On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:45:13AM +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
368226 Quagga does intentionally not upgrade automatically
Maintainer forgot to close the bug.
Perhaps you should use a versioned close on this bug, so that the status of
the fix can be tracked in etch and lenny?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:45:13AM +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
368226 Quagga does intentionally not upgrade automatically
Maintainer forgot to close the bug.
Perhaps you should use a versioned close on this bug, so that the status of
the fix can be tracked in
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:29:48PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On jeu, aoû 30, 2007 at 11:51:36 +, Luk Claes wrote:
Pierre Habouzit
393403 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
NMUed.
294520 qtparted: Incorrect handling of extended partitions
The patch is commited
On 2007-08-30, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once you've done as much as you're able for the two weeks, make sure the
bug report includes all the up to date information, then reply to this
mail (to debian-release@lists.debian.org) with a brief summary of what's
happened and what the next
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 13:51:36 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Julien Cristau
423966 wvdial: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that depend on
a template parameter, so a declaration of 'cur' must be available
Robert took care of that one before I had a chance :)
393361 Source package
On 2007-08-30, Robert Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-08-30, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
423823 retchmail: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that
depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'cur' must be available
C++ headers are Turing-complete -- the bug
[Cced the victi^Wpotential assistents this time - next time get it from
the list :]
Hi guys,
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the
following bugs:
Robert Edmonds
423823 retchmail: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that
depend on a template
On jeu, aoû 30, 2007 at 11:51:36 +, Luk Claes wrote:
Pierre Habouzit
393403 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
NMUed.
294520 qtparted: Incorrect handling of extended partitions
The proposing fix has been reviewed by Otavio and committed in the
parted git repository, and
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On jeu, aoû 30, 2007 at 11:51:36 +, Luk Claes wrote:
Pierre Habouzit
393403 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
NMUed.
Hmm, it seems you didn't follow the NMU rules, for instance I see no
patch in the bug log nor a trace of informing the maintainer
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 30.08.2007, 13:51 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
[Cced the victi^Wpotential assistents this time - next time get it from
the list :]
Hi guys,
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the
following bugs:
Robert Edmonds
[..]
405186 docbook2x:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:37:28PM +, Luk Claes wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On jeu, aoû 30, 2007 at 11:51:36 +, Luk Claes wrote:
Pierre Habouzit
393403 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
NMUed.
Hmm, it seems you didn't follow the NMU rules, for instance I see no
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hmm you mean I should inform a Maintainer's package for a package
whose last 4 uploads since 2006-10-27 are NMUs ? for a bug that is
what, 10 months old ? Heh. It qualifies to the 0-day NMU policy for so
many reasons that well...
I totally agree with you here!
Could
Amaya wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hmm you mean I should inform a Maintainer's package for a package
whose last 4 uploads since 2006-10-27 are NMUs ? for a bug that is
what, 10 months old ? Heh. It qualifies to the 0-day NMU policy for so
many reasons that well...
I totally agree with you
Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hmm you mean I should inform a Maintainer's package for a package
whose last 4 uploads since 2006-10-27 are NMUs ? for a bug that is
what, 10 months old ? Heh. It qualifies to the 0-day NMU policy for so
many reasons that well...
I
On 30/08/07 at 12:40 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hmm you mean I should inform a Maintainer's package for a package
whose last 4 uploads since 2006-10-27 are NMUs ? for a bug that is
what, 10 months old ? Heh. It qualifies to the
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Before the release, we had a 0-day NMU policy for bugs older than 7
days. Maybe we could have a permanent 0-day NMU policy for bugs older
than 21 days, or older than a month?
Also, it would be great if this could be extended to the release goals.
I
On 2007-08-30, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
423823 retchmail: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that
depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'cur' must be available
C++ headers are Turing-complete -- the bug is actually in the wvstreams
source. Merged with
On 2007-08-30, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
368226 Quagga does intentionally not upgrade automatically
It looks like the maintainer rewrote the prerm script to fix this but
neglected to note this in the changelog or BTS.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:48:38PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hmm you mean I should inform a Maintainer's package for a package
whose last 4 uploads since 2006-10-27 are NMUs ? for a bug that is what,
10 months old ? Heh. It qualifies to the 0-day NMU policy for so many
reasons that
Hi,
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060504 14:07]:
[...]
Thanks for your work. Please continue this way. :)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
thanks for your work. One comment only:
* Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060504 22:48]:
311188 [ ] debian-edu-config: Messes programmatically with
conffiles of other packages
I made a list of the by debian-edu-config affected conffiles in /etc.
Though closing the bug is
Hi,
* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060504 23:05]:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
[Cced the victi^Wpotential assistents this time - next time get it from the
list :]
Hi guys,
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve
* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060516 10:28]:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:17:42AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Andrea Mennucci
354650 lightspeed: segfault at start up on amd64
I converted it to GTK2; the bug submitter says
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:17:42AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Andrea Mennucci
354650 lightspeed: segfault at start up on amd64
I converted it to GTK2; the bug submitter says that the new version
is fine, so I uploaded it to
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Andrea Mennucci
354650 lightspeed: segfault at start up on amd64
I converted it to GTK2, and uploaded it to experimental, as version
1.2a-3 ; if anybody has a AMD64 machine on the desktop, please test
it. In 1.2a-3 there is a bug
Hi Andrea,
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:46:43PM +0200, wrote:
^^
You might want to check that you set valid From: headers in your mails. :)
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
354650 lightspeed: segfault at start up on
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:19:38AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Andrea,
You might want to check that you set valid From: headers in your mails. :)
I do not know how it got wrong... anyway I have other debugging to be done
354650 lightspeed: segfault at start up on amd64
so here
Heya,
Let's see what I've done.
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
354093 [ ] libnss-ldap: getent segfault when reading large
uid-/gidNumbers
This bug seems to be fixed in newer upstream releases. As there are
other RC bugs on the
Andreas Barth wrote:
[Cced the victi^Wpotential assistents this time - next time get it from the
list :]
Hi guys,
Hi Release Managers and debian-release readers :-)
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the
following bugs:
[...]
Luk Claes
335473 [
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
[Cced the victi^Wpotential assistents this time - next time get it from the
list :]
Hi guys,
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the
following bugs:
Before starting, I would like to ask how I
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the
following bugs:
346115 lineak-xosdplugin: doesn't print onscreen messages anymore
this bug was closed
340538 apache2: includes non-free and possibly
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
Hi guys,
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the
following bugs:
Guido Trotter
346354 [ ] distribution of this package is likely a GPL violation
351981 [ ] muine: Fails
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:16PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
[Cced the victi^Wpotential assistents this time - next time get it from the
list :]
Hi guys,
Your first assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to solve the
following bugs:
Speaking of which, since this seems like as
33 matches
Mail list logo
