Hi,
metar showed up as Bug of the Day[1] and I'd like to work on the bugs of
the package. I think its a nice fit to Debian Science team. Usually I
would file some ITS bug following the Package Salvage procedure[2] but
given that you asked for sponsoring (RFS) I assume you would like to
join a te
fixing some bugs and
opened some issues in upstream Git to sort out whether we can close the
other Debian bugs.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/metar
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 07:54:02AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > metar sh
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Christopher David Desjardins wrote:
I'll be starting graduate school in Ecology at the University of Alberta in
Edmonton, Canada this September. I would be interested to hear what everyone
thinks about GRASS since I am interested in using this GPS program. Does
anyone kn
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
Nice to see this list liven up so quickly, obviously there seems to be
a need for it among Debian using scientists. There has already been a
number of useful unofficial Debian packages and repositories
mentioned, so I might as well put a plug here for one
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
Could not we settle something similar for science packages?
(like pkg-debian-science).
If you ask me the field "science" is a little bit unsharp. If you
want to attract people you need people in more specific fields.
It's quite unlikely that somebod
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
While I agree that it would be easy to find the sponsors that way, I strongly
oppose that idea of splitting the community further.
CDD is not about splitting the community but focussing on smaller pieces
of work. The piece of work should match yo
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Stephan Gromer wrote:
As I need to write scientific publications once in a while, I need
some sort of reference manager. Most biomedical journals insist on
manuscripts in Word or RTF-format, so OpenOffice is the suite of
choice under Linux I guess.
Using OOo is however a pai
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
My idea is simply generalising the idea to science software maintained
(more or less according to the policy) outside Debian. As outside
maintainers are most often not as much structured as Ubuntu is, I
believe it would be nice to provide (on Alioth)
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Albin Blaschka wrote:
something similar is already happening with the Debian-GIS/ pkg-grass-general
- list: The aim of the people behind is to bring GIS-Software (Geographic
Information Systems) into Debian. The starting point was GRASS, therefore the
(now outdated) name,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Albin Blaschka wrote:
Mhmm, in general I am a biologist, too, and so I would be interested in a
Debian-Bio-Project in general. (but at the moment I am contracted with very
very little spare-time...)
That's the problem of many interested people - or rather for biologists
t
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Michael Hanke wrote:
I wonder if anyone on this list is involved in psychophysical experiments?
I guess your chances to find people working in this field is higher if
you ask on debian-med mailing list.
I often need to fit psychometric functions to data from such experim
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
I would sponsor this package for you. Have you applied to become a DD?
Have you filled an ITP against wnpp?
I had some problems with my mail and thus your mail reached me past I
sended my own comments about the package. If you want to sponsor it
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Little nitpicking: the Policy Manual seems to recommend the use of only
the first three components of the Policy version in Standards-Version
(although four is also allowed). See:
Thanks. Nitpicking is always welcome - I have to read policy from
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Michael Hanke wrote:
I have now filed an ITP bug (Bug#325671) and changed the changelog so that it
closes it on upload.
I noticed this.
I cleaned up the rules file and fixed the permissions in the upstream tarball.
Fine.
The textfiles where already in the upstream so
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Michael Hanke wrote:
As Rafael pointed out, I used the standalone tarball
(psignifit-2-5-6-bin.tar.gz) which included all additional documentation
files.
Please specify the exact URL of this file in the copyright file to avoid
confusion.
To reduce the confusion I followe
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Michael might also include a script with a regression test in the
package, something like:
#!/bin/sh
prog=/usr/bin/psignifit
exdir=/usr/share/doc/psignifit/examples
if test -x $prog ; then
$prog $exdir/dat $exdir/prefs
else
echo 1
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
Where am I supposed to include such script. Should it be run in the
postinst script (probably not) or should I just include it somewhere
like in /usr/share/doc/psignifit/tests.
The later. Mention it in the README.Debian and/or the man page, pleas
.
There's no point duplicating the effort, especially when there's already
packages out there that people have been using.
This would in fact be a waste of time. Please be patient with Guanglei because
he seems to be quite new to Debian packaging.
Perhaps you can find
another proje
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Guanglei Xiong wrote:
BTW, I still think packaging and publishing for Debian is free and
accessible for every human being. So does Debian itself. There should be
no restriction that someone has already packaged something, and some
others must not package and publish it. I am
ED]
To: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#186958 acknowledged by developer (WNPP bug closed)
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#186958: RFP: koha -- Web-based library automation package,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been clos
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Gavin Baker wrote:
Right - I have downloaded the source to Guanglei's packages. I will merge
in any changes he has made that I didn't have, then put the sources up on
mentors.debian.net again. Then others can at least get the source packages
and build it themselves, and fr
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:04:49 -0700
From: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#243450 acknowledged by developer (WNPP bug closing)
This is an automatic
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
What's the state of the packaging today?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/insighttoolkit
Are they uploadable?
Not yet and I told Gavin Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (who did a really
great job) the reasons why I think some work is nec
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
Are there any plans to have some followup at debconf 6 with respect to
the scientific use of Debian?
I'd love to see continuous effort in this topic and I would love even more
if the Custom Debian Distribution idea
http://people.debian.org/~till
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
The next Quantian release will have once again a large selection of tools
incl a complete set of BioConductor packages (that part is not in Debian) but
What BioConductor version are you using? The BioConductor movement to
official Debian is a littl
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
That ITP is officially dead. Action, if any, can be had around the pkg-bioc
project on alioth where we have some rough code to spew out hundreds of .deb
packages based on sources from both CRAN and BioC.
I just notice that I was actually talking abo
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
What is the story with emboss? Couldn't find it for the currently ongoing
preparations of the next Quantian update. Are there binaries somewhere?
Are you looking for biological software in and outside Debian in general?
I hope you noticed
http
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/microbio
Nice page(s that I was in fact unaware of. I only need to know your med-*
meta packages :)
Well, my plan is to build this kind of pages automagically from metapackage
dependencies (for the offi
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Andreas' URL to the Debian Med project also had a lot of bio/generics
pointers.
... and if you konow something that is missing on this page just write
an e-mail to the debian-med list - that's what this list is for.
Kind regards
Andreas
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:02:23PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> e.g. http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/meteorology page has empty
> banner on top -- shouldn't (wasn't) there some logo -- is missing src
> there entirely.
There is no such thing like a Debian Science logo and
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:29:05AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> ok -- so I guess we have a tender for the logo... were there any
> ideas/drafts ever suggested?
Not that I'm aware of
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.o
Hi,
I plan to create metapackages for Wheezy next Monday. So if you are
maintaining packages that are relevant for science please verify that
it is mentioned here
http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/
in the appropriate section to make sure Wheezy users will get the full
list of sc
Hi Joost,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:07:40AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Thanks for heads up!
:-)
> The package "mcl" should get added to
> http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics and/or
Added.
> http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/biology .
H, we do
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:42:35AM +0200, Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> > list of scientific applications in Wheezy easily.
> Is there a change to add the recent PolyBoRi 0.8.3 from experimental to
> http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/mathematics or
> http://blends.alioth.debi
Hi Ambrose,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:38:52PM +1000, Ambrose Andrews wrote:
> Ferret-vis (under at least "Meteorology") has been removed from Wheezy.
thanks for the hint but this is regarded automatically and exactly the
reason why the metapackages are created that late in the release
process:
Hi Alexander,
[Please make sure to read PS below.]
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:52:45AM +0200, Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> > However, you might have missunderstood the sense of the tasks ans thus
> Indeed, I missed the point: this will only add the outdated version.
That's kind of 'normal' that pack
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:53:44AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > [1] http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/bio#pkgvcs-debs
>
> Yes, of course, that's the plan. Just like e.g. the timbl package. Alioth
> user proycon-guest has already been granted commit access. We'd like to use
> SV
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:08:27AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Unfortunately this means for our users, turning on backports becomes
> almost mandatory;
> but how to best advertise this? a separate metapackage for backports?
apt-get install --install-suggests
might help to some extend
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:08:27PM +0200, Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> > That's kind of 'normal' that packages become outdated in the release
> > process. It might be reasonable to consider backports if you want to
> > make sure that users of Wheezy will be able to use the latest versi
[CC to debian-blends because it is related]
Hi Michael,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:12:23PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:58:41AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > In contrast to the metapackage creation process (which was the topic of
> > my initial mail
Hi Filippo,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> could you add
>
> mmass - Mass spectrometry tool for proteomics
> mmass-modules - Mass spectrometry tool for proteomics - extension modules
> python-mzml - mzML mass spectrometric data parsing
> python-mzml-doc - mzML
Hi Jerome,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:15:25PM +0200, Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> I packaged pyFAI which is used for X-ray crystal diffraction and small angle
> scattering, so the meaningful topics are:
> physics, biology & chemetry.
$ svn diff
Index: med/trunk/debian-med/tasks/bio-dev
Hi Joost,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:47:36PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some background info: python-timbl (https://github.com/proycon/python-timbl)
> will get maintained under the debian-science umbrella, using this groups
> SVN-repo at Alioth (user proycon-guest). I'll co-main
Hi,
thanks to melchiaros for the heads up. It actually affects all Blends
pages. I do not really think that it is DDE related but probably the
reason why DDE is broken and the tasks pages are broken is the very
same. The web sentinel is doing direct SQL queries to UDD and my guess
is that soemt
Additional notes:
The subject is wrong - the pages in question are *not* Wiki pages.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:45:10AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> That is because UDD is currently not exposed via DDE (ie not listed on
> http://dde.debian.net/dde/?list).
> Related discussion is
> https://
Hi Yves,
your RFS request might be more successful if you would maintain the
package inside the Debian Science team and would use the according
repository for packaging.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:14:35PM +0200, yves renier wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Se
Hi Giulio,
I missed your initial ITP but now I became aware of the package. I also
noticed that you are doing the packaging in
git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git
I'd rather recommend to join Debian Science team because it is definitely
related and you can get additional s
Hi,
just to keep you informed: I filed
http://bugs.debian.org/705580
that is responsible for the current problem. Hope this will be solved
soon.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:35:07PM +0200, melchiaros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this mornign was a change on:
>
> http://
Hi,
besides the release notes everybody can very easily do something to make
the user impression for scientific software in Wheezy even better.
Please pick the task of your choice from
http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/
and start providing screenshots for the packages. You can ea
Hi Giulio,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:22:39AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
> >git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git
> >
> > I'd rather recommend to join Debian Science team because it is definitely
> > related and you can get additional support.
>
> Jakub Wilk seems interested
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 04:09:51AM +0200, Giulio Paci wrote:
> Il 25/04/2013 08:42, Andreas Tille ha scritto:
> > The advantage of using Debian Science in your specific case would be
> > that there is some gatherer for machine readable information running on
> > this re
Hi Jakub,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:50:55PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille , 2013-04-25, 08:42:
> >It is fine if Jakub is working as sponsor - I know that he is
> >doing a great job in sponsering. However, he can perfectly do
> >this in Debian Science reposito
Hi Julien,
thanks for your work on palp as sagemath precondition. As you might
have read on debian-devel-announce[1] (subscribing this list is
mandatory and I personally would expect reading Debian Science members
to read Blends related postings) I announced a personal "Sponsoring of
Blends packa
Hi Julien,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:15:39PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
> >It is a bit sad that nobody has given a hint to palp when I was calling
> >for help for the metapackage creation[2].
>
> Well, there is already a palp in debian, outdated ; maintained (but
> mostly abandoned) by Tim Abbot
Hi Julien,
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 05:03:42PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
> >debian/control:
> > I'd regard the description as quite weak. Any package management
> > tools are not capable to browse the internet and just relying to
> > two URLs to let the potential user understand what the pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-deldir
Version : 0.0-22
Upstream Author : Rolf Turner
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/deldir/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : GNU R Delaunay
Hi,
I just learned about ths package by the latest upload. It seems that
the binary package
libroboptim-core-dev
would make a good target for a (not yet existing robotics-dev) task.
Thomas, I have no idea how comfortable you are with the Blends concept.
We try to assemble binary packages tha
Hi Thomas,
[in case you confirm that you are reading debian-science@lists.debian.org
I'll stop CCing you as per list policy,]
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:08:58PM +0900, Thomas Moulard wrote:
> yes I would like to help having a better support for Robotics in Debian.
Fine.
> Actually all the pac
Hi Olе,
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:39:23AM +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
> Andreas Tille reminded me that I should put the ITP packages into the
> appropriate Debian Blends tasks (astronomy and astronomy-dev) soon, and
> I agree that we should discuss this here on the list a bit.
+1
Hi Adrian,
I would like to package spatstat for the Debian GNU Linux distribution.
I stumbled upon it as a new dependency of R surveillance but it might be
interesting in itself for the Debian Science team that has the goal to
support scientists with a decent set of software fully included into
De
Hi Michael,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:30:41AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:42:54AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Debian invites submissions of proposals for papers, presentations,
> > discussion sessions and tutorials for its DebConf13¹ conference which
> > will take p
Hi,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> >
> >https://penta.debconf.org/penta/submission/dc13/event/989
> >
> > Because I do not have any idea whether everybody can read this:
> >
> >
> >Debian Science meeting
> >DebConf meeting of the Debian Med team
>
Hi Thomas,
I became aware of your recent commits to Debian Science repository of
some robotics related packages. I have no idea about robotics packages
but from the description it looks like this change in the tasks files
would be reasonable:
$ svn diff
Index: debian-science/tasks/robotics-dev
=
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 04:08:45PM +0900, Thomas Moulard wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> I checked out the repository to make some modifications and I have a
> couple of questions:
Thanks for checking! Those sanity checks are really welcome.
> 1. Should the WNPP field be removed when the pack
Hi Holger & Andi,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:55:47AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
> On Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> > I had a look at the debian-science alioth repository, they use a
> > subdirectory 'packages' for packaging [1].
In general I would (strongly) rec
Hi Leopold,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:45:37PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> > > 2. I think that some packages are too general to be there: Boost,
> > > Gnuplot, Octave, etc.
> > > What about removing them from the list?
> >
> > As I said I'm no robotics expert and I will not raise an
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 02:30:55PM +0900, Thomas Moulard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Leopold,
>
> Sorry for the delay, here is a patch for debian-science.
> Can you take a look at it Andreas?
I did applied the patch in SVN
Hi,
from the description I would consider libquadrule-dev as a good
candidate for the Debian Science task mathematics-dev. Mike, if you
look at the set of tasks we have assembled in Debian Science at
http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/
would you think that it might better fit into
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:13:44AM -0400, Mike Neish wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> >from the description I would consider libquadrule-dev as a good
> >candidate for the Debian Science task mathematics-dev. Mike, if you
> >look at the set of tasks we have assembled in Debian Science at
> >
> >htt
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will add it to the blend in svn.
I was faster. ;-)
Is it correct that it is only "Suggests" and not "Depends"?
Kind regards
Andreas.
> I should also add it to the list of packages to port to python3 ...
> h
Hi Mike,
thanks for the hint. It would be definitely welcome but I made the
experience that making an ITP somehow "out of thin air" without a real
need of the package mostly ends in noise inside BTS. We should find out
whether there are some users who are needing these applications and
would bec
Hi Tobias,
thanks for your effort into Sage.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 02:16:54AM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Hi debian-science,
>
> the efforts of packaging Sage [1,2] are still making good progress. We
> organized a GSoC project inside Sage where Felix Salfelder is adding
> support for buildin
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 25.07.2013 14:25, schrieb Michael Banck:
> > What to do about the compatibilty is a different matter, did this come
> > up before?
>
> looks like one hand in the debian-science team doesn't know what the other
> ha
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:55:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 26.07.2013 15:35, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > BTW, it would have been perceived even without the unfriendly tenor. In
> > case you might not know the team is maintaining a wide range of packages
>
Hi Vincent,
I'm not aware that anybody started with it but it looks interesting.
I'd recommend contacting the authors and offer the chance to become an
official Debian package by coordinating via Debian Med team.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:50:17PM +1000, Vincent McIn
Hi Ross
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 08:06:16AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I am thinking of packaging stan and rstan, and would appreciate some advice.
Nice.
> stan is a program for doing Bayesian analysis with a variant of
> hybrid/Hamiltonian monte carlo. http://mc-stan.org/ homepage;
> https://
Hi to all who were not able to enjoy DebConf,
we just had some Science BoF with some results about handling citations.
I did the summary inside the Wiki to enable further input:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Citations
There was some hint about the usage of DebTags via goplay / goscien
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:30:08PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Lame me missed the whole debconf13 in physical presence and remote
> participation in this BoF.
Shame on you! ;-)
> FWIW it is great to see that discussion was going about the issue of
> citations.
>
> From the wiki:
>
Hi Yaroslav,
we do just have the key "Debian-Package" which for instance is used in
ncbi-tools6 source d/upstream file. IMHO this exactly addresses what
you want to address with "Files". And yes, it leaves the strict
"upstream" land ... but we somehow need this.
Did I missunderstood you?
Kind
Hi Yaroslav,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:14:47AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Hi Yaroslav,
>
> > we do just have the key "Debian-Package" which for instance is used in
> > ncbi-tools6 source d/ups
Hi Simon,
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 05:09:37PM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
> Am 2013-08-23 13:39, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> >>Otherwise I'd gladly help working on a lintian module.
> >I have never written any lintian check so some kind of kickstart would
> >be great.
&
Hi Leopold,
please consider maintaining this package as well as fcl in Debian
Science team.
Kind regards and thanks for the ITP
Andreas.
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:02:30PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda"
>
Hi Leopold,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:57:44PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Of course, the git repo is created under debian-science.
Great. If you add this information (Vcs-URL) to the ITP this would be
helpful for others as well (perhaps someboy is keen on helping you ;-))
and it w
Hi Ole,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:54:36PM +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
>
> On the other hand, these data become freely available for everyone [3],
> allowing (and ecouraging) the scientific re-use by the whole
> community. Especially for scientists without direct access to the
> telescope, this i
Hi Jerome,
I assume you are maintaining this package in Debian Science team. It
would be nice to CC debian-science@lists.d.o in ITP bugs and also to
mention the version control system location of your packaging.
Kind regards and thanks for working on mplapack
Andreas.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013
Hi Ghislain,
[sorry for the delay, I'm just back from vacation]
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:19:58AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Thought I would introduce myself first before submitting anything here.
> I am a Ph.D. student in medical imaging with a special interest in
> computing and open so
Hi Ghislain,
thanks for your work on this interesting package. As somebody else just
mentioned you should have a look into the Debian Science policy how to
use the version control system of the team.
I also try to support people of Debian Science and other Blends in my
Sponsoring of Blends effor
Hi Ghislain,
thanks for the interesting ITP. I guess you are aware of the Debian
Science team and will maintain the package in its VCS. It would be
great if ITPs like this would be CCed from the beginning to
debian-science@lists.debian.org for more easy coordination.
Kind regards
Andreas
s for your advice.
>
> I'll definitely look into the debian science VCS and policy later when I
> get some more time.
>
>
> 2013/10/15 Andreas Tille
>
> > Hi Ghislain,
> >
> > thanks for your work on this interesting package. As somebody else just
&g
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:29:32PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:32:14AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Last Tip: On Debian lists you should not CC the author because it is
> > assumed that he is subscribed. I'm CCing you because I
Hi Ghislain,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:54:50PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Just a short update on this RFS,
>
> Following your advice, I have moved the package over to debian-science
> and followed the debian-science policy. It now hosted on
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-sci
Hi Ghislain,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:48:35PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Hi Andreas, I have updated the package following your comments.
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/nfft.git
I'm afraid I have some further remarks:
d/control:
- Thanks to Scott's exp
Hi Ghislain,
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:56:32PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Sorry I could not take care of that earlier, being in the middile of my
> writing-up too.
No need to sorry in those minor (< 1 week) cases.
> > d/control:
> > - Thanks to Scott's explanation I think I understood
Hi Ghislain,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:50:13PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> >
> > > > - Neat tip: You might like to check, how config modell using
> > > >cme fix dpkg-control
> > > > is formating your control file. I personally like this.
> > >
> > > not quite sure what you
Hi Leopold,
I noticed that you tried to follow my Sponsering of Blends procedure[1]
and injected some data to the robotics tasks. That's great and it is
really welcome. I always like to teach at these examples who to do this
properly and efficiently. So let me comment your changes first:
On We
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:46:36PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > - You are trying to close the ITP bug in an "historic" changelog
> > paragraph (0.12.2-Source-1). This does not work. Bugs can only
Hi Leopold,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 03:28:15PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > 2. The specified dependency should be a binary package name which
> > correlates to a binary package name in your debian/control file.
> > You specified the source package name 'ompl' - but you can
Hi Leopold,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:04:51AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > If it is helpful for you there is no rule that would forbid to keep the
> > entries. I just heard from ftpmaster that they might become distracted
> > to read irrelevant stuff and I personally like to keep
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 11:01:07PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> Hi, Boris!
> Thanks awfully :-)
>
> I've committed changes that you suggested:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-open-axiom/pkg-open-axiom.git
^^
That's not in the Debian S
Hi Pablo,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:41:31PM +0200, Pablo Oliveira wrote:
>
> I did not see this information in the Debian Sciency Policy.
> Attached is a patch proposal.
Thanks for the patch. Since nobody insisted in a time frame of ten days
I'd regard it as accepted and published the change.
301 - 400 of 2092 matches
Mail list logo
