
binutils was recently updated in wheezy-security and wheezy-p-u to fix
a number of security issues identified in DSA-3123-1; of these, a
number concern binutils-mingw-w64 as well, so it would
Hi Michael,
Le 12/01/2015 04:21, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Is there any handling of Built-Using-marked packages by the security
team, or
is it up to the affected maintainers to keep an eye on things?
It's not automated at all, so you'll
Hi Thijs,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:13:02 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org
wrote:
On Mon, January 12, 2015 20:18, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Note that the archive requires the source package to already be in the
target suite (or a base suite in case of overlays like p-u or
experimental).
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
binutils was recently updated in wheezy-security and wheezy-p-u to fix
a number of security issues identified in DSA-3123-1; of these, a
number concern binutils-mingw-w64
Hi Matthias and the release team,
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:58:26 +0100, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
please binNMU the following packages to build with binutils (= 2.25-3).
ggcov, tulip, lush, binutils-arm-none-eabi, binutils-mingw-w64,
binutils-z80, cross-binutils, openbios,
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:37:19 +, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:39:56AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I would like to know if the following changes to gcc-mingw-w64 would
be acceptable for Jessie, before uploading the package to unstable
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:51:25 +, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
You know what, we might as well skip unstable. Feel free to go ahead to
t-p-u on the basis of the submitted patch, and remove the moreinfo tag.
Done, thanks!
Regards,
Stephen
+
+ * Properly replace /usr/share/doc/mingw32 with a symlink to
+/usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw-w64-base (Closes: #773342).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:23:13 +0100
+
gcc-mingw-w64 (14.2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Ensure README.Debian is installed in gcc-mingw-w64-base
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
Matthias tells me he's planning on requesting a freeze exception for
gcc-4.9 4.9.2. If you grant his request, would it be at all possible
to rebuild gcc-mingw-w64? That would cause it
!
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org Tue, 25 Nov 2014 23:23:54 +0100
+
libevdev (1.3+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 64dad28..da0ddfd 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ Description: wrapper
Hi Niels,
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:34:23 +0100, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
On 2014-10-31 00:24, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
The localisation teams
@@
+solaar (0.9.2+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Stephen Kitt ]
+ * Add Portuguese translation (closes: #761589).
+
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * Debconf templates and debian/control reviewed by the debian-l10n-
+english team as part of the Smith review project. Closes: #761939
+ * [Debconf
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:53:32 +0200, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:49:52 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 19:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you.
On Wed, 2013-10
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:02:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On 2014-09-23 9:43, Stephen Kitt wrote:
And I still managed to mess this up :-(. The following patch fixes
#762547
which was just filed against stable:
[...]
Is it OK if I upload this?
Please go ahead
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:49:52 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 19:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you.
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 22:59 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:29:00 +0100
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:18:39 +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 23:27:33 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 23:23:06 +0100, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:57:06 +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
wrote
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:57:06 +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
wrote:
Thanks. Feel free to upload to sid.
Done, thanks.
Regards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:46:59 +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 00:15:18 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I've made libmikmod-dev provide libmikmod2-dev in 3.3.5-2 and uploaded it
to experimental. Should I file bugs (with patches...) for heroes and
sdl
Hi Julien,
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:05:33 +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 20:07:03 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
libmikmod changed its soname from 2 to 3, so upgrading it requires a
transition. Unfortunately the current -dev package is versioned
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
I'm not sure experimental binNMUs are appropriate, but if so I'd
appreciate a rebuild of gcc-mingw-w64 12+exp1 with gcc 4.9-20140218.
Thanks in advance,
Stephen
nmu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
libmikmod changed its soname from 2 to 3, so upgrading it requires a
transition. Unfortunately the current -dev package is versioned
(libmikmod2-dev), so transitioning the reverse
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:07:03 +0100, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org wrote:
libmikmod changed its soname from 2 to 3, so upgrading it requires a
transition. Unfortunately the current -dev package is versioned
(libmikmod2-dev), so transitioning the reverse dependencies requires
source changes
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:29:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 07:52 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
oss-compat in stable suffers from two serious bugs:
* 660803, related to changes in kmod (and causing issues when
installing Debian Edu wheezy
load
+the OSS modules when configured but not installed. (Closes: #718241.)
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:30:56 +0200
+
oss-compat (2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Stephen Kitt ]
diff --git a/debian/postinst b/debian/postinst
index e0fe783..ca1d9b5 100644
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
mail-notification's last binNMU (for the Evolution 3.8 transition)
pulled in libgmime-2.6-dev 2.6.17-1, and the resulting package built
without GMime support thanks to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
binutils recently added a fix for #688951 (CVE-2012-3509) which also
affects binutils-mingw-w64. The following binNMU will cause the fix to
be applied to binutils-mingw-w64:
nmu
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:44:12 +, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:09:20AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Would it be possible to unblock mednafen? It fixes #699143 which I
consider important (I replaced the version of libvorbisidec provided
in the mednafen
2013-01-29 23:41:52.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mednafen (0.8.D.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Build using the provided libvorbisidec source; mednafen doesn't work
+correctly with the version currently in Debian (closes: #699143).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:40
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:49:44 +, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 00:22 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
And after discussion with Christian and -devel/-mentors, the updated
package is available at
http://www.sk2.org/calibre/calibre_0.8.51+dfsg1-0.1.dsc
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 23:42:38 +0100, Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:40:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Anyone any interest in preparing a t-p-u for that?
I've prepared a t-p-u candidate with all the above, based on Arno's
previous t-p-u candidate. I just
-liberation. Thanks to Kan-Ru Chen! (Closes: #674838)
-- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:12:30 +0100
The debdiff against the package in testing is as follows:
diff -Nru calibre-0.8.51+dfsg/debian/calibre.README.Debian
calibre-0.8.51+dfsg+wheezy1/debian/calibre.README.Debian
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:25:27 +0200, Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I've prepared a new version of gcc-mingw-w64, fixing the RC bug
#690148 (/usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw32
the
+functionality of the Squeeze version; add g++ compatibility symlink
+(Closes: #682257).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Wed, 17 Oct 2012 07:49:14 +0200
+
gcc-mingw-w64 (7) unstable; urgency=low
* When upgrading from versions where /usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw-w64 is a
diff -Nru gcc
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:13:58 +0200, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 01:33:16AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org (14/10/2012):
Now that gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12 is installed in unstable on all
architectures, would it be possible to give gcc
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:49:31 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
Surely it would be more efficient to do a maintainer upload fixing RC
bug #690148, and you'll get the rebuilds for free?
I started looking at this bug yesterday, the fix is easy but I did not
have
) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * When upgrading from versions where /usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw-w64 is a
+directory, force its replacement with a symlink (Closes: #683617).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:21:56 +0200
+
gcc-mingw-w64 (6) unstable; urgency=low
* Handle
retitle 685478 unblock: gcc-mingw-w64/7
thanks
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:42:46 +0200, Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org wrote:
unblock gcc-mingw-w64/8
Of course that's
unblock gcc-mingw-w64/7
Regards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi KiBi,
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:49:15 +0200, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org (05/07/2012):
Just to clarify, this is a pre-upload request...
yeah, it looks possible to install all 3 packages + the
conflicted-against package in wheezy without apparent issues
-binutils so remove
+the relationship (helps with #662746).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Wed, 04 Jul 2012 22:54:01 +0200
+
binutils-mingw-w64 (1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Stephen Kitt ]
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 9ec7885..39dcbab 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b
index e6866ff..056d74d 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+binutils-mingw-w64 (2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * binutils-mingw-w64 doesn't conflict with mingw32-binutils so remove
+the relationship (helps with #662746).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Wed, 04
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:24:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I'd like to request a freeze exception for binutils-mingw-w64; it
currently (needlessly) conflits with mingw32-binutils, which prevents
apt-get from handling mingw32-ocaml upgrades properly (#662746).
Just to clarify, this is a pre
Hi,
On Mon, 14 May 2012 01:00:40 +0200, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 00:30:10 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
¹ I somehow missed the requirement to request transitions as bug reports
against the release.debian.org pseudo-package, and asked it about 2
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
On 14.05.2012 00:20, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Stephen Kitt recently prepared a wine-gecko 1.1 package, which is now
waiting in the NEW queue [1], [..]
My biggest concern is the wine-gecko packages in NEW
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:25:04 +0200, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
wrote:
- gcc-mingw32 (build-depends on mingw-w64, which depends on
gcc-mingw-w64, which only exists on i386 and amd64; so all screwed up,
somebody should file a bug)
I hadn't expected this to become urgent, I'll fix it
Hi again,
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:57:04 +0200, Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org wrote:
Since binutils is now up to 2.21.51.20110421-2, may I suggest
nmu binutils-mingw-w64_0.1 . amd64 i386 . -m Rebuild for binutils
2.21.51.20110421-2.
Sorry for the to-ing and fro-ing, I'll actually be uploading
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:36:08 +0200, Didier Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
binutils-mingw-w64 is lagging on i386. A binNMU would solve this.
This package applies a set of patches to the binutils source, and hence
needs a binary rebuild at each new binutils upload. AFAIK there are no
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 07:52:36PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 22:35 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Should I remove the dependency?
Packages producing different results depending on the cleanliness of the
build environment are never great for reproducibility for security
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:07:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 22:48 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Please unblock package mednafen; the latest version in unstable fixes
a memory leak. I'm attaching the full diff between 0.8.D-1 (the
version currently
upstream version, fixing a significant memory leak.
-- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:18:16 +0200
mednafen (0.8.D.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version.
* Standards-Version 3.9.1, no change required.
* Add build dependency on libjack-dev.
-- Stephen Kitt st...@sk2
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100829 15:55]:
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100822 23:18]:
* Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100820 00:02]:
The version of Wine Squeeze is going to ship with (1.0.1) is nearly
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:02:37AM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Den 21. aug. 2010 03:01, skrev Svante Signell:
Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
good! People are trying to help out!
I wouldn't hold
people have tested them. I haven't had much
reaction from Ove but I do know he is aware of their existence; I haven't
consulted him regarding this particular request.
The changelog for my packages is as follows:
wine (1.2-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Stephen Kitt ]
* Non-maintainer upload
Hi,
My joystick package (hardly one of the important one in Debian, I know) is
ready for migration except that it hasn't been rebuilt for s390. I gather
there's an entry in Packages-arch-specific preventing such a rebuild, so
would it be possible to remove the s390 build from testing?
Thanks in
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:55:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:15 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
My joystick package (hardly one of the important one in Debian, I know) is
ready for migration except that it hasn't been rebuilt for s390. I gather
there's an entry
100 matches
Mail list logo
