Bug#863031: RM: nikola/7.6.4-1

) Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when yo

Bug#857347: Acknowledgement (unblock: reclass/1.4.1-2)

I approve of this upload and back the request for a freeze exception. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing s

Re: Bug#777124: unblock: di-netboot-assistant/0.38a+nmu1

point most of the purpose of this package is kinda rendered useless. The modifications essentially just provide a standardised and tested approach to these otherwise manually required changes. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http

Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

a newer version is already in unstable. It's my understanding that you cannot upload 1.8.10p3-1.1 to unstable when 1.8.11p2-1.1 is already there. Am I wrong? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian

Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

to be 1.8.10p3-1.1 via t-p-u. Doable? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images

Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

to push p2-1.2 or p2-2 to jessie, we would need to use t-p-u to bypass unstable. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Bug#770822: unblock: reclass/1.4.1-1

@@ -reclass (1.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium +reclass (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * New upstream release reverting the logging changes, which weren't ready +yet. + + -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:56:59 +0100 + +reclass (1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low

Bug#770822: unblock: reclass/1.4.1-1

for the only fixed bug being wishlist? Thanks Jonathan for your time! The wishlist is about packaging the new upstream version, which includes bug fixes that didn't have Debian bug reports since I found them or they were reported on Github. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft

Bug#745541: Any news?

? Thank you! -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems there's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want

Bug#745541: Any news?

Any news on this bug? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http

Bug#641155: pu: package mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1+squeeze1

package. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems even a stopped clock

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next r-release? -- .''`. martin f

Bug#596658: unblock: libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

). I expected this response, but I would appreciate if you made an exception. From all I can tell, this is unproblematic and would alleviate an inconvenience from our users, which didn't exist in the lenny version. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian

Bug#596658: unblock: libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects

Bug#596659: unblock: mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1

-1+8efb9d1) unstable; urgency=low * Added patch with Makefile fix from upstream (commit 8efb9d1) to fix compiler/linker problem on non-x86 architectures (closes: #595290). -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:45:01 +0200 mdadm (3.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New

Re: Git for Squeeze

. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems even a stopped clock

Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.04.03.0957 +0200]: Can we please have the full information in order to schedule the necessary binNMUs? Thanks. After further investigation, it seems that the problem was specific to the NMU package, which was never uploaded. I don't remember

Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

Dear release team, Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org

Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

also sprach Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]: * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly

unblock: mdadm 3.1.1-1

Please unblock mdadm 3.1.1-1 and let it enter testing. My goal is to then move the experimental package to unstable and try to get it ready for squeeze too. The incremental assembly stuff is off-by-default. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian

Re: Time-based freezes

. No announcement about any of this was made, so you cannot really blame the media for assuming that the goals of July are still current. Does this make sense and explain my motivation now? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http

Re: Time-based freezes

://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg00010.html together with the announcement about a tentative goal March is still current? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org

Re: Time-based freezes

also sprach martin f krafft madd...@debian.org [2009.10.26.1054 +0100]: As far as I can tell, the press release during DebConf9[0] is still taken to be the official position of the Debian project, at least if I scan the pertinent media sources. Luk's e-mail updates have not overly embraced

Time-based freezes

. http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg9.html Would it be possible to get an updated statement? Will there be regular freezes from now on? What period? I think we should issue a press release about this. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects

Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion

then. It's exactly points like this which need to be addressed explicitly: why are we doing this? And iff Canonical/Ubuntu is part of the reason, then state exactly where the benefits for Debian are, and ideally how this decision was reached in the first place. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o

Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

to changelog stanza order (which is chronological) without differentiating between experimental and unstable? Thanks for spotting this. I hope I fixed it now. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info

Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems she is absolutely inadmissible into society

Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

time to start auto-generating changelogs from commit messages... -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better

unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have

unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

prevent ctrl-c from terminating the bugscript prematurely. -- martin f. krafft madd...@debian.org Tue, 05 May 2009 11:46:22 +0200 mdadm (2.6.9-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix the check of whether mdadm.conf defines all devices known to the system; thanks Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn (closes

[SRM] mdadm 2.6.7.2-3, take two

bouncing. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems consciousness

Re: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

choice. Monolithic setuid approaches must die. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than

Re: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems cs class at 8:30am. ugly. if you can

new release goal default-mta? (was: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2)

. If there are no objections, I'll formulate a squeeze release goal and file the bugs. (updated mdadm coming to s-p-u on Thursday, are there other comments? http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/05/msg00024.html) -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud

stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems distrust all those who love you

please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2

please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2 PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp

Re: Bug#514818: lenny-backports not a recognised distribution

the diff minimal and because --bpo is a convenience method). also sprach Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt h...@ftwca.de [2009.02.11.0927 +0100]: Please upload. I suggest to also include the fix to --bpo. I'll gladly review the diff. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects

mdadm 2.6.7.2-1 uploaded, please unblock

. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems i wish i hadn't slept all day

Re: urgent RFH: please help test mdadm 2.6.7.2-1

also sprach Luca Capello l...@pca.it [2009.02.04.1208 +0100]: I am going to re-install another HP Vectra VEi8 with the same specifications as above: should I test our udeb, as well? Not necessary. Thanks! -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian

urgent RFH: please help test mdadm 2.6.7.2-1

. + d305b6e623bed4767f9c97f01ca5db46482c430b Release mdadm-2.6.7.2 Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have

freeze exception: net-tools 1.60-22

Please let net-tools into testing: net-tools (1.60-22) unstable; urgency=low * Add new command line option -W/--wide to netstat which prevents truncation of IPv6 addresses (Closes: #254243). Thanks Luar Roji. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] Related projects

Re: freeze exception: ttf-aenigma 0.0.20080510.dfsg-1

also sprach Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.09.20.2303 +0100]: Unblocked. It will be removed the second there's an rc bug. Sounds fair, thanks! I'll make sure this happens if there is an RC bug. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer

freeze exception: ttf-aenigma 0.0.20080510.dfsg-1

to get the package into shape for Debian, convincing upstream to let us distribute it in a Free fashion. It would be a real shame if lenny users couldn't benefit from that. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user

logcheck 1.2.68 freeze exception

ignore bad certificate errors. - added rule to ignore SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol messages. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http

RM: jppy/unstable [ia64] -- NVIU; ia64 build screws up, thus preventing testing migration

http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=jppy http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=jppy No idea what's going on, but since it builds everywhere else, this is likely an ia64 problem. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author

please unblock mdadm 2.6.4-2

(closes: #449244). * Bump DH compatibility level to 6; no changes required. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better

netconf lenny: possible freeze exception?

talked to Andi on IRC, I understand that you have reservations about making exceptions during the freeze. This is why I bring up the issue now already, in the hope that it won't need an exception anymore by the time August comes around. Cheers, -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED

unblock mdadm/2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3

subject says it all; please. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems la lune, c'est

molly-guard for r1

of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems wenn

Re: Debian release cycle for enterprise ?

minded people and pool resources. But even though I said I agree, I don't think I'll join such an endeavour since it would conflict directly with my activities as developer of Debian unstable. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL

Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

report about these things. That udev maintainer could also explain how a script in /sbin with a manpage and all does not constitute a public interface. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer

not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

#416658 is an easy fix to the mdadm initramfs hooks. May it go into etch? If so, urgency=high upload? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http

Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.03.31.1206 +0200]: #416658 is an easy fix to the mdadm initramfs hooks. May it go into etch? If so, urgency=high upload? changes: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mdadm?op=comp[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please do not send copies

Re: please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

also sprach Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.03.18.2317 +0100]: Sorry, only RC bugs are considered anymore. Okay, thanks for the explanation. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author

Re: please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems be the change you want to see in the world

please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems NP: Mathias Grassow Mathias

please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-9

Hi release team, please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-9. I only added two debconf translations: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mdadm/news/20070224T160206Z.html Thanks! -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud

freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.54

of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems if you can

Re: freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.53

also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.01.25.1144 +]: I would greatly appreciate if you could exempt logcheck 1.2.53 from the freeze. It's scheduled to go in during Friday's second Britney run. Executive summary: please let 1.2.53 through, I'll take responsibility :) I forgot

freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.53

Dear release team, I would greatly appreciate if you could exempt logcheck 1.2.53 from the freeze. It's scheduled to go in during Friday's second Britney run. Cheers, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud

Re: please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-8

of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems to get back my

Re: freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.52 (and 1.2.53)

copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems NP

please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-8

. Cheers, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better

freeze exception: logcheck 1.2.52 (and 1.2.53)

/main/binary-all/admin/ Could I please have permission to set urgency=high on the 1.2.53 upload? If not, can I use medium? Thanks, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator

permission to upload new logcheck upstream

copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems we all

freeze exception: mdadm 2.5.6-7

appreciate if you unblocked it. Thanks, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info

Really 2.6.18?

, and let 2.6.18 follow with r1? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you

Re: Really 2.6.18?

also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.11.10.1102 +0100]: Are we sure we want 2.6.18 as the kernel for etch? I reported two bugs, #391929 and #391955, the first of which is readily reproducible on 2.6.18 only (including ABI -2), meaning I cannot see the problem with 2.6.17

Re: please unblock mdadm 2.5.5-1 (udeb)

week. I respect your preference, Frans, but doesn't this also mean that mdadm 2.5.6 will be rather unlikely to make it? Or should I upload 2.5.6 now? Remember: 2.5.5 fixes an RC bug that's currently in testing. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f

Re: please unblock mdadm 2.5.5-1 (udeb)

upstream to fix a certain issue. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you

please unblock mdadm 2.5.5-1 (udeb)

mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems the mind

permission to upload mdadm 2.5.5

the use of mdadm by d-i. I would like to see 2.5.5 in etch. Do I have permission to upload? (I am specifically asking because with the 2.5.4-1 upload I kind of violated the rules)... Cheers, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL

Re: mdadm/sid into etch please

also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.07.1321 +0200]: Could you please give a thumbs-up on mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-2 migrating into etch, please? It's blocked because of the udeb... Hm, #385994 is RC (I just bumped it to serious). I'll upload -3 with urgency high because

unblock mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-2

Please unblock the udeb-generating mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-2 from entering testing. It fixes a number of serious issues with the 2.5.2-* packages and should definitely replace 2.5.2-7 in testing. Thanks, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f

Re: http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060901

this soon, before you get flooded with emails like this. Maybe it's too late. ;-) Thanks, I've forwarded it to the right people. We'll see what we can do. Your help and quick reaction is greatly appreciated! -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f

Re: Summary: Secure APT Key Management

lifetime as security measure anyway. Thus, we anticipate that the key will be cracked and have a proper procedure to follow when that's the case. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author

Re: Fwd: Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0

of etch a bit later. Don't forget that it was liw who bribed Apple to use broken hardware just so he would stand a slight chance at not having to get a tattoo. And please do not cross-post messages. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft

Re: Secure APT Key Management

mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system no micro$oft components were used in the creation or posting of this email

Re: Secure APT Key Management

! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system i must get out of these wet clothes and into a dry martini

Re: Secure APT Key Management

also sprach Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.26.1711 +0100]: Feel free to start a separate discussion about it though if you feel that's useful. (on another mailing list) -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED

unblock mdadm 2.5.2-7

Please unblock mdadm 2.5.2-7 and let it into testing so that the d-i team can work with it for beta4. Thanks, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info

Re: unblock mdadm 2.5.2-7

. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system the unix philosophy basically

Re: CVE-2006-2314: debian dovecot package vulnerable. (fwd)

also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.15.1832 +0200]: Have you talked to the stable release team? Maybe they'd be willing to let it into the next update? I am sorry, I accidentally replied to this as if it had come in via a different mailing list. -- Please do not send copies

Re: CVE-2006-2314: debian dovecot package vulnerable. (fwd)

update? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys

Re: Erich Schubert: SELinux support is a release goal for etch

dropped than our release delayed. I don't want to step in the way of people who're serious about getting it in (in addition to the 3-4 already working on it), but I wanted to get my thoughts out. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http

Re: Erich Schubert: SELinux support is a release goal for etch

, but they won't delay the release. Erich: that should settle it. Mind to update your blog respectively? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info

Re: please let mdadm-udeb into testing

also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.01.0526 +0200]: Hint added. Muchas gracias, señor. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info

Re: please let mdadm-udeb into testing

also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.06.01.0423 +0200]: I uploaded mdadm-udeb 2.4.1-2 into unstable tonight. Please let it progress into testing (it's a UDEB and thus requires a hint, AFAICR). 16:20 fjp vorlon: Please remove hint for mdadm. In [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Drop the minor release number

also sprach Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.07.08.1854 +0200]: How do you explain RCS/CVS? I am sorry to everyone who tries. Same applies to subversion. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian

Re: Release team for etch?

in a year! -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use

Re: Release Notes - Proposed last minute changes

, but the code names instead. I think this is a bug in apt-setup. Though you are right in pointing this out as a potential problem. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user

Re: Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

of it, and I do trust his judgement. From a cursory look, it seems that the only downside of the fix is a stray error message for devfs users. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin

Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

, or not expect non-interactive installs to work. Right now it fails even with priority==high. My patch would create the behaviour you describe. Let me know if I should upload. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

discouraged, and Zope 2.7 should be used instead, if at all possible. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do

Re: zope bugs

/admin-password-confirmation || true --- db_input critical $PKG/admin-password-confirmation || true If this warrants a new upload, I can prepare one within minutes... it's building now... -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f

Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

handles this by not creating an instance in postinst. We will use the same approach also for zope 2.6, but not before sarge. Anyway, do people want me to fix this? If so, how? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: libcwd/non-free

! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from

Re: libcwd/non-free

think consensus ever existed on debian-legal. For what it's worth, I disagree with you. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have

please accept adduser-ng 0.1.2-1.1 (RC fix)

documentation generation from HTML. eb7a7a1d759319b295168bd38193fedd 797 admin extra adduser-ng_0.1.2-1.1.dsc b245a02962dfe354055888530f6e0a64 70446 admin extra adduser-ng_0.1.2-1.1.tar.gz -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft

libcwd/non-free

architectures have been left in, but I would be satisfied if it at least came for i386. Thanks for your consideration. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author

  1   2   >