Bug#894494: singular: FTBFS: coeffs_test fails on arm*, mips* and s390x architecture

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: singular
Version: 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: FTBFS

It appears that coeffs_test fails on most of official architectures:
the issue was reported to upstream: 
https://github.com/Singular/Sources/issues/862

Thanks,
Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Stretch*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages singular depends on:
ii  singular-data 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5
ii  singular-modules  1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5
ii  singular-ui   1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5

singular recommends no packages.

singular suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Accepted singular 1:4.1.1-p1+ds-1 (source) into experimental

[Jerome Benoit]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:20:12 +
Source: singular
Binary: singular libsingular4 libsingular4-dev libsingular4-dev-common 
singular-modules singular-data singular-ui singular-ui-emacs singular-ui-xterm 
singular-doc singular-dev-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1:4.1.1-p1+ds-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 
<debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Description:
 libsingular4 - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- library 
pa
 libsingular4-dev - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- 
developmen
 libsingular4-dev-common - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations 
-- common dev
 singular   - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations
 singular-data - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- shared 
dat
 singular-dev-doc - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- 
developer
 singular-doc - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- user 
docum
 singular-modules - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- 
module pac
 singular-ui - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- console us
 singular-ui-emacs - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- 
emacs user
 singular-ui-xterm - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations -- 
xterm user
Changes:
 singular (1:4.1.1-p1+ds-1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version.
   * Debianization:
 - debian/copyright:
   - Format field, secure;
   - copyright year tuples, refresh;
   - Files-Excluded field, update;
 - debian/control:
   - debhelper, bump to 11;
   - Standards Version, bump to 4.1.3 (no change);
   - Vcs-* fields, migrate to Salsa;
 - debian/rules:
   - get-orig-source target, compression option, move to d/watch ;
 - debian/patches/*:
   - d/p/debianization-4ti2.patch , obsoleted by upstream;
   - update;
 - debian/watch:
   - compression option, add.
Checksums-Sha1:
 7a737c36e6037ae23d324b547f54d3a7e6ff924d 3564 singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.dsc
 d0766a159a82c2466d0c34035f53ee12aa301678 10521012 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds.orig.tar.xz
 ce3c27b142261c16ed3ac805c8676f6725c8c480 21552 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz
 4ab68f032f6deafaa3e5a7542b80126c33956267 9266 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 43e7f47bbe846e5667b0a9ab555db314b0aeb531fd9ab3c33f23f70d7f7c363c 3564 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.dsc
 b6ae3d884aa4c4039195e26c71a80033785603037064e9bb7a27e2dd775b560e 10521012 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds.orig.tar.xz
 8f6c1a4c0eb449d0bea943af8ce99dbe913f8e6e593520e6116e574c823ec004 21552 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz
 a1770b31247b57adbc8631281cdaa52237d41402347ff5c06560355619a0391f 9266 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 23b3835fcc1087cd87a61e8c01fcf939 3564 math optional singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.dsc
 3d88031880ab6712060d448cdfff3f9b 10521012 math optional 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds.orig.tar.xz
 3e89be8ed3f9237c1790757780bb51da 21552 math optional 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz
 f3838072c88202e1df3fbb356c818899 9266 math optional 
singular_4.1.1-p1+ds-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=RxvW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mail

Bug#888560: mpfi dependencies inconsistency

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hello Tobias, thanks for the hint. I have just upload a corrected version. 
Jerome

On 27/01/18 17:19, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 01/27/2018 01:41 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello Vincent, thanks for your bugreport.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27/01/18 06:31, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> Package: src:mpfi
>>> Version: 1.5.3+ds-1
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Justification: Policy 7.2
>>>
>>> The current libmpfi-dev version is 1.5.3+ds-1+b1, which has:
>>>
>>> Depends: libmpfi0 (= 1.5.3+ds-1+b1), libmpfi-dev-common (= 1.5.3+ds-1), 
>>> libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev
>>>
>>> but libmpfi-dev-common 1.5.3+ds-1 has:
>>>
>>> Recommends: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.3+ds-1)
>>>
>>> This is inconsistent.
>> This true.
>>
>> Do you have any idea from where comes the +b1 ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jerome
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the +b1 was appended to the binary version for the rebuild against libmpfr6. 
> This is a matter of using (=${binary:Version}) vs. (=${source:Version}) in 
> debian/control.
> 
> Best,
> Tobias
> 

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#888560: mpfi dependencies inconsistency

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hello Vincent, thanks for your bugreport.



On 27/01/18 06:31, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: src:mpfi
> Version: 1.5.3+ds-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 7.2
> 
> The current libmpfi-dev version is 1.5.3+ds-1+b1, which has:
> 
> Depends: libmpfi0 (= 1.5.3+ds-1+b1), libmpfi-dev-common (= 1.5.3+ds-1), 
> libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev
> 
> but libmpfi-dev-common 1.5.3+ds-1 has:
> 
> Recommends: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.3+ds-1)
> 
> This is inconsistent.

This true.

Do you have any idea from where comes the +b1 ?

Thanks,
Jerome

> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: buster/sid
>   APT prefers unstable-debug
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 
> 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=POSIX 
> (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
> 
> libmpfi-dev-common depends on no packages.
> 
> Versions of packages libmpfi-dev-common recommends:
> ii  libmpfi-dev  1.5.3+ds-1
> 
> libmpfi-dev-common suggests no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#881869: FTBFS: recipe for target 'test-/5x5PF.diff' failed

[Jerome BENOIT]

Dear Aaron M. Ucko, thanks for your report.

I have already filled an issue about it:
https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/issues/161

I hope it will be fixed quickly.

Cheers,
Jerome

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#881678: primesieve: FTBFS: __atomic_fetch_add_8 undefined

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hi, thanks for your report.

On 14/11/17 05:19, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Source: primesieve
> Version: 6.2+ds-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> 
> Builds of primesieve for armel, mips, mipsel, and the non-release
> architectures m68k, powerpc, powerpcspe, and sh4 have started failing:
> 
>   libprimesieve.so.8.2.0: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8'
>   collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> On these architectures, you should be able to find this symbol in
> libatomic.  I'd suggest linking with -Wl,--as-needed -latomic
> everywhere so that you don't have to special-case any platforms or get
> formal dependencies on libatomic on the platforms that don't need it
> here.
> 
> Could you please take a look?

I have already discussed this matter with the upstream maintainer.
He was kind enough to react quickly: he released a version which
fixes the bugs observed on the 32bits arch and the atomic bugs.
I scheduled to package it next Friday (my next spare time dedicated to Debian).

Cheers,
Jerome

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
> http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
> 

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#877210: normaliz FTBFS on i386/armhf: Some error in the normaliz input data detected: Error while reading grading (a 1x2 matrix) !

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hello Folks,

it appears that the latest version also shows up issues on i386 arch.
An issue ticket has been emitted: 
https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/issues/156 .

Thanks, Jerome


-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: primesieve needs new maintainer?!

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hello  All, and Kim,
primesieve does need a new maintainer:
I will work on it soon: it is the second package to refresh on my top list.
I have first to deals with normaliz on which depends SageMath.

Thanks for your patience,
Jerome

On 06/11/17 12:53, Kim Walisch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am the author of the primesieve C/C++ library (math tool for finding
> prime numbers). The version offered by Debian is 5.7.2 (15 months
> old) while the most recent version is 6.2. I would be happy if the
> primesieve package in Debian was updated to the latest version.
> 
> Up until now Jerome BENOIT was primesieve's maintainer but he
> told me about 6 months ago that he is very busy due to a new job
> and my last contact attempt 9 days ago failed.
> 
> As mentioned before primesieve is a C/C++ based library which now
> uses cmake as its build system. I have also created the GitHub repo
> https://github.com/kimwalisch/primesieve-debian which contains the
> code required to package primesieve-6.2 for debian. So there is only
> little work required to package primesieve-6.2.
> 
> Please get in touch with me if you are willing to take over primesieve
> maintainership.
> 
> Best regards,
> Kim

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#877210: normaliz FTBFS on i386/armhf: Some error in the normaliz input data detected: Error while reading grading (a 1x2 matrix) !

[Jerome BENOIT]

Dear bunk, thanks for your report.
I have just realized that d/watch is obsolete and that normaliz has evolved a 
lot
since the last packaging. I am on my way to package the latest version (3.4.0).
So, let see what will happen with this new version.
Thanks, Jerome

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#872561: sollya: FTBFS on armhf arch

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: sollya
Version: 6.0+ds-2
Severity: important

Dear All,

it appears that Sollya failed two library tests at build time on the 
armhf architecture.

Thanks,
Jerome



-- System Information:
Debian Release: Stretch*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.30-0211-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages sollya depends on:
ii  libc6   2.24-11+deb9u1
ii  libfplll2   5.0.3-1
ii  libgmp102:6.1.2+dfsg-1
ii  libmpfi01.5.1+ds-4
ii  libmpfr43.1.5-1
ii  libsollya6  6.0+ds-1
ii  libstdc++6  6.3.0-18
ii  libxml2 2.9.4+dfsg1-2.2

Versions of packages sollya recommends:
ii  gnuplot  5.0.5+dfsg1-6+deb9u1
ii  rlwrap   0.42-3

Versions of packages sollya suggests:
ii  libsollya-dev  6.0+ds-1
ii  sollya-doc 6.0+ds-1

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: request to package: graph-tool

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hi, it looks as a very good idea, indeed .

On 10/08/17 08:13, Alexandre Hannud Abdo wrote:
> Ni!
> 
> Hello Debian science maintainers,
> 
> I am quite new to Debian packaging, but I'd like to help see the graph-
> tool[1] scientific library packaged for Debian.
> 
> [1] http://graph-tool.skewed.de/
> 
> The main developper of the package already provides his own repo[2],
> which I checked and as far as I understand it seems to be done in the
> proper manner, providing a source package and using 3.0 (quilt).
> 
> [2] http://downloads.skewed.de/apt/


Where is the source Debian ball ?


> 
> There seem to be a few things missing, such as some fields in the
> debian/copyright file, an obnoxious name in the author fields there -
> "root" - even though his email is correct and his name does show up in
> other places, a choice of 'python' for section instead of 'science' in
> debian/control, and default README.{debian,source}. Also, as it's
> currently found in his own repo, he lists himself as maintainer.
> 
> Can you please let me know if this is good enough for you to move
> forward with it, or if there is any work in which I could help out?
> Such as, for example, fixing the aforementioned missing details.

Have you already created and/maintained any Debian package ?

> 
> I commit myself to work with him to provide whatever is most convenient
> for you to package it, now and in the foreseeable future.

You may first fill either an RFP [1] or ITP [2], then act accordingly. 

Thanks,
Jerome

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/RFP
[2] https://wiki.debian.org/ITP
> 
> Thank you so much, and cheers from Debconf (:
> 
> ale
> .~´
> 
> 

-- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#870698: libfplll-dev: FPLLL_DEFAULT_STRATEGY[|_PATH] must be encoded in /u/i/fplll/fplll_config.h

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: libfplll-dev
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer.

It appeares that the strategies default path and file is set up via the 
macros
FPLLL_DEFAULT_STRATEGY[_PATH|] in fplll/Makefile.am .

This set up affect fplll only at building time via the fplll/defs.h 
header which
distributed within libfplll-dev . Therefrom, any software built against 
libfplll3
will have as strategies default path and file the default ones set up in
fplll/defs.h , namely, an empty string.

The best option may be to set the macro in the fplll/config_fplll.h 
which is
distributed and included by fplll/def.h . Accordingly, it is an 
upstream issue.

Best whishes,
Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Stretch*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.30-0211-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages libfplll-dev depends on:
ii  libfplll35.1.0-2
ii  libgmp-dev   2:6.1.2+dfsg-1
ii  libmpfr-dev  3.1.5-1

libfplll-dev recommends no packages.

libfplll-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#863919: Acknowledgement (sympow segfaults with basic input)

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Ximin, thanks for your report.

Do you meant that the issue happens on Stretch ?
I ask because I thought it happens on experimental and because the CI test does 
not currently fail.

Thanks,
Jerome 

On 02/06/17 14:34, Ximin Luo wrote:
> BTW the stretch release date is soon:
> 
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/05/msg2.html
> 
> The deadline for fixing this is June 9th and you'll need to file an unblock 
> request, asking them to reduce the default migration time of 10 days.
> 
> I'm not sure if this bug warrants raising the severity to grave, but please 
> do that if appropriate.
> 
> X
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=0Msq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#860664: primesieve: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: make -j64 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello, unfortunately I cannot reproduce the issue on the Debian porter barriere.
I am on my way to ask to the uptream maintainer.
Thanks, Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJY+wh4AAoJED+SGaZ/NsaLSsAf/3+6IEoFEFJwG2aqE2VKv2Z8
71sm1lmWkbmfRiCfo94OoGaanAH+jnEMIVuoc53WVhUVKv+eILh1lWV98EB1iaJ8
DhAPTqpWsadtqknvfdGDtVRwuLZTZMcPowODW2RoH9NQ52EEMhRNjnC3UipBONth
q6f4Qx28edJPQMm5Vuz4hg1Zo05LeKVa3h1ARdonKqIFeP/ZnMKDESXODipCfWVp
eRnxVzXfwsbhQ+QdJBljpOobNviKpiD6xn8UhSQsy3hIifJsRKrleZbAgOrOTUrJ
S/kSDqBQBMn+JPx4qcdvlewETnovalQwnr3q7Pf+FSzIudw3vL6nyaeE8oR3Vct0
2PYx/QN6mXsMYc0C7HRf1RC416NKxVxdt8MEbyJ7eKst1Qn9f6aywbPAEdC+jbEw
yywaAPLZ/vkzz4163aD5h3yZFl7v57kQpZsC70YjntYt3TwZZ67UoUKxl825lu3e
7aWrYVsn4iMiY88wv0u5C9+ovNHmWkEXbfvFfc1i4FMF8qNgBAJHKxolkYDtXtMn
i1LU1T/fg9BO24nczoP9GdwowTnW7A2iQXzd2RH4aGORwfrvuqyXCTVEEDofFEXm
XYL8Zk/aAgLe4R/YmUVNtQ9cBMdKjaXszVkw2CZx3EFnAX/dTOEPm11rlys1LSmw
gS3OIX9orJAGAOu6NWsIvUQlNaiLg7Bs2/7K3jB2U+5NL+8AcMqWJd+Lx1lEkTvA
A40oOhfgqdGcP5DIKCxa42NahPJmUym+TeVa5oSh8r3KJlT409AD4L1kObWBn7vf
ePYtoF9o3qM2tzYDMXPP8EMMBHaw2uc7bvOU715KwJQEzPBnOtZW5bCocIZgMtr9
CFH+3M87kVbaqaCWciJ+DQAAanXiiJP1tr6QTGsgQqU0+1tBWf6i6KA48iPmvaFA
F5KKP+4of2v7HfR7OwtTT/mRlb7UqT23RowzPgIrodzz1w8ce6mwCjrOslQxVyM8
zjeo2tI0mqrFqCS3VpPTdZpt4HV5GpX8hkyld1ObtOm1nBSJX3pG8g2xXfYNOuWl
tNW4YdbX5Iwll/iQONiZAkNDck6pjvUadTWu2FBfT3zhrN4o5eF+pmTtiLCQhn4T
hcVk04Dw8fGIVmNYvafJ1Oy2SSUSU6I/njRvqwKnFUJgx46E18c50wWV4twlB72v
XEsmgxmi4Okbsq2SgImaGigrWr+3Gfa32kuPCra7PYRxVqA7i1C8rUrIlCXuvNQT
576TnVG48IcrpG9Tx5eKZSYYO6dsCpNrRtiGgMlCoDxcYGdqZyXUWhnKw55owIB6
ByCm0YwXn6mguhDJ8md6cLdc9kTo+RnIbGp4N7ST5wgAqqr/sOQlnXqQ/6tzGTw=
=CaVZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#860782: libnauty2-dev: suggest include geng.c source

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Dear Kelvin, thanks a lot for your suggestion.
Jerome

On 20/04/17 06:35, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Package: libnauty2-dev
> Version: 2.6r7+ds-1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> The source codes geng.c, gentourng.c, gentreeg.c have some #define
> GENG_MAIN stuff allowing them to be included in a user program.  Those
> files could be helpfully included in the package for that.  Not certain
> where they might best live, maybe /usr/share/nauty/.
> 
> callgeng.c example program shows the way to use them.  Perhaps it would
> go with the other examples in /usr/share/doc/nauty-doc/examples.  Though
> the Makefile there might then want the special compile rule shown in
> callgeng.c and perhaps plus -I/usr/include/nauty, unless wanted to
> change geng.c #include "gtools.h" to  which is where
> that file is packaged.  That could be helpful for all uses.
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 9.0
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
> Locale: LANG=en_AU.iso88591, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.iso88591 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
> 
> Versions of packages libnauty2-dev depends on:
> ii  dpkg   1.18.23
> ii  libnauty2  2.6r7+ds-1
> 
> libnauty2-dev recommends no packages.
> 
> Versions of packages libnauty2-dev suggests:
> ii  nauty-doc   2.6r7+ds-1
> ii  pkg-config  0.29-4+b1
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=As8C
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#856871: singular-doc: broken symlink: /usr/share/info/singular.info.gz -> singular.hlp.gz

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Andreas, thanks for your  report.

On Sun, 05 Mar 2017 18:56:00 +0100 Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: singular-doc
> Version: 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5
> Severity: normal
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> 
> Hi,
> 
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
> a broken symlink.
> 
> >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
> 
> 0m24.6s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
>   /usr/share/info/singular.info.gz -> singular.hlp.gz
> 
> 
> A file called singular.hlp.gz does not seem to exist in any
> package in the Debian archive.

singular.info was distributed as compressed before the venue of Singular:
I forget this link story. I will fix it in my next packaging.

Thanks,
Jerome

> 
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Andreas

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=Uioi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#855615: tachyon: not binNMU safe

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Thanks, now I can reproduce the issue. Jerome

On 22/02/17 14:08, James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 22/02/17 07:01, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Dear James, thanks for your report.
>> I am looking for reproducing the issue. So far, I cannot.
>> Where can we get the binMMUed source material ?
>> Cheers, Jerome
> 
> Starting from tachyon 0.99~b6+dsx-7:
> $ dch --bin-nmu test
> $ dpkg-buildpackage -B -us -uc
> 
> Or alternatively using sbuild:
> $ sbuild -m'test <t...@example.com>' --make-binNMU=test --binNMU=1 
> tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-7
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 
> 
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=oo5G
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#855615: tachyon: not binNMU safe

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Dear James, thanks for your report.
I am looking for reproducing the issue. So far, I cannot.
Where can we get the binMMUed source material ?
Cheers, Jerome

On 20/02/17 23:42, James Cowgill wrote:
> Source: tachyon
> Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-7
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hi,
> 
> tachyon was recently binNMUed on mips* as part of fixing the fallout of
> the binutils symbol table bug (#844227) but unfortunately it is now
> uninstallable on mips.
> 
> Multiple packages are affected, but for example the Depends line of
> libtachyon-mpich-0-dev contains this on mips which is obviously
> unsatisfiable:
> 
> Depends: libtachyon-dev-common (= 0.99~b6+dsx-7), libtachyon-mpich-0 (= 
> 0.99~b6+dsx-7+b1), libtachyon-dev-common (= 0.99~b6+dsx-7+b1)
> 
> This is likely caused by the use of dh_installdocs --link-doc (see
> #747141)
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 
> 
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=z8iO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#849945: evolver: FTBFS on ppc64el - error: initializer element is not constant

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Fernando, thanks for your reminder. I am on my to upload.
Jerome



On 30/01/17 20:42, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote:
> Hello, Maintainers.
> 
> I can send an RFS with the nmu of this package, in case you do not have
> time to apply the patch.
> I have tested it on amd64 and ppc64el.
> Please let me know.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=hzaJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#849661: gap-guava: FTBFS with some SHELLs(?): cd: too many arguments

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello GUAVA enthusiasts,

@Chris, thanks for report the issue.

On 29/12/16 16:08, Chris West (Faux) wrote:
> Source: gap-guava
> Version: 3.13+ds-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> Tags: sid stretch
> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-CC: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> The package fails to build:
> 
> gcc -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2
> -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/gap-guava-3.13+ds/2nd=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security
> -Wno-unused-result -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o leonconv leonconv.c
> cd leon make
> /bin/sh: line 0: cd: too many arguments
> Makefile:14: recipe for target 'all' failed
> 

I can reproduce the FTBFS within a schroot Sid environment on my amd64 box with 
bash as sh.
This shell issue is rather disturbing.

> 
> There's definitely an error in the Makefile:
> https://sources.debian.net/src/gap-guava/3.13%2Bds-1/src/Makefile/#L14
> 
> all :   $(FILES)
> cd leon make
> 

This code looks insane. I am on my way to attempt to harden it,


> 
> The variation appears to be that most shells treat this is "cd leon"
> (and ignore the rest of the arguments), whereas some shells reject it as
> an error:
> 
> % mkdir -p foo bar; for s in bash zsh dash posh sh; do $s -c 'cd foo bar'; 
> done
> zsh:cd:1: string not in pwd: foo
> posh: cd: too many arguments
> 
> (the others succeed)
> 
> I have no idea what upstream intended there.
> 
> A full build log can be seen on the reproducible-builds builders, which
> vary the shell (between bash and.. some sh):
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/gap-guava
> 

Thanks,
Jerome


- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=YI3F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#848246: sympow does not works properly when HOME is non-writable [RESOLVED]

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello SymPow enthusiasts,

this issue can be easily workaround by pointing the environment variable
SYMPOW_CACHEDIR to an existent folder. This feature was hacked in the patch
d/p/upstream-system_wide.patch [1]. Sadly, I documented it only in the patch 
header.
Second, at the time of writing this patch, I guessed that HOME is always 
existent.

I am on my way to see how this patch can be improved (and more visible).

Meanwhile, I am closing this report.

Thanks,
Jerome

[1] 
http://sources.debian.net/src/sympow/1.023-7/debian/patches/upstream-system_wide.patch/
 
- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=xeXB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#848131: libmpich.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello,

I can reproduce the issue in schroot Sid environment on an amd64 box.
The Depends fields for the libraries is

${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}

and it works fine except for mpich. Before to add it by hand, I want
to understand why dpkg-shlibdep does not make properly its job.

$ dpkg-shlibdeps 
debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0

gives something interesting:

dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 has an unexpected SONAME 
(libmpi.so.20)
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for 
/usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 (used by 
debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0)

And, more interestingly,

ls -l /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12

gives

/usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 -> libmpi.so

libmpi.so coming from libopenmpi-dev while 


Installing only libmpich-dev on a fresh schroot gives similar output:
it looks as a mpich building error.



Thanks,
Jerome

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=ZczI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#848246: sympow does not works properly when HOME is non-writable

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: sympow
Version: 1.023-7
Severity: normal

Hello Folks,

it apperas that sympow does not work properly when HOME is non-existent
or non-writable, what can be an issue in sbuild environment.

Thanks,
Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages sympow depends on:
ii  dpkg 1.18.3
ii  libc62.19-18+deb8u6
ii  pari-gp  2.7.6-1~bpo8+1
ii  sympow-data  1.023-7

sympow recommends no packages.

sympow suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#848131: Acknowledgement (libmpich.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Ximin, thanks for your report.

On 14/12/16 14:55, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 libtachyon-mpich-0 Control: affects -1
> tachyon-bin-nox Control: affects -1 tachyon-bin-ogl
> 
> Note that the problem occurs only when you install
> libtachyon-mpich-0. (For some reason, that is what sbuild chose to
> satisfy sage's "tachyon" dependency. Probably I should remove my
> workaround of adding "libmpich12" to Sage's depends.)
> 
> It should be fixed by adding Depends: libmpich12 to
> libtachyon-mpich-0. I'm not sure exactly why this isn't happening
> already - but for example, if it is dynamically loaded using
> dlopen(1) rather than normal dynamic *linking* then I guess
> dpkg-shlibdeps won't pick it up, so you need to add it explicitly in
> debian/control.

I can reproduce the issue in schroot Sid environment on an amd64 box.
The Depends fields for the libraries is

${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}

and it works fine except for mpich. Before to add it by hand, I want
to understand why dpkg-shlibdep does not make properly its job.

$ dpkg-shlibdeps 
debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0

gives something interesting:

dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: /usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 has an unexpected SONAME 
(libmpi.so.20)
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for 
/usr/lib/libmpich.so.12 (used by 
debian/libtachyon-mpich-0/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtachyon-mpich-openmp.so.0)

This leads me think that the issue caused by mpi-default-dev or a misusage of 
it.
I willdig it later.

Thanks,
Jerome

> 
> X
> 
> Debian Bug Tracking System:
>> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>> 
>> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your
>> message has been received.
>> 
>> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and
>> other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in
>> due course.
>> 
>> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian
>> Science Maintainers
>> <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
>> 
>> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please 
>> send it to 848...@bugs.debian.org.
>> 
>> Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to
>> report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>> 
> 
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=4kMv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#847699: apophenia FTBFS on several architectures: distances: The error is 0.0220695, which is too big (> 0.02).

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Adrian, thanks for your hint.

On 10/12/16 18:05, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: apophenia
> Version: 1.0+ds-4
> Severity: serious
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apophenia=sid
> 
> ...
> PASS: lognormal_test
> FAIL: ../eg/test_updating
> PASS: ../eg/transform
> PASS: test_apop
> =
>apophenia 1.0: tests/test-suite.log
> =
> 
> # TOTAL: 50
> # PASS:  49
> # SKIP:  0
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL:  1
> # XPASS: 0
> # ERROR: 0
> 
> .. contents:: :depth: 2
> 
> FAIL: ../eg/test_updating
> =
> 
> distances: The error is 0.0220695, which is too big (> 0.02).
> FAIL ../eg/test_updating (exit status: 1)
> 
> 
> Testsuite summary for apophenia 1.0
> 
> # TOTAL: 50
> # PASS:  49
> # SKIP:  0
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL:  1
> # XPASS: 0
> # ERROR: 0
> 
> See tests/test-suite.log
> Please report to fluffm...@f-m.fm
> 
> Makefile:1790: recipe for target 'test-suite.log' failed
> make[4]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1
> 
> 
> You cannot rely on anything being fast on the buildds.

How can we manage this kind of issue ?

Thanks,
Jerome

> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=fk2E
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#837016: singular: FTBFS: aminclude.am:35: error: DX_COND_doc does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL version graph

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Thanks a lot, I will fix it asap.
Jerome

On 29/09/16 00:23, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
> 
> 
> Hi Maintainer
> 
> The attached patch fixes the FTBFS with recent ax_prog_doxygen.m4.
> Note the build-dependency on autoconf-archive should be bumped to (>=
> 20160320) as well.
> 
> --- a/control
> +++ b/control
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  Uploaders: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
>  Build-Depends:
>   debhelper (>= 9),
> - autotools-dev, autoconf-archive, dh-autoreconf, libtool, help2man,
> + autotools-dev, autoconf-archive (>= 20160320), dh-autoreconf,
> libtool, help2man,
>   libreadline6-dev,
>   libgmp-dev, libmpfr-dev, libglpk-dev, libcdd-dev, libflint-dev, libntl-dev,
>   graphviz, 4ti2, normaliz, surf-alggeo,
> 
> 
> Regards
> Graham
> 
> 
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=nnyd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#837012: tachyon: FTBFS: ld: tachyon_ogl-glwin.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XNextEvent'

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi, thanks for your patch.

In fact the issue was not in the Makefile.am as a X_LIBS was already present,
but in the configure.ac where X_LIBS was set up but not SUBSTantiated.

Is there a way to cancel the dealy, given that the revison -6 was accepted.

Thanks,
Jerome

On 13/09/16 06:27, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've uploaded an NMU of tachyon that fixes this to DELAYED/5.
> 
> The debdiff is:
> 
> dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package 
> (/srv/build/tachyon/tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-5.1.dsc)
> diff -Nru tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/changelog 
> tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/changelog
> --- tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/changelog2016-08-01 02:23:29.0 
> +0100
> +++ tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/changelog2016-09-12 14:12:26.0 
> +0100
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +tachyon (0.99~b6+dsx-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> +  * Fix FTBFS: Needs to link against libX11 explicitly. Closes: #837012.
> +
> + -- Alastair McKinstry <mckins...@debian.org>  Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:12:26 
> +0100
> +
>  tachyon (0.99~b6+dsx-5) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>* Debianization:
> diff -Nru tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/series 
> tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/series
> --- tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/series2016-08-01 
> 02:12:39.0 +0100
> +++ tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/series2016-09-12 
> 14:12:26.0 +0100
> @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@
>  upstream-rationalization-autotools.patch
>  debianization.patch
>  debianization-documentation.patch
> +x11.patch
> diff -Nru tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/x11.patch 
> tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/x11.patch
> --- tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/x11.patch1970-01-01 
> 01:00:00.0 +0100
> +++ tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/debian/patches/x11.patch2016-09-12 
> 14:12:26.0 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +Author: Alastair McKinstry <mckins...@debian.org>
> +Description: X11 lib is needed for linking
> +Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/837012
> +Last-Update: 2016-09-12
> +Forwarded: no
> +
> +Index: tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/demosrc/Makefile.am
> +===
> +--- tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx.orig/demosrc/Makefile.am
>  tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx/demosrc/Makefile.am
> +@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ bin_PROGRAMS += tachyon-nox tachyon-ogl
> + man_MANS += tachyon-nox.1 tachyon-ogl.1
> + endif
> +
> +-
> ++X_LIBS= -lX11
> + AM_CFLAGS = -Wno-unused-result
> +
> + tachyon_SOURCES = \
> 
> regards
> Alastair
> 
> 
> On 13/09/2016 01:50, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello Lucas, thanks for the report.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/09/16 23:18, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > Source: tachyon
>> > Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-5
>> > Severity: serious
>> > Tags: stretch sid
>> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
>> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160906 qa-ftbfs
>> > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
>> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
>> > amd64.
>>
>> > Relevant part (hopefully):
>> >> /bin/bash ../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc -Wno-unused-result 
>> >> -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O3 
>> >> -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx=. -fPIE 
>> >> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_REENTRANT 
>> >> -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer   -o tachyon-ogl tachyon_ogl-main.o 
>> >> tachyon_ogl-getargs.o tachyon_ogl-parse.o tachyon_ogl-nffparse.o 
>> >> tachyon_ogl-mgfparse.o tachyon_ogl-ac3dparse.o tachyon_ogl-glwin.o 
>> >> tachyon_ogl-spaceball.o tachyon_ogl-trackball.o ../src/libtachyon.la -lm 
>> >> -lGL  -lGL
>> >> libtool: link: gcc -Wno-unused-result -I/usr/include/libdrm 
>> >> -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O3 
>> >> "-fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx=." -fPIE 
>> >> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_REENTRANT 
>> >> -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -o .libs/tachyon-ogl tachyon_ogl-main.o 
>> >> tachyon_ogl-getargs.o tachyon_ogl-parse.o tachyon_ogl-nffparse.o 
>> >> tachyon_ogl-mgfparse.o tachyon_ogl-ac3dparse.o tachyon_ogl-glwin.o 
>> >> tachyon_ogl-spaceball.o tachyon_ogl-trackball.o  
>> >> ../src/.libs/libtachyon.so -lm -lGL
>> >> /usr/bin/ld: tachyon_ogl-glwin.o: undefined reference to symbol 
>> >> 'XNextEvent'
>> >> //usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6: error adding symbo

Bug#837012: tachyon: FTBFS: ld: tachyon_ogl-glwin.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XNextEvent'

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Lucas, thanks for the report.



On 07/09/16 23:18, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: tachyon
> Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160906 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
> 
> Relevant part (hopefully):
>> /bin/bash ../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc -Wno-unused-result 
>> -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O3 
>> -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx=. -fPIE 
>> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_REENTRANT 
>> -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer   -o tachyon-ogl tachyon_ogl-main.o 
>> tachyon_ogl-getargs.o tachyon_ogl-parse.o tachyon_ogl-nffparse.o 
>> tachyon_ogl-mgfparse.o tachyon_ogl-ac3dparse.o tachyon_ogl-glwin.o 
>> tachyon_ogl-spaceball.o tachyon_ogl-trackball.o ../src/libtachyon.la -lm 
>> -lGL  -lGL 
>> libtool: link: gcc -Wno-unused-result -I/usr/include/libdrm 
>> -I/usr/include/libdrm -g -O3 
>> "-fdebug-prefix-map=/<>/tachyon-0.99~b6+dsx=." -fPIE 
>> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_REENTRANT 
>> -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -o .libs/tachyon-ogl tachyon_ogl-main.o 
>> tachyon_ogl-getargs.o tachyon_ogl-parse.o tachyon_ogl-nffparse.o 
>> tachyon_ogl-mgfparse.o tachyon_ogl-ac3dparse.o tachyon_ogl-glwin.o 
>> tachyon_ogl-spaceball.o tachyon_ogl-trackball.o  ../src/.libs/libtachyon.so 
>> -lm -lGL
>> /usr/bin/ld: tachyon_ogl-glwin.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XNextEvent'
>> //usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6: error adding symbols: DSO missing 
>> from command line
>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> The full build log is available from:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2016/09/06/tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-5_unstable.log

I could reproduce the issue in a chroot environment.
I am working on it.


> 
> A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
> 
> About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
> Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
> failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
> 

Thanks,
Jerome

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=3XQj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#835373: blitz++: FTBFS due to testsuite failures on several architectures

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello blitz++ enthusiasts,

to begin with, this issue are not new issues but old ones:
what is new is that tests has been improve, in particular their
results is now taking into account during the package building.

Otherwise, I am working on it.

Thanks,
Jerome

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=oqBd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#835505: New fplll breaks your package

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Julien, thanks for your message.

On 26/08/16 12:51, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Package: gap-float Version: 0.6.3+ds-3
> 
> The newly released fpll 5.x.y series breaks the api completely, so
> the sollya and gap-float packages will need new upstream versions. In
> the mean time, I'm going to upload (well, get sponsored) my fplll
> packages to experimental only, so you have it at hand.

For Sollya, there should be no major issue as it is actively in development.
For gap-float I am not sure. Is there any guide on how to upgrade ? 

> 
> When everything is ready (and we have something nice down into
> stable), then we'll push to unstable.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Snark on #debian-science
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net
http://www.rezozer.net/

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=E093
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: libgap-sage_4.8.3+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Chris, thanks for your time.



On 14/08/16 15:00, Chris Lamb wrote:
> 
> Lots of files missing attribution, for example:
> 
> src/intfuncs.c
> src/sctable.c
> src/sctable.h
> src/vec8bit.h
> src/weakptr.c
> 
> I stopped looking here.

The copyright of the these files are ambiguous as commented in the d/copyright 
file.
I am on my way to resolve the ambiguity.

Thanks,
Jerome

> 
>  -- Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org>  Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:11:21 +
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=+Rd3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#833870: libprimesieve7-dev-common: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/include/primesieve/Callback.hpp

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi Andreas, thanks for your report.

On 09/08/16 17:50, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libprimesieve7-dev-common
> Version: 5.7.0+ds-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> 
> Hi,
> 
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'testing'.
> It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
> because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
> Breaks+Replaces relation.
> 
> See policy 7.6 at
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
> 
>>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
> 
>   Selecting previously unselected package libprimesieve7-dev-common.
>   Preparing to unpack .../libprimesieve7-dev-common_5.7.0+ds-1_all.deb ...
>   Unpacking libprimesieve7-dev-common (5.7.0+ds-1) ...
>   dpkg: error processing archive 
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libprimesieve7-dev-common_5.7.0+ds-1_all.deb 
> (--unpack):
>trying to overwrite '/usr/include/primesieve/Callback.hpp', which is also 
> in package libprimesieve6-dev-common 5.6.0+ds-2
>   Errors were encountered while processing:
>/var/cache/apt/archives/libprimesieve7-dev-common_5.7.0+ds-1_all.deb
> 
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net
http://www.rezozer.net/

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=vUGz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#832951: sollya: FTBFS: nondeterministic test failure

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: sollya
Version: 5.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

Dear Sollya enthusiast,

it appears that a test based on time, tests-lib/tget_element_in_list, 
has not
(yet) been neutralized: be assured that it will !

Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages sollya depends on:
ii  libc6   2.19-18+deb8u4
ii  libfplll0   4.0.4-2
ii  libgcc1 1:4.9.2-10
ii  libgmp102:6.1.0+dfsg-2
ii  libmpfi01.5.1+ds-4
ii  libmpfr43.1.2-2
ii  libstdc++6  4.9.2-10
ii  libxml2 2.9.1+dfsg1-5+deb8u2

Versions of packages sollya recommends:
ii  gnuplot  4.6.6-2
ii  rlwrap   0.41-1

Versions of packages sollya suggests:
ii  libsollya-dev  5.0+ds-1
ii  sollya-doc 5.0+ds-1

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#831072: singular: FTBFS with GCC 6: segfault

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

retitle 831072 singular: FTBFS with GCC 6: segfault
thanks


Hello Folks,

it appears that it is segfault bug.

I could reproduced it the vanilla source ball by
building with GCC compilers (6.1.1) and by forcing shared library
at configure time:

$ ./configure --enable-shared --disable-static

Then, after processing `make', ./Singular/Singular emits a segfault.

The GDB prints:

 GNU gdb (Debian 7.11.1-2) 7.11.1
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.
For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from ./Singular/Singular...done.
[New LWP 7786]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `./Singular/Singular'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x7fa9769a810d in idrec::get(char const*, int) () from 
/home/calculus/singular/unpacked/singular-4.0.3-11/Singular/.libs/libSingular-4.0.3.so

Exporting dpkg-buildflags FLAGS, shows that the issue is emiited from line 104 
of Singular/ipid.cc :

l=IDLEV(h);

where `idhdl h = this;' (line 94) and IDLEV is the macro  `((a)->lev)' defined 
in Singular/ipid.h .

Thanks,
Jerome



- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=z9wv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: blitz++ is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Andreas,

On 20/07/16 10:33, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> is there anybody who wants to take care for blitz++.

If still applicable, I am ready to take care of it:
can you orphan it ?


  Christophe and I
> are listed as Uploaders.  While I think Christophe is not active any
> more (Christophe, please correct me if I'm wrong) I for myself had never
> any specific interest in this package.  It simply came to me and I do
> not have free time cycles to care any more.  The only reverse depencency
> is odin (maintainers in CC).
> 
> If somebody might provide a patch I might consider applying it - but I
> hereby confirm that this package has very low priority for me.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>   Andreas.

Cheers,
Jerome

> 
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:39:08AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch 
> wrote:
>> blitz++ 1:0.10-3.3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-07-29
>>
>> It is affected by these RC bugs:
>> 811923: blitz++: blitz++: FTBFS with GCC 6: invalid preprocessing directive 
>> #!
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> debian-science-maintainers mailing list
>> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
>>
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=7tNW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#830301: geomview: please provide PDF document uncompressed

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

On 08/07/16 01:45, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> Package: geomview
> Version: 1.9.5-1
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
>   it appears that the PDF documents are gzip compressed:
>   as such they are accessible from The Geometric Center

of course you got it: you must read: (...) they are NOT accessible from (...)

>   because it looks for ungzipped PDF documents. Note that
>   each PDF document might be compressed internally rather
>   than externally.
> 
> hth,
> Jerome


Jerome
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: Jessie*
>   APT prefers stable
>   APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
> 
> Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
> 
> Versions of packages geomview depends on:
> ii  dpkg  1.18.3
> ii  install-info  5.2.0.dfsg.1-6
> ii  libc6 2.19-18+deb8u4
> ii  libgcc1   1:4.9.2-10
> ii  libgeomview-1.9.5 1.9.5-1
> ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  10.3.2-1+deb8u1
> ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]9.0.0-2
> ii  libice6   2:1.0.9-1+b1
> ii  libsm62:1.2.2-1+b1
> ii  libstdc++64.9.2-10
> ii  libx11-6  2:1.6.2-3
> ii  libxext6  2:1.3.3-1
> ii  libxm42.3.4-6+deb8u1
> ii  libxmu6   2:1.1.2-1
> ii  libxt61:1.1.4-1+b1
> 
> Versions of packages geomview recommends:
> ii  evince-gtk [pdf-viewer]  3.14.1-2+deb8u1
> ii  mupdf [pdf-viewer]   1.5-1+b2
> ii  zathura [pdf-viewer] 0.3.1-2
> 
> geomview suggests no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net
http://www.rezozer.net/

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=3rEC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#830301: geomview: please provide PDF document uncompressed

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: geomview
Version: 1.9.5-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

it appears that the PDF documents are gzip compressed:
as such they are accessible from The Geometric Center
because it looks for ungzipped PDF documents. Note that
each PDF document might be compressed internally rather
than externally.

hth,
Jerome

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages geomview depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.18.3
ii  install-info  5.2.0.dfsg.1-6
ii  libc6 2.19-18+deb8u4
ii  libgcc1   1:4.9.2-10
ii  libgeomview-1.9.5 1.9.5-1
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  10.3.2-1+deb8u1
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]9.0.0-2
ii  libice6   2:1.0.9-1+b1
ii  libsm62:1.2.2-1+b1
ii  libstdc++64.9.2-10
ii  libx11-6  2:1.6.2-3
ii  libxext6  2:1.3.3-1
ii  libxm42.3.4-6+deb8u1
ii  libxmu6   2:1.1.2-1
ii  libxt61:1.1.4-1+b1

Versions of packages geomview recommends:
ii  evince-gtk [pdf-viewer]  3.14.1-2+deb8u1
ii  mupdf [pdf-viewer]   1.5-1+b2
ii  zathura [pdf-viewer] 0.3.1-2

geomview suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#830206: libmpfi-dev: undefined symbol: mpfi_is_strictly_neg_default

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hello Ximin, thanks for your report.

On 07/07/16 12:10, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Package: libmpfi-dev
> Version: 1.5.1+ds-4
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> When trying to compile Sage 7.1 as described in 
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sagemath.git/
> 
> Sage compiles successfully but the resulting binary crashes when I try to run
> it, with an error related to cython dynamic library loading:
> 
> cd ../.. && sage-logger './sage --docbuild --no-pdf-links all html ' 
> logs/dochtml.log
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 163, in _run_module_as_main
> mod_name, _Error)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 111, in _get_module_details
> __import__(mod_name)  # Do not catch exceptions initializing package
>   File 
> "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage_setup/docbuild/__init__.py",
>  line 22, in 
> import sage.all
>   File "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/all.py", 
> line 79, in 
> from sage.rings.all  import *
>   File 
> "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/all.py", 
> line 50, in 
> from finite_rings.all import *
>   File 
> "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/finite_rings/all.py",
>  line 21, in 
> from finite_field_constructor import FiniteField
>   File 
> "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_constructor.py",
>  line 176, in 
> import sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element as polynomial_element
>   File "sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx", line 53, in init 
> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element 
> (/home/anonymous/tmp/sage/sagemath/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.c:78933)
>   File 
> "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring.py",
>  line 148, in 
> import sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element_generic as 
> polynomial_element_generic
>   File 
> "/home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element_generic.py",
>  line 1057, in 
> from sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint import 
> Polynomial_rational_flint
>   File "sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_integer_dense_flint.pxd", line 7, in 
> init sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint 
> (/home/anonymous/tmp/sage/sagemath/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.cpp:21576)
>   File "sage/rings/real_mpfi.pxd", line 11, in init 
> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_integer_dense_flint 
> (/home/anonymous/tmp/sage/sagemath/sage/src/build/cythonized/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_integer_dense_flint.cpp:19473)
> ImportError: 
> /home/anonymous/.sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/rings/real_mpfi.so:
>  undefined symbol: mpfi_is_strictly_neg_default
> 
> This function is present in the source code, but not in the compiled .so for
> some reason. I will investigate further in the meantime, but any tips on this
> would be appreciated.

A script version is created on fly (see d/changelog and 
d/p/upstream-libtoolization-version_script.patch):
mpfi_is_strictly_neg_default is not meant to be exported according is the sense 
it is not in the header.

Is there any other missing symbol ? can you use an official symbol instead ?

Thanks,
Jerome



> 
> Thanks!
> 
> X
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: stretch/sid
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 
> 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
> 
> Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> 
> Versions of packages libmpfi-dev depends on:
> ii  dpkg1.18.9
> ii  libgmp-dev  2:6.1.1+dfsg-1
> ii  libmpfi-dev-common  1.5.1+ds-4
> ii  libmpfi01.5.1+ds-4
> ii  libmpfr-dev 3.1.4-2
> 
> libmpfi-dev recommends no packages.
> 
> libmpfi-dev suggests no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJXfkM6AAoJED+SGaZ/Nsa

Bug#829742: dpkg-maintscript-helper fails to convert directory to symlink on upgrade

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi Tobias, thanks for the report.



On 05/07/16 18:46, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Source: mpfi
> Version: 1.5.1+ds-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: prevents package upgrade
> 
> Hi Jerome,
> 
> When upgrading from version 1.5.1+ds-2, I get the following error:
> 
> Preparing to unpack .../libmpfi-dev_1.5.1+ds-4_amd64.deb ...
> dpkg-query: no packages found matching libmpfi-dev:amd64
> dpkg-query: package 'libmpfi-dev' is not installed
> Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
> and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
> dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: directory '/usr/share/doc/libmpfi-dev'
> contains files not owned by package libmpfi-dev:amd64, cannot switch to
> symlink
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpfi-dev_1.5.1+ds-4_amd64.deb (--unpack):
>  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpfi-dev_1.5.1+ds-4_amd64.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> 
> The directory contains the following files
> 
> ls /usr/share/doc/libmpfi-dev
> changelog.Debian.gz  changelog.gz  copyright

Indeed the migration part of the story had been messed up for a while:
a couple of fixes has been done to fix it. Tests via piuparts and the absence
of any piuparts bugreport let me think that is now working with the current
distributed versions:  1.5.1-1, 1.5.1-3, and 1.5.1+ds-4 .
Your former version, according to the report is 1.5.1+ds-2, a buggy one
that was for a short while in testing or unstable: my guess is that we
can consider it as over. Otherwise, I am not sure if it is relevant
to fix this very migration as it is quite unlikely while I am not sure
how to reproduce it.

Thanks,
Jerome


> 
> Best,
> Tobias
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=LsnY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hi,

On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
>> i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam 
>> originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science),
>> and this one is not.
>> 
>> AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my
>> point of view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be
>> moved under the roof of Debian Science and you can be added as an
>> uploader of this package. But we need a confirmation from Adam or
>> MIA-team, I think.
> 
> 
> last activity is around 2012 according to db.d.o
>> Another option for the time being is that you are preparing a new
>> upload, file a bug against evolver ("new version...") and the
>> package will be NMUed after some time.
> 
> 
> I second this option, together with the move on debian-science of the
> package.
> 
> in the meanwhile, according to quantz, the MIA process started some
> time ago (on 2016-05-24),


How can we get the current status of the process ? 


Thanks,
Jerome


 so I guess you can start proposing patches
> and open bugs, and then somebody will sponsor the work (after some
> reasonable time), together with a move to science team.
> 
> 
> thanks!
> 
> Gianfranco
> 
> 
> 2016-06-07 23:42 GMT+02:00 Jerome BENOIT
> <sphericaltrian...@rezozer.net>:
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> since a while I [0] have wanted to update the [surface] evolver
>> package [1,2] because I used it a few years ego [and because I may
>> use it a gain sooner or later]: I try to contact several times the
>> current maintainer in view to get the package officially orphaned
>> before any ITA submission. So far, I got no feed back. The package
>> is clearly abandoned. Is there any Debian authority that have the
>> permission to orphan it ? If not, what can be done ?
>> 
>> Thanks, Jerome
>> 
>> [0]
>> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus%40rezozer.net=1
>>
>> 
[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evolver.html
>> [2] http://facstaff.susqu.edu/brakke/evolver/evolver.html
>> 
>> -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list 
>> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org 
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#828717: gmp-ecm: 7.0 regresses on 32 bit platforms

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Thanks for your report.
I believe that the upstream team is working on this issues.
Whatever, I am forwarding your report to them.
Cheers,
Jerome

On 27/06/16 07:33, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: gmp-ecm
> Version: 7.0.1+ds-2
> Severity: important
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Since version 7.0, gmp-ecm fails on i386 and armhf (the two 32 bit
> architectures that Ubuntu runs tests on):
> 
>   http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/i386/
>   http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/armhf/
> 
> 64 bit still works, like
> 
>   http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/amd64
>   http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/ppc64el
> 
> I haven't yet found out what to search for in the log [1] to see the
> actual error. There is no "fail" in the upstream output, and all the
> "error" hits that I checked are also present in the amd64 log, i. e.
> they are expected error messages triggered by the tests. I hope you
> have some more familiarity with the test output and know what to look
> for.
> 
> We don't run 32 bit tests on Debian, so this doesn't appear on
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/gmp-ecm/.
> 
> I'm setting severity "important" as this package may be a building
> block for security mechanisms (even though nothing in Debian currently
> uses it).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin
> 
> [1] 
> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-yakkety/yakkety/i386/g/gmp-ecm/20160623_084317@/log.gz
> 

- -- 
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=
=NTYc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Fwd: Bug#827509: ITP: sollya -- library for safe floating-point code development

[Jerome BENOIT]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: Bug#827509: ITP: sollya -- library for safe floating-point code 
development
Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:06:02 +
Resent-From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, w...@debian.org
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:02:32 +0100
From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Reply-To: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>, 827...@bugs.debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>

* Package name: sollya
  Version : 5.0.0
  Upstream Author : Christoph Lauter <christoph.lau...@lip6.fr>
* URL : http://sollya.gforge.inria.fr/
* License : Cecill-C
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : library for safe floating-point code development

Sollya is both a tool environment and a library for safe floating-point
code development. It offers a convenient way to perform computations with
multiple precision interval arithmetic. It is particularly targeted to the
automatized implementation of mathematical floating-point libraries (libm).

The Sollya library also opens to dynamical extension with bindings such as
for Python and Sage.

This package will be maintained on behalf of the Debian Science Team.


-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

[Jerome BENOIT]

Thanks for the reply.

On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working
> 
>> the [surface] evolver package ?
> 
> A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package
> and only the maintainer/MIA team can do it.
> 
> But a bug with patches and you proposing the maintainership is something
> that might be appreciated by the community

Right now the package rocks.
But the upstream version is (very) old, and the Debian package material
clearly needs some refreshment. Is a patch really appropriate here ?
May I rather wait for  clear orphaning instead ?

Jerome

> 
> G.
> 

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hi,

On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
>> i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam 
>> originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science),
>> and this one is not.
>> 
>> AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my
>> point of view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be
>> moved under the roof of Debian Science and you can be added as an
>> uploader of this package. But we need a confirmation from Adam or
>> MIA-team, I think.
> 
> 
> last activity is around 2012 according to db.d.o
>> Another option for the time being is that you are preparing a new
>> upload, file a bug against evolver ("new version...") and the
>> package will be NMUed after some time.
> 
> 
> I second this option, together with the move on debian-science of the
> package.
> 
> in the meanwhile, according to quantz, the MIA process started some
> time ago (on 2016-05-24), so I guess you can start proposing patches
> and open bugs,

May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working
the [surface] evolver package ?


 and then somebody will sponsor the work (after some
> reasonable time), together with a move to science team.
> 
> 
> thanks!

Cheers,
Jerome

> 
> Gianfranco
> 
> 
> 2016-06-07 23:42 GMT+02:00 Jerome BENOIT
> <sphericaltrian...@rezozer.net>:
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> since a while I [0] have wanted to update the [surface] evolver
>> package [1,2] because I used it a few years ego [and because I may
>> use it a gain sooner or later]: I try to contact several times the
>> current maintainer in view to get the package officially orphaned
>> before any ITA submission. So far, I got no feed back. The package
>> is clearly abandoned. Is there any Debian authority that have the
>> permission to orphan it ? If not, what can be done ?
>> 
>> Thanks, Jerome
>> 
>> [0]
>> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus%40rezozer.net=1
>>
>> 
[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evolver.html
>> [2] http://facstaff.susqu.edu/brakke/evolver/evolver.html
>> 
>> -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list 
>> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org 
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hello All,

since a while I [0] have wanted to update the [surface] evolver package [1,2]
because I used it a few years ego [and because I may use it a gain sooner or 
later]:
I try to contact several times the current maintainer in view to get
the package officially orphaned before any ITA submission.
So far, I got no feed back. The package is clearly abandoned.
Is there any Debian authority that have the permission to orphan it ?
If not, what can be done ?

Thanks,
Jerome

[0] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus%40rezozer.net=1
[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evolver.html
[2] http://facstaff.susqu.edu/brakke/evolver/evolver.html

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#825462: FTBFS: build-arch failure

[Jerome Benoit]

Source: scscp-imcce
Version: 1.0.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

Dear Folks,

it appears that the newly introduced build-arch machinery fails
because it also composes the documentation while it must not:
this faulty behaviour is caused by the debian patch
d/p/debianization-doc-texinfo.patch which should be discarded.

Sorry for the noise,
Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#824134: [libtachyon-serial-0] OpenMPI in the description of libtachyon-serial

[Jerome BENOIT]

Dear Katsuhiko, thanks for your report. Jerome

On 12/05/16 18:46, Katsuhiko Nishimra wrote:
> Package: libtachyon-serial-0
> Version: 0.99~b6+dsx-4
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> I'm afraid that the description of this package is little bit wrong.
> (OpenMPI in libtachyon-serial-0)
> 
> Here I attach a patch to fix it.
> I hope it helps you.
> 
> Regards,
> Katsuhiko
> 
> 
> 

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#806108: singular: FTBFS due to indep build failure

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hello,

I upgraded (again) because the then last package (4.0.3-p1+ds-1) was non-usable:
working on this issue was then my highest priority. I thought that I could
postpone this issue, but I was wrong (obviously).

Whatever, I fixed by forcing a complete build.
I am on my way to submit the new package *4.0.3-p1+ds-2).

Cheers,
Jerome

On 29/04/16 10:36, Santiago Vila wrote:
> severity 806108 important
> thanks
>
> Hi. I *really* appreciate that you consider this has a greater severity
> than "important", but I prefer to keep it important for two reasons:
>
> * I don't have the "blessing" (so to speak) from the release managers
>   to make these bugs RC yet.
>
> * If this is serious, all the other similar bugs should be serious too.
>   Here is the complete list of similar bugs:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=binary-indep;users=sanv...@debian.org
>
>
> Well, those are my reasons, but of course if you insist that this must
> be serious, go ahead. I promise that I will not downgrade it again,
> otherwise it would be a very odd severity war indeed: Maintainer
> raises severity and reporter downgrades it :-)
>
> Thanks.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXI3s2AAoJEIC/w4IMSybj4FEIALt14ADF/mlQyyBashkqeRi+
DANq2IiGX98MkbXpZiZI6EJG1GBZJcifx+1Pqfk8ht8Vk+ZYqreCCymzR4ukw2dY
4Mia1+CqtrhgnQ3z3nbm5kmTXN13jDwinK9mawycvWYVOW6hlbaYw1XHqWO4WAfr
a42bhLhqXVrIVN2OBe3NZfl/QImzRb1+H3B3ydyr71V1A7O0VLUC74qA4kvr81d2
+EJfkaHvzSgk7RYPqjuba5YgQzWMW7zMafOy1DMOqpWECcjoSwr8mXMkk1Q2qmno
uAPriagKIpV+M2zBJN9XxReQlnTqjjP0Ni2Emdwk0PK2w2bTHKVVER9au5/x0Gc=
=rWFS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#819702: FTBFS: test failure on architectures mips, powerpc, s3990x, ...

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: gmp-ecm
Version: 7.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

For the records:

It appears that the new major version of gmp-ecm (version 7) failed the 
check
stage on some exotic architectures.

Thanks,
Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages gmp-ecm depends on:
ii  libc6 2.19-18+deb8u3
ii  libecm1   7.0+ds-1
ii  libgmp10  2:6.1.0+dfsg-2

gmp-ecm recommends no packages.

gmp-ecm suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#819696: gmp-ecm: the library should not recommend an exact version of gmp-ecm

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Dear Vincent, thanks for your report.

On 01/04/16 01:17, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Source: gmp-ecm
> Version: 6.4.4+ds-5
> Severity: normal
> 
> One has for libecm0 6.4.4+ds-5:
> 
> Recommends: gmp-ecm (= 6.4.4+ds-5)
> 
> and for libecm1 7.0+ds-1:
> 
> Recommends: gmp-ecm (= 7.0+ds-1)
> 
> i.e. each time with an exact version.
> 
> According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819636#10
> this is a bad idea.
> 
> BTW, is there any reason why one has a "Recommends"?

This a good question. Actually I am asking myself the same question right now 
for an other packages.
I guess I picked up the scheme from an other package. But now, I am realizing 
that it is not a good idea.
I will remove this Recommends fields.

Thanks,
Jerome

> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: stretch/sid
>   APT prefers unstable-debug
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 
> 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
> 
> Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW/cbEAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj4z4IAMvLlgilGFvpMge94cfSGDcF
PFCO9JsnQToDhc5ONKUWAfRWrM1HPxNL4LMkOILjkCpkeZ9S8ii51dURmPFzD+gz
En8Tc9wAHnAxCm/KfF3cPP4NKIJYH7yqi70YnoqBZYbsIGo5VSW/Xc82j8w6Ii4V
H30QObGuVb+pWg8h82CBm2m47lA8qFroX285PMVs6OGiE5ooxGtVzuoDeP4WGHX6
XOj/yfGTocPGbnmlYei8qD3guN7tQI4nytGJywbPnqvstDebrW+5f9AEiXWYz2Nv
RXR+fyz7RNRbwueAuiOjSUDqrWRrF1FTAR+h0LafRvJ441xH4dNZGZ3rt8M87mg=
=EBbK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

sage: singular4: API or interpreter ?

[Jerome BENOIT]

Hello Forum:

In the Debian wiki dedicated to Sage [1], we read:

 Singular 4.0.3 is now in Debian but unfortunately its API is completely
 incompatible from 3.1.7 and the latter is what Sage are using.

This is very unfortunate indeed.

On the other hand, on the Sage page dedicated to the Singular interface [2] we 
read:

 This interface is extremely flexible, since it’s exactly like typing into the 
Singular interpreter,
 and anything that works there should work here.

Of course, I may quote the remaining:

  The interface offers three pieces of functionality:

singular_console() - A function that dumps you into an interactive 
command-line Singular session.
singular(expr, type='def') - Creation of a Singular object. This provides a 
Pythonic interface to Singular.
  For example, if f=singular(10), then f.factorize() returns the 
factorization of 10 computed using Singular.
singular.eval(expr) - Evaluation of arbitrary Singular expressions, with 
the result returned as a string.

  Of course, there are polynomial rings and ideals in Sage as well (often based 
on a C-library interface to Singular).
  One can convert an object in the  Singular interpreter interface to Sage by 
the method sage().


So I guess that what might cause troubles is the very last paragraph.
Even so, my understanding is that the Singular library did not experience any 
big change.
I also understand that the Debian package of Singular4 rationalize a bit the 
library dispatching,
but these changes are transparent to autotools.

What force us to stick to the old dead branch 3.1.7 ?


Best wishes,
Jerome

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage
[2] 
http://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/doc/reference/interfaces/sage/interfaces/singular.html

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#814970: FTBFS: libpng12.a: error adding symbols: Bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Dear Maintainers:

A bunch of packages are flagged for removal because they depend on libm4ri:
do you plan to fix this minor before the dead line [20160401] ?

Thanks,
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW1iw+AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjRv0H/0jEEMXR4o+9ptHf3Bc9uzt7
6E97d6c0NEPn5oD0Jg9V1vsXZfHrDZ8hefVtG6Q8yBExOZVgnbqAr2HH+4XhGAjk
YODS91rI7kVq+ldbIArBBooEIf8pnb1uDhRaJWxxRoJ/bFnuhLFlwGdvk0ALRK3C
2D4kkdxR0yA66qGJD3VbcesTI9Eyed+LPO7ahKQDmI2Jy9+B/t+iRPdbni8uk7uU
ZMdXyvrd1XcP4MSp5N35zq3dDYsO2aF36q1U48nd1xno/e6/hZbm+hcVIoQGYYRg
7X4mB51fFurFyjoQIn+ehHxudBYW4U4mgTIX1yk5lSDR0W1uanLreuwwlu6yy08=
=bk84
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Fwd: Bug#815039: RFS: normaliz 3.1.0+ds-1 [New Upstream Version] -- math computing tools

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256




-  Forwarded Message 
Subject: Bug#815039: RFS: normaliz 3.1.0+ds-1 [New Upstream Version] -- math 
computing tools
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:45:02 +
Resent-From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Mentors <package-sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 06:40:20 +0100
From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Reply-To: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>, 815...@bugs.debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentors:

I am looking for a sponsor for the normaliz package [1], a mathematical package
used by Singular. This package brings to Debian the latest version of normaliz.

Thanks in advance,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/normaliz.git

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWxxP4AAoJEIC/w4IMSybj+9EH/Au3aI37xp9JlkDJ9r9faqDb
vQjLDR5JsUHdVOkCxBNWzeWfs9mxk4ww6xgGk8C1KrBEW7hfDKd7ZqqQ4+Y8GyEA
qTHcwhNQmkGKYrr/iv5yCyyROmlcH20vmou2x478LJSkQ5iYTjgg81FYzZSFiHM6
Bc3lENVu+PooyqZihh02kipevYWlnqz03jjp96h7Y3RGyH884AN+puN4nBqCvOhL
sL3cpebb7zD83cVJLrmkRBeXfDcB0h25LkqUV6Vgdv17HXS4e2UIi+Uta9P7gThO
wcivjqszzmkU7mgUncuTF64UuubGpS8O+0A3OEBQUQdEzG2EdCH3d0FKyoZUqio=
=cKEB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Fwd: RFS: gap-io/4.4.5+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] -- low level C library IO bindings for GAP

[Jerome BENOIT]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: RFS: gap-io/4.4.5+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] -- low level C library IO 
bindings for GAP
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:21:24 +0100
From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentors:

I am looking for a sponsor for my Debian package gap-io, a GAP package
that brings low level C function to GAP. This Debian package mainly
brings the latest version to Debian.

Thanks,
Jerome

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)



-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Fwd: Bug#810361: RFS: mpfrc++/3.6.3+ds-1 [new version] -- multi-precision floating point number class for C++

[Jerome BENOIT]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: Bug#810361: RFS: mpfrc++/3.6.3+ds-1 [new version] -- multi-precision 
floating point number class for C++
Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:24:02 +
Resent-From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Mentors <package-sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:22:11 +0100
From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Reply-To: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>, 810...@bugs.debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentors:

I am looking for a sponsor for the package mpfrc++ [1] that
I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
This package is an update with some refreshments.

Thanks,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/mpfrc++.git

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)




-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Fwd: Bug#808411: RFS: primesieve/5.6.0+ds-1 [new upstream release]

[Jerome BENOIT]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: Bug#808411: RFS: primesieve/5.6.0+ds-1 [new upstream release]
Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 20:57:01 +
Resent-From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Mentors <package-sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:55:00 +0100
From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Reply-To: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>, 808...@bugs.debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Dear Mentors:

I am looking for a sponsor for the package primesieve [1] that
I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
This version brings to Debian the lastest upstream version.

Thanks,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/primesieve.git

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)




-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#807829: 4ti2: please make the build reproducible

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hello All:

On 13/12/15 16:49, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Source: 4ti2
> Version: 1.6.7+ds-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: timestamps locale
> X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> 
> Hi!
> 
> While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
> that 4ti2 could not be built reproducibly.
> It embeds a locale- and timezone-dependent timestamp into the
> documentation.

Indeed. Sorry for forgetting the locale aspect of the time stamp.

> 
> The attached patch fixes this by using the C locale and UTC for
> generating the timestamp.

I have just applied the patch to the git material.

I will wait for more material for submitting the package.

Best wishes,
Jerome

> 
> Regards,
>  Reiner
> 
> [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
> 
> 
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWbZ8rAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjiMgIALnCSa5XuL9OMOGGiPuarODC
72SNHEYrZ3uU0+oIrKqRwb2KhOjdBGXbCTaUUXbdi+Qso/2UfvwpnWk3MCc5lEeM
IBcUkozqhtEtKf6eOoknnv9D1QLXnA3dR1htNgOFykv6/iju6/w6ayJcgl9y99mk
khBRW73hwLJGaK7td4Ub6uZri9v9Qlo/W9+fTernpf7GJ1l4CmetFcJiSDrkSGni
akJu6oJ3+W+pdhxPSpF5nN821eELc5pswLnnq7MYMBZXf2F/8Xye3u8+YWMi4dUt
roSfV+p5khON7LTTsfEbjuUr7WH71CjgtUHh2T4kQuNAk8ana4EU/IR2rFA60Fs=
=XaGh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hello All:
Please let me know what I may do to solve this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Jerome

On 02/12/15 11:21, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> 
> 
> normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz:
> According to the control file the size hash should be 496120,
> but normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz has 497920.
> 
> If you did not include normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz in your upload, a 
> different version
> might already be known to the archive software.
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYIG3AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjqlQH/RNfOCJZGvwMK5YeDI/6LtIW
JHDNAk2XeKgBOr1Z8inTK0MIXT7p0SG+QyFrB9HkSW/k4FA8FSYWoN5XzwoZyP92
ieeWolUlCKZKbAOlQXQnaLnH0nvQ/pSf2ecEuz9FYdpGXVAbKyEf5HwQcNXQtWDO
MR/fA2mQkwUblNLLW1fLAMkJSvfOfPmUqc7EtVSCq9ZLJxDqGjQv1cfVpCf4BlbT
kds4B66NoIUYPEz3YXnQe3Kl3blXw1YSFB/LnUb+W/Tfo5AharYemu24woDYYTbs
rqbiNbT9dshtTPFM/8UVAd450F5uMHBWZBJUhYYdDOnrtDvaJnXDscyYDCoV6Jo=
=A9uf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#806769: FTBS: failed test on mipsel architecture: random Bus error emitted from GOMP

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: normaliz
Version: 3.0.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Hello Folks:

On mipsel architecture, normaliz is subject to random `Bus error(s)' 
that
are emitted from GOMP. A GDB backtrace typically reads:

--8><--
[...]
Starting program: /home/calculus/normaliz/normaliz-00/normaliz/_build/normaliz 
-h test-h/cut.in
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
[New Thread 0x77913450 (LWP 24948)]
[New Thread 0x77113450 (LWP 24949)]
[New Thread 0x76913450 (LWP 24950)]

Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
[Switching to Thread 0x77113450 (LWP 24949)]
0x77b1ef60 in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from 
/usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1
#0  0x77b1ef60 in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from 
/usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1
#1  0x77b1ee7c in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from 
/usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1
Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC
(gdb)
--><8

For the record,
Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages normaliz depends on:
ii  normaliz-bin  3.0.0+ds-1

normaliz recommends no packages.

Versions of packages normaliz suggests:
ii  singular  4.0.2-p2+ds-1

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Fwd: Bug#806754: RFS: gmp-ecm/6.4.4+ds-5 [FTBFS fix]

[Jerome BENOIT]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: Bug#806754: RFS: gmp-ecm/6.4.4+ds-5 [FTBFS fix]
Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:57:02 +
Resent-From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Mentors <package-sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:52:48 +0100
From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Reply-To: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>, 806...@bugs.debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentors:

I am looking for a sponsor for the package gmp-ecm [1] that
I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
This version fix the FTBFS issue #806619 that pointed that
the gmp-ecm package did not honour the arch/indep built scheme:
this release introduce a fully working arch/indep built scheme.

Thanks in advance,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/gmp-ecm.git

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)




-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#806389: RFS: jsurf-alggeo/0.3.0+ds-1 [new uptream release]

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentor:

I am looking for a sponsor for my package jsurf-alggeo that
I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
jsurf-alggeo is a java library dedicated to algebraic geometry:
it basically renders real algebraic surfaces into PNG files [1].

Thanks,
Jerome

[1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/jsurf-alggeo
[2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jsurf-alggeo.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Fwd: Bug#806389: RFS: jsurf-alggeo/0.3.0+ds-1 [new uptream release]

[Jerome BENOIT]

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: Bug#806389: RFS: jsurf-alggeo/0.3.0+ds-1 [new uptream release]
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:51:02 +
Resent-From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, Debian Mentors 
<package-sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:48:29 +0100
From: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>
Reply-To: Jerome Benoit <calcu...@rezozer.net>, 806...@bugs.debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentor:

I am looking for a sponsor for my package jsurf-alggeo that
I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team.
jsurf-alggeo is a java library dedicated to algebraic geometry:
it basically renders real algebraic surfaces into PNG files [1].

Thanks,
Jerome

[1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/jsurf-alggeo
[2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jsurf-alggeo.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)




-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Forum:

On 21/11/15 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT <calcu...@rezozer.net> wrote:
>> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense 
>> to say so.
>> For a least two reasons:
>> 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git;
>> 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself.
>>
>> Do I miss something here ?
>> What is the best way to fix this ?
> 
> I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd
> version of the orig.tar.xz.
> I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?).

On a porter (partch), I could reproduce this issue.
I will try to figure out what is going on here because this sounds endless.


> 
> So yes, the faulty one is in the archive.  The uploader of your
> package should have used 'pristine-tar checkout' instead of running
> the get-orig-source rule.
> 
> Unless there is something wrong with the version in the archive (have
> you compared the files?), I suggest deleting
> normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.id and
> normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.delta from the pristine-tar branch and
> running 'gbp import-orig' on the version that in the archive.
> 

Thanks,
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWUMHFAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjceMH/iWRCSkC5XhpgVJSEh6yHjsK
2axMTzHE6KWZn6tKPi77P4octjQTbhmFJNA18DLNBqIgtXTNhMDYgCVdU9DDoxu/
7CHJcX6oFpyPugSVrx8LTwssBFYMVebooVsDLo3NlwC0cGUhf83IKNYtk7igN9Ha
WlHTAx3kwoMltHeVU8W4gM0XalwtXlEGjvGV9TyP9yGkiw9MvwPig7ypNJgqC+Ov
NwdXeA5G+OVpNfbQU1j3ivIHz/BpmwSuBJ1C9oAp7g3Bs0e91Qd3A61uiPSaQ2GY
0265ToqS8bR8MEiMlGY9H3O4ANN9nr+xf5UFpGv1T+94Z9jGzMSvPX+ZsGocUt4=
=ci95
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Graham:

On 22/11/15 08:27, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 22 November 2015 at 07:04, Jerome BENOIT <calcu...@rezozer.net> wrote:
>> I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks:
>> it should be ok now.
> 
> It looks OK to me.  Shall I go ahead and upload?

Yeas, please.

Thanks in advance,
Jerome

> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWUXOnAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjI7YIAKIMpkvfQuOeW4rRF/KNFLN4
DuMl3YZotmqh/afxloKmdSiLWQNjS9JXl5x6qtQ6t0D8dy80V7DwZSnNUrNoY0J2
52TT7TQI04SCypRnwTfI1EJXooLS2cOxRrEyGWmkIInClKMwQTvwo0xhGQYWFLz2
lCa0ohDZzOa/PZYcgByEN/bkOAHPfPoE2tP73J6e8bX9r5sAEgWmUEaSFmY7D7N8
asoNplfcz7uB4AGOj9dNIuaVfs5mLaztFSdqK2QOx/jkHK2CJv18QxRjH+Or/9kJ
wkxWU7tCj+7F12yUErv01pIqyUG5NPP5W82puFNn1+x0SIaeb0yGB05SJi5CZGU=
=oxug
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Again:

On 21/11/15 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT <calcu...@rezozer.net> wrote:
>> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense 
>> to say so.
>> For a least two reasons:
>> 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git;
>> 2] the one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself.
>>
>> Do I miss something here ?
>> What is the best way to fix this ?
> 
> I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd
> version of the orig.tar.xz.
> I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?).

It appeared that tar does not produced reproducible balls.

> 
> So yes, the faulty one is in the archive.  The uploader of your
> package should have used 'pristine-tar checkout' instead of running
> the get-orig-source rule.

Ok.

> 
> Unless there is something wrong with the version in the archive (have
> you compared the files?), I suggest deleting
> normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.id and
> normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz.delta from the pristine-tar branch and
> running 'gbp import-orig' on the version that in the archive.
> 

I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks:
it should be ok now.

Thanks,
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWUUzCAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjemsH/3CPochrA3FT/2zkaqiQfBlP
KNPZneD3No2AkW/KY/c0uk0d/Dz+ylv8SV5lx/AVzO+bEyUbb+CRoVNq8vgTYybT
gnyz4vW1mKoW+z2/Yg0GseBYghL95d9wf10svhNY55pRFBcJj2E5klp2JXCBPLmh
oRrblGYUAYUoqBOo+uHGsjM8m0Iz4tF4kEw22WAnqs61WhqkRePUzg+JjTAkKn3v
Ewy4Ko7S9waSCFBScLFLkBB6/oEZMftqYOkQkxv15eQkyCt0X0PkC6Iapkn/nJPx
ibtNokV/FvhUpknYb5T9rqfFKlQsqZqb24PhpsLrOAM6RAyi4gAqmP5bk3o9MqM=
=JP7t
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804981: jsurf-alggeo: failure of the make-TestJSurf autopkgtest test

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: jsurf-alggeo
Version: 0.2.0+ds-1
Severity: normal

Hell Folks:

It appears that the make-TestJSurf lacks a dependency.

For the record,
Jerome



-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages jsurf-alggeo depends on:
ii  antlr33.2-10
ii  default-jre [java7-runtime]   2:1.7-52
ii  libcommons-cli-java   1.2-3
ii  libvecmath-java   1.5.2-5
ii  openjdk-7-jre [java7-runtime] 7u85-2.6.1-6+deb8u1
ii  openjdk-8-jre [java7-runtime] 8u66-b17-1~bpo8+1
ii  oracle-java7-jdk [java7-runtime]  7u76
ii  oracle-java8-jdk [java7-runtime]  8u40

jsurf-alggeo recommends no packages.

Versions of packages jsurf-alggeo suggests:
pn  graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat  

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804892: FTBFS: failed to build on powerpc architecture: __builtin_frame_address not fully supported

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: singular
Version: 4.0.2-p2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Hello Folks:

singular failed some check (omalloc check, precisely) on the powerpc 
architecture
because of a partial support of __builtin_frame_address on this 
architecture.

For the record,
Jerome

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages singular depends on:
ii  singular-data 4.0.2-p2+ds-1
ii  singular-modules  4.0.2-p2+ds-1
ii  singular-ui   4.0.2-p2+ds-1

singular recommends no packages.

singular suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804714: jsurf-alggeo: new upstream version

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: jsurf-alggeo
Version: 0.1.4+ds-1
Severity: wishlist

Hello Folks:

A new upstream version for jsurf-alggeo is available.

For the record,
Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages jsurf-alggeo depends on:
ii  antlr33.2-10
ii  default-jre [java7-runtime]   2:1.7-52
ii  libcommons-cli-java   1.2-3
ii  libvecmath-java   1.5.2-5
ii  openjdk-7-jre [java7-runtime] 7u85-2.6.1-6+deb8u1
ii  openjdk-8-jre [java7-runtime] 8u66-b17-1~bpo8+1
ii  oracle-java7-jdk [java7-runtime]  7u76
ii  oracle-java8-jdk [java7-runtime]  8u40

jsurf-alggeo recommends no packages.

Versions of packages jsurf-alggeo suggests:
pn  graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat  

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804742: FTBFS: failed to build on armel architecture: exception_ptr not suppored on armel

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: normaliz
Version: 3.0.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Dear All,

normaliz failed to build on armel architecture because of a lack of 
support
for exception_ptr on this architecture.

For the record,
Jerome

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages normaliz depends on:
ii  normaliz-bin  3.0.0+ds-1

normaliz recommends no packages.

Versions of packages normaliz suggests:
ii  singular  4.0.2-p2+ds-1

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804408: gmp-ecm: constant failure of the make-longcheck autopkgtest test

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: gmp-ecm
Version: 6.4.4+ds-3
Severity: minor

Hello Folks:

It appears that autopkgtest is not yet ready to accept relatively long 
tests
(3 hours does not seems that long for numerical tests perform with 
valgrind).
Meanwhile, the crunchy test might be cooled down.

For the record,
Jerome


-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages gmp-ecm depends on:
ii  libc6 2.19-18+deb8u1
ii  libecm0   6.4.4+ds-3
ii  libgmp10  2:6.0.0+dfsg-6

gmp-ecm recommends no packages.

gmp-ecm suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804186: FTBFS: underterministic check

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: singular
Version: 4.0.2-p2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Dear All,

singular/omalloc check are undeterministic, what emits random FTBFS.

For the record,
Jerome

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages singular depends on:
ii  singular-data 4.0.2-p2+ds-1
ii  singular-modules  4.0.2-p2+ds-1
ii  singular-ui   4.0.2-p2+ds-1

singular recommends no packages.

singular suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#777073: Current version doesn't seem able to factor... 1 !

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Julien:

The latest gmp-ecm package has finally reached testing:
have you made any progress on this issue ? Do you think that we can close it ?

Thanks,
Jerome 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWNbP8AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjVS0IAMbwO3zS5F0OYj+vHrTdGB5q
s7Xpp/ZDTglYD8KQ61QZUzgzrlk1eTQXqUYw+qxCTbh5bNWqAeVKLVBFwN18i/6s
kw7fJJeoaV0KjflGvsInnTt3P9LJEpQUm/FTYRxVNC8k5u5tEGtMq0Hzv2QZhQlf
RWbEPX7tGhI7Wk7Y2+8//Ty64z7rLyD0LDoODnpznG6ZQWmdDrbBlB50mREwP0fx
SrIerTZP0/va/xBjClG1kATAPs2YvQnifKxkrzKPkZvazwgJHLPHFCdHmd086Fsc
lLXWJ3nCzEjL2JlP+vGiNevtSZcsglxXlpaIqZmb18gYNe4PhvH3mEVz3AoOrCI=
=J46q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#800961: singular-ui: fails to upgrade squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie -> stretch

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Andreas:

I downgraded the severity from Serious to Important because
the issue involves the package from the oldoldstable (squeeze)
distribution while the package is not present in oldstable and stable.

Thanks,
Jerome

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWEnqRAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjI+MH/3O7ZRjyzxbNiHxRphhmu/S0
y5HMXY5xz/H6zVMDRq3ELRQXkTOfksb0bfoKPYppyFtYr8Yr003P1InkMi54TGIs
KPDqXg6fvU03V4/bJV/oc4/VjcAYHSlPxOupd/aR/yaGlwJ0+sgsBdEtA+i/WHH5
UYjmVbVIqMkfEuIU8f/eLKYktHwhYIOAnvU1xBCHDptea6llOHZVeEaXyxRGySBu
ba/F/2EY24d434F1JvrdozPw3UDaSFXf4P/Wz59C+qjrEAJ+hQjemhlIubMtSdVh
o9D/gCiHVLPiqLJa5XeouvgprbelcDD0/EumYsaOqEUvgXV9CtLv5+rJRffd1H0=
=eHd0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#793998: apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello:

On 31/08/15 22:38, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> notfixed 793998 0.999b+ds3-3
> found 793998 0.999b+ds3-3
> thanks
> 
> "Aaron M. Ucko"  writes:
> 
>> * distribution_tests fails on *i386 and ppc64el.
>> * ../eg/test_updating fails on arm64, (traditional) powerpc, and s390x.
> 
> These two tests are better now, thanks!

Thanks !

> 
>> * s390x has one other failed test: ../eg/t_test_by_rows.
> 
> This test continues to fail on s390x, though; please keep this bug open
> until you've addressed it as well.


I am on my way to fix it. To begin with, I asked an access to a s390x Debian 
porter.

Thanks for your encouragements,
Jerome

> 
> Thanks!
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV5ObDAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjiJgH/jl+iO2bGa1etxghkCF+PA1F
8YOhs7zLon6UUS7bAPclY9a4IdE6Sb/dSUoxXljJ7PEMyd4qs1pdRYcDIRYq3HJv
huCt4muGlgiyNchkLo4e840mSaxnth0E9KthO2xRZy7kxWGWTahjYEZieaZ2fGMK
VGfeo/VFml84VZTVT+9bvJnqYDxceadljPRvcjEJoxVCCIaVSXqyU9fjC7NP1K2P
vM8Un6ROGZrLaAFryVpfhoWhq/4Azxe/hjVWs16Grapeg6PJ3vBuOYtUsXI31Yrp
4Gg+bH8X70YgAOoKO/679UwGauFFNoUyUbZ1dBQMNc1EbW45IhtB2lJqg1yeUSg=
=utxr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#792850: gmp-ecm, libecm-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Andreas:

I have just installed piuparts 0.66 on my box in order to reproduce the issue:
so far, I I have not succeeded to reproduced the issue.

Please can you confirm the issue ? Or give the proper option to reproduce it ?

Thanks in advance,
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV3fblAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjBU8IAK99p+S0YZVoHZ0gc5Lu1jLp
lDTVawB7razlDFFjrFh2+m6/ykbu5INgKyxyOe82JXTcI/5+CCQ4RRMaPPLTv6Zt
n39/CCHVgmk0fBsUpapaiWKGmOIqkZpg7l8PEUpPRU9jleDh6laP8rBkcrLhB+5Y
4RSMgdlbcQ9nit1jyrc3KBrvOx/Gl+KO80XkIgAidpytLQ+/Y87DxxhJXWiR0nTQ
oASA74dEHDW5OkZa0c4OFXdBH81NnuweBzdWE0Jc8h/+toXpb5pKdj3poL3aL4Sl
cM1BhRdU+q1Ife82uimMNepHKvXA+tIRuzMajoevohjmm6KOscd0yQvvf+uE288=
=Xu44
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#793012: gmp-ecm: FTBFS on mipsel: bad assembly?

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Arturo:

Have you made any progress ?

Thanks,
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV2QsmAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjxcQH/j96ha2fKrodVdu8E9MxMB7F
bMdpC5SokKhRh+Eu6rZGioC59DecM8HkAPuuqiYsmazYe2mNFLpf2rseiTC3jb3V
IdiTlxfV9XkpUHejE3is/HiM/NfDue+2CqwdTwhKDsCB7rRlVtREeIIuD9MwZjFp
FHp8Ou6JJ8opwJVv0XkBOFbt0apy/78XpxLl45nMxzYdoTKuLwIBVRxCaHizkTyX
/v+7uPGnvuSxnyREmqNeVZenWLK8Ssu1Qyccw8Lr0kqbpg3r0I6XpbRNy18tx6qF
FNZTxpYWRpk0guRRyjyByh7DX5m5YCxMAybwDf1COqzdIdxAKW+OhvpRIO8Knd8=
=6ipP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#793998: apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Aaron, thanks for your bug report.

On 30/07/15 19:10, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
 found 793998 0.999e+ds-2
 notfixed 793998 0.999e+ds-2
 thanks

 These failures are still occurring, and may well indicate real problems,

I am agree.

 in which case ignoring them by disabling the tests

tests were not disabled, but only extended tests, otherwise
the it would build just well as the build failed on tests.

 would have been
 inappropriate anyway.


  Could you please take another look?

I will. Meanwhile I contacted the upstream maintainer who
will have a look as well (after his vacation). Of course,
you can also have a look.

Thanks again,
Jerome


 Thanks!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVumIdAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj3xUH+QEI1rM87KxpXmI0JFEz2/Ik
UzGDVitNEm9KUs/+FQJsDy9BrfehLjUqEqiTxh4rttPL2jHhtPjKHlnqQWdPivnm
GnvWQ0KNJyHzExnHlfqC8zRDtKQ6Ixw+gf62SODEQcLd7lzubBHuivc2M+r1c7Jh
MD1z/UuwvJ0KKOpgt6bLfCDOu5c84nbekiVHt6VlsqUhnuYimUWa9Su5eu2OFiGD
1UUlZFUDa0P6uLKwa/mljcu1RvnixQHEGmCTfg7NaFgnZ+MCDl2SxXYXRjqAnW/G
bFnN6bmLbL65K9jjq8ZdLb9qJy3tXZGiDpl21dDpGa/iAZmcf3HW+zK/kA/+hTk=
=AOjp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#793998: apophenia: FTBFS: tests fail on certain architectures

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear Aaron, thanks for your bug report.

On 30/07/15 19:10, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
 found 793998 0.999e+ds-2
 notfixed 793998 0.999e+ds-2
 thanks
 
 These failures are still occurring, and may well indicate real problems,

I am agree.

 in which case ignoring them by disabling the tests

tests were not disabled, but only extended tests, otherwise
the it would build just well as the build failed on tests.

 would have been
 inappropriate anyway.  Could you please take another look?

I will. Meanwhile I contacted the upstream maintainer who
will have a look as well (after his vacation). Of course,
you can also have a look.

Thanks again,
Jerome

 
 Thanks!
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVul0yAAoJEIC/w4IMSybj38AH/R9twUU1lq4J5GEXRzssYTXE
d1MHjI5NFZDdcu/2x6ujSphVfzk+P4tGmlcDFSJoCH7Eh/DKNrNoEEAAQRMr0/xq
cQa0/WiJwGD/Mt8K/hL/5jKXSoBvOVg+nNKUcI3/HOqCOiyes/BgewUWVgtlrQ7G
ba9YG8EVXIgh2WXTz7WWFAysgkKsOlhJP/7A/nibVgSkqH3NjTRQbpLQh2FoPOtn
9eW2StTCKrQ63/5pgHpP1ylLNDes5lbCyCVz5g/EY7H4Q0I/WEuIqSD6rDret5BX
CBGt/m0yawif4jiNICoIgNJmzyyXXnDxVSG73D3c3t2wFAXNlc270Z1cZEdGf2g=
=MnhQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#792850: gmp-ecm, libecm-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Andreas,

thanks for your report.

I am agree that there is an error here:
I would save some space and at the end I get a bugreport.
Poor me :-(

Whatever. My point is that I am ready to fix it:
the main issue right now is that I am blind to this error because
my piuparts cannot detect it: I run piuparts version 0.64~bpo8+1
((on my fresh Jessie box)) while your attached log was produced
by the most recent version 0.65~201507160102~0.62-31728-gf6286b :
in short, I feel stuck, not to say uncomfortable.

It would be great it I could reproduce the issue on my own box
before to try to fix it; I think.

Thanks for your work,
Jerome


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVuDZSAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjMJ4H/jbMF8tjvtFWRhCRGQENGh5q
vH5oTOP7/zs/hjw1xkbgGnzeq85f6cTpJrkIre1plLHGqGg8lwSxOGPHlNaKoySz
M1zlNhNjFVhkxKOwfBDw2LpVFVxh7x/Mh7IX7AfFSQvdnR88umj2X+7TNylnri9G
wPzTEghUmeYjoUAUnvDPIg57gmy2lhssahXgXFKMQYGn1rpwcn2qSkKatRsLuSeS
ReBb769iYPIq3jN499D6nFoOVeukJhyeWRPpQZiPxqS2omzCMbJzXpmS8Y+IwXF6
hkKZjDyqvKnAwQQ6AWfKkIqNjyufzxkatR/+D1iiLb6WxOMZaGOSw/dnylVSWQM=
=tztT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#777772: apophenia: ftbfs with GCC-5

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi, finally a new upstream version has been released:
the corresponding package has been push at Alioth, and
sponsorship is on the way.
The new upstream closes this bug.
Jerome

[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/apophenia.git
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVoPzYAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjKd8IAI+x1eUIIPC1AD/LqKGoPjl5
ZatneOBCu5rIQ4M4uY4iGjwGSP6lHC2zP5cFkLqrczceyj/7txSouZQFWYoLjauV
3BNyeCC0QTbV657d5lNG0S0o/avMT/WC3xJaBQ+yrDH0nBUfprmj8elZw31SUOUx
mEaF3d+iWa3YohsdJxgBFsGfjiAqIWlBme8DvYi+kl1cij+4Ihxm8Oed6gLtmu1Z
UHOIqN8GBC++bjmd2JYBDLKMp57mQdfTp8sIMLeoRC10USLoVluiZY/Eq9o6jGsR
8VxxZ4m5aKIO8Oqa3z5ali14K3OKEVdUfXIShp5Fq2HBmVHwCTvB+oDP7/z3CsQ=
=+zlb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi, finally a new upstream version has been released:
the corresponding package has been push at Alioth, and
sponsorship is on the way.
The new upstream closes this bug.
Jerome

[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/apophenia.git
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVoPzmAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjsk0H/0Whe4qzN4o8miM9oCfb0EQH
udz439kh9YqLnn3PPV7eXuW76KfSaXy6PSu4Np9VHP64Hsn/tcRVv2PiocrJbNBI
32HOLE8k6/TglfVTj52obS1ZO/UKEnFwlE7zxMD/2up/OLUTKlDMO051izfKzmAV
GwbQv9UjmwQLOkUGY4NOKR24NvuNaBfgzGNj0ihpbT1EDxrr3zwtygEF3yzXC9Pq
rkTjyVX/Ez5GnDk9Qm7BJ8spPFsi22RsAoWAoSUK00pC4PBYiN9upS1HBw3CuTJh
iYla0NNYmBb7XpMTgqq+53a2yQAHwOyD3qiMKe0EeLYfT4gWCf/ehnyn5QOl2kY=
=EcmD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi, please be patient, a new release version is on the grill.
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVm8gNAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjMZwH/iCgXYHVtFxvuqPzUIB2N6Lz
SifwYY45dVjLdhaKbppCkzHBArHS4tEgT9j6XobT5ithWNMPFkoITcD5222un7Or
iKIa59VRUwIfvUMOeDs4Ro7E9f22tbDU0HP+tQLwyqRIha1WK3DUEl16GD/K4uol
Ztzx1oDHECnwCljz4t4/cJ2tbYdkJDY7kdDiW5dRk3p2MgzgWbtxjIAfGzGu9zb6
gikw67RO8cmXHThXpka7rLZ/Nsrd0reTjQjTS7aEb6hqhjTK1O2kW5Hst9016C7j
nf4tPUkXTz1gsMgfolmbYBhi6EL695QzSlZPxi1Sv5Z2Or0zS442tqpcfNJ5hKo=
=zfoa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#790509: libmpfi-dev: transitional package uninstallable

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Andreas,

thanks for your report and your fix.

On 30/06/15 00:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
 Package: libmpfi-dev
 Version: 1.5.1+ds-1
 Severity: grave
 Tags: sid
 Justification: renders package unusable
 User: debian...@lists.debian.org
 Usertags: piuparts
 
 Hi,
 
 during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
 installable in sid:
 
   The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   libmpfi-dev : Depends: libmpfi0-dev (= 1.5.1+ds-1) but it is not going to 
 be installed
 
 This is caused by the Conflicts in libmpfi0-dev:
 
 Package: libmpfi0-dev
 Source: mpfi
 Version: 1.5.1+ds-1
 Replaces: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.1-3)
 Provides: libmpfi-dev
 Depends: libmpfi0 (= 1.5.1+ds-1), libmpfi0-dev-common (= 1.5.1+ds-1), 
 libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev
 Conflicts: libmpfi-dev
 Breaks: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.1-3)
 
 
 The transitional package being uninstallable will prevent migration
 to testing. Please don't drop the transitional package (because
 upgrades won't automatically switch from a real package to a
 virtual one) but drop the Conflicts for now.
 For stretch+1 you can drop the transitional package and switch to
 unversioned Breaks+Replaces (or Conflicts+Replaces) to ensure the
 old transitional one gets removed upon upgrades.

Let be specific. The current d/control metadata for libmpfi0-dev are:

Package: libmpfi0-dev
Provides: libmpfi-dev
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
Replaces: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.1-3)
Breaks: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.1-3)
Depends:
 libmpfi0 (= ${binary:Version}), libmpfi0-dev-common (= ${source:Version}),
 libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev, ${misc:Depends}
Conflicts: libmpfi-dev
Multi-Arch: same
Description: multiple precision floating-point interval computation library -- 
libdev
[[LONG DESCRIPTION]]


May I replace them by:


Package: libmpfi0-dev
Provides: libmpfi-dev
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
Replaces: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.1-3)
Breaks: libmpfi-dev (= 1.5.1-3)
Depends:
 libmpfi0 (= ${binary:Version}), libmpfi0-dev-common (= ${source:Version}),
 libmpfr-dev, libgmp-dev, ${misc:Depends}
Multi-Arch: same
Description: multiple precision floating-point interval computation library -- 
libdev
[[LONG DESCRIPTION]]


Namely, removing the Conflicts: entry.

 
 
 Cheers,
 
 Andreas
 
 PS: Is it really necessary to switch from an unversioned -dev package
 to a versioned one?

For consistency ?


Best wishes,
Jerome

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVkdUoAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjltsH/RWaOTW8Hy5q4YL100sUNnKY
Q0spSuFleAtlizziWARSXGBD8qQQTVfmRvzkKLXy7oovQajr1U1w/j8RAJKqTkym
ztSPgorbGhkWo/+Gd+M5llwmheEO4Jq9FLQZ15ZFibwHxK0AyPmZR2UjEjrgG41M
nZUNdWUZBnLauCCAmBpQjWtLRl+HiumhhjAlTWVoeB8wk7awUvjgeM0QN39su5wS
TKhP2T/mwm368OrYC6GISMybTpEC9j1YZDz6EMMdl//lRd2L3I5pz6j+wNm0Q2rf
/YHGypFlzpdr1pH6mAF6djKc8qJLzV8tKv2U3qsLXN7Mthfz/zvcNMfnW5NJ+DI=
=8uzq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sigh ! Still waiting.
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVjK6hAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjxicH/jzuiXmRoRCBPKXnZy6zCEgK
WJmBFV2jwLaH/C7BDdgO1e0nwbE8GUCj3Z/uypAfTRQ3ZqHw2lBHCoeC77uwmalp
OOLHT1w8rDUw04JwqlOraGxAFfyoSCiDOJ5wiaA5NbE/amm9NjzvGIjtLuSQF4mL
6SXGJPG57xuXcd5+8nU0IHJSp0XlTuPWgkg3zBHySKONrkiP3FVFCarlH/mo0+t3
DbPlRalfr6e0DyKTYUrz7BDq53/QKoSgcZFP6NaLI/j+Y02GpkNth6o7A+RkIEpu
Srw32fUyKxCLn4UYGjDe/ml9O71UEKtEzhpGyTOFOCG6LXSheRiRxuveX8cieP0=
=9S37
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: mpfi_1.5.1+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear All:



On 16/06/15 20:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
 
 Hi Jerome,
 
 unfortunately I have to reject your package.
 
 According to NEWS and several file headers the license is LGPL2.1 and 
 not GPL as in your debian/copyright

I have just corrected my mistake and deposited the corrected package to Alioth.


Thanks,
Jerome

 
 Please also tell upstream that there should be a file COPYING.LIB.
 
 Thanks!
  Thorsten
 
 ===
 
 Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
 your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
 concerns.
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVgWi0AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjis0IAJD1pvtTTu5ErBOehiSl5nHL
syVbGmdpAFMSXEdYaXDMVW77WVdBH5jXIYmcwqDGVnpkFhutfuZ7Z7OWZDD+IquZ
i9FVDgf3In+0HeGS/Ef3UqvySD65tG4I6DPi7s8E/W1CWRZM0vLqOdtgPDOC3xjU
aaY2YeVgUY0BexA6d+Z9JTuTb6Al6L22cojbXEHHJFKfyKQhCpp7K1fL8oPvR7JM
V4FM7S8s+nZkzZVI1JyxR6Kh6DXVEt9/DBG3pMUTIlUMbhp2egeTwaWmhP6I3FJK
C+IXm5pWIDIu4yGgX8nQHK/UoGIPDJuVSmyx5qAh7+ELhza/7dPedOU8tytQ9G4=
=t7Mc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi There !

Still waiting for the official release.

Thanks,
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVS+sOAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjf78IAJ359/cFFieg7SvJktgrwBGO
4w8rmDEyLhNK/tq8kOvJ1IlJOwpyJ0HIEXdpJ7FwvLu0dgOrxs/Wiv+VNdqgbiU4
R2xE9BEpUhUwHjOly7DBRihU0MxQIvmijISZ3+JxMJT0MiI4K8r1xiH9Upz6y4C6
DGvT6HpYg6/T4bI2Asa4fGyD1mOdp4QabM/C1aJmUOYe0WD3pi2lVgyiPb86IWmu
WhO/5R2dzsSI1AyhS8cjrIqHu2pwL5mpTklGsie+EvYGBHniFRfwc4c0NmtnVMQk
sDLOoF+MH/KAZvOLulwo52IY+wtJJsaaVCt9YLv1uYNWubXOEDoEZSAk/XxvTTc=
=uC8K
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing: FIXED

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear All !

The upstream maintainer has discarded the COPYING2 license in his GIT upstream 
source for Apophenia.
So from now Apophenia will be distribution under the GSL-2 license.

I am waiting for the next release of Apophenia (release 0.999d) which may 
arrive soon to close this RC bug.

Thanks,
Jerome

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVO8UJAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjq3IH/Rz32gw0IoqK9lCxGE1c/Vwr
5TVmKnljo0lluE58GyucwiPqOEuvcbNVmh/bxBwbC0AJVZ6EwEiItcONtSTIuXrz
hNx7CijWDDGQq4ugyqzGaZoA9kBGHBifuEAdCuHlB6mLqwLmAnF0J6SJHy2G9QP0
MTNAK3q9TssKR+YpbMvjLtWvwpMi/GXOc7PMEWgcpwWqpWyvbLs1qFjiQAjRja7O
Ied642PWuuPjX/6lNjicfbxMTjQ3BvXkfLqTSoQ2iSKvUbrNlRLzEUUTTfX3E35x
5hOi8lPp+L/XyVnM1cZREJ7xAuOa3hpch+0vvKPo8oJc9/EWhd3XhHjFMZ30YFM=
=MW0o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#781566: COPYING2 contains some armchair licensing

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear All,

I forwarded the bug report to the upstream maintainer:
please find below his answer.

On 31/03/15 05:08, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
 Package: apophenia Severity: serious User: paul...@debian.org 
 Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks
 
 Right, hello, maintainers!
 
 Thanks for all your work,
 
 
 This work is licensed under the GPLv2. At least, it tries to.
 COPYING2 contains a further restriction on distribution that results
 in a work that is *not* distributable, since the headers say v2 (not
 v2 or later) with these changes (the GPLv3 lets us remove further
 restrictions)
 
 I question if a lawyer was behind these changes, and I also question
 the validity of this license, and as a result, I question the 
 distributablity.
 
 Could you please ask upstream to either pick AGPL, LGPL or GPL? It
 seems like the author wants to use the GPL, but the first part of
 COPYING2 wants to be AGPL, and the second wants to be LGPL.

- 
--8-

- ---

First, imagine a bug report entitled file.c contains some armchair coding. 
Such a statement would imply there is a class of people allowed to write code, 
from which the author of file.c is excluded. I feel it against the ethos of 
free, open software that text would be accepted or rejected based on the 
qualifications of the person writing it.

But because much of the bug report is concerned with the qualifications of the 
author, here goes: no, I do not have a law degree. However, my work as a Free 
Software Foundation employee included writing white papers on intellectual 
property law and a legal brief filed in the US Federal Circuit. My 
recommendations and legal reasoning in the brief, a law review paper, and other 
writings from the mid to late `00s are not far from the ruling and reasoning in 
last year's Supreme Court ruling in Alice Corp. Over the course of my work with 
the FSF on intellectual property law, I spoke directly with the people involved 
in writing the AGPL, who expressed some disappointment with how the AGPL was 
worded, and said that they wished that they'd just stated directly that running 
code on a public server is distribution. I have also had extensive dealings 
with the authors of GPLv3, and know the license, its history, and many of the 
considerations that went into it very well. These interacti!
 ons went i
nto the considerations for the licensing of Apophenia.


There are three parts to the Apophenia license as written. I recommend keeping 
the first, changing the text of the second, and cutting third. 


1. The first part of the license is the GPLv2. There are other packages that 
are based on GPLv2, and not GPLv2 or later. For example, I understand that 
Debian distributes the Linux kernel. Not only is the kernel licensed under 
GPLv2, the GPLv2 license as distributed with the kernel is prefaced with 
explicit sniping about GPLv3:

Also note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as the kernel is 
concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not v2.2 or v3.x 
or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/COPYING

Based on this precedent, I believe that distributing a Debian package under the 
GPLv2 (not and later) is valid.


2. The first paragraph of COPYING2 is an attempt to clarify what the AGPLv1 is 
saying.  The common summary of the AGPL is that it requires that software 
distributed over the network must make source available, but the way it 
expresses that is by requiring that certain HTTP links must not be removed. 
Here is the text for you to try to follow:

- --
2d) If the Program as you received it is intended to interact with users 
through a computer network and if, in the version you received, any user 
interacting with the Program was given the opportunity to request transmission 
to that user of the Program's complete source code, you must not remove that 
facility from your modified version of the Program or work based on the 
Program, and must offer an equivalent opportunity for all users interacting 
with your Program through a computer network to request immediate transmission 
by HTTP of the complete source code of your modified version or other 
derivative work.
- --

Why not just come out and say that making available over a network triggers the 
obligation to open the source code? In June of 2007, I wrote the paragraph in 
COPYING2 that attempts to state this directly.

- --
- --An application hosted on a server and remotely operated by users, such as a 
web application or database server, is understood to be distribution of the 
software, and therefore all GPL v2 clauses regarding distribution apply. For 
example, a web application must include a link for downloading the application 
source code.
- 

Re: Comments regarding tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-1_amd64.changes

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Paul,

On 11/03/15 02:14, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote:
 Howdy maintainer,
 
 This is a new upstream release during freeze. Have you talked with the
 Release Team?

tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-1 has been in the NEW queue since 4 months.

My intention was not to get in Jessie but to step forward for bringing Sage in 
Stretch.
 
 Would you like me to reject this so you can retarget experimental?

My understanding is that the current material in the NEW queue will be free 
just after Jessie release:
can tachyon_0.99~b6+dsx-1 just stay in the NEW queue until Jessie release ?
If not, let retarget it.

Thnaks,
Jerome

 
 Thanks!
   Paul
 
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU/+/5AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjqE8IAJrq6jVzkdeuhs02ml3JIK6N
6JRDyLzemInYfiMfqLVwpv/x1rEteIoMjhdah2iuDh1I83tYF6W9/+MdYw+kfs8w
5egP517l/2Fn5s79OWnTeODeRBq2Ep31hV9ctabauzoD9oNE0iukLTRoxeBFnn92
F7S3XyN9fF0BoDBNuY9qKgXYY7k1m42roG4b1n4yYu7ZgdKIMLjFitlDIskPJEf7
h5bWhX20F887md4+7WHMi/2/gVTKMsPUHiD+rMgcJIQe7+BJqqdBtF4pq3QGennG
fA8xpbMUBuMz85X3gZxMjieeE7czaw6oY48QJZb1A+mAyA8KiGv6GJPy7j/1FI0=
=nwp1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#764904: apophenia: FTBFS - test suite times out or has unexpected failures

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Edmund,

On 09/12/14 10:12, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
 The changes described above are now in the git repo:
 
 http://github.com/b-k/apophenia

Thanks for the update.

I will look at it soon, I look for upgrading the Debian material.

 
 Do you want to add them as a patch to the Debian version?
 


Thanks,
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUhsMVAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjtQEH/jIIjO5N3mgs+g6/oYpmNyua
vfZQJM8CRYzts5VfXCWbTu/dyblEMUSR3lbGEqtN/Y7V8xCfdPnTo5OzOaFG7c62
IDu5KqREullno332m6wSwVCoclDnwpz1nSWJbmseXtCgWl+iEfxklpyevIOoLuoc
1dLKpN6TR9fav39TU6fgv5POTSy/1106siald++PAnaycmMzdrpVECUOs1MWfuO8
1G0eiKoq2UxYLZgv4ptYJkPAypN9vxSkVZkUlab71wNQ+FzWapd83ga8nf2FN87z
8SY6jVi3HGlU0sMRZOVaLARsXDxsbbntFHs7WcOsVQUOtR+TRL3pwyXix2nvNCU=
=V5Gt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#772245: gap-scscp: bashism in /bin/sh script

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Raphael,

thanks for your report.

I can reproduce the bugreport issue on my box.

I have just double checked: `sleep' seems not to be a shell command,
but it is rather a command-line provided by coreutils according to
the man page sleep(1). From the sleep(1) manpage itself, we read in the 
DESCRIPTION section (second sentence):

Unlike most implementations that require NUMBER be an integer, here 
NUMBER may be an arbitrary floating point number.


So

sleep 0.25

is valid, and I guess that checkbashisms is over reacting here.
what do you think ?

Best wishes,
Jerome

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgwNvAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjPPYH/ilJfwAOGr853bMDtW7ma7Fo
BmDRj8dTMfYky8uX8+ceTPE6Ua5Z2V1SyKXmhSWAn4FNYWW+7yh+asj6zNXQA3bJ
JvjWiC6zVKyY2APkM6NAs4zGr05m/QGugVWajRXJrA4g8rGSnKxiYk+4UdexAeBK
a7DVxANrELzDEVNiLcQ16dWP0MkdWuikNxWWIOMMRTV/WGHZDy6tPo5aQv2gxadQ
pZopmtSWfoaU0E47JqBZRZROwin4enWsZUbBjEJyUY9VSLerDA6EZGcmIwwHO9l0
a8RACcEcCvugnzLkgbnJvpw3/YBYDQlcbXsjJg7vE5DZZPg6fOGBgQP6g+bG6kM=
=k4hB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#764904: apophenia: FTBFS - test suite times out or has unexpected failures

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 11/11/14 18:40, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
 Some good news: the code doesn't seem to need a lot of changes to make
 it work on arm64. I did this:
 
 * Changed the type of the local variables to which the value returned
   from fgetc, getopt or get_next is assigned from char to int.
 
 * Made get_next return int instead of char, and, to make it return EOF
   when it should, set buffer[len] to (char)-1 when len  bs and
   instead of returning buffer[(*ptr)++] assign that to a new local
   variable r and return (r == (char)-1 ? EOF : r). (In a
   ISO-8859-1-encoded file 'ÿ' will be interpreted as EOF, but that was
   presumably already the case. If you really want all characters to be
   correctly distinguished then you will have to add an out-of-band way
   of denoting EOF.)
 
 With those changes, apophenia passed its tests on arm64.

Perfect. Can you send a patch or the modified source in such a way I can submit 
it to the upstream maintainer.
Of course, you can do it yourself directly.

Thanks for your contribution,
Jerome

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUYmk/AAoJEIC/w4IMSybj4pEH/igjKKYVmlp6O4c5MrjoEWbI
ZsHTjZ0J4/dJJheW2Ev7IXgS8VNz5E3i8UYlOJf7Eo5tTyrefzsOOIUzjRn1enSw
x5NxHE6VtR/MKi1DU4pa4XGEH2MFjNSXZnw1Ql5DkGkp5vU8sc4VzMhqxouogUcs
x6H8ONADAPXoEVmBX5N2pCHepi8MEDKz75syO/WjIiuoFb/1847mPo78qNCKyY3O
rbPHkOH65iz8NM7hyhxwNmhe2d5Hl8AATuGIFlT+sLAtnf2lUDSVD6krtSotaaae
216AdUbwnJjf1ILTHDaOIuee+cAj7sB/DuByB6wGOioOlzPukwwztGrxQ/pdneQ=
=VT9o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#764904: apophenia: FTBFS - test suite times out or has unexpected failures

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 11/11/14 18:40, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
 Some good news: the code doesn't seem to need a lot of changes to make
 it work on arm64. I did this:

 * Changed the type of the local variables to which the value returned
   from fgetc, getopt or get_next is assigned from char to int.

 * Made get_next return int instead of char, and, to make it return EOF
   when it should, set buffer[len] to (char)-1 when len  bs and
   instead of returning buffer[(*ptr)++] assign that to a new local
   variable r and return (r == (char)-1 ? EOF : r). (In a
   ISO-8859-1-encoded file 'ÿ' will be interpreted as EOF, but that was
   presumably already the case. If you really want all characters to be
   correctly distinguished then you will have to add an out-of-band way
   of denoting EOF.)

 With those changes, apophenia passed its tests on arm64.

Perfect. Can you send a patch or the modified source in such a way I can submit 
it to the upstream maintainer.
Of course, you can do it yourself directly.

Thanks for your contribution,
Jerome


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUYnK6AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjIkEH/22I8BLcdQ8d2Qp7GxHbtWFd
KPEqXOCIPLVXuBTMtbdXUY+Zo+8MMiKL2YE3exjW68HvRQODPIsHUmOMy3/NCtft
wIsQFtduAq9saOMhymz9amPzdUiJW2GEPKXnRTkt0okfIb1km3X8f6EOv3u77nLA
tzQMNfsEAqGiWGwsAbZ9HZ98t9QQbv1Cr+HI4wuQQzfvdQ9EdVtBVm7GaW4gbeJd
f4KId9ilQGrcyhMe8SfMlPfw7B+Lsz+5qAeTsQIkx/RU2W+8iGYBRwd+ZduqslaE
Sdu710Crd+4PItwuCAaZKebrpCtYYplj6w8mLe2tZ6lQPhMZJw6m2U0zEdVRvIk=
=Tq5/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#764904: apophenia: FTBFS - test suite times out or has unexpected failures

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thanks Edmund for your comment:
I will forward them to the upstream author.

On 10/11/14 23:48, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
 By the way, it might be a good idea to remove the /dev/null 21
 from the command lines in case the compiler wants to warn you about
 this sort of thing. (I don't know whether GCC does in this particular
 case.)
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUYVyoAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjKs0IANSzM1Bd7KybP7qK43ZhYSfR
yGB0qP9nOBgVTmb/ujq5309ykdMvdEyCAgo/8HzjC+ttHFukYUnVc7f80PsVC/Em
uTNYsOC9Dc5R/u75ZaiKFNK2L6Svns7CR4cYJ33mSdptpVYaPSYnxsfL+jEXKO8D
9WY4B3m22qQe1CXWEdKDCCLqx+j5KAbHQPdoqm2wagg0gUa3DI6H+faMjmBGjhQK
3NrO8twq/Hss9WKMlr9H8zQ5KAcmqVALIjRHcj2+LNHjgrk2QjeqZNHkObVOlrFz
cvoUrr4wXMJn7EeCfMUHMkImUaJdup/GZYmsqVylhAUEb0NV5pHtnoqtEqUuwdY=
=gKn6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#764904: apophenia: FTBFS - test suite times out or has unexpected failures

[Jerome BENOIT]

On 10/11/14 23:48, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
 By the way, it might be a good idea to remove the /dev/null 21
 from the command lines in case the compiler wants to warn you about
 this sort of thing. (I don't know whether GCC does in this particular
 case.)
 

Please could you specify the place of this code.
Thanks in advance, Jerome

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#766912: sympow: FTBFS - build-arch/build-indep build scheme failure

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: sympow
Version: 1.023-2
Severity: normal

It appears that the newly implemented build-arch/build-indep build machinery
fails because the Configure script can not find the PARI caculator gp:
this machinerie can be hardened by setting a default value.

Thanks,
Jerome

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Wheezy*
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (990, 'stable-updates'), (990, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13.10-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages sympow depends on:
ii  libc62.13-38+deb7u6
ii  pari-gp  2.7.2-1
ii  sympow-data  1.023-2

sympow recommends no packages.

sympow suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#766231: sympow: FTBFS - floating-point precision test/check failure

[Jerome Benoit]

Package: sympow
Version: 1.023-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

It appears that the floating-point test/check machinery fails
for some architectures: this test/check must be harddened.

Thanks,
Jerome

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Wheezy*
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (990, 'stable-updates'), (990, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13.10-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages sympow depends on:
ii  libc62.13-38+deb7u6
ii  pari-gp  2.7.2-1
ii  sympow-data  1.023-1

sympow recommends no packages.

sympow suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#764903: apophenia: FTBFS on mips: doxygen takes too long: RESOLVED

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for the hint: build-arch/build-indep scheme has been set up.
(I have just deposited the material at Alioth).

Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUOpn/AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjsQQIAIf2xhoIO5kOxxntB5bzLCf7
NwMi9hO+tmHIvYHXB992sOoJkeb9zF2jdwMwx4OIWd/ZSsxzyXEk01vay9O0yOqZ
MLlh/2US6jPSf3zqpFRhpO6obqdRRXvqZeOgvdBBykCFINzuV5tjS4jeSqLFzhaO
nlY1/advXAHZ4UeiErUFNMshwjfQNRji++wo/0g1qMkeUGlo5X7KeG6OzPEkplkz
GlHQuFlqnP3q09EPuXyFn0dprym+icJ2danSlrpbE2EsmxzlR9XZwsTDeWPPlrNA
/qnARi2vXWFYPFAqgy51D9s/8wx56q+kUjuV6to5jEQAKTNtpZBQpNmzH9DNqFg=
=PnQ+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Comments regarding apophenia_0.999b+ds1-1_amd64.changes

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for the noticed:
it has been fixed for the coming package.

On 09/10/14 14:30, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
 Dear Maintainer,
 
 I marked your package for accept, but asprintf.c is licensed 
 under GPLv2+ and not only GPLv2.
 
   Thorsten
 
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUNps2AAoJEIC/w4IMSybj4ZUH/09dGw+TYmfGLGB04F9QI4ex
wos1MMeB0P0nSZhVHWfg3mndC7Rb5ztsHjGsZ2Kdm9hjTC5FcoUlvK7ChzuYHkRp
X4tw1f7QLhMca1vNQI2lV1s5Cih6J+YC6oZp4WpCJ6vtpmFOCGKC2IefnDuCQXCz
m/wZqzZKY7DbhaLMQObAwNkFZG7ajNv1Za4Du0A4xSkKq2zIWTbJL3GgtUNcAiE9
nSkM3fmRROvB7vELwkBl3avii0BBJwLrYE8d4vO8oCoekBuGKymgp2L2Hh8N2Upb
iVzucBv2esEw1egsvBZa1oBrdtPkFP+5h3mMQr7Z+jvSEFsgngiw6d4xLnJDHvs=
=+/tg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#762730: symmetrica: FTBFS: autoreconf: 'configure.ac' or 'configure.in' is required

[Jerome BENOIT]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

a fix has been already deposited at Alioth [1],
and review has been asked to the sponsor.


Thanks,
Jerome

[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/symmetrica.git
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUIyFFAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjiTsH/A/th7Ch/+n1xCAMXDnLWZuX
/XggbOcA6XpaKAegloboC+S9d+kV5vietArxKLTOix+Gys6skz1yuwXoVLd9ePwV
EhtwfoEQP23yC/N9W8GslWuwC4qp0/luDU49sVbPocGSWmjOd0mm2Mr5NBbUH1mK
aQYTJwo3sNXPxGw/fJ5Hljr5CAdgv8EQsNL3gVYwIze89SSV7YseAQiJU2rJtv5F
7zr0qPRoYEQMrfA4icgSQE5b+ZywHXNkrFzY4s50Ek0Og9pyrm6Cu3JdlbxS/TYA
xk/Q3UZTa2AicwsEyHzMZPrTmiRsMuZQXkZr9XrvxG4iDVskI/zF45ko1dMg2jY=
=PyuK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers