And as I am quite paranoid - won't .. daren't.. use dselect..
what is the answer then?
thank you
clare
On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Should I be wary of ubgrading from libc6 2.0.6 to 2.0.7? Or can I just
> > blithely replace the library?
> >
> > Andre
On 8859 xxx 2001, Orn E. Hansen wrote:
> Date: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mi=F0,?= 03 Sep 1997 23:00:14 +0200 (CET DST)
> From: "Orn E. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 03-Sep-97 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> >Hm, interesting thought.. Right now it does sort by the Date: line which
> >is quite nice, it puts a
> Please can anyone tell me what might have sparked the message:
> lpr: unable to get official name for local machine
Sorry folks, I have found how I caused this - it was by deleting
a line
n.n.n.n bay
from /etc/hosts. ( I got the lpr source to find that out, I find if I put
the same IP numbers as
Hi group:
Please can anyone tell me what might have sparked the message:
lpr: unable to get official name for local machine
I have re-installed the lpr from lpr_5.9-13.1.deb, but no cure that way.
hostname gets the right answer for the machine name (bay).
Root can cat to lp2 and print. /etc/printca
) the bios and debian's own startup said the
printer was.(I also have a note that I initted via boot/root menus telling it
that is where the printer is and saved that to my custom boot disk.
I have not installed lilo, but I think it has an option to put the printer
details.)
clar
5 matches
Mail list logo