Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-26 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 26 January 2023 10:26:05 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote: >Am Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:22:15AM -0700 schrieb Sam Hartman: >> >> Well, if you and a group of people believe you can maintain it in stable >> given the additional discussions ith upstream, then explicitly say >> you're ready to sign

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:22:15AM -0700 schrieb Sam Hartman: > > Well, if you and a group of people believe you can maintain it in stable > given the additional discussions ith upstream, then explicitly say > you're ready to sign up to maintaining in stable. > I think that's the kind of

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-26 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Nilesh" == Nilesh Patra writes: Nilesh> Since I had done quite a bit of work on this, I'm a sad to Nilesh> see this happen, as fasttrack still has much less visibility Nilesh> / availability than an official stable release, or even Nilesh> backports. Well, if you and a

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Nilesh, On 26-01-2023 10:06, Nilesh Patra wrote: I guess something that changed since then is that upstream is aware about it and can help a bit with backporting. However the onus to maintain it in stable is still on the maintainer and security@ (to some extent) It is bit of a high-effort

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-26 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:51:21AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 25-01-2023 20:14, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 08:34:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > So in my understanding of the above the situation around > > > singularity-container, > > > which lead for

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 25-01-2023 20:14, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 08:34:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: So in my understanding of the above the situation around singularity-container, which lead for buster to https://bugs.debian.org/917867 and keeping it out of the stable

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-25 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 08:34:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > So in my understanding of the above the situation around > singularity-container, > which lead for buster to https://bugs.debian.org/917867 and keeping it out of > the stable release, did not really change in the aspect of

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-21 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Andreas, [Note if you want direct input from the Debian security team it's usually better to loop in the team email address directly rather the general discussion list debian-security, adding team@s.d.o to recipients] On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:28:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release?

2023-01-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, it would be great if someone from Security Team might raise some opinion to this question. Kind regards Andreas. Am Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 03:51:10PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:38:27PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > src:singularity-container was