Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2023-03-07 01:12:58 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: gtk+...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:gtk+3.0
>
> gtk+3.0_3.24.37
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1032450 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): gtk+3.0/3.24.37-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1032450: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032450
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:quakespasm
Bug #1032514 [release.debian.org] unblock: quakespasm/0.95.1+dfsg-2
Added indication that 1032514 affects src:quakespasm
--
1032514: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032514
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: quakesp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:quakespasm
Please unblock package quakespasm
[ Reason ]
Fix #1032276
[ Impact ]
If not fixed, when the quake-server
Your message dated Wed, 08 Mar 2023 10:38:01 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock thinkfan
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032460,
regarding unblock: thinkfan/1.3.1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 12:29:05PM +, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > It's been a while. Any progress? It's getting late in the freeze
> > already.
> upstream confirmed that there are some last minutes changes to
> the API so the final soname will happen with the official 2.40.0
> release, which is
Hello
Just out of curiosity: Is there a reason why the orig tarball does not
match the tarball from kernel.org, which is signed by Linus and
friends?
Regards
Stephan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:dar
Bug #1032526 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: dar/2.7.8-2
Added indication that 1032526 affects src:dar
--
1032526: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 21:35:41 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Simon McVittie, on 2023-03-03:
> > llvm-toolchain-15/1:15.0.7-1 was uploaded several weeks ago, shortly
> > after the transition freeze, but has not migrated to testing due to an
> > autopkgtest regression (#1029010).
>
> I subscribe
On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 13:13:08 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2023-03-07 01:12:58 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > gtk+3.0_3.24.37 is in experimental at the moment, and we'd like to
> > include it in bookworm if possible.
>
> Are there any other stable releases planned for the 3.24.x
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: jgoer...@complete.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dar
Hi RMs,
Please pre-approve a feature enabled version of dar.
[ Reason ]
John Goerzen updated build dependencies to
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Verbücheln, on 2023-03-08:
> Just out of curiosity: Is there a reason why the orig tarball does not
> match the tarball from kernel.org, which is signed by Linus and
> friends?
Thanks for your concern, I believe this is at least caused by
files excluded, see the
Control: retitle -1 unblock: gtk+3.0/3.24.37-2
On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 13:13:08 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2023-03-07 01:12:58 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Resync with upstream release. What we have in bookworm at the moment
> > is GTK 3.24.36 and something like half of 3.24.37;
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: gtk+3.0/3.24.37-2
Bug #1032450 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): gtk+3.0/3.24.37-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: gtk+3.0/3.24.37-2' from 'unblock (pre-approval):
gtk+3.0/3.24.37-2'.
--
1032450:
Your message dated Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:01:22 +0100
with message-id <9d53c7de-4b7e-9a77-0f93-4968965ac...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1031879: unblock: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.22.1-1
(Preapproval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031879,
regarding unblock: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.22.1-1
Your message dated Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:02:38 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1031910: [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.21
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031910,
regarding [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.21
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Upstream has just confirmed that the new WebKit API for GTK4 is
final[1] so this is effectively a release candidate for WebKitGTK
2.40.0, to be released in ~10 days.
I just uploaded the packages, the GTK4 ones are in the NEW queue.
Jeremy, you can start testing the reverse dependencies whenever
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
> python-cryptography/38.0.4-3~deb12u1 was uploaded to security-master
> as source only upload, the upload got rejected with:
>
> | Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.
There were two issues:
- The override sync from ftp-master to security-master was not
Your message dated Wed, 08 Mar 2023 19:55:50 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock gtk+3.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1032450,
regarding unblock: gtk+3.0/3.24.37-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
I have a slightly related question for the release team, and apologies
in advance if I'm hijacking this thread.
WPE WebKit, the other major port of WebKit in Debian is also
introducing a new API in 2.40.0, although in this case the old API
will still be available (but deprecated) for a time.
20 matches
Mail list logo