Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Andreas,
Le mercredi 29 novembre 2023 à 10:06 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Am Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 01:40:22AM +0200 schrieb Sébastien Villemot:
> > Le lundi 10 juillet 2023 à 22:01 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > > I've checked my
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
Am Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 01:40:22AM +0200 schrieb Sébastien Villemot:
> Le lundi 10 juillet 2023 à 22:01 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > I've checked my responsibility for the dependencies and stumbled about
> > emmax
> >
> >
> > emmax.c:10:10: fatal error:
gt; Since the present thread seems to indicate that there to be a consensus
> towards removing atlas from Debian, I am going to move forward.
Thanks to those who gave me feedback.
I went ahead and reported the bugs, here is the list:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=atlas
Hi,
Le dimanche 05 novembre 2023 à 21:49 -0500, Mo Zhou a écrit :
> The following line is what I use for the PyTorch package (ignore the
> fact that I forgot to bump the BLIS abi from 3 to 4):
>
> Recommends: libopenblas0 | libblis3 | libatlas3-base | libmkl-rt | libblas3
>
> So the latest
.
Since the present thread seems to indicate that there to be a consensus
towards removing atlas from Debian, I am going to move forward.
Please find below a bug report template, which I plan to use for
reporting bugs against the ~20 packages that currently have a (build-
)dependency against atlas
that there to be a consensus
towards removing atlas from Debian, I am going to move forward.
Please find below a bug report template, which I plan to use for
reporting bugs against the ~20 packages that currently have a (build-
)dependency against atlas. Feedback is welcome.
...
As a consequence, please drop
Le samedi 08 juillet 2023 à 10:01 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> As the maintainer of the atlas package over the last decade, I now
> wonder whether we should remove it from the archive.
Since the present thread seems to indicate that there to be a consensus
towards removing atla
* M. Zhou [2023-07-17 12:05]:
On Fri, 2023-07-14 at 01:51 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Your fix looks good. Note that an even better fix is to simply Build-
Depend on libblas-dev. Linking against an optimized BLAS does not
really help at build time, because since all variants are ABI
On Fri, 2023-07-14 at 01:51 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> Your fix looks good. Note that an even better fix is to simply Build-
> Depend on libblas-dev. Linking against an optimized BLAS does not
> really help at build time, because since all variants are ABI
> compatible and use the same
Nilesh Patra writes:
> You can send patches via BTS, if you don't want to create a salsa
> account. BTS is the standard way of filing/reacting to bug reports.
Sure, I know and approve of the email BTS, but it doesn't help for
contributing. I'm happy to have a salsa account, as I did alioth(?),
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> (I'd contribute to Debian packaging if it didn't require an account on
> salsa, which requires Recaptcha.)
You can send patches via BTS, if you don't want to create a salsa
account. BTS is the standard way of filing/reacting to bug
Rafael Laboissière writes:
> * Sébastien Villemot [2023-07-08 10:01]:
>
>> As the maintainer of the atlas package over the last decade, I now
>> wonder whether we should remove it from the archive.
I'd say definitely. I don't know of any value in atlas these days.
I'm not a Debian
Le mercredi 12 juillet 2023 à 15:34 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit :
> * Sébastien Villemot [2023-07-08 10:01]:
>
> > As the maintainer of the atlas package over the last decade, I now
> > wonder whether we should remove it from the archive.
[…]
> Thanks for starting this discussion and
Le mercredi 12 juillet 2023 à 16:05 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:34:09PM +0200 schrieb Rafael Laboissière:
> > When generating the C++ code, the xmds tool tries to link against
> > libcblas.so, which, currently, only exists in the libatlas-base-dev package.
>
> I
Le lundi 10 juillet 2023 à 22:01 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Sébastian,
>
> Am Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:01:15AM +0200 schrieb Sébastien Villemot:
> >
> > So, given all that, I’m inclined to (try to) remove atlas during the
> > trixie development cycle.
>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> > Any
Hi Rafael,
Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:34:09PM +0200 schrieb Rafael Laboissière:
> When generating the C++ code, the xmds tool tries to link against
> libcblas.so, which, currently, only exists in the libatlas-base-dev package.
I admit this is actually the reason why any of the packages I'm
* Sébastien Villemot [2023-07-08 10:01]:
As the maintainer of the atlas package over the last decade, I now
wonder whether we should remove it from the archive.
As a reminder, ATLAS is an optimized BLAS implementation, that fits
into our BLAS/LAPACK alternatives framework.¹ Its strategy for
ou can reach upstream it would be great if you could ping
them somehow.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> Best,
> Steffen
>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 10. Juli 2023 um 22:01 Uhr
> > Von: "Andreas Tille"
> > An: debian-science@lists.debian.org
> > Betreff: Re: Removing
.
Best,
Steffen
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. Juli 2023 um 22:01 Uhr
> Von: "Andreas Tille"
> An: debian-science@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Removing ATLAS?
>
> Hi Sébastian,
>
> Am Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:01:15AM +0200 schrieb Sébastien Villemot:
> >
>
Hi Sébastian,
Am Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:01:15AM +0200 schrieb Sébastien Villemot:
>
> So, given all that, I’m inclined to (try to) remove atlas during the
> trixie development cycle.
Sounds reasonable.
> Any thought on this?
I've checked my responsibility for the dependencies and stumbled
I agree. The usage of ATLAS is more suitable for source based distros
like Gentoo. Plus, according to my past benchmarks, ATLAS, even if
compiled locally with -march=native flags, still falls behind OpenBLAS
and BLIS in terms of performance.
Both OpenBLAS and BLIS are still healthy, actively
Hi,
As the maintainer of the atlas package over the last decade, I now
wonder whether we should remove it from the archive.
As a reminder, ATLAS is an optimized BLAS implementation, that fits
into our BLAS/LAPACK alternatives framework.¹ Its strategy for
achieving good performance is to adjust
22 matches
Mail list logo
