Bonjour,
Sous SID
Je voudrais logguer automatiquement un user avec lightdm,
j'ai donc modifié le fichier de conf de la manière suivante
autologin-user = cyrille
autologin-user-timeout = 0
autologin-session = xfce
Mais je tombe toujours sur l'écran de login.
Quelqu'un a une piste ?
Le
Bonjour,
Il ne manque pas une ligne dans ton fichier de conf genre:
pam-service=lightdm-autologin
où lightdm-autologin fait référence au fichier /etc/pam.d/lightdm-autologin
? (voir http://www.linuxcore.fr/2013/02/lightdm-debian/)
Cordialement, Louis.
2013/12/4 Cyrille cyri...@cbiot.fr
Il ne manque pas une ligne dans ton fichier de conf genre:
Oui je l'avais vu dans la doc mais la variable pam-service ne figure plus de
le
fichier de conf https://www.dropbox.com/s/malsxmermhazql7/lightdm.conf
par défaut, donc je ne l'ai pas mise
pam-service=lightdm-autologin
où
Salut!
Si lightdm ne te sert qu'à ouvrir une session pour un utilisateur, je
te conseille de passer à nodm. Il ne sert qu'à ça : ouvrir une session
automatiquement et lancer X. Faire une seule chose et la faire bien
:)
Gaël
Le 4 décembre 2013 11:26, Cyrille cyri...@cbiot.fr a écrit :
Bonjour,
te conseille de passer à nodm. Il ne sert qu'à ça : ouvrir une session
automatiquement et lancer X. Faire une seule chose et la faire bien
:)
cool je garde la référence sous le coude, mais maintenant je suis curieux de
savoir ce que j'ai mal fait dans lightdm ;-)
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste
Bonjour à tous,
je sais que cela fera surement sourire les pros de la Debian, mais j'ai
tellement galérer pour installer ASP64 sur ma testing que je vous livre
ma recette.
Il faut savoir d'ASP64 n'est que l'emballage d'un programme 32bit d'ou
de nombreux errements.
pardonnez donc mon
Bonjour
Ce message se raccorde à un récent fil sur la compilation du noyau.
Constat: la version wheezy/backports de linux-source vient de passer de
3.10 à 3.11.
Cette version 3.11 vient juste d'être abandonnée par les dev du noyau.
Elle est déclarée EOL_End of life_Fin de vie ici
El día 3 de diciembre de 2013 22:01, Erick Ocrospoma
zipper1...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola,
No sé si unison puede realizar esto. En todo caso, que precisamente
necesitas que se ejecute?
~ Happy install !
Erick.
---
Cellphone : +51 950307809
Blog: http://zerick.me/
LUG
El día 4 de diciembre de 2013 03:26, William Romero
wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:10:57 -0430
Subject: escritorios
From: edward.villarr...@gmail.com
To: debian-news-requ...@lists.debian.org;
debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org; listmas...@lists.debian.org;
El día 4 de diciembre de 2013 03:26, William Romero
wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:10:57 -0430
Subject: escritorios
From: edward.villarr...@gmail.com
To: debian-news-requ...@lists.debian.org;
debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org;
El Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:10:57 -0430, Edward Villarroel (EDD) escribió:
buenas saludos a todos!!
Buenas, pero deja el html en casa y marca el asunto como OT :-)
yo se que el tema esta algo trillado! pero saben de algun proyecto.. que
sea un escritorio para linux que use html php algo asi como
El Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:25:18 -0300, Fabián Bonetti escribió:
Ahora solo active la zram. Sin la swap tradicional.
No tira en el /var/log/syslog mas el error Write-error on swap-device
Bueno, al menos ya sabes quién lo generaba... pues oye, la mayoría de
artículos que leí en Google sobre ese
El Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:42:44 +0100, Maykel Franco escribió:
Hola buenas, uso unison para sincronizar 2 servidores web y necesito que
después de sincronizar el contenido /var/www , envia un comando en
remoto y ejecute otro en local.
Pues en el manual no veo ninguna opción integrada :-?
El día 4 de diciembre de 2013 15:54, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió:
El Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:42:44 +0100, Maykel Franco escribió:
Hola buenas, uso unison para sincronizar 2 servidores web y necesito que
después de sincronizar el contenido /var/www , envia un comando en
remoto y ejecute
El Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:01:07 +0100, Iván Herrera López escribió:
En primer lugar perdonar si este no es el foro correcto, pero viendo el
nivel de la lista creo que podéis darme algo de luz.
No problemo, un OT de vez en cuando no hace daño.
Estoy intentando acceder desde internet a una web
El Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:02:00 +0100, Maykel Franco escribió:
El día 4 de diciembre de 2013 15:54, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
escribió:
(...)
He estado googleando pero no encuentro como, a través de unison, puedo
enviar el comando en remoto. Sino se puede, realizaré un script a mano
que
El día 4 de diciembre de 2013 16:21, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió:
El Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:02:00 +0100, Maykel Franco escribió:
El día 4 de diciembre de 2013 15:54, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
escribió:
(...)
He estado googleando pero no encuentro como, a través de unison, puedo
El 04/12/13 15:39, Camaleón escribió:
Mis pruebas fueron:.
seamonkey + flash de adobe + http://cut07.tk/chau
¿Qué demonios es ese enlace? Lo siento pero es una basura de página :-/
Como sistema para sobrecargar la memoria tiene su mérito. Me ha dejado
temblando el ordenador.
--
To
-- Mensaje reenviado --
De: Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
Fecha: 4 de diciembre de 2013 08:27
Asunto: [OT] Re: escritorios
Para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
El Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:10:57 -0430, Edward Villarroel (EDD) escribió:
buenas saludos a todos!!
Buenas, pero deja
¿Qué haría yo?
Pues en primer lugar, y aunque parezca pesada, intentar iniciar Windows 7
desde algún gestor de arranque (LiveCD o desde un disquete, antes se
podía iniciar Windows desde un disquete de inicio ¿sigue siendo posible
esto?) para asegurarme de que sigue vivo y coleando.
El Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:57:06 +, alberto moreno martinez escribió:
¿Qué haría yo?
Pues en primer lugar, y aunque parezca pesada, intentar iniciar Windows
7 desde algún gestor de arranque (LiveCD o desde un disquete, antes se
podía iniciar Windows desde un disquete de inicio ¿sigue siendo
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:12:49 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:08:58 +0100
Subject: Re: [OT] Acceso a home server desde internet
From: usuario.foros.lis...@gmail.com
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
El día 3 de diciembre de 2013
! Antes de imprimir piensa en nuestro planeta ..!
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:47:14 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Acceso a home server desde internet
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:12:49 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:04:09 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Poq no dejas de joder granuja, 15 años de webon tendras no experto , hablas
como grande imbecil.
Atte.
William:
el ladron cree a todos de su condicion
Anda y estudia lo basico de redes, sobre todo NAT y
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:39:00 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Bueno, al menos ya sabes quién lo generaba... pues oye, la mayoría de
artículos que leí en Google sobre ese error apuntaban a un fallo de
hardware, convendría que ejecutaras el smartctl sobre esa unidad de
disco
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:43:51 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Imbecil
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:04:09 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Poq no dejas de joder granuja, 15 años de webon tendras no experto ,
El 04/12/2013 10:22 p.m., William Romero escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:43:51 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Imbecil
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:04:09 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Poq no dejas de joder
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 20:22:39 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:43:51 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Imbecil
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:04:09 -0500
William Romero
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:51:07 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
! Antes de imprimir piensa en nuestro planeta ..!
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:47:14 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Acceso a home server desde
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:13:42 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Imbecil
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 20:22:39 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:43:51 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:28:12 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Acceso a home server desde internet
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:51:07 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
! Antes de imprimir piensa en nuestro
El 05/12/13 03:28, William Romero escribió:
PD , nos seas sonso todos necesitamos de los DNS , y bueno como eres tan
tarado no compres desde hace mucho.
bueno que podria decir aun viejo que solo jode en este foro y no ayuda
en NADA , y no lo digo por MI.
Sólo por compensar tanto insulto
El 04-12-2013 23:28, William Romero escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:13:42 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Imbecil
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 20:22:39 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec
El 04/12/2013 11:34 p.m., William Romero escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:28:12 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Acceso a home server desde internet
El Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:51:07 -0500
William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:39:45 -0300
From: robe...@acshell.net
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Imbecil
El 04-12-2013 23:28, William Romero escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:13:42 -0300
From: an...@angel-alvarez.com.ar
To:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:44:14 -0300
From: sisisi...@yahoo.com.ar
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Acceso a home server desde internet
El 04/12/2013 11:34 p.m., William
Romero escribió:
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013
From: wromer...@hotmail.com
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Imbecil
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:45:11 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 23:39:45 -0300
From: robe...@acshell.net
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Imbecil
El 04-12-2013 23:28, William
Por favor, si quieren discutir, háganlo en privado. Aunque les
recomiendo a ambos: callar es una opción. Lo único evidente es que no
se convencerán el uno al otro. Es mejor ignorar la discusión, y
seguir tranquilos con sus vidas.
Saludos,
--
Eduardo Alan Bustamante López
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Esta Navidad regala algo diferente.
Visita este link http://www.eventosagenciarebsamen.com/#!grid-grande/c1a02
Disfruta de una foto Navideña acompañado de tu familia en un hermoso Castillo
ubicado en la Col Narvarte.
Tomate un impresionante book en una locación estilo Luis XV.
Pessoal!!
Estou precisando fazer uma auditoria de link de internet pra saber se tem
alguma coisa gargalando.
A máquina onde passa o link é o nosso firewall composto de:
debian 6 atualizado.
Iptables
squid
squidGuard
Retornei hoje de férias e me falaram que de uns 10 dias para cá a internet
http://bandwidthd.sourceforge.net/
Atenciosamente,
*Gabriel Ricardo*
Consultor em Tecnologia
*Cel.:* (41) 8881-7828
*Skype:* gabriel.nerdworkti
*Facebook:* facebook.com/nerdworkti
*Site*: www.nerdworkti.com.br
Em 4 de dezembro de 2013 10:34, Fagner Patricio
fagner.patri...@gmail.comescreveu:
Você pode analisar também com o iptraf em tempo real :)
Atenciosamente,
*Gabriel Ricardo*
Consultor em Tecnologia
*Cel.:* (41) 8881-7828
*Skype:* gabriel.nerdworkti
*Facebook:* facebook.com/nerdworkti
*Site*: www.nerdworkti.com.br
Em 4 de dezembro de 2013 10:48, Gabriel Ricardo
Tenho um colega que acabou de me relatar que se ele tirar o acesso do squid
ele sente mais rápido, então meu primeiro teste é verificar o squid, alguma
dica?
Em 4 de dezembro de 2013 09:49, Gabriel Ricardo gricard...@gmail.comescreveu:
Você pode analisar também com o iptraf em tempo real :)
Em geral é cache do squid em disco. Tá usando mais I/O. Se limpar o
cache, deve ficar mais rápido, mas o ideal é rever a configuração pra que
boa parte das páginas mais solicitadas fiquem na RAM.
Abs,
Helio Loureiro
http://helio.loureiro.eng.br
http://br.linkedin.com/in/helioloureiro
Arautos do Software Proprietário dizem que Squid não é pra ambiente
produtivo grande. EU nunca atuei em um, e onde atuei o Squid bem
configurado dava conta muito bem.
Em 4 de dezembro de 2013 13:25, Helio Loureiro he...@loureiro.eng.br escreveu:
Em geral é cache do squid em disco. Tá usando
Voltando a lista...
Rí alto, e quem seria para ambiente grande, MS ISA Server? TMG?
Eu trabalho com os dois, e digo, SQUID é justamente para ambientes
grandes, onde o ISA não suporta.
SQUID é mais configurável, mais rápido, mais seguro.
Me lembro de cabeça agora, a Wikipedia utiliza SQUID como
Pessoal de um tempo pra cá tenho recebido mensagens do tipo ping duplicado
* Nagios *
Notification Type: PROBLEM
Service: PING
Host: esx-002
Address: 192.168.10.37
State: WARNING
Date/Time: Wed Dec 4 12:53:00 BRST 2013
Additional Info:
PING WARNING - DUPLICATES FOUND!
Como o tráfego atual é muito mais https que http, não tem como faze cache.
Então o squid se torna apenas um paliativo.
O melhor é rodar squid numa máquina com bastante RAM e discos SSD. Isso
fará com que a latência de cache seja a mínima possível. Se não tiver SSD,
o melhor é configurar pra
Ou vc tá com um loop na sua rede, que poderia ser resolvida com
spanning-tree ou rapid-spanning-tree, ou tem alguma outra máquina com o
mesmo IP.
Abs,
Helio Loureiro
http://helio.loureiro.eng.br
http://br.linkedin.com/in/helioloureiro
http://twitter.com/helioloureiro
http://gplus.to/helioloureiro
Parece-me que o teu problema passou a ser o python em si, nao a
configuração.
Na wiki do debian alguns comentaram que apt pinning não é... recomendado:
https://wiki.debian.org/AptPreferences
Att,
Tobias
http://gnu.eti.br
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS/CM/G/H/IT/L/SS d?(--)
Já tentou bloqueio de sync.
Não tem nada que passe se não tiver sync.
Abraços,
Paulo Correia
Em 02-12-2013 21:47, Thobias Oliveira escreveu:
Me desculpe nobre Chará rsrsrsrs!
Mas acredito que fazendo por este meio descrito neste artigo do V|OL
que o senhor indicou seria bem mais custoso do
Poderia ser mais claro. Obrigado!
Em 04-12-2013 23:08, Paulo Correia escreveu:
Já tentou bloqueio de sync.
Não tem nada que passe se não tiver sync.
Abraços,
Paulo Correia
Em 02-12-2013 21:47, Thobias Oliveira escreveu:
Me desculpe nobre Chará rsrsrsrs!
Mas acredito que fazendo por este
Olá Deivison , tudo bem ?
Tenta estudar mais a fundo o iptables , tem cursos ead e material open
source .
Se você pretende ou exerce alguma atividade de Admin é importante você
estudar .
Abraços
Em 29-11-2013 12:22, Deivison Moraes escreveu:
Boa tarde pessoal,
Desculpem se o assunto for
Onde tem curso ead de fw?
Julio julio.s...@gmail.com escreveu:
Olá Deivison , tudo bem ?
Tenta estudar mais a fundo o iptables , tem cursos ead e material open
source .
Se você pretende ou exerce alguma atividade de Admin é importante você
estudar .
Abraços
Em 29-11-2013 12:22, Deivison
Obrigado Julio, pela dica.
Já veio estudando o iptables e seus módulos há algum tempo, já sou
SysAdmin Linux há 4 anos (não que este tempo seja muito). Este tópico é
para ver o que o pessoal tem usado para bloquear afim de integrar com
uma solução mais fácil de administrar. O ultrasurf é bem
Bloqueio de sync é mais ou menos assim
iptables -A FORWARD -o eth1 -p tcp --syn -j REJECT
Tem o livro do Urubatan Neto, Dominando o Linux Firewall Iptables em
média usado R$ 19,00 a 25,50 e novo de R$ 19,90 a 27,00.
Tem alguns tópicos no Viva o Linux sobre o iptables, curso ead eu não
Mas dessa forma eu bloquearia todo o tcp.
De fato, este livro é excelente!
[]'s
Deivison Moraes
Em 05-12-2013 00:38, Paulo Correia escreveu:
Bloqueio de sync é mais ou menos assim
iptables -A FORWARD -o eth1 -p tcp --syn -j REJECT
Tem o livro do Urubatan Neto, Dominando o Linux Firewall
Todos os pacotes syn.
Em 04-12-2013 22:42, Deivison Moraes escreveu:
Mas dessa forma eu bloquearia todo o tcp.
De fato, este livro é excelente!
[]'s
Deivison Moraes
Em 05-12-2013 00:38, Paulo Correia escreveu:
Bloqueio de sync é mais ou menos assim
iptables -A FORWARD -o eth1 -p tcp
Essa semana eu vi esse artigo
http://www.vivaolinux.com.br/artigo/Fail2ban-Bloqueio-de-Peer-to-Peer-Ares-uTorrent-e-Proxies-UltraSurf-e-Tor/
pode ser util abraços
Em 04-12-2013 19:38, Deivison Moraes escreveu:
Obrigado Julio, pela dica.
Já veio estudando o iptables e seus módulos há algum
Acredito que existem varias empresas
https://www.google.com.br/#q=iptables+ead+
Abraços
Em 04-12-2013 21:14, Leandro Paulo escreveu:
Onde tem curso ead de fw?
Julio julio.s...@gmail.com escreveu:
Olá Deivison , tudo bem ?
Tenta estudar mais a fundo o iptables , tem cursos ead e material open
Sim, vou montar alguns testes com as ranges do ultrasurf e ver até que
ponto ele consegue ser efetivo.
Mais uma vez, obrigado à todos.
Em 05-12-2013 00:44, Antonio Novaes escreveu:
Não necessariamente. Deste que relacione o destino.
bloquear todo sync que vai para o destino 1.2.3.4
Att,
Foi útil sim Júlio, um outro membro também o mandou no inicio da thread,
porem te confesso que está é minha última opção.
[]'s
Deivison Moraes
Em 05-12-2013 00:49, Julio escreveu:
Essa semana eu vi esse artigo
Acho que na 4linux também tem alguns cursos que abordam firewall.
[]'s
Deivison Moraes
Em 05-12-2013 00:51, Julio escreveu:
Acredito que existem varias empresas
https://www.google.com.br/#q=iptables+ead+
Abraços
Em 04-12-2013 21:14, Leandro Paulo escreveu:
Onde tem curso ead de fw?
Para alterar suas preferências, copie este link em seu navegador:
http://email.buscadescontos.com.br/preferences.php?m=193729mh=07bd4d6d851cba211ec56db996c6a41br=14418811rh=2e9644b8d187d5170e56ec7747c7731f
On Ma, 03 dec 13, 17:51:11, Brad Alexander wrote:
One point I would like to make is that it is probably not a bad idea to
capture this from all of your machines as a starting point to have a pool
of machine types. For instance, being a believer in bastion hosts, I have
a separate firewall,
On Wednesday 04 December 2013 12:46 AM, Slavko wrote:
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:38:00 +0100 Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net napísal:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:23 +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
Can this be a dbus issue?
I'm told that I need to file a separate RFS bug against the sponsorship-requests
pseudo-package. I have spent hours reading the documentation and I thought that I
had done this, I am totally mystified about what else I need to do and how. Has anyone
got any helpful suggestions please?
KMail is a mess right now.
Messages not readable until kmail restart
Broken mail resources until kde restart
etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Le 04/12/2013 02:33, Bob Proulx a écrit :
François Patte wrote:
Think back... How many times have someone asked you for help with
something. And you asked them what did they do? And they said, I
didn't do anything! And of those times how often did it turn out
that they had actually done
On Mi, 04 dec 13, 09:25:25, ChrisofBristol (gmail) wrote:
I'm told that I need to file a separate RFS bug against the
sponsorship-requests pseudo-package.
JFTR, that was me, while triaging bugs filed against unknown packages.
I have spent hours reading the documentation and I thought that I
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:16:00PM +0100, Slavko wrote:
My daughter has similar problem. I investigated it remotely only, but
it seems, that the CD/DVD drive is not recognized at boot time. Then it
is not a DE's related problem. I cannot tell more yet.
Occasionally I have a similar problem
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:52:06PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Many threads will wonder a bit and everyone accepts this. Just try to
Agreed! Also ... wander. :)
--
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are
On Wednesday 04 December 2013 02:54 PM, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
On Wednesday 04 December 2013 12:46 AM, Slavko wrote:
Ahoj,
Dňa Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:38:00 +0100 Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net napísal:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:31 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 10:23
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:05 PM, AP worldwithoutfen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:46:05 PM Brad Alexander wrote:
I like kmail's interfaces. It's just the backend encryption that has a
problem. For whatever reason, it won't let me decrypt and add my s/mime
I am following the instructions on the following site ---
https://library.linode.com/upgrading/upgrade-to-debian-7-wheezy
I do
sudo apt-get update
and get the following
N: Ignoring file 'google-chrome.list.save' in directory
'/etc/apt/sources.list.d/' as it has an invalid filename extension
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:54:24 +0530
Kailash Kalyani listskail...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Kailash,
If this works, your udev rules are fine. You'd then have to look at the
desktop side - gvfs in gnome's case.
I've been suffering this issue under KDE, so I suspect gvfs isn't the
problem here.
In
AP writes:
Having cookies in Firefox is not an issue because websites cannot work
without it.
Not true in general. The vast majority of the sites I use work fine
with no cookies (and without scripts).
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2013-12-04 13:17 keltezéssel, John Lindsay írta:
I am following the instructions on the following site ---
https://library.linode.com/upgrading/upgrade-to-debian-7-wheezy
Official Debian release notes is better source I think.
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 07:57:18 AM John Hasler wrote:
Not true in general. The vast majority of the sites I use work fine
with no cookies (and without scripts).
I meant in general and most of the websites means websites like youtube,
facebook, google, dictionary, pogo, yahoo which
AP writes:
I meant in general and most of the websites means websites like
youtube, facebook, google, dictionary, pogo, yahoo which end users use
most of the times.
Youtube requires scripts but not cookies. Google search requires
neither. Wiktionary requires neither. Visiting public
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 23:05:14 AP wrote:
On Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:46:05 PM Brad Alexander wrote:
I like kmail's interfaces. It's just the backend encryption that
has a problem. For whatever reason, it won't let me decrypt and
add my
s/mime
certificate on my installation
On 12/4/2013 2:14 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Ownership of the directory is root:root, but the scripts should
*never* be owned by root:root.
Uhmm... No. There is no problem whatsoever with php files being
owned by root:root. Why do
On 12/3/2013 11:40 PM, AP wrote:
On Tuesday, December 03, 2013 01:15:21 PM Jerry Stuckle wrote:
And exactly what is wrong with using cookies on a bank transaction?
In fact, all banks I know of need to use cookies to manage signons.
It's how the bank (or any site that uses signons) knows
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 08:32:27 AM John Hasler wrote:
Youtube requires scripts but not cookies. Google search requires
neither. Wiktionary requires neither. Visiting public Facebook pages
requires neither. Yahoo search requires neither.
Then I need to correct myself. I was in
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 09:53:09 AM Jerry Stuckle wrote:
I keep cookies, because they're also used for other things. For
instance, the Remember me checkbox on a site will store a cookie on
your system which contains your userid and password (hopefully
encrypted!). That way I don't
Lisi wrote:
I shall now null-file you as I have done with Ralph. I have had
enough of your unpleasantness.
I was had any unpleasantness with you but okay.Better is to confabulate
over lists, at least with you.
--
Regards,
AP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Lisi wrote:
I believe Xfce.
I gave my granddaughter a laptop (second hand!) some years ago and
administered it for her. We ended up with OpenSUSE as the only
distro we could find that her school wi-fi would agree to talk to -
it was, not surprisingly, but sadly, set up basically for
Lisi wrote:
I believe Xfce.
I gave my granddaughter a laptop (second hand!) some years ago and
administered it for her. We ended up with OpenSUSE as the only
distro we could find that her school wi-fi would agree to talk to -
it was, not surprisingly, but sadly, set up basically for
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 08:45:26 PM you wrote:
Lisi wrote:
I shall now null-file you as I have done with Ralph. I have had
enough of your unpleasantness.
I was had any unpleasantness with you but okay.Better is to confabulate
over lists, at least with you.
Correction: I
On Wednesday 04 December 2013 14:19:25 AP wrote:
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 08:45:26 PM you wrote:
Lisi wrote:
I shall now null-file you as I have done with Ralph. I have
had enough of your unpleasantness.
I was had any unpleasantness with you but okay.Better is to
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 03:28:20 PM you wrote:
It is in the code of conduct that private messages should not be
posted on list. Especiallly some time after I thought that we had
resolved the differences. :-/ As I said, I had un-null-filed you.
This really isn't relevant to Debian
AP writes:
Then I need to correct myself. I was in wrong impression
really. Thanks for clariying this!!
Note that all of the sites I mentioned attempt to send cookies and run
scripts, and try to convince you that by refusing them you are missing
out on something terribly important. Most sites
Jerry writes:
I keep cookies, because they're also used for other things. For
instance, the Remember me checkbox on a site will store a cookie on
your system which contains your userid and password (hopefully
encrypted!). That way I don't have to sign on manually every time I
visit a site.
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:43:43 AM John Hasler wrote:
Note that all of the sites I mentioned attempt to send cookies and run
scripts, and try to convince you that by refusing them you are missing
out on something terribly important. Most sites do this. In most cases
they work fine
AP writes:
But earlier you said they don't store cookies on PC...Ok you mean they
ask?
They offer cookies but continue to allow access when you refuse them.
Other ways to handle unwanted cookies (which Firefox/Iceweasel doesn't
offer) is to either accept the cookie and save it to /dev/null or
On Wednesday 04 December 2013 17:42:56 John Hasler wrote:
AP writes:
But earlier you said they don't store cookies on PC...Ok you mean
they ask?
They offer cookies but continue to allow access when you refuse
them.
Other ways to handle unwanted cookies (which Firefox/Iceweasel
doesn't
On 12/4/2013 11:46 AM, John Hasler wrote:
Jerry writes:
I keep cookies, because they're also used for other things. For
instance, the Remember me checkbox on a site will store a cookie on
your system which contains your userid and password (hopefully
encrypted!). That way I don't have to sign
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 01:00:44 PM Jerry Stuckle wrote:
As for the logins - I also let the browser store usernames and passwords
(encrypted, of course).
How this particular step you achieve?
--
Regards,
AP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 11:42:56 AM John Hasler wrote:
But earlier you said they don't store cookies on PC...Ok you mean they
ask?
They offer cookies but continue to allow access when you refuse them.
Well this is okay...Just refuse and still surf...:-)
Other ways to handle
Lisi writes:
Can't we just drop it
Can't you just killfile it?
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
