Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Hi Stéphane, Thanks for the reply. On 17-11-2019 10:14, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Now, I see the following reasons: > - hivex is too young Grr... why upload during a transition > - lwt is blocked because arch:all packages are not built... but there > are no longer arch:all packages (I don't know what can be done here, I > assumed cruft packages were automatically removed at some point) Yes, arch:all cruft often needs manual cleanup. Please file an appropriate bug against ftp.debian.org. > - llvm-toolchain-8 FTBFS on mips* (I've reported #944844) Ack. > - llvm-toolchain-9 is waiting for piuparts I'll check this myself. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Le 16/11/2019 à 21:28, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> Let's see where we are when all ages are fine. > > I'm failing to (quickly) see why ocaml doesn't want to migrate. Does > anybody already have some foo laying around to see what the problem is? > I'm only seeing ocaml in the autohinter section, while I expected in the > regular section. Now, I see the following reasons: - hivex is too young - lwt is blocked because arch:all packages are not built... but there are no longer arch:all packages (I don't know what can be done here, I assumed cruft packages were automatically removed at some point) - llvm-toolchain-8 FTBFS on mips* (I've reported #944844) - llvm-toolchain-9 is waiting for piuparts Cheers, -- Stéphane
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Hi, On 14-11-2019 16:50, Paul Gevers wrote: > Let's see where we are when all ages are fine. I'm failing to (quickly) see why ocaml doesn't want to migrate. Does anybody already have some foo laying around to see what the problem is? I'm only seeing ocaml in the autohinter section, while I expected in the regular section. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Hi Stéphane, On 14-11-2019 09:07, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 12/11/2019 à 20:24, Paul Gevers a écrit : >>> Here is a status update after 8 days. >>> >>> Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few >>> exceptions, bugs have been filed and all of the concerned packages >>> (except llvm-toolchain-8) can be removed from testing. >> >> I am not too familiar with the ocaml way of working, but does everything >> needs to be rebuild before it can migrate? If so we can remove those >> packages once the llvm-toolchain-8 issue is fixed. > > Yes. You can remove all red packages in [1] + meta-ocaml (which depends > on pxp). Note that lwt, which is orange (because of cruft liblwt-ssl-*), > should not be removed. Done (pxp and meta-ocaml on the next real britney run). > [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml-4.08.1.html > >>> So the main blocker now is llvm-toolchain-8 with #943920. >> >> Thanks for the update. Are you aware of the other migration blockers? >> See https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ocaml > > Yes. I've fixed some of those and I've reported #944709. Let's see where we are when all ages are fine. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Hi, Le 12/11/2019 à 20:24, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> Here is a status update after 8 days. >> >> Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few >> exceptions, bugs have been filed and all of the concerned packages >> (except llvm-toolchain-8) can be removed from testing. > > I am not too familiar with the ocaml way of working, but does everything > needs to be rebuild before it can migrate? If so we can remove those > packages once the llvm-toolchain-8 issue is fixed. Yes. You can remove all red packages in [1] + meta-ocaml (which depends on pxp). Note that lwt, which is orange (because of cruft liblwt-ssl-*), should not be removed. [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml-4.08.1.html >> So the main blocker now is llvm-toolchain-8 with #943920. > > Thanks for the update. Are you aware of the other migration blockers? > See https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ocaml Yes. I've fixed some of those and I've reported #944709. Cheers, -- Stéphane
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Hi Stéphane, On 12-11-2019 14:05, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 04/11/2019 à 13:50, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >>> Please go ahead. >> >> Started. > > Here is a status update after 8 days. > > Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few > exceptions, bugs have been filed and all of the concerned packages > (except llvm-toolchain-8) can be removed from testing. I am not too familiar with the ocaml way of working, but does everything needs to be rebuild before it can migrate? If so we can remove those packages once the llvm-toolchain-8 issue is fixed. > So the main blocker now is llvm-toolchain-8 with #943920. Thanks for the update. Are you aware of the other migration blockers? See https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ocaml Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 941907 by 943920 Bug #941907 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml 941907 was not blocked by any bugs. 941907 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 941907: 943920 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 941907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941907 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
block 941907 by 943920 thanks Le 04/11/2019 à 13:50, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >> Please go ahead. > > Started. Here is a status update after 8 days. Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few exceptions, bugs have been filed and all of the concerned packages (except llvm-toolchain-8) can be removed from testing. So the main blocker now is llvm-toolchain-8 with #943920. Cheers, -- Stéphane
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Le 03/11/2019 à 21:06, Paul Gevers a écrit : > On 07-10-2019 15:50, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> I think it's time to upgrade OCaml to 4.08.1. >> >> It has been uploaded to experimental, and builds fine on all release >> architectures. [1] >> >> Most of reverse-dependencies recompile fine with no changes (on >> amd64). [2] >> >> Bug reports have been (or will be) reported for the few packages that >> need action. [3] >> >> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml=experimental >> [2] https://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-4.08.0/ > > This link never works for me. Maybe it is because it is reachable via IPv6 only? >> [3] >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ocaml-4.08-transition;users=debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org >> >> I will take care of the necessary binNMUs. > > Please go ahead. Started. Cheers, -- Stéphane
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Stéphane, On 07-10-2019 15:50, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > I think it's time to upgrade OCaml to 4.08.1. > > It has been uploaded to experimental, and builds fine on all release > architectures. [1] > > Most of reverse-dependencies recompile fine with no changes (on > amd64). [2] > > Bug reports have been (or will be) reported for the few packages that > need action. [3] > > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml=experimental > [2] https://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-4.08.0/ This link never works for me. > [3] > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ocaml-4.08-transition;users=debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org > > I will take care of the necessary binNMUs. Please go ahead. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #941907 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 941907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941907 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#941907: transition: ocaml
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I think it's time to upgrade OCaml to 4.08.1. It has been uploaded to experimental, and builds fine on all release architectures. [1] Most of reverse-dependencies recompile fine with no changes (on amd64). [2] Bug reports have been (or will be) reported for the few packages that need action. [3] [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml=experimental [2] https://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-4.08.0/ [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ocaml-4.08-transition;users=debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org I will take care of the necessary binNMUs. Ben file: title = "ocaml"; is_affected = .depends ~ "ocaml(-base)?(-nox)?-4.05.0" | .depends ~ "ocaml(-base)?(-nox)?-4.08.1"; is_good = .depends ~ "ocaml(-base)?(-nox)?-4.08.1"; is_bad = .depends ~ "ocaml(-base)?(-nox)?-4.05.0"; Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
