I have a couple of systems I am trying to setup as production servers
using Debian stable. They have dual P3s and 2GB RAM.
It looks like the standard kernel images in Debian stable do not support
the 2GB of RAM. I'd like to avoid compiling my own kernel images if
possible but it looks like
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:55:47PM -0400, Alfredo Valles wrote:
Hi all.
Seems to me that for the first time debian is going to have real competition
in its own field.
Red Hat announced that they will join with fedora community and produce the
Red Hat Linux Project. So they will have
The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6.
The packaged version in unstable is 3.0.4. I compiled 3.0.6 manually,
necessary to work with the latest ov511 drivers.
I filed a wish about it; most of the bugs are 1 or 2 years old (most
are marked as Fixed in NMU).
What's
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..someone on this list mentioned some other program to check
popservers before fetchmail'ing?
mutt and telnet are my favourite programs.
For mutt simply run:
mutt -f pop://pop.server.com
then it will ask you for username and
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:51:36 -0500
Alex Malinovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:55:47PM -0400, Alfredo Valles wrote:
Hi all.
Seems to me that for the first time debian is going to have real
competition in its own field.
Red Hat announced that they will join with
Rich Puhek said:
(my reply is a bit disjointed, since I put things inline, and jumped
around while crafting my response...sorry for the nonlinear thinking
pattern)
'sOK. I thought you had some good points. Thanks for the input. Inline is
just right for me.
Jacob Anawalt wrote:
To me the
On Tuesday September 23 at 03:09pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6.
The packaged version in unstable is 3.0.4. I compiled 3.0.6 manually,
necessary to work with the latest ov511 drivers.
I filed a wish about it; most of the
Jeronimo Pellegrini said:
[snip]
Make the list server PGP-sign the messages, maybe? You install the
list
server key once, and never worry about it again?
If some small PGP/GPG data could be sent as part of a new EHLO syntax
command then OK, otherwise I'm in the DATA section again. It
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 12:31, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:26:42 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And wasn't there a big, long thread last month where most in the
thread excoriated C-R?
Yup. Which goes to show that these people clearly didn't read it, don't
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:31:35PM -0400, Mark Roach wrote:
Hi folks, I am trying to understand how to get opengl working on my
compaq evo n1000v laptop with radeon M7 LW (7500) and it seems pretty
confusing. Can someone break it down for me a little bit? Here's what my
current understanding
Ray said:
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 15:12, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
Jeronimo Pellegrini said:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 01:16:38PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
[snip]
The latest churn on debian-user about Spam hasn't been UCE spam.
It's been worm spam. I don't know anyone personally who likes
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:49:12AM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:51:36 -0500
Alex Malinovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:55:47PM -0400, Alfredo Valles wrote:
Hi all.
Seems to me that for the first time debian is going to have real
Op di 23-09-2003, om 22:17 schreef Osamu Aoki:
Hi, my neibour :-)
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:02:08PM +, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
i have a server and it has a quite extensive sources.list. Now i would
like to make a cron job that does apt-get update every so often and
then use that
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:58:00 -0400
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Jeff Elkins([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
| I'm curious as to how to integrate mailfilter into my spamassassin/fetchmail
| scheme. Currently, fetchmail runs every 300 seconds and gathers mail from my
|
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:17:00 -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vikki Roemer) wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:18:06PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..uhmmm, yep, sounds like you spun it up _good_. You probably fried
the motor or the fan bearings, in the former case
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:54:56AM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
You can use a spare disk drive power connector: the red wire on the
fan to the yellow wire on the connector, black wire on the fan to one
of the black wires on the connector. If the fan has a third, yellow,
wire, don't connect that
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:31:26 -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vikki Roemer) wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..uhmmm, yep, sounds like you spun it up _good_. You probably fried
the motor or the fan bearings, in the former case you can blow the
fan up to speed with any kind of smokers lungs,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:10:42 +0200,
Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:11:48 -0500,
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wayne writes:
With fetchmail and mailfilter, it is.
It is possible with
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:40:25AM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
Where can I find config-doc about fetchmail ?
Or a sample fetchmailrc for multiple ISP and accounts ??
Thanks for the info.
mess-mate
I have a short description of my mail setup using fetchmail on my
website at:
Hello,
I am running debian unstable; I tried to install gnome-panel and ran
into the following issues. My libxml and libxslt are up to date. I
dist upgraded the other day and this problem persisted.
Any pointers will be appreciated. Thanks.
$ sudo debfoster gnome-panel
[...]
Setting up
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:05:47PM +0200, Mark Maas wrote:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*sigh*
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:16:38 -0600 (MDT),
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Compare this to the dog chasing cars method of inventing a new
filter rule that looks through the MIME data to decide if this is the
latest worm you don't want or the kissing picture
* Steve Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030920 20:41]:
My only wish is that I knew exiscan-acl well enough to figure out if I
could have a custom script run upon a positive hit. In doing so have the
infected IP automatically added to Shorewall's blacklist. It would also
Don't deny the initial
* cr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030920 20:47]:
I love Kmail too, but I'm running 1.3.2 (the version that comes with Woody)
and I'm not sure it offers that facility.I believe the newest version
does, but when I installed it briefly (with RedHat 9, before I switched to
Debian) it warned me
* csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030921 15:54]:
This delete-before-download feature can be done by other, stand
alone applications applications: popsneaker, popcheck, pop
surgeon, pop browser, Save My Modem. mail filter, and for those
with the fortitude, telnet.
mutt is good at this, too. You can
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..someone on this list mentioned some other program to check
popservers before fetchmail'ing?
mutt and telnet are my
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:49:33 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I stopped reading the thread soon after the acrimony started
flying. Calling people stupid without a valid reason is pretty much
*wrong*.
Given the verbage written about C-R and the problems it causes one has to
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:35:21PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
On Tuesday September 23 at 03:09pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6.
The packaged version in unstable is 3.0.4. I compiled 3.0.6 manually,
necessary to work with
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:13:28PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:35:21PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
On Tuesday September 23 at 03:09pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6.
The packaged version in
On Tuesday September 23 at 06:13pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I clearly stated my question:
Why is Debian packaging 3.0.4 when 3.0.6 has been out for a long time?
Purely a Debian question...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show motion
snip
Maintainer: Paul Hedderly (DH/DSS)
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 06:03 pm, Paul E Condon wrote:
RedHat's business model is moving toward support services for enterprises
and away from sale of boxed sets of CDs. I don't think it makes much
sense for them to continue work on the RedHat Linux distribution, but I
can see why they
Arnt Karlsen([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:11:48 -0500,
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wayne writes:
With fetchmail and mailfilter, it is.
It is possible with fetchmail alone, though at a small risk of loss
mess-mate([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Where can I find config-doc about fetchmail ?
Or a sample fetchmailrc for multiple ISP and accounts ??
Thanks for the info.
mess-mate
'If' you have it installed locate should find what you need.
Otherwise /usr/share/doc/fetchmail should
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:19:54PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
On Tuesday September 23 at 06:13pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I clearly stated my question:
Why is Debian packaging 3.0.4 when 3.0.6 has been out for a long time?
Purely a Debian question...
[EMAIL
On Tuesday September 23 at 06:37pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can stop flaming me now.
I'm not flaming anyone, I'm trying to fix the signal/noise ratio by
directing your question to the proper place. I'm sorry I didn't see that
you sent the message to Paul Hedderly, but there was no reason to
Thanks to everyone. I was able to resolve this snag I did finally get an
open view of the shell in kde and reconfigured-whew! Debian is great!! I
just sometimes don't have the patience and knowledge to administer it.
(writing down ctrl-alt-F1) I thought I hit every key combination ;)
JY
Quoting
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:55:39PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
On Tuesday September 23 at 06:37pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can stop flaming me now.
I'm not flaming anyone, I'm trying to fix the signal/noise ratio by
directing your question to the proper place. I'm sorry I didn't see
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:52:20AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For telnet simply run:
telnet pop.server.com 110
USER username
PASS password
LIST
TOP number (to show only the
Wayne writes:
I guess you could use fetchmail to weed them out but I found that
spending time on the DENY rules in mailfilter was better spent.
Fetchmail can be used alone to delete oversize mails on the server. I do
so because I am too lazy to get mailfilter up on Woody.
--
John Hasler
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:09:23:21:18:48-0500] scribed:
Wayne writes:
I guess you could use fetchmail to weed them out but I found that
spending time on the DENY rules in mailfilter was better spent.
Fetchmail can be used alone to delete oversize mails on the server. I do
so
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:14:27 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:52:20AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:02:20 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For
I wrote:
Fetchmail can be used alone to delete oversize mails on the server. I do
so because I am too lazy to get mailfilter up on Woody.
mds writes:
What do you do about legitimate attachments sent to you?
Legitimate attachments of over 140k in size are rarely sent to me. For the
time
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:18:48PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Wayne writes:
I guess you could use fetchmail to weed them out but I found that
spending time on the DENY rules in mailfilter was better spent.
Fetchmail can be used alone to delete oversize mails on the server. I do
so because
Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:26:42 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And wasn't there a big, long thread last month where most in the
thread excoriated C-R?
Yup. Which goes to show that these people clearly didn't read it, don't
care, or are just plain stupid. I
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:59:00 -0600
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe they gave up early on it due to content. I just forced myself to
drudge through the whole of it. Lots of good ideas and reasons to not
use C-R* from the I'll take it all to not miss one email camp.
Easier to
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:12:40 -0500
Legitimate attachments of over 140k in size are rarely sent to me. For the
time being if any are I'll lose them. When the current worm storm abates I
will stop the deletion.
When? Ladies and gents, we have an optimist in the house. :)
--
Hello -
I am running debian testing with Exim (3.36) and Cyrus Imap (1.5.19).
I'm having difficulty configuring exim to deliver mail to a shared
folder.
I created a shared folder with cyradm, like this:
linux:/var/spool/cyrus/mail# cyradm -u mailadmin 127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:38:48PM -0400, Daniel B. wrote:
It also means that you have to put settings in two places (your shell's
login-initialization file _and_ .xsession).
I do this in ~/.xsession:
# source ~/.bashrc to get our environment vars
# we're a login script, so this is OK
if [
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:16:38 -0600 (MDT),
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Compare this to the dog chasing cars method of inventing a new
filter rule that looks through the MIME data to decide if this is the
latest worm you don't want
I have been trying to install from Debian Sid a new (purged all of the
old stuff) Zope it simply does not work. I have had it running in the
past but sometome ago lost interst in it. I now want to see how it
stacks up (2 years later) as a CMT suystem. I can only get the same
message that it's
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 20:55, Johann Koenig wrote:
On Tuesday September 23 at 06:37pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can stop flaming me now.
I'm not flaming anyone, I'm trying to fix the signal/noise ratio by
directing your question to the proper place. I'm sorry I didn't see that
you
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 20:28, Terry Hancock wrote:
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 06:03 pm, Paul E Condon wrote:
RedHat's business model is moving toward support services for enterprises
and away from sale of boxed sets of CDs. I don't think it makes much
sense for them to continue work on
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:06:40PM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:37:29AM +0300, Mihalis I. Tsoukalos wrote:
Dear list,
I have the following problem:
After upgrading the ipmasq package yesterday, NAT is not working
properly.
What do I need to do in
As usual, I found something to frustrate me again in my constant pursuit
of Linux paradise.
I have a large hard drive with a single NTFS partion. I have installed
this drive in a Woody box and mounted the partition.
No prob.
Next, I shared the mounted partition via Samba 3.
No prob.
From
Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:59:00 -0600
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe they gave up early on it due to content. I just forced myself to
drudge through the whole of it. Lots of good ideas and reasons to not
use C-R* from the I'll take it all to not miss one email
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:29:50 -0600
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While reading that certainly clarified the woes of the
challenge-response system, I'm unsure if it would have cleared me of
your charges since they said to read the thread:
Touche'. I think that reading the essay
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 23:27, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
[snip - don't know enough about samba]
I thought I'd try ftp. So I installed vsftpd - no probs after I figured
out the directory published via ftp is done by the user home directory -
and tried to access the NTFS mount.
This failed.
Am I missing something else in the exim.conf?
(It would help to include your exim.conf file as an attachment.)
If your exim.conf file was created by the eximconfig script, then the
local_delivery transport is invoked by the localuser director.
Notice how the localuser director uses the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Seems like if Verisign is now hosting all NXDOMAIN domains, then they
should pay for them just like the rest of us, after all.
How can we plug a certain nasty loophole that exits: If they just pay
themselves, no money moves.
Anyone care to calculate how
At Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:19:02 -0400,
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:06:45PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
I've been using kdm for a long time and was very comfortable
with the way a user can select the window manager to use at
start up. I virtually never choose KDE, but
401 - 460 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
