Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> The "-o" means: "Write output image to FILE". And it does
>> so, as far as I can see.
>
> The question is whether specifying "-o f f" where the output file
> has the same name as the input file actually overwrites the original
> input file. Another person reported that it
hede wrote:
> "Idempotent" means, that a task with the same input data and
> the same config (for example to remove a tag via exif-tool)
> results in the same output data.
Determinism.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
The Wanderer wrote:
>>> That's maintainership history, with E-mail
>>> addresses attached.
>>
>> There should be no history entries in the man pages that
>> relates to practical aspects that are no
>> longer operational.
>
> The E-mail address doesn't relate to a practical
> aspect, though.
Ikr?
On Sat 24 Sep 2022 at 18:48:13 (-0700), Ray Andrews wrote:
> On 2022-09-24 13:52, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Ray Andrews wrote:
> > > To whom might read this. I can't boil this down to a formal bug report
> > > but
> > > for what it's worth:
> > >
> > > BULLSEYE INSTALL, 2022-09-23:
> > >
> > > Deci
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 04:03, Ray Andrews wrote:
> ... I get as far as partitioning and although the disk (sdb) is
> already partitioned and formatted and working fine, it seemed to be
> impossible to just leave things as they were and install to the existing
> partitions, it kept complaining t
On Sat 24 Sep 2022 at 10:45:56 (-0700), Ray Andrews wrote:
> To whom might read this. I can't boil this down to a formal bug
> report but for what it's worth:
>
> BULLSEYE INSTALL, 2022-09-23:
>
> Decided to do a virgin install of bullseye to my /dev/sdb while
> keeping /dev/sda devoted to Stret
On 2022-09-24 13:52, Dan Ritter wrote:
Ray Andrews wrote:
To whom might read this. I can't boil this down to a formal bug report but
for what it's worth:
BULLSEYE INSTALL, 2022-09-23:
Decided to do a virgin install of bullseye to my /dev/sdb while keeping
/dev/sda devoted to Stretch. Got t
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022, 2:47 PM Gareth Evans wrote:
> Given what looks to be the ongoing absence of mysql-workbench in stable:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mysql-workbench
>
> Can anyone recommend a free (at least as in beer) alternative that creates
> ERDs automatically from MariaDB?
>
It's
Ray Andrews wrote:
> To whom might read this. I can't boil this down to a formal bug report but
> for what it's worth:
>
>
> BULLSEYE INSTALL, 2022-09-23:
>
> Decided to do a virgin install of bullseye to my /dev/sdb while keeping
> /dev/sda devoted to Stretch. Got the installer onto a USB sti
Given what looks to be the ongoing absence of mysql-workbench in stable:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mysql-workbench
Can anyone recommend a free (at least as in beer) alternative that creates ERDs
automatically from MariaDB?
I tried installing mysql-workbench-community from mysql.com on Ubun
On 2022-09-24, David Wright wrote:
>
> It's odd: virtually all the software I use (eg emacs, gnumeric,
> inkscape, even mutt) modifies either the title bar or a status bar
> as soon as I make any modification of a document (typically an
> asterisk), and removes it if I revert the change, or save i
On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 20:36 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Yes, I may have been "lucky" in the sense that I probably already had
> the prerequisite libraries installed, and had perhaps already messed
> with the required settings. There seem to be two orthogonal components
> necessary to get smoot
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 7:53 PM Tixy wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 18:46 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> > On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 18:52 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > What's more, I no longer have to continue my research about
> > > hardware-accelerated video playback in the browser which p
On Sat 24 Sep 2022 at 06:43:03 (-0400), Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ wrote:
> On Samstag, 24. September 2022 00:11:01 -04 piorunz wrote:
> > On 24/09/2022 01:38, Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ wrote:
> > > did you realize that, if the backup copy fails for any reason, also
> > > the document cannot be saved and thus *
To whom might read this. I can't boil this down to a formal bug report
but for what it's worth:
BULLSEYE INSTALL, 2022-09-23:
Decided to do a virgin install of bullseye to my /dev/sdb while keeping
/dev/sda devoted to Stretch. Got the installer onto a USB stick, and
proceeding normally. The
On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 18:46 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 18:52 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> [...]
> > What's more, I no longer have to continue my research about
> > hardware-accelerated video playback in the browser which prompted all
> > of this - it just started working automat
On Sat, 2022-09-24 at 18:52 +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
[...]
> What's more, I no longer have to continue my research about
> hardware-accelerated video playback in the browser which prompted all
> of this - it just started working automatically after the upgrade.
I just checked and you're righ
Sorry for top-posting, but it makes sense for this summary.
As indicated by the replies to my initial email, it is now late
September and firefox-esr has moved to version 102 in the stable
branch. I just upgraded without even noticing any difference,
definitely nothing that broke.
What's more, I
On Samstag, 24. September 2022 11:27:24 -04 Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:50:04 +0100
>
> piorunz wrote:
> > On 24/09/2022 11:43, Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ wrote:
> > > The problem is: if you enabled it and for some reason the backup
> > > copy cannot be written, LibreOffice also does n
On 24/09/2022 16:27, Charles Curley wrote:
That's very interesting. Where does backup copy is being written? To
the same folder where original supposed to be? Like Kate text editor
writes backups as "filename.txt~" in the same folder?
~/.config/libreoffice/4/user/backup/
Incidentally, it won'
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 15:50:04 +0100
piorunz wrote:
> On 24/09/2022 11:43, Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ wrote:
>
> > The problem is: if you enabled it and for some reason the backup
> > copy cannot be written, LibreOffice also does not write the
> > original. The warning LibreOffice emits is: "Cannot write
On Sat 24 Sep 2022 at 12:13:09 (+1200), Alex King wrote:
> On 24/09/22 03:32, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:22:31AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > > 'man bash' cites Brian Fox and Chet Ramey as the authors, and gives an
> > > E-mail address for each. (It's possible that they m
On Samstag, 24. September 2022 10:50:04 -04 piorunz wrote:
> On 24/09/2022 11:43, Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ wrote:
> > The problem is: if you enabled it and for some reason the backup
> > copy
> > cannot be written, LibreOffice also does not write the original.
> > The warning LibreOffice emits is: "Cann
On Sat 24 Sep 2022 at 10:43:04 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 03:17:31PM +0200, hede wrote:
> > Am 21.09.2022 14:46, schrieb Emanuel Berg:
> > > Maybe related to the '-o f f' part as your imagination
> > > tells you ...
> >
> > The "-o" means: "Write output image to FILE".
On Fri 23 Sep 2022 at 16:14:43 (+0200), Emanuel Berg wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> >> exif(1) which says on line 57 that --remove
> >>
> >> Remove the tag or (if no tag is specified) the entire IFD.
> >>
> >> Only if it does, why is it there the next time to be removed
> >> as well?
> >
> > Ha
On 2022-09-24, Alex King wrote:
>
>
> I've been using Debian as my main OS since 1997 or earlier. I've spent
> 100s of hours reading man pages. Although it's a reasonable assumption
> (since there are a lot of man pages with outdated AUTHORS sections), I
> didn't know the AUTHORS section is s
On 24/09/2022 11:43, Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ wrote:
The problem is: if you enabled it and for some reason the backup copy
cannot be written, LibreOffice also does not write the original.
The warning LibreOffice emits is: "Cannot write backup copy" but it does
not tell you that it will not even write
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 03:17:31PM +0200, hede wrote:
> Am 21.09.2022 14:46, schrieb Emanuel Berg:
> > Maybe related to the '-o f f' part as your imagination
> > tells you ...
>
> The "-o" means: "Write output image to FILE". And it does so, as far as I
> can see.
The question is whether specifyi
Am 21.09.2022 14:46, schrieb Emanuel Berg:
I don't know what the intended behaviof of "exif --remove -o
file file" is. I'm imagining [...]
exif(1) which says on line 57 that --remove
Remove the tag or (if no tag is specified) the entire IFD.
"Idempotent" means, that a task with the same in
On Samstag, 24. September 2022 00:11:01 -04 piorunz wrote:
> On 24/09/2022 01:38, Eike Lantzsch KY4PZ wrote:
> > did you realize that, if the backup copy fails for any reason, also
> > the document cannot be saved and thus *all* work is lost? I
> > experienced this behaviour recently to my dismay (
30 matches
Mail list logo
