It might be easier to upgrade to 1.2.4 first, then 1,3,x later.
I was already planning to try a build+autopkgtest of the reverse
dependencies, and probably an upload to experimental (it's also common
for pandas to fail a few tests on non-amd64), at some point, but not
just yet. (The last time I did this was #969650.)
Thanks for the tools suggestions.
I
Hi Rebecca,
Am Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 09:31:12PM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer:
> I was already planning to try a build+autopkgtest of the reverse
> dependencies, and probably an upload to experimental (it's also common for
> pandas to fail a few tests on non-amd64), at some point, but not just
On 11 November 2021 5:44:09 am IST, Drew Parsons wrote:
>On 2021-11-10 20:19, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>> Source: pandas
>>
>> On 10/11/2021 17:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> pandas is lagging behind upstream by several versions. I guess we
>>> should try to get in sync with upstream a bit
Hi,
Am Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:17:27PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> >If the new pandas builds successfully, then certainly upload it to
> >experimental first. We can test dependencies from there.
^^
> That makes sense, but other than that, I'd really
On 2021-11-10 20:19, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
Source: pandas
On 10/11/2021 17:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
pandas is lagging behind upstream by several versions. I guess we
should try to get in sync with upstream a bit more.
Yes, but please don't upload this yet: it's common for a pandas
6 matches
Mail list logo
