On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 19:22 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Camm,
am Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:02:52PM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
Greetings! This was in line of addressing #682719. I was under the
impression that the emacsen would cover the absence of emacs24.
emacs24's forced in
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[recipient list trimmed, although it should probably be even smaller]
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing
package emacsen with emacs23 | emacsen?
It does exist
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:59 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing
Hi,
Title says it all. Where to find weekly built netinst isos (or
unstable)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
good! People are trying to help out!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Looks like group reply in my mailer means reply only to the mailing list
I have defined a filter for? Anyway, forwarding to debian-release too.
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com
Reply-to: Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com
To: debian-h
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
sorry, thinko. I did mean End of May.
So we're at the end of May. Can we have that revert now, or do I need
to NMU?
Stop nagging about the default gcc compiler for
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Svante,
am Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:58:10PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:39 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 19:56:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
sorry, thinko. I did mean End
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 08:34 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2012-05-27 at 00:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:51 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
...
With all due respect, So far I have not seen any bug report causing the
gcc-4.7 as default compiler being serious
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 09:53 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:08:16PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 19.05.2012 19:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I'm not sure we've ever released with an architecture which was in
either broken or fucked, but hopefully someone will correct
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 11:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Wed 30 May 2012 11:14:24 +0200, a écrit :
* its archive coverage is far lower than required
What is required, currently the percentage is 77%.
No, it is rather 76%.
It would be interesting to know how large
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 11:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Wed 30 May 2012 11:31:24 +0200, a écrit :
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 11:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Wed 30 May 2012 11:14:24 +0200, a écrit :
* its archive coverage is far lower than required
On 28/05/12 01:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 29/05/12 19:57, Andreas Barth wrote:
[...] we add hurd-i386 to testing with
break/fucked, but we don't expect it to make the release. I.e. bugs
for hurd-i386 are not RC.
Maybe that's all that's needed?
The recent enthusiasm sounds to me
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:18 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On 28/05/12 01:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 29/05/12 19:57, Andreas Barth wrote:
[...] we add hurd-i386 to testing with
break/fucked, but we don't expect it to make the release. I.e. bugs
for hurd-i386 are not RC.
Maybe
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 10:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
I assume this is not a regular mail correspondence, is it?
I generally consider it polite to give people an opportunity to respond
before assuming that you're being ignored, especially if it's part of a
longer thread.
Maybe three
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 13:23 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 4. Juni 2012, Svante Signell wrote:
One issue is how to encourage more people trying Hurd out, when it is
not in testing.
I honestly don't think that's the main blocker trying out hurd. Lack of SATA,
and USB
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 21:47 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi Samuel,
On 06/05/13 21:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
away by its inclusion?
I would
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 16:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Thu 09 May 2013 16:25:46 +0200, a écrit :
Why do you expect anything to be different now compared when the freeze
happened, _several months ago_, in zero time?
Please avoid this level of language, it can't bring
FYI!
---BeginMessage---
This is now published on
http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-news.en.html
http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/news/2013-05-debian_gnu_hurd_2013.html
Please spread the news :)
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
- fix arch-related bugs
I am a not (yet) a DM/DD
Svante Signell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1379596145.5825.104.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 04:20 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 00:49:17 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
(about kfreebsd and hurd)
I am a DD.
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 19:46 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le dim. 02 sept. 2018 19:45:19 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-po
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 01:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > So has the debian patch been submitted in #900240 upstream by you or Petter
> > Reinholdtsen yet? I don't believe so!
>
> I don't think so either, it'd be marked forwarded. That doesn't mean you
> can't help with it.
Regardless who
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-ports page[1] may
> > provide some objective statistics or reflection on the actual
> > suitability of your architecture's continued inclusion.
> > [1]:
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 00:19 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry Samuel, I asked both you and James Clarke, Cc:ed, for help on this
> > issue and you both said it was not possible to NMU cmake, even if you are
> > both
> > DD's.
>
> For my part, I was not talking about that patch, but
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 11:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> On 2019-08-09 11:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> > > severity 934132 important
> > Bug #934132 [release.debian.org] unblock:
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 12:06 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 12:55:02PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 11:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Control: severity -1 normal
> > >
> > > On 2019-08-09 11:
27 matches
Mail list logo
