On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:07:23 +0100, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[...]
Smith - The Matrix
- Original Message -
From: Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Tait [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian-Security List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: Mailserver HDD organization
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
Exim does
hi ya andrew
theres's about a dozen anti-virus sw...
http://www.Linux-sec.net/Mail/#AntiVirus
have fun linuxing
alvin
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
I am using Exiscan: http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/. Installation is fairly
straight forward.
Along with the linux version of
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:07:23 +0100, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[...]
Smith - The Matrix
- Original Message -
From: Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Tait [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian-Security List debian-security@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: Mailserver HDD organization
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote
hi ya andrew
theres's about a dozen anti-virus sw...
http://www.Linux-sec.net/Mail/#AntiVirus
have fun linuxing
alvin
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
I am using Exiscan: http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/. Installation is fairly
straight forward.
Along with the linux version of
hi all,
i have one question. I am going to start a security companie. I know, every person
must choose its own mailserver
software. I have tryed out qmail, exim and a little bit postfix. Qmail seams
to be very secure and very fast. The configuration i think is to difficult
vor every System. Now
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
das exim not handle a big mail site like 1000 users?
Hm, well, Cambridge University, home of Exim, has what, several tens of
thousands? They seem to be doing OK with Exim:
$ telnet hermes.cam.ac.uk smtp
Trying 131.111.8.67...
Connected to
At 12:37 PM + 1/19/02, Pete Ryland wrote:
I wouldn't always believe the version reported by a large mail server. It's
quite common practice (I'm sure a lot on this list may do so) to display a
version string that is not at all accurate in an attempt to put off crackers
or create a honeypot.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:04:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Thomas,
why schould i not use exim for my customers?
Is it insecure? (i have read the mailinglists and there is nothing i have heard
about)
das exim not handle a big mail site like 1000 users?
--- cut ---
From [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, 19. January 2002 13:37, Pete Ryland wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 12:02:59PM +, Thomas Thurman wrote:
$ telnet hermes.cam.ac.uk smtp
Trying 131.111.8.67...
Connected to yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk.
Escape character is '^]'.
220
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Johannes Weiss wrote:
220 yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk ESMTP Exim 3.22 #1 Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:01:26 +
* It says that it's Exim
[...]
I wouldn't always believe the version reported by a large mail server.
ACK, but the is syntactically correct is an Exim proof I think.
AIUI,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AIUI, Exim was originally written to handle Cambridge's email
anyway, so the fact that hermes is running Exim isn't a huge
surprise. :)
The Mailserver of TU-Berlin (I think more than 1 Users) and other
central Mailserver here run Exim.
Previously Hendrik Naumann wrote:
Why whas Exim choosen to be the standart MTA for Debian?
It was a good successor to smail, postfix didn't exist yet, sendmail
ate too much resources and the rest was too obscure.
Wichert.
--
_
hi all,
i have one question. I am going to start a security companie. I know, every
person must choose its own mailserver
software. I have tryed out qmail, exim and a little bit postfix. Qmail seams
to be very secure and very fast. The configuration i think is to difficult
vor every System. Now
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
das exim not handle a big mail site like 1000 users?
Hm, well, Cambridge University, home of Exim, has what, several tens of
thousands? They seem to be doing OK with Exim:
$ telnet hermes.cam.ac.uk smtp
Trying 131.111.8.67...
Connected to
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 12:02:59PM +, Thomas Thurman wrote:
$ telnet hermes.cam.ac.uk smtp
Trying 131.111.8.67...
Connected to yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk ESMTP Exim 3.22 #1 Sat, 19 Jan 2002 11:58:44 +
At 12:37 PM + 1/19/02, Pete Ryland wrote:
I wouldn't always believe the version reported by a large mail server. It's
quite common practice (I'm sure a lot on this list may do so) to display a
version string that is not at all accurate in an attempt to put off crackers
or create a honeypot.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, 19. January 2002 13:37, Pete Ryland wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 12:02:59PM +, Thomas Thurman wrote:
$ telnet hermes.cam.ac.uk smtp
Trying 131.111.8.67...
Connected to yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk.
Escape character is '^]'.
220
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Johannes Weiss wrote:
220 yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk ESMTP Exim 3.22 #1 Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:01:26 +
* It says that it's Exim
[...]
I wouldn't always believe the version reported by a large mail server.
ACK, but the is syntactically correct is an Exim proof I think.
AIUI,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AIUI, Exim was originally written to handle Cambridge's email
anyway, so the fact that hermes is running Exim isn't a huge
surprise. :)
The Mailserver of TU-Berlin (I think more than 1 Users) and other
central Mailserver here run Exim.
Previously Hendrik Naumann wrote:
Why whas Exim choosen to be the standart MTA for Debian?
It was a good successor to smail, postfix didn't exist yet, sendmail
ate too much resources and the rest was too obscure.
Wichert.
--
_
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
Exim does everything that I want, RBL, anti-virus with the exiscan program,
and custom filters as well.
I run exim as well on the mail server of my institute, and I am
investigating the possibility to add virus scanning capability on it,
would you mind
/boot partition is OK.
but I also want to use sofwtare RAID on the mailserver,
I'm going to patch Debian's Potato stable Kernel-2.2.19
against RAID support.
Let me say I organize my server this way...
Disk: /dev/sda
---
/
Hello
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:05:18PM -0500, Federico Grau wrote:
i would suggest you to use not exim. exim is a very nice MTA but the best
mind of security and performance is qmail!
Which is very complicated to administer and install, try postfix for
not to big sites (a matter of taste
Greetings!
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:06:37AM +0100, eim wrote:
I was thinking about a partition for /, one for boot, one for
/var/spool/mail and some other important system parts.
As you want to use exim and mailing list, you will want to have a
partition for /var or /var/spool instead of
On Thursday, 17. January 2002 19:05, Federico Grau wrote:
Boot is where kernels live (placed at the start of the disk for old bioses
that cannot read far into large disks ... your bios may not need it...
experiment if you have time). I have a lot of kernels on my system, 6
and my boot
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
Exim does everything that I want, RBL, anti-virus with the exiscan program,
and custom filters as well.
I run exim as well on the mail server of my institute, and I am
investigating the possibility to add virus scanning capability on it,
would you mind
/boot partition is OK.
but I also want to use sofwtare RAID on the mailserver,
I'm going to patch Debian's Potato stable Kernel-2.2.19
against RAID support.
Let me say I organize my server this way...
Disk: /dev/sda
---
/
Hello
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:05:18PM -0500, Federico Grau wrote:
i would suggest you to use not exim. exim is a very nice MTA but the best
mind of security and performance is qmail!
Which is very complicated to administer and install, try postfix for
not to big sites (a matter of taste
Greetings!
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:06:37AM +0100, eim wrote:
I was thinking about a partition for /, one for boot, one for
/var/spool/mail and some other important system parts.
As you want to use exim and mailing list, you will want to have a
partition for /var or /var/spool instead of
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has a better
license
--
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta | They that give up essential liberty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has a better
license
please, use whatever good MTA
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has a better
license
we could
Hi there
On the subject of MTA's, is there no groupware like Lotus Domino or exchance
server available on Debian? Personaly I feel all Linux MTA's are very good.
Is it not just a matter of personal choice?
Kind Regards
Gerrit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
: Mailserver HDD organization
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has a better
license
--
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta | They that give up
Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:22:07 +0100
Subject: Re: Mailserver HDD organization
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has
mmh, conclusions...
...I think I'm going to use exim.
exim runs fine with Mailman for the lists,
has spam filtering... and is avaiable as binary
and completly free under Debian Potato 2.2r5.
Anyway I'll consider qmail for future upgrades.
Thanks for all replays,
have a nice day...
-Ivo
On
hi ivo
for partitions...
- i prefer smallest/reasonable / partitions ( 64M or 128M etc )
- getting into single user mode is extremely important
- /var/spool/{mail,mqueue} in a mail server should
be its own huge partitions ???
- /home doesnt
On 17 Jan 2002 07:06:37 +0100
eim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking about a partition for /, one for boot, one for
/var/spool/mail and some other important system parts.
MTAs are inherently disk IO bound. As such, if possible devote a
spindle to /var/spool/mail and do what you can to
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:23:02 -0500
Dave Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, I know, use what you feel comfortable with, but how
comfortable are you guys with Exim? -A. Dave
Very. I like, and use both Exim and Postfix in deployed production
systems.
--
J C Lawrence
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: eim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian-Security List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:06 AM
Subject: Mailserver HDD organization
Hallo to everyone on the Debian Sec.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:16:05AM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
On 17 Jan 2002 07:06:37 +0100
eim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking about a partition for /, one for boot, one for
/var/spool/mail and some other important system parts.
MTAs are inherently disk IO bound. As such,
: +61 (03) 58 711 874
It's the smell! If there is such a thing. Agent Smith - The Matrix
- Original Message -
From: Dave Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian-Security List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: Mailserver HDD organization
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has a better
license
--
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta | They that give up essential liberty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has a better
license
please, use whatever good MTA
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail and has a better
license
we could
Hi there
On the subject of MTA's, is there no groupware like Lotus Domino or exchance
server available on Debian? Personaly I feel all Linux MTA's are very good.
Is it not just a matter of personal choice?
Kind Regards
Gerrit
: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:22:07 +0100
Subject: Re: Mailserver HDD organization
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get.
please use postfix, since it's as secure as qmail
I know, I know, use what you feel comfortable with, but how comfortable
are you guys with Exim?
I use Exim here for a low throughput small office mail server, grabbing
aliases from LDAP. I'm very happy with it - the documentation is extensive,
and the configuration is a doddle. The Exim user
mmh, conclusions...
...I think I'm going to use exim.
exim runs fine with Mailman for the lists,
has spam filtering... and is avaiable as binary
and completly free under Debian Potato 2.2r5.
Anyway I'll consider qmail for future upgrades.
Thanks for all replays,
have a nice day...
-Ivo
On
hi ivo
for partitions...
- i prefer smallest/reasonable / partitions ( 64M or 128M etc )
- getting into single user mode is extremely important
- /var/spool/{mail,mqueue} in a mail server should
be its own huge partitions ???
- /home doesnt mean
On 17 Jan 2002 07:06:37 +0100
eim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking about a partition for /, one for boot, one for
/var/spool/mail and some other important system parts.
MTAs are inherently disk IO bound. As such, if possible devote a
spindle to /var/spool/mail and do what you can to
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:23:02 -0500
Dave Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, I know, use what you feel comfortable with, but how
comfortable are you guys with Exim? -A. Dave
Very. I like, and use both Exim and Postfix in deployed production
systems.
--
J C Lawrence
-Original Message-
From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:22:07 +0100
Subject: Re: Mailserver HDD organization
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:04:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
please use qmail, its really the securest MTA you can get
55 matches
Mail list logo
