Re: PGP vs. GPG BAD SIGNATURE

Hi Pollywog! mutt thinks: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --] gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC gpg: BAD signature from Ethan R. Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [-- End of PGP output --] What might be the reason? On Sun, 30

Re: PGP vs. GPG BAD SIGNATURE

Hi Pollywog! mutt thinks: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --] gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC gpg: BAD signature from Ethan R. Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [-- End of PGP output --] Argl. I really should read more

Re: PGP vs. GPG BAD SIGNATURE

On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 03:34:25AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: Hi Pollywog! mutt thinks: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --] gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC gpg: BAD signature from Ethan R. Benson [EMAIL

Re: PGP vs. GPG BAD SIGNATURE

Hi Ethan! On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Ethan Benson wrote: mutt thinks: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --] gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC gpg: BAD signature from Ethan R. Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [-- End of

Re: PGP vs. GPG BAD SIGNATURE

Peter == Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Hi Pollywog! mutt thinks: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --] gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC gpg: BAD signature from Ethan R. Benson

Re: PGP vs. GPG BAD SIGNATURE

Hi Brian! On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Brian May wrote: Peter == Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Pollywog, you really should not include signatures of other Peter mails in replies :) but that mail was PGP/MIME formatted. So I don't think it is quite as simple as what you