Hi Brian!
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Peter" == Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter> Pollywog, you really should not include signatures of other
> Peter> mails in replies :)
>
> but that mail was PGP/MIME formatted. So I don't think it is quite as simpl
> "Peter" == Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Hi Pollywog!
>> mutt thinks: > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30
>> 03:33:11 2000) --] > gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24
>> 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC > gpg: BAD signature from
>
Hi Ethan!
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > mutt thinks:
> > > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --]
> > > gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID
> > > 2C447AFC
> > > gpg: BAD signature from "Ethan R. Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 03:34:25AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi Pollywog!
>
>
> mutt thinks:
> > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --]
> > gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC
> > gpg: BAD signature from "Ethan R. Benson <
Hi Pollywog!
> mutt thinks:
> > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --]
> > gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC
> > gpg: BAD signature from "Ethan R. Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > [-- End of PGP output --]
Argl. I really should
Hi Pollywog!
mutt thinks:
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --]
> gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC
> gpg: BAD signature from "Ethan R. Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> [-- End of PGP output --]
What might be the reason?
On
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 12:58:09AM -, Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 30-Apr-2000 00:17:24 Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 12:12:19AM -, Pollywog wrote:
> >> Where does one get the extensions?
> >
> > i don't know where the upstream sources are, but they are packaged
> > for
> > de
On 30-Apr-2000 00:17:24 Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 12:12:19AM -, Pollywog wrote:
>> Where does one get the extensions?
>
> i don't know where the upstream sources are, but they are packaged
> for
> debian (potato at least) in non-US/non-free gpg-idea and gpg-rsa.
>
> not
Hi Pollywog!
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Pollywog wrote:
> Where does one get the extensions?
You'll find it at your local gpg mirror.
e.g:
http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/privacy/gnupg/contrib/
You want {idea,rsa{,ref}}.c
Don't forget to put
load-extension idea
load-extension rsa
into your ~/.gnupg/opti
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 12:12:19AM -, Pollywog wrote:
> Where does one get the extensions?
i don't know where the upstream sources are, but they are packaged for
debian (potato at least) in non-US/non-free gpg-idea and gpg-rsa.
note that gpg-rsa is illegal inside the US. there is a gpg-rs
Where does one get the extensions?
On 29-Apr-2000 23:13:57 Ethan Benson wrote:
> that version is anchient, and was not very compatible, even with
> newer
> PGP. GPG is not really compatible with PGP2.6 (read RSA/IDEA) (not
> without the non-free extensions)
11 matches
Mail list logo