Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:11:41AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > | > > dplyr just had a new upstream CRAN release 0.7.4 yesterday. Don't know > about > | > > the others as I am less close to BioConductor. > | > > | > I'll upload new version soon > | > | I have no idea why r-cran-rcpp was

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:11:41AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 29 September 2017 at 15:24, Andreas Tille wrote: > | On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > | > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:59:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > > > | > > dplyr just had a

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 16:23, Andreas Tille wrote: | On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:11:41AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > | rebuild against r-api-3.4 to upload r-cran-dplyr. | > | > It so happens that I (as upstream) got Rcpp 0.12.13 onto CRAN yesterday too, | > so I owe Debian a new

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:11:41AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > | rebuild against r-api-3.4 to upload r-cran-dplyr. > > It so happens that I (as upstream) got Rcpp 0.12.13 onto CRAN yesterday too, > so I owe Debian a new r-cran-rcpp_0.12.13. > > However, I had local server issues and

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 15:24, Andreas Tille wrote: | On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: | > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:59:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > > | > > dplyr just had a new upstream CRAN release 0.7.4 yesterday. Don't know about | > > the others

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 15:11, Graham Inggs wrote: | On 29 September 2017 at 12:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 29 September 2017 at 07:36, Graham Inggs wrote: | > | rgtk2 and rggobi now FTBFS on s390x, they also fail in a Buster chroot | > | on zelenka.debian.org so I don't

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:59:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > > > dplyr just had a new upstream CRAN release 0.7.4 yesterday. Don't know about > > the others as I am less close to BioConductor. > > I'll upload new version

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 12:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 29 September 2017 at 07:36, Graham Inggs wrote: > | rgtk2 and rggobi now FTBFS on s390x, they also fail in a Buster chroot > | on zelenka.debian.org so I don't believe it is a regression in R, but > | the binaries will

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:59:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > dplyr just had a new upstream CRAN release 0.7.4 yesterday. Don't know about > the others as I am less close to BioConductor. I'll upload new version soon Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 29 September 2017 at 07:36, Graham Inggs wrote: | I've been working on this transition in Ubuntu and here are some of my notes: | | rgtk2 and rggobi now FTBFS on s390x, they also fail in a Buster chroot | on zelenka.debian.org so I don't believe it is a regression in R, but | the binaries

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

I've been working on this transition in Ubuntu and here are some of my notes: rgtk2 and rggobi now FTBFS on s390x, they also fail in a Buster chroot on zelenka.debian.org so I don't believe it is a regression in R, but the binaries will need to be removed. r-bioc-iranges,

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 28 September 2017 at 22:22, Andreas Tille wrote: | I wonder if we could teach dh-r to make sure that is added to arch:all | packages. I'm converting all packages I'm touching to dh-r anyway. | | At least a lintian warning might help. | | Kind regards | | Andreas (after having

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 28 September 2017 at 18:53, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:04:51AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > On 28 September 2017 at 13:20, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | > | On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:53:10PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: | > | > On 28/09/2017 12:28,

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:53:26PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:04:51AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > I now understand that we ideally need two API/ABI-like values instead of one: > > - one that is bumped when only arch:any packages need to be rebuilt > >

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:04:51AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 28 September 2017 at 13:20, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > | On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:53:10PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > | > On 28/09/2017 12:28, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > | > > Note that there are many arch:all R

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 28 September 2017 at 13:20, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:53:10PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: | > On 28/09/2017 12:28, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | > > Note that there are many arch:all R packages that will need sourceful upload | > > (they are easy to identify on the

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:53:10PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 28/09/2017 12:28, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > Note that there are many arch:all R packages that will need sourceful upload > > (they are easy to identify on the transition tracker whose URL is above). > > Besides r-cran-nlp

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 28/09/2017 12:28, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Note that there are many arch:all R packages that will need sourceful upload (they are easy to identify on the transition tracker whose URL is above). Besides r-cran-nlp which doesn't show up in the tracker, I've found several other arch:all

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:33:39AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-base-3.4.html > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 24/09/17 15:36, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > The latest upload of r-base, versioned

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 24 September 2017 at 15:36, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > title = "r-api-3.4"; > is_affected = .depends ~ /r-api-3(\.4)?/; > is_good = .depends ~ /r-api-3\.4/; > is_bad = .depends ~ /r-api-3\b/; I had some trouble with this in Ubuntu until Stefano Rivera suggested: is_bad

Processed: Re: Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-base-3.4.html Bug #868558 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-3.4 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-base-3.4.html'. > tags -1 confirmed Bug #868558

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-base-3.4.html Control: tags -1 confirmed On 24/09/17 15:36, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: retitle -1 transition: r-api-3.4 > Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org > Control: usertags -1

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

On 24 September 2017 at 15:36, Sébastien Villemot wrote: | Control: reopen -1 | Control: retitle -1 transition: r-api-3.4 | Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org | Control: usertags -1 = transition | | On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:15:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: | | > To be

Bug#868558: transition: r-api-3.4 [was Re: Bug#868558: nmu: multiple r-* packages]

Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 transition: r-api-3.4 Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Control: usertags -1 = transition On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:15:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > To be perfectly, honest, I would prefer if you did a proper ABI-like > transition