has been out for a while now. I'm not sure Dermot
Bradley's packages are getting worked on right now; I got the impression
recently that he'd become too busy (always understandable).
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e
, there are a few packages meant to allow that by having an
alternative gcc and C library on the system: libc5-altdev, altgcc, and
libdl1-altdev (the only ones I've seen). I haven't tried these.
Hope this clarifies things a little, anyway -
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED
. :)
Anyway, the bug was fixed a while ago. (in -8, according to the
changelog)
so it's coming down the pike somewhere.
Hth,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED
of the libc6-dev
environment and go back to libc5-dev, straight up.
Hope that's somewhat clear,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick == Rick Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rick I know we've gone to libc6, but I'm not quite clear on how to
Rick compile
with what you see on your system? Hope it helps,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
pdmenu
being used by many people on some not-yet-Debian machines.)
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey Peter S Galbraith:
Gee, sounds exactly like the debian version, which mentions
just
of:
alias net-pf-5 appletalk
I think my current conf.modules is the 1.3 default, and it has the 'off'
alias, disabling appletalk.
HTH,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED
haven't had to
worry about inter-user issues like that. Hope this helps,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Craig -
Thanks, for the second time this week, I think. :-) I'm not sure which
change was decisive on my system, but after following some of your
suggestions I could compile a kernel again.
Craig == Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig On 15 May 1997, Ed Donovan wrote
into production on each
platform.
I'll keep an eye on the '-L' paths, etc. I hadn't thought that through,
thanks. Appreciate the time thought,
Ed
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe
Debian as always,
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
for Craig; he's helped enough :) Is there still work being
done on adpkg, or are the ideas being moved into the deity project or
some such?
Well, I'm chattering a bit, those are just browsing-level interest
questions, I know what I need to know practically now. Thanks again,
Craig,
Ed
--
Ed
and debian installation as clean and
uninterfered-with as possible, so I'm curious to hear what the group
knows before trying anything more.
Thanks all,
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL
think I'm starting to hum it to the
tune of Hooray for Captain Spaulding :-)
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to:
update-rc.d atd remove /dev/null
rm -rf /var/spool/at{jobs,spool}
That is, take the premature ; fi off the end of line five, and change
the pipe (|) into a comma on line 6. After this, I could install the
new version cleanly. Hope this helps,
--
Ed Donovan
Hi Peter,
It's on master.debian.org and hasn't made it to ftp.debian.org yet. I
got through and snagged a copy if you wouldn't mind it as a mail
attachment or some such...
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
versions on the web yet.)
Does anyone on the list happen to know more about this; anyone working
with them yet?
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL
many admit is not so hot a
way to see them, if you don't use emacs or xemacs.
Hope this is of some use,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
popped into my head, sorry.
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the linker. Messed
this up just today :-)
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xemacs to not overwrite the emacs-provided ones, and so
had to list the packages as conflicting for now, though he was very
unhappy about that. I haven't downloaded the xemacs package, so I don't
know if this is mentioned anywhere within.
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought you were just supposed to mail Bruce, directly. I haven't
ever tried to get on, though...
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
releases, curses evolved to use more facilities and
offer more capabilities, going far beyond BSD curses in power and
flexibility.
hth?
I think I'll be posting my own latest ncurses compilation question soon
:-)
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) -batch -q -f batch-texinfo-format
and it will run emacs in batch (non-interactive) mode to do the job.
Does that fit?
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are very usable. There's a new html parser. It's a
dramatic difference, I really recommend it, well worth what betaness
there is. In the 'betas' subdirectory of the above path; there may be a
symlink to newest version in the above directory also, don't recall.
--
Ed Donovan
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (me) writes:
Mark Eichin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
More usefully, w3 can be found in the binary-i386/net/w3-el_2.2.25-4.deb
on any debian mirror...
Yeah, but those 2.2.x w3's are way slower than the 2.3 now 3.0
betas, which are very usable. There's
Well, how many times can I follow myself up? Let me know if I get near
a record.
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, wait, I didn't add: there is also a 2.2.26 release version, which
I'm pretty_ includes the fast new parser, though not this and that
spiffiness, blah, blah...
Uh, I
already assessed this situation, then excuse me.
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
been modified should
respect that, offering you options like leaving your versions in place
and copying the new distribution versions in as /etc/*.dpkg-dist.
Nb: this is no kind of official statement. If corrections are needed,
I'm sure they'll follow.
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL
it helps,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:0:
* ^TOdebian-changes
debian-changes.spool
Procmail uses one of those stanzas for each filter. The '.spool' suffix
is a Gnus default that I went along with. Following the FAQ, I have
these in ~/.procmail/rc.maillists--in a more vanilla setup they'd be
in ~/.procmailrc.
Hth,
--
Ed Donovan
valuable, since I
used to 'dpkg -x' deb-files all the time to check stuff out, and often I
was root. Cleaning up from that, I'd always 'rm -r usr/' in the
unpacking workspace, and then gasp, realizing I'd been one character
away from the apocalypse :-)
Thanks again, Rick.
--
Ed Donovan
and this version went in fine, works
fine. Darren, are you around to confirm that this is behind us?
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this might be
the case. But any login from a console prompt should be a login shell,
and read the startup files as specified above. Specifying login
behavior, or the .bashrc solution, would work if it was a sub.
Hth,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there. They'll want
(parts of) your XF86Config, and perhaps the results from running
Superprobe. Right now, either the settings don't match the hardware, or
you have to specify more to force the server to realize that they do.
HTH a little,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
try
installing them in turn and see what lights up my life, but maybe I can
get a little more background than I have from docs or FAQs on the roles
of those different fonts.
Many thanks as always,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is
the most recent locale I've seen (that was off the Gnus mailing list, I
have no relations with NT, thank you please! :-)
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reader should note unhealthy emacs-junkie gleam in poster's eye)
, though I've
never filled that. As of not long ago, Bruce's installation testbed was
a 386 with 4M, and he repeatedly tweaked the install to deal with
possible issues people encountered on 4M machines.
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
binary? (and then force-depends
kernel-package? Or can I just force it now? I'm presuming Manoj had
his reasons.)
Does everybody else just have the perl package installed? :-)
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Repeat question, sorry; in May this was part of a long
first, and ultimately catted them back together under Linux.
This reminds me of what Dr. McCoy accused the transporter of doing to his
molecules.
Second topic: I've been swamped lately, and haven't thanked you for
some of your help messages; I've really appreciated them.
--
Ed Donovan
sorry, it's not in front
of me to check where, it's probably in /usr/bin.)
Are either of these last two a problem for anyone else?
(Related: I see someone's already reported the a.out setterm binary as a bug.)
Thanks for any education here,
Ed
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL
Since I upgraded to 1.1, all of the ELF versions of mtools have failed
on my system, with the error:
init: set default params
Can't initialize 'A:'
(approximate transcription)
I'm not even sure if this is the system call init or the uber-process
init, and haven't succeeded in any attempts to
of these functions; should I
disable it somehow? That doesn't seem the case but beyond that I'm in
over my head. Do most people have them working correctly?
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disabling daemons from init.d
Date: Sat, 04 May 1996 10:49:57 -0400
From: Michael Alan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cd to /etc/init.d, chmod -x whatever, where whatever is the script you
want
appreciated. Tried to include what info I could, let me know if I need
more, but this one's long enough now as it is. Thanks,
--
Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 4 01:40:32 1996
To: Ed Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: error make-ing kernel 1.2.13
Well, you are not alone. I also have this problem, when I recompiled
this kernel
46 matches
Mail list logo
