Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

2022-01-24 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 25 Jan 2022, at 03:02, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Tue 25 Jan 2022, at 02:54, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:31:35AM +0000, Gareth Evans wrote: >>> /var/run$ sudo touch utmp >>> /var/run$ sudo chown root:utmp utmp >>> /var/run$ sudo chm

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

2022-01-24 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 25 Jan 2022, at 02:54, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:31:35AM +0000, Gareth Evans wrote: >> /var/run$ sudo touch utmp >> /var/run$ sudo chown root:utmp utmp >> /var/run$ sudo chmod 664 utmp >> /var/run$ ls -l utmp >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 root utm

modprobe tun required after reboot for virt-manager

2022-01-24 Thread Gareth Evans
Further to my disappearing /var/run/utmp query, I also newly can't start VMs with virt-manager without first doing $ sudo modprobe tun This has also changed recently, apparently without intervention on my part. Presumably it has stopped being autoloaded somewhere. Should tun be in /etc/modul

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

2022-01-24 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 25 Jan 2022, at 01:31, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Mon 24 Jan 2022, at 12:45, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:51:05AM +0000, Gareth Evans wrote: >>> I've just noticed that: >>> >>> $ who >>> >>> and >>

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

2022-01-24 Thread Gareth Evans
On Mon 24 Jan 2022, at 12:45, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:51:05AM +0000, Gareth Evans wrote: >> I've just noticed that: >> >> $ who >> >> and >> >> $ users >> >> both return nothing, with or without sudo. &g

Bullseye - who and users return nothing

2022-01-24 Thread Gareth Evans
Hello, I've just noticed that: $ who and $ users both return nothing, with or without sudo. $ sudo strace who access("/var/run/utmpx", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/var/run/utmp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) access

Re: Colemak layout at boot time

2021-09-19 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 13:43, piorunz wrote: > On 19/09/2021 13:26, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > The commands appeared to succeed (with suitable alteration of variables) > > but my VM now boots into a grub prompt immediately - doesn't ask for LUKS > > password.

Re: Colemak layout at boot time

2021-09-19 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 13:00, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 11:48, Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 06:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 05:49, David Wright > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat 18 Sep 2021 at 21:56:

Re: Colemak layout at boot time

2021-09-19 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 11:48, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 06:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 05:49, David Wright wrote: > > > On Sat 18 Sep 2021 at 21:56:34 (+0100), piorunz wrote: > > > > On 18/09/2021 20:00, David Wright wrot

Re: Colemak layout at boot time

2021-09-19 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 06:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 05:49, David Wright wrote: > > On Sat 18 Sep 2021 at 21:56:34 (+0100), piorunz wrote: > > > On 18/09/2021 20:00, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > > A lot of hits from googling

Re: Colemak layout at boot time

2021-09-18 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 19 Sep 2021, at 05:49, David Wright wrote: > On Sat 18 Sep 2021 at 21:56:34 (+0100), piorunz wrote: > > On 18/09/2021 20:00, David Wright wrote: > > > > > A lot of hits from googling grub colemak including > > > https://forums.debian.net//viewtopic.php?f=16&t=76833 > > > which uses dvo

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-23 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 15:37, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 22 Aug 2021 at 13:18:38 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 05:36, David Wright wrote: > > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021 at 14:13:55 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > > There is also no e

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-22 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 13:18, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 05:36, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021 at 14:13:55 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 04:45, David Wright > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-22 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun 22 Aug 2021, at 05:36, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 20 Aug 2021 at 14:13:55 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 04:45, David Wright wrote: > > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 07:42:56 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > $ apt policy pitivi > >

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-21 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sat 21 Aug 2021, at 13:42, Sven Hartge wrote: > Gareth Evans wrote: > > > So I would like to know if apt is not handling this properly, or if > > the scenario of a file changing packages (see David's previous email) > > is an expected exception to th

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-20 Thread Gareth Evans
On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 04:45, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 07:42:56 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021, at 05:50, David Wright wrote: > > > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 04:00:04 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > On Wed 18 Aug

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-20 Thread Gareth Evans
On Fri 20 Aug 2021, at 12:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:45:57PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > One might assume so, but only you can check that. There are two logs > > of the upgrade. /var/log/apt/history.log (and its predecessors) shows > > the command issued, followed by

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-18 Thread Gareth Evans
On Thu 19 Aug 2021, at 05:50, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 04:00:04 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 23:33, piorunz wrote: > > > On 18/08/2021 16:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > Unpacking gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0:amd64 (1.1

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-18 Thread Gareth Evans
On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 23:33, piorunz wrote: > On 18/08/2021 16:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > > Unpacking gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0:amd64 (1.18.4-3) ... > > [1mdpkg:[0m error processing archive > > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-Un4rDW/28-gir1.2-gst-plugins-bad-1.0_1.18.4-3_amd

Re: Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-18 Thread Gareth Evans
On Wed 18 Aug 2021, at 00:44, Gareth Evans wrote: > Hello, > > I upgraded from Buster stable to Bullseye stable last night, with > apparent success eventually, but it went less than smoothly and I would > be grateful for any advice as to why that may have been. > > I fol

Buster to Bullseye upgrade problem

2021-08-17 Thread Gareth Evans
Hello, I upgraded from Buster stable to Bullseye stable last night, with apparent success eventually, but it went less than smoothly and I would be grateful for any advice as to why that may have been. I followed the preparation advice at https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-

Re: runc CVEs in docker.io

2021-08-04 Thread Gareth Evans
On Mon 2 Aug 2021, at 11:48, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 18:07:53 CEST Gareth Evans wrote: > > Given that these are all fixed in Bullseye (and at least the grave > > apt-listbugs issue has been fixed in eg Ubuntu since March 2020 [1]) why >

runc CVEs in docker.io

2021-07-27 Thread Gareth Evans
Hello, I was just trying to install docker.io on Buster stable when apt-listbugs complained about one of the open CVEs listed here: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/runc Given that these are all fixed in Bullseye (and at least the grave apt-listbugs issue has been fix

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-29 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 22:41, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 17:11, David Wright wrote: > > On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > > > But your even

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-29 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 17:11, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was unconstrained, > > > and so shim-signed could be removed becaus

Re: Disappearing shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-26 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue 22 Jun 2021, at 19:13, David Wright wrote: > On Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 08:59:13 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote: > > A recent dist-upgrade on Buster (in a scripted cron job run at 01:00 daily) > > failed due to apt-listbugs complaining about the boot-breaking bug in > > shi

Disappearning shim-signed after failed dist-upgrade

2021-06-22 Thread Gareth Evans
A recent dist-upgrade on Buster (in a scripted cron job run at 01:00 daily) failed due to apt-listbugs complaining about the boot-breaking bug in shim-signed, and pinning v1.33 in the process. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990082 The next (manual) dist-upgrade removed shim-s

Re: Odd behavior of Debian 10.7 with MATE desktop

2021-02-01 Thread Gareth Evans
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021, at 12:46, Richard Owlett wrote: > I have just installed Debian 10.7 to my Lenovo T510 Thinkpad having > copied debian-10.7.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso to a flash drive [the machine is > intentionally isolated from the internet]. > > When logging in as user, everything appears normal. >

Re: gnome-control-center

2021-01-31 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, at 17:46, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2021-01-31 17:09 +0000, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > I'm trying to install gnome-online-accounts on Debian 10.7 with Mate: > > > > > > $ sudo apt install gnome-control-center gnome-online-accounts > >

gnome-control-center

2021-01-31 Thread Gareth Evans
I'm trying to install gnome-online-accounts on Debian 10.7 with Mate: $ sudo apt install gnome-control-center gnome-online-accounts [...] Package gnome-control-center is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is onl

Re: problem with wifi

2021-01-19 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 19:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 19 ian 21, 10:37:57, Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 07:53, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:51:21, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > > > I thought without eg. connman

Re: Python 3 wicd

2021-01-19 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 08:16, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:54:25, Gareth Evans wrote: > > There is apparently a Python 3 fork of wicd (or two) but I can't > > figure out what state they're in - are either of these likely to > > become availa

Re: problem with wifi

2021-01-19 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 07:53, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:51:21, Gareth Evans wrote: > > > > If the machine in question has a desktop environment and > > NetworkManager (or equivalent), doesn't /etc/network/interfaces (or > > interfaces.d) c

Python 3 wicd

2021-01-18 Thread Gareth Evans
There is apparently a Python 3 fork of wicd (or two) but I can't figure out what state they're in - are either of these likely to become available in Buster repos? Backports? https://github.com/PXke/wicd-reloaded https://github.com/zeph/wicd The latter is apparently "migrated upstream" to htt

Re: problem with wifi

2021-01-18 Thread Gareth Evans
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, at 20:33, David Christensen wrote: > On 2021-01-18 01:14, Long Wind wrote: > > buster's wifi connection is ok for several hours, so i think problem > > disappearbut after rebooting pc, problem appears again > > wifi is provided by hotel, they hide AP somewhere, i don't know

Re: Debian 10 64bit

2020-12-15 Thread Gareth Evans
ork (as in the first installation) suggests a password error, doesn't it? The fact that sudo was made to work during the first installation (having not initially) suggests that su must have succeeded at some point, doesn't it? Kind regards, Gareth On Tue, 15 Dec 2020, at 18:12, Greg W

Re: Debian 10 64bit

2020-12-15 Thread Gareth Evans
oesn't it? Kind regards, Gareth On Tue, 15 Dec 2020, at 18:12, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:02:48PM +, Gareth Evans wrote: > > It seems to me that Jerry may have mistakenly typed a user rather than root > > password at the su (not sudo) prompt at least on

Re: Debian 10 64bit

2020-12-15 Thread Gareth Evans
It seems to me that Jerry may have mistakenly typed a user rather than root password at the su (not sudo) prompt at least once, but also used the correct (root) password at least once. How else could changes to /etc/sudoers (which I imagine is what is meant by "the sudouse(r) file") have been

Re: Debian 10 and tethering USB

2020-11-23 Thread Gareth Evans
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, at 00:14, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, at 16:08, Charles Curley wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:55:25 + > > mag...@autistici.org wrote: > > > > > Instead a friend of mine has an iPhone. There were > > > no problems

Re: Debian 10 and tethering USB

2020-11-23 Thread Gareth Evans
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, at 16:08, Charles Curley wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:55:25 + > mag...@autistici.org wrote: > > > Instead a friend of mine has an iPhone. There were > > no problems with Debian 10 and iOS 13, instead with > > iOS 14, 14.0.1 and 14.1 tethering USB does non work > > anymo

Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest]

2020-11-22 Thread Gareth Evans
I may be a Claws convert :) Thanks G On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, at 17:08, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:55:19 + > "Gareth Evans" wrote: > > Hello Gareth, > > >On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, at 15:38, Brad Rogers wrote: > >> Once one sets up an MUA c

Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest]

2020-11-22 Thread Gareth Evans
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, at 17:08, Brad Rogers wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:55:19 +0000 > > "Gareth Evans" wrote: > > > > Hello Gareth, > > > > >On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, at 15:38, Brad Rogers wrote: > > >> Once one sets up an M

Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest]

2020-11-22 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, at 17:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 04:55:19PM +0000, Gareth Evans wrote: > > [...] > > > Thanks to all who have replied pointing out the issues. > > No worries. Things happen. No need to defend yourself, I hope. > >

Re: Hijacking Threads [was: Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest]

2020-11-22 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, at 15:38, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:10:10 +0200 > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Hello Andrei, > > >Starting a new e-mail requires filling out at least the To: address so > >it is easier to reply instead (especially with many addresses in To: > >and Cc: that on

Re: rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest

2020-11-22 Thread Gareth Evans
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, at 08:44, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 04:43:21AM +0000, Gareth Evans wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have asked this question on both the rsync mailing list and > > serverfault.com but got no response from either. >

rsync link corruption with -H and --link-dest

2020-11-21 Thread Gareth Evans
Hi all, I have asked this question on both the rsync mailing list and serverfault.com but got no response from either. I would be grateful, if this isn't too off-topic, if anyone could explain the following: man rsync for -H includes: "If you specify a --link-dest directory that contains hard

Duplex tumble options missing since CUPS upgrade

2020-07-01 Thread Gareth Evans
Hello, The duplex tumble option seems to have disappeared for me when printing, I think since a recent CUPS upgrade on Debian 10.4 No matter whether I use driverless or Brother drivers with MFC-L2740DW the only options are "short edge"/"long edge" or "portrait"/"landscape" respectively, but al

<    1   2   3