Hi,
just a heads up, the proposed update to clamav that will probably reach stable
this weekend, introduces a regression. clamdscan segfaults when called with the
options --fdpass and --multiscan and if you have the ExcludePath option set in
your clamd.conf.
I submitted a bug report about 6
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 14:12 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-04-23 08:21:44 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Ah, apologies for not spotting that from your earlier mail. An
> > updated
> > draft:
>
> This is perfect Adam, thank you.
Great, thanks for confirming.
That's now
On 2021-04-23 08:21:44 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Ah, apologies for not spotting that from your earlier mail. An updated
> draft:
This is perfect Adam, thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
Sebastian
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 08:55 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-04-22 16:58:46 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I drafted some text for an SUA; comments / complete rewriting
> > welcome:
> >
> > =
> > ClamAV is an AntiVirus
On 2021-04-22 16:58:46 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 21:35 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2021-04-20 20:52:09 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Please feel free to upload. I assume that, given there are security
> > > fixes involved, you'd prefer an
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 21:35 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-04-20 20:52:09 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please feel free to upload. I assume that, given there are security
> > fixes involved, you'd prefer an early release via stable-updates as
> > we've done with a number
On 2021-04-20 20:52:09 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> I'm certainly happy to defer to your judgement here, given our previous
> experience with clamav updates in stable. I was simply trying to
> ascertain the scale of the update involved, but fear I may have just
> confused the discussion;
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #987038 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
clamav/0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
987038: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987038
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2021-04-20 at 21:42 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-04-19 21:15:06 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > I guess the diff against the current buster package is quite
> > > > large
> > > > by
> > > > this point?
> > >
> > > What do you mean
On 2021-04-19 21:15:06 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > I guess the diff against the current buster package is quite large
> > > by
> > > this point?
> >
> > What do you mean by this point? We did full clamav uploads in the
> > past.
> > Please excuse if I miss something obvious.
>
> Sorry,
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 22:00 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-04-19 19:41:58 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 09:27 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > This is an update from ClamAV from 0.102.4 to 0.103.2. The 103
> > > release was in unstable
On 2021-04-19 19:41:58 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 09:27 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > This is an update from ClamAV from 0.102.4 to 0.103.2. The 103
> > release was in unstable since the beginning. I skipped it for Buster
> > back then because the 102
On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 09:27 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This is an update from ClamAV from 0.102.4 to 0.103.2. The 103
> release was in unstable since the beginning. I skipped it for Buster
> back then because the 102 based release recevied a security update
> and it appeared to
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: buster
Severity: normal
This is an update from ClamAV from 0.102.4 to 0.103.2. The 103 release
was in unstable since the beginning. I skipped it for Buster back then
because the 102 based release recevied
14 matches
Mail list logo
