Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On ചൊവ്വ 27 മാർച്ച് 2018 04:17 വൈകു, Georg Faerber wrote: > Sure -- I was just wondering, if this package is still used? Popcon > seems quite low, and there are no (build) rdepends. > This is a test dependency of diaspora. https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/diaspora/blob/master/Gemfile#L285 We

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi, On 18-03-27 10:03:37, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On March 27, 2018 3:01:33 AM GMT+05:30, Georg Faerber > wrote: > >- ruby-factory-girl-rails: @Pirate: If you need help with this, tell > > me. > > If you can do it, that'll be good. I don't know when I'll come back to > this

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On 18-03-14 16:53:42, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 18-03-14 10:18:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > Reverse dependencies are then able to change their dependency > > > anytime they wish. > > > > yes, but ideally we want to push

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

For the record, I uploaded this package. Cheers, Cédric

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On 18-03-14 16:53:42, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 18-03-14 10:18:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > On 18-03-13 16:30:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > > > On

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On 18-03-14 10:18:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > On 18-03-13 16:30:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > > > >

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 18-03-13 16:30:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > > > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On 18-03-13 16:30:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking > > > looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > Hi, > > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking > > looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a factory_bot. > > > > I don't know if it is

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi Cédric, all, On 18-03-04 22:04:46, Georg Faerber wrote: > On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency > > checking looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a > > factory_bot. > > > > I don't know if it is better to

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi, On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking > looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a factory_bot. > > I don't know if it is better to fix factory-girl-rails gemspecs, or to > ship also the

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On 18-03-03 15:35:29, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > I think it should be also 'autopkgtest-pkg-ruby' instead of > 'autopkgtest' for Testsuite field in debian/control but the smart > autopkgtest seems to detect that it is indeed a ruby package anyway. Thanks, it worked with 'autopkgtest' as well, but

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi Cédric, Thanks for your review. On 18-03-03 15:05:14, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > I would just propose to include the old changelog from > ruby-factory-girl, so that the history is not gone, when the source > package ruby-factory-girl is removed. Done. > Please keep also the previous

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

And a last detail: ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a factory_bot. I don't know if it is better to fix factory-girl-rails gemspecs, or to ship also the factor_girl.gemspec file too with ruby-factory-bot.

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 03:05:14PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > It looks fine for me too. I would just propose to include the old > changelog from ruby-factory-girl, so that the history is not gone, when > the source package ruby-factory-girl is removed. > Please keep also the previous

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

It looks fine for me too. I would just propose to include the old changelog from ruby-factory-girl, so that the history is not gone, when the source package ruby-factory-girl is removed. Please keep also the previous uploaders in the control file. Cédric signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi Hleb, all, On 18-02-19 20:07:44, Georg Faerber wrote: > Thanks a lot for the review, I've created a repo now [1]. > > On 18-02-19 10:53:00, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > > On 2/19/18, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > I've worked on this now, and would be more than happy, if someone

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi Hleb, Thanks a lot for the review, I've created a repo now [1]. On 18-02-19 10:53:00, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 2/19/18, Georg Faerber wrote: > > I've worked on this now, and would be more than happy, if someone could > > review my work [1]. Note: That's not yet ready for

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On 2/19/18, Georg Faerber wrote: > I've worked on this now, and would be more than happy, if someone could > review my work [1]. Note: That's not yet ready for upload, before, I d/changelog: Please remove this line as this is not an initial release: * Initial release.

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi all, On 17-12-01 00:14:14, Georg Faerber wrote: > Upstream decided [1] to rename factory-girl to factory-bot, because > "The name "Factory Girl" was confusing to some developers who > encountered this library, and offensive or problematic to others." [2] > > We're using this in schleuder,

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:14:14AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > Hi all, > > Upstream decided [1] to rename factory-girl to factory-bot, because "The > name "Factory Girl" was confusing to some developers who encountered > this library, and offensive or problematic to others." [2] > > We're

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:43:49AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I think renaming and updating reverse dependencies will be enough. It > will still have to go through NEW and once it clears, you will need > update reverse dependencies and request removal of old package. The new source

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On വെള്ളി 01 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2017 04:44 രാവിലെ, Georg Faerber wrote: > Hi all, > > Upstream decided [1] to rename factory-girl to factory-bot, because "The > name "Factory Girl" was confusing to some developers who encountered > this library, and offensive or problematic to others." [2] > > We're using

Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

Hi all, Upstream decided [1] to rename factory-girl to factory-bot, because "The name "Factory Girl" was confusing to some developers who encountered this library, and offensive or problematic to others." [2] We're using this in schleuder, therefore I would like to update the name accordingly.