Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Nilesh Patra]

On 6/2/22 2:37 PM, PIERRE SARAMITO wrote:

Hi Nilesh Patra,

 > From Nilesh Patra:
 > I'm a bit confused with the branches though,
 > isn't debian/sid  the branch we should be using for uploads?
 > Atleast I am seeing prev commits on that branch.
 > Please move your commits there if that's the case.

I'm sorry about that: the prev commits was on the "master" git branch,
with improvements from Rafael Laboissière  and me.
Next, new version 7.2 is on the "master" git branch also.

I don't known how to move it now on the "debian/sid" one:


Please prune debian/sid then. Causes less confusion, or if you want
it, document it somewhere.


Is it possible to use the "master" branch instead for uploading ?


Uploaded.

--
Best,
Nilesh

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[PIERRE SARAMITO]

Hi Nilesh Patra, 

> From Nilesh Patra: 
> I'm a bit confused with the branches though, 
> isn't debian/sid the branch we should be using for uploads? 
> Atleast I am seeing prev commits on that branch. 
> Please move your commits there if that's the case. 

I'm sorry about that: the prev commits was on the "master" git branch, 
with improvements from Rafael Laboissière  and me. 
Next, new version 7.2 is on the "master" git branch also. 

I don't known how to move it now on the "debian/sid" one: 
a git merge will perhaps now lead to a lot of conflicts ? 
Is it possible to use the "master" branch instead for uploading ? 
I don't known wich is the best solution. 

Many thanks for your help, 

Pierre 
-- 
pierre.saram...@imag.fr 
Directeur de Recherche CNRS 
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France 
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito 


De: "Nilesh Patra"  
À: "PIERRE SARAMITO" , "Andreas Tille" 
, "debian-science" , 
"1007118" <1007...@bugs.debian.org>, "984965" <984...@bugs.debian.org>, "bunk" 
, "byang" , "rafael"  
Envoyé: Jeudi 2 Juin 2022 09:38:28 
Objet: Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef 
package 

On 2 June 2022 11:57:38 am IST, PIERRE SARAMITO  
wrote: 
>I just commit with git a new release 7.2-1 of the debianization of the rheolef 
>package. 
>This corresponds to a new version 7.2 of the upstream package 
> 
>Could you please upload it in debian ? 

I can do it later today. 

I'm a bit confused with the branches though, isn't debian/sid the branch we 
should be using for uploads? 
Atleast I am seeing prev commits on that branch. 
Please move your commits there if that's the case. 


-- 
Best, 
Nilesh 

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Nilesh Patra]

On 2 June 2022 11:57:38 am IST, PIERRE SARAMITO  wrote:
>I just commit with git a new release 7.2-1 of the debianization of the rheolef 
>package. 
>This corresponds to a new version 7.2 of the upstream package
>
>Could you please upload it in debian ? 

I can do it later today.

I'm a bit confused with the branches though, isn't debian/sid the branch we 
should be using for uploads?
Atleast I am seeing prev commits on that branch.
Please move your commits there if that's the case.


--
Best,
Nilesh

HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[PIERRE SARAMITO]

Hi all Debian Maintainers, 

I just commit with git a new release 7.2-1 of the debianization of the rheolef 
package. 
This corresponds to a new version 7.2 of the upstream package: 

https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef 

This version closes the two pending outstanding bugs: #1007118 and #984965 
The upstream version 7.2 integrates some patches 
thanks to Nilesh Patra  
The debianization version 7.2-1 integrates various improvements 
thanks to Raphael Laboissiere  

Could you please upload it in debian ? 

Many thanks for your help. 

Best wishes, 

Pierre 
-- 
pierre.saram...@imag.fr 
Directeur de Recherche CNRS 
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France 
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito 

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Anton Gladky]

Hi Pierre,

I have sponsored your package.

Please consider the migration to compat-level 12. 10 is outdated.

Best regards

Anton

Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 18:43 Uhr schrieb Anton Gladky :
>
> I think I sponsored this package some time ago and I will try to have
> a look again.
>
> Anton
>
> Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Pierre Saramito
> :
> >
> > Hi Andreas Tille,
> >
> > > From Andreas:
> > > Currently I can only support Covid-19 related
> > > packages (which we try to assemble in Debian Med team currently)
> >
> > Let me known if I could help the Debian Med team ?
> > I remain "confined" at home, but I could help (test pkg, ect) ?
> >
> >
> > > please find some other sponsor from Debian Science project.
> >
> > Is there somebody from the Debian science project
> > to just help me for uploading the Rheolef-7.1-1 pkg ?
> > The debianization is ready and well-tested at
> >https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef
> > It closes the two FTBFS bugs: #944197 and #946116
> >
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> > --
> > pierre.saram...@imag.fr
> > Directeur de Recherche CNRS
> > Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
> > http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito
> >

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Anton Gladky]

I think I sponsored this package some time ago and I will try to have
a look again.

Anton

Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 18:33 Uhr schrieb Pierre Saramito
:
>
> Hi Andreas Tille,
>
> > From Andreas:
> > Currently I can only support Covid-19 related
> > packages (which we try to assemble in Debian Med team currently)
>
> Let me known if I could help the Debian Med team ?
> I remain "confined" at home, but I could help (test pkg, ect) ?
>
>
> > please find some other sponsor from Debian Science project.
>
> Is there somebody from the Debian science project
> to just help me for uploading the Rheolef-7.1-1 pkg ?
> The debianization is ready and well-tested at
>https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef
> It closes the two FTBFS bugs: #944197 and #946116
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Pierre
>
> --
> pierre.saram...@imag.fr
> Directeur de Recherche CNRS
> Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
> http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito
>

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Pierre Saramito]

Hi Andreas Tille,


From Andreas:
Currently I can only support Covid-19 related
packages (which we try to assemble in Debian Med team currently)


Let me known if I could help the Debian Med team ?
I remain "confined" at home, but I could help (test pkg, ect) ?



please find some other sponsor from Debian Science project.


Is there somebody from the Debian science project
to just help me for uploading the Rheolef-7.1-1 pkg ?
The debianization is ready and well-tested at
  https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef
It closes the two FTBFS bugs: #944197 and #946116


Best wishes,

Pierre

--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Pierre,

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:24:13PM +, Pierre Saramito wrote:
> 
> Let me known if I could help the Debian Med team ?
> I remain "confined" at home, but I could help (test pkg, ect) ?

We'll about to post an announcement for the upcomming
virtual COVID-19 hackathon.

I admit I could definitely help to package streamlit[1].
I do not even have an idea how to start with this package.

Kind regards

   Andreas.
 

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/streamlit 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Pierre,

sorry, I'm flooded with work - please find some other sponsor from
Debian Science project.  Currently I can only support Covid-19 related
packages (which we try to assemble in Debian Med team currently)

Thanks a lot for your understanding

   Andreas.

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 10:47:14AM +0100, Pierre Saramito wrote:
> Hi Andreas, 
> 
> I just commit with git a new release 7.1-1 of the debianisation of the 
> rheolef package. 
> This corresponds to a new version 7.1 of the upstream package: 
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef 
> 
> This version closes the two pending FTBFS bugs: #944197 and #946116 
> 
> Could you please upload it in debian ? 
> 
> Many thanks for your help. 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> Pierre 
> -- 
> pierre.saram...@imag.fr 
> Directeur de Recherche CNRS 
> Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France 
> http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Pierre Saramito]

Hi Andreas, 

I just commit with git a new release 7.1-1 of the debianisation of the rheolef 
package. 
This corresponds to a new version 7.1 of the upstream package: 

https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef 

This version closes the two pending FTBFS bugs: #944197 and #946116 

Could you please upload it in debian ? 

Many thanks for your help. 

Best regards, 

Pierre 
-- 
pierre.saram...@imag.fr 
Directeur de Recherche CNRS 
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France 
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito 

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Sébastien Villemot]

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:00:33PM +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote:

> Are the debianization files ready for an upload in Debian ?

I made a few more changes (pushed to the git repository), and uploaded the
result.

Note that there is still a rather important issue that needs to be fixed in the
next upload: librheolef.so.1.0.0 is underlinked (it looks like it's missing a
link to boost and/or standard C++ library, maybe more). I get these messages:

dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol 
_ZSt2wsIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_istreamIT_T0_ES6_ used by 
debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found in none 
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol _ZTISt13runtime_error used by 
debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found in none 
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol _ZNSolsEs used by 
debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found in none 
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol __cxa_free_exception used by 
debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found in none 
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol 
_ZTTNSt7__cxx1119basic_ostringstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE used by 
debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found in none 
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol 
_ZSt5flushIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_ used by 
debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found in none 
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol 
_ZN5boost13serialization13typeid_system27extended_type_info_typeid_015type_unregisterEv
 used by debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found 
in none of the
libraries   
   
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol 
_ZNK5boost3mpi12communicatorcvP19ompi_communicator_tEv used by 
debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found in none 
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol 
_ZSt7getlineIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEERSt13basic_istreamIT_T0_ES7_RNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIS4_S5_T1_EES4_
 used by debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 f
ound in none of the libraries   
   
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol _ZN5boost7archive6detail14basic_oarchiveC2Ej 
used by debian/librheolef1/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librheolef.so.1.0.0 found 
in none of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: 218 other similar warnings have been skipped (use -v 
to see them all) 


Thanks for your contribution.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄  http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Pierre Saramito]

Dear Sebastien,


> Sorry, there is already a stanza for these files, but you need to add
> config/dmalloc_return.h which is not listed there.

Ok, I've added this file in d/copyright



> Also, I tried to build the package, and got these lintian errors/messages 
> that should be fixed:
>  E: rheolef source: malformed-override Possibly wrong package in override at 
> line 10 (got librheolef-dev, expected rheolef)
>  I: rheolef source: vcs-field-not-canonical 
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef.git 
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef
>  I: rheolef source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in 
> package rheolef


The "E" is fixed: now d/source/lintian-overrides has the right file format.
The first "I" is also fixed, by removing the .git suffix, tganks to your advice
For the last "I", I really don't understand the message... have an idea ?
It seems it is neither and error nor a warning in lintian.

Now lintian issues a warning:
   W: librheolef-dev: manpage-section-mismatch 
usr/share/man/man7/index_set.7rheolef.gz:8 7rheolef != 7
but I really do not know what to to (all unix man pages are automatically 
extracted from comments in source files). 
Perhaps a fix will be possible in the upstream source for a next version.

Are the debianization files ready for an upload in Debian ?

Many thanks for yours advices and help,

Pierre
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito


(for the latter, you should basically drop the .git suffix from Vcs-Browser in 
debian/control)

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄  http://www.debian.org

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Sébastien Villemot]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> - there are files under Copyright 2000 Gray Watson and under the NTP license,
>   not mentioned in debian/copyright:
> config/dmalloc_return.h
> util/dmallocxx/conf.h
> util/dmallocxx/dmallocc.cc
> util/dmallocxx/return.h
> util/dmallocxx/settings.h

Sorry, there is already a stanza for these files, but you need to add
config/dmalloc_return.h which is not listed there.


Also, I tried to build the package, and got these lintian errors/messages that
should be fixed:

E: rheolef source: malformed-override Possibly wrong package in override at 
line 10 (got librheolef-dev, expected rheolef)
I: rheolef source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in 
package rheolef
I: rheolef source: vcs-field-not-canonical 
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef.git 
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef

(for the latter, you should basically drop the .git suffix from Vcs-Browser in 
debian/control)

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄  http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Sébastien Villemot]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:18:28PM +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote:

> > In this precise case, this file looks incorect: it states that most of the 
> > code
> > is GPL-3 (only) and that utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1 (only). But these two
> > licenses are incompatible!
> > Looking at the source code, it looks like utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1+ (note 
> > the
> > plus, which means v2.1 *or later*), which solves the problem.
> 
> Hum... I am not very fluent with this subject!
> I've just added a + after LGPL-2.1 for utils/bamg in debian/copyright
> and enter "git push" : is it fixed now ?
> 
> 
> > Also, it could not figure if the rest of the code is GPL-2+ or GPL-3+ (the 
> > README file says
> > GPL-2+, but the COPYING file says GPL-3+).
> 
> The upstream source code has updated the COPYING file to GPL-3+ while, in the 
> header
> of some individual files, there is some previous text still indicating GPL-2+.
> It will fixed later in the upstream. 
> Is it a problem for uploading the new 7.0 upstream version in Debian ?

Since GPL-3 is implied by GPL-2+, this is not by itself a problem (no need to
make a new upstream release).

Still, the debian/copyright file is not yet correct:

- the description of the various licenses is not complete, you must copy/paste
  the whole licensing terms (short of what is already in /u/s/common-licenses).
  See for example what is done here for GPL-2+:
   https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#examples

- there are files under Copyright 2000 Gray Watson and under the NTP license,
  not mentioned in debian/copyright:
config/dmalloc_return.h
util/dmallocxx/conf.h
util/dmallocxx/dmallocc.cc
util/dmallocxx/return.h
util/dmallocxx/settings.h

- similarly, config/install-sh is under the Expat license. I think that's all
  for the missing files, though I did a very superficial check.

- for the rest of the software, and debian/*, why not using GPL-3+ instead of
  GPL-3?

- moreover, you could use a separate license paragraph for the latter two, to
  avoid duplicating license information

I could do the above changes myself, though I would prefer you do them. Let me
know. In any case, the copyright file is a very important one (maybe the most
important one), so great care should be given to ensure it is accurate.

Note that you can also use "cme fix dpkg-copyright" from
libconfig-model-dpkg-perl once you are finish, to fix some
automatically-fixable mistakes.

Best,

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄  http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Pierre Saramito]

Dear Sebastien,

> In this precise case, this file looks incorect: it states that most of the 
> code
> is GPL-3 (only) and that utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1 (only). But these two
> licenses are incompatible!
> Looking at the source code, it looks like utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1+ (note the
> plus, which means v2.1 *or later*), which solves the problem.

Hum... I am not very fluent with this subject!
I've just added a + after LGPL-2.1 for utils/bamg in debian/copyright
and enter "git push" : is it fixed now ?


> Also, it could not figure if the rest of the code is GPL-2+ or GPL-3+ (the 
> README file says
> GPL-2+, but the COPYING file says GPL-3+).

The upstream source code has updated the COPYING file to GPL-3+ while, in the 
header
of some individual files, there is some previous text still indicating GPL-2+.
It will fixed later in the upstream. 
Is it a problem for uploading the new 7.0 upstream version in Debian ?

Many thanks for your help,

Pierre
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito

- Mail original -
De: "Sébastien Villemot" 
À: "debian-science" 
Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Mars 2018 15:51:41
Objet: Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef 
package

Dear Pierre,

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:42:27PM +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote:

> I've just update the upstream branch and merge it into master.
> The repository should now contains the 7.0 version.
> Is there something else to do for the new 7.0 version in Debian ?

As with every new upstream release, you should verify that the debian/copyright
file is up-to-date.

In this precise case, this file looks incorect: it states that most of the code
is GPL-3 (only) and that utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1 (only). But these two
licenses are incompatible!

Looking at the source code, it looks like utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1+ (note the
plus, which means v2.1 *or later*), which solves the problem. Also, it could
not figure if the rest of the code is GPL-2+ or GPL-3+ (the README file says
GPL-2+, but the COPYING file says GPL-3+).

You can find the reference documentation for the machine-readable format of
debian/copyright at the following place:

 https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/

Best,

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄  http://www.debian.org

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Sébastien Villemot]

Dear Pierre,

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:42:27PM +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote:

> I've just update the upstream branch and merge it into master.
> The repository should now contains the 7.0 version.
> Is there something else to do for the new 7.0 version in Debian ?

As with every new upstream release, you should verify that the debian/copyright
file is up-to-date.

In this precise case, this file looks incorect: it states that most of the code
is GPL-3 (only) and that utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1 (only). But these two
licenses are incompatible!

Looking at the source code, it looks like utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1+ (note the
plus, which means v2.1 *or later*), which solves the problem. Also, it could
not figure if the rest of the code is GPL-2+ or GPL-3+ (the README file says
GPL-2+, but the COPYING file says GPL-3+).

You can find the reference documentation for the machine-readable format of
debian/copyright at the following place:

 https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/

Best,

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄  http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Pierre Saramito]

Dear Sebastien,

I've just update the upstream branch and merge it into master.
The repository should now contains the 7.0 version.
Is there something else to do for the new 7.0 version in Debian ?

Many thanks for your help,

Pierre
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito

- Mail original -
De: "Sébastien Villemot" 
À: "debian-science" 
Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Mars 2018 12:00:38
Objet: Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef 
package

Dear Pierre,

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:02:54AM +0100, Pierre Saramito wrote:

> I just commit with git a new release 7.0-1 of the debianisation of the 
> rheolef package:
> this corresponds to a new version 7.0 of the upstream package:
>   http://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito/rheolef/rheolef-7.0.tar.gz
> 
> Could you please upload it in debian ?

It looks like you forgot to update the upstream branch (and merge it into
master). The repository still contains source for rheolef 6.7.

Basically you need to do the following:

$ gbp import-orig --pristine-tar $TARBALL
$ git push --all
$ git push --tags

where $TARBALL is the upstream source tarball.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄  http://www.debian.org

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Sébastien Villemot]

Dear Pierre,

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:02:54AM +0100, Pierre Saramito wrote:

> I just commit with git a new release 7.0-1 of the debianisation of the 
> rheolef package:
> this corresponds to a new version 7.0 of the upstream package:
>   http://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito/rheolef/rheolef-7.0.tar.gz
> 
> Could you please upload it in debian ?

It looks like you forgot to update the upstream branch (and merge it into
master). The repository still contains source for rheolef 6.7.

Basically you need to do the following:

$ gbp import-orig --pristine-tar $TARBALL
$ git push --all
$ git push --tags

where $TARBALL is the upstream source tarball.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄  http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

[Pierre Saramito]

Hi Andreas,

I just commit with git a new release 7.0-1 of the debianisation of the rheolef 
package:
this corresponds to a new version 7.0 of the upstream package:
  http://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito/rheolef/rheolef-7.0.tar.gz

Could you please upload it in debian ?

Many thanks for your help.

Best regards,

Pierre
--
pierre.saram...@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito