>> I know the difference between a 32-bit processor and a 64-bit processor.
>
> Obviously you don't. Or at least are not aware about consequences.
>
>
> Since you still offer 32bit machines of which Debian has enough of. (64 bit
> kernel probably but it doesn't matter) where it does not
Keeping in mind that I am new to this arena...
I have some Intel systems - both 64-bit and 32-bit - that I might be able to
use as build platforms.
What does the Debian team need from me to be able to use these systems?
I can't guarantee they'll be FAST, but I'll do what I can to make them
Sent from my mobile device.
From: YunQiang Su
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 10:11
To: r...@neoquasar.org
Cc: noloa...@gmail.com; debian-ker...@lists.debian.org;
debian-...@lists.debian.org; debian-de...@lists.debian.org;
debian-release@lists.debian.org
Let me try again, following up on the previous thread, but removing most of the
irrelevant history.
If I have a 32-bit Intel system that is currently supported on bookworm
(currently running bullseye, but I can upgrade it), is that of use to anyone as
a native build platform for 32-bit binary
No.
You are AGAIN assuming what I am talking about.
I know the difference between a 32-bit processor and a 64-bit processor.
If you're not going to answer my question, kindly don't answer at all.
--J
> On Jan 12, 2024, at 21:40, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> rhys 于2024年1月13日周六 11:27写道：
&
> * Thank you for your offering, but Debian is never in lack of
> x86/x86_64/amd64/intel/amd/whatever_you_name_it hardware for package building.
> In fact, we now have some of the very powerful machines.
If you're sure. Working 32-bit systems are not as common as they once were,
and sometimes
6 matches
Mail list logo
