Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

On 6/2/22 2:37 PM, PIERRE SARAMITO wrote: Hi Nilesh Patra, > From Nilesh Patra: > I'm a bit confused with the branches though, > isn't debian/sid  the branch we should be using for uploads? > Atleast I am seeing prev commits on that branch. > Please move your commits there if that's the

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

Hi Nilesh Patra, > From Nilesh Patra: > I'm a bit confused with the branches though, > isn't debian/sid the branch we should be using for uploads? > Atleast I am seeing prev commits on that branch. > Please move your commits there if that's the case. I'm sorry about that: the prev commits

HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

Hi all Debian Maintainers, I just commit with git a new release 7.2-1 of the debianization of the rheolef package. This corresponds to a new version 7.2 of the upstream package: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef This version closes the two pending outstanding bugs: #1007118 and

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

On 2 June 2022 11:57:38 am IST, PIERRE SARAMITO wrote: >I just commit with git a new release 7.2-1 of the debianization of the rheolef >package. >This corresponds to a new version 7.2 of the upstream package > >Could you please upload it in debian ? I can do it later today. I'm a bit

Re: Ceres solver version 2.1.0

Hello Pierre, > While you are at it, you could upgrade the Standards version and > apply > the multiarch hints. Also I feel debian/copyright could be refreshed. Sure, I'll do it. Best, François signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part