Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:25:38PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 8 Mar, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>>
>> > response to sick patients? The first is impossible as they already
>> > have 100% of the market, the second already a problem they are aren't
>> > respond
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Better to lobby government to tell me what I can't do.
That's a rather glib way of writing off society. That's exactly what
government is designed to do: Uphold the standards of the society that
created it.
We like having productive and scenic land land; compact, accessabl
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:35:57AM +0100, steef wrote:
>> >
>> yeah. first bomb them down on false premises and lies and then tell
>> them: o jeez: you cannot do it without us: you have no functioning
>> economy.
>>
> Ummm, the premises were not false. The Brits had
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:35:30PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:44:54AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As long as we're controlling it, and ca
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:47:12PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > The instruction by Jesus to turn the other cheek was directed at
>> > individuals. Paul lays out the guidelines for government in Roma
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:33:43PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > Umm, prior to WWI and WWII we had an isolationist bent. We waited for
>> > the problem to get to us. Personally, I am glad that Sa
Curt Howland wrote:
> I do not have a problem with "broken" threads, since, not only do I
> read the digest, I read the Subject line.
So you don't mind taking a shit in the bed because you don't have to sleep
in it. Classy, Curt. Real classy.
> While you're looking for scapegoats, why not bla
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> LOL. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and even a blind
> squirrel finds a nut sometimes. One working state government hospital
> does not equal a working federal bureaucracy. An example of a broken
> federal health care system is a much more relevant example
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Iguess you'll have show me how the government is efficient at anything.
Transportation. Try driving someplace that has a privatized road system
like Australia and tell me privatization is a good idea.
> Ever dealt with Workman's Comp? Another instance of a government
Viktor Podivinsky wrote:
> Can anybody explain me what's going on??Why am I getting notice of winning
> a million pounds without any responces on my emails?? Viktor
Don't respond to them, it's a scam that could leave you bankrupt, maimed or
dead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_fee_fraud
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> When an employee can sit in the library and read during the majority of
> their work day, and critical maintenance that they are personally
> responsible for such as cleaning out drip pans under refrigeration coils
> in the meat coolers for the kitchen that supplies the
David Purton wrote:
> (No, I can't be bothered adding In-Reply-To and References to my
> checking ;) )
No, you don't get to complain about the problem if you aren't willing to
take the natural solution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:35:18AM -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
>> On Wednesday 07 March 2007 04:06, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
>> heard to say:
>> > Please fix your MUA so that you stop creating a new thread every
>> &g
Curt Howland wrote:
> Actually, the clear implication is that I consider the military
> occupation of 170 different countries by the US to be reprehensible,
> which causes me to wonder what the peoples so occupied think of it.
Does it matter? We're the ones paying for it, if we think it's
repreh
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/07/07 12:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Al Eridani wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/2/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> [snip]
>>
>> The wh
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:44:54AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> As long as we're controlling it, and calling it our model project, we
>> really should be asking questions like "Why are we giving more to them
>> than we get
&
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> > The number one requirement for any public transportation system is that
>> > it be ubiquitous and accessible.
>>
>> Indeed. One thing that is an unfortunate stumbling block is the number
>> of relatively sparse neighborhoods that cropped up after the elimination
>>
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/07/07 12:18, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:33:06PM -1000, Al Eridani wrote:
>>>> On 3/2/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/07/07 12:22, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>> s. keeling wrote:
>>>>> This is a ridiculous statement. I
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/07/07 14:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 7 Mar, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:44:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>>
And virtually every other developed nation
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:33:18AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> There's a difference between fighting a war because the planet is in
>> immediate danger and complicating a civil war or other largely internal
>> conflict. We d
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/07/07 12:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/06/07 20:43, Al Eridani wrote:
>>>> On 3/4/07, Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >> That's modern socialism, my friend.
>> >>
>> > I will again quote from Wikipedia:
>> >
>> > "As an economic system, socialism is often char
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:44:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> As far as health care goes, medicare is by far the most efficient
>> system in the US.
>>
> Really? Then why won't every doctor in American accept Medicare?
Probably because it's rude to in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 7 Mar, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:55:56PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>>
>>> > Iraq also does not have a functioning economy. Now, you might
>>> > argue t
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:13:06PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> >> > Nice revisionist bit of history there. If you go back to the Reagan
>> >> > Administration (and less so the first Bush a
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:47:05 -0800
>> > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > the efforts in the Balkans hav
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:55:56PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > Iraq also does not have a functioning economy. Now, you might argue
>> > that providing National healthcare is simply getting them ad
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:18:14PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:34:44AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm willing to argue that Vietnam was
Paul E Condon wrote:
> What has been in Iraq is hardly a reasonable standard of comparison for
> how the USA should conduct its own internal affairs on any issue. But I
> happen to know a few details of the recent history.
As long as we're controlling it, and calling it our model project, we real
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> s. keeling wrote:
>>> This is a ridiculous statement. I've met a few who did. All
>>> Canadians, regardless of their position in the scheme of things have
>>> two choices: accept what you're offered by tho
Al Eridani wrote:
> On 3/2/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> if you compare motor vehicle traffic in those cities, you see that even
>> the two *best* public transport cities in the US can't even make public
>> transport work for a *majority* of their residents.
>
> First, c
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:33:06PM -1000, Al Eridani wrote:
>> On 3/2/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >if you compare motor vehicle traffic in those cities, you see that even
>> >the two *best* public transport cities in the US can't even make p
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:31:45PM -1000, Al Eridani wrote:
>> On 3/4/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >See, and I have been losing respect for the rest of world for
>> >interfering too much in people's daily lives and sitting idly by (or
>> >pro
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/06/07 20:43, Al Eridani wrote:
>> On 3/4/07, Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>> Not at all. What the rest of the world wants is less interference from
>> the US. As far I can see, Sweden does not interfere with what happens
>> in other places, b
Al Eridani wrote:
> On 2/27/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:55:28AM +0100, Dan H. wrote:
>> >
>> > I think in any society, no matter in what system, it's always the
>> > stupid and poor that end up in the military, at least in those ranks
>> > that a
Curt Howland wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2007 15:30, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
>> I wouldn't be so quick to assume Debian's working on communist
>> theory successfully. I think the DPL would have something to say
>> about nobo
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/06/07 18:22, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:02PM -1000, Al Eridani wrote:
>>> On 2/27/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:55:28AM +0100, Dan H. wrote:
> [snip]
>>>
>> What does it matter what someo
Please fix your MUA so that you stop creating a new thread every time you
hit reply. You're breaking threading and destroying thread context.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Laissez-faire economics is an impossible pipe dream and Germany proved
>> it. Taken to it's natural end, you get Germany's pre-WWII out-of-control
>> rapid inflation where soon it takes millions of dollar
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:34:44AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> I'm willing to argue that Vietnam was worse for us than 1812 was for
>> Canada. They at least made it all the way to the capitol and successfully
>> captured
>&g
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:14:22AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> I would be a little bit less torqued about foreign aid and a lot more
>> sympathetic to the cause if the aid we were exporting wasn't a better
>> deal
>> tha
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/06/07 04:14, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:31:40PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ummm, many of the overseas mi
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:41:50PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> >> > You mean the wars of which Hillary Clinton
>> >> > said the following [0]:
>> >>
>> >&
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> > Nice revisionist bit of history there. If you go back to the Reagan
>> > Administration (and less so the first Bush administration), you will
>> > see that the Soviets were a much greater threat (short term and long
>> > term) than even Hussein and bin Laden.
>>
>>
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:33:30PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>
>> >> You seem to miss that Sweden and a large portion of the Commonwealth
>> >> of Nations operate under some form of democratic socialis
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> > You mean the wars of which Hillary Clinton
>> > said the following [0]:
>>
>> She lost my vote over that speech when I heard that on CSPAN live.
>>
> Did she get it back when she flipped to being anti-war and effectively
> denying that she ever supported the war?
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:47:05 -0800
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > the efforts in the Balkans have been "utter failures" ?
>>
>> I'd hardly call any of the former Soviet-bloc stable.
>
> Pleas
Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> You seem to miss that Sweden and a large portion of the Commonwealth
>> of Nations operate under some form of democratic socialism.
>
> You mean democracies with proper market economy and just some
> socialist tendencies.
That's modern socialism, my friend.
--
To UNS
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:31:40PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > Ummm, many of the overseas military bases are in place at the
>> > *invitation* of the host governments.
>>
>> OK, then
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:21:54PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> I'd feel a lot better about the American military protecting Americans if
>> they were actually stationed where they can defend Americans. How many
>> soldiers are s
Curt Howland wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 21:57, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
>> > As would the Canadians, invaded in 1776 and 1812 unsuccessfully,
>>
>> 1812 was a success. They just couldn't hold Washington for more
>> tha
Curt Howland wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 21:57, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
>> The problem is, you can't get the government out of the way. It's
>> either work with the government we have, or go with some kind of
>> anarch
Curt Howland wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> > So the Standard Oil Trust was a good thing, and we should welcome
>> > it's return?
>
> During the time Standard Oil was in operation, the price of kerosine
> dropped some 90%.
They're still in operation, t
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:29:17PM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>>
>> 2) I never said a word about WWI or WWII. My comments we primarily
>> aimed at the "W" wars. The ones in which the U.S. unilaterally invaded
>> another country. Not wars which involved major portion
s. keeling wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> > On 03/05/07 03:06, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> >> s. keeling wrote:
>> >>> Uh huh. Move to Canada. Need a hip replacemnt? Six to eighteen
>> >>
>>
s. keeling wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> s. keeling wrote:
>>
>> > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Paul Johnson wrote:
>> >> >> Totalitari
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:36:09 -0800
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> It's a little disingenious to hide behind the success of World War II to
>> whitewash over the utter failure of every military action since.
>
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:02:26AM +0100, Mitja Podreka wrote:
>>>> The terms socialism and communism were vandalised by the authoritarian
>>>> governments and individu
s. keeling wrote:
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> No problem with state health insurance, as long as it competes
>> *directly* with private ones.
>
> I'd have no problem with that, assuming I can opt out of paying into
> your system, and none of my taxes go to pay for your system.
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:19:32AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:02:26AM +0100, Mitja Podreka wrote:
>> >> The terms socialism and communism were vandalised by the
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:14:23PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> No, I didn't. It was an utter failure. It took them how long to rescue
>> folks from the Superdome? And then the cleanup from the Superdome was so
>> bad, demolitio
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:20:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Mitja Podreka wrote:
>>
>> > Ron Johnson wrote:
>> >> Or... they could get off their butts, get an education and improve
>> >> their own lives.
>> &g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:36:09AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> It's a little disingenious to hide behind the success of World War II to
>> whitewash over the utter failure of every military action since.
>
> Not *every* military ac
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:54:37AM -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
>>
>> The US doesn't protect anyone. If the US were actually interested in
>> defense, rather than empire, the military bases overseas would be
>> closed, rather than manned in 170 countries, of which, what,
Curt Howland wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 09:36, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to
> say:
>> Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>> > [the United States] have never gone to war to expand our borders
>> >
>>
>> The Native Americans might disagree with you
>
> As would the Canadians, in
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/05/07 03:06, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> s. keeling wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Paul
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:07:27AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> So I guess the trick to getting the US to help you is make sure you
>> aren't a US taxpayer and move someplace disaster prone.
>>
> What a crock. If anything,
Curt Howland wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2007 02:22, "Roberto C. Sanchez"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>> See, and I have been losing respect for the rest of world for
>> interfering too much in people's daily lives and sitting idly by
>> (or providing only token participation) while th
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> When will you socialists learn to understand that the extremely high
> taxes and all the government programs you have are all forms of
> control?
It depends on the country it's practiced whether this is a bad thing. The
US would be highly compatible as all power of the
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:02:26AM +0100, Mitja Podreka wrote:
>> The terms socialism and communism were vandalised by the authoritarian
>> governments and individuals, in order to legitimate their authorities.
>
> The terms socialism and communism where not vandalized
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Marc Shapiro wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 07:04:13PM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>>>
>>>
If we do go socialistic this nation will have abandoned what made it
great. I hope you do notice that the further we move toward so
Mitja Podreka wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Or... they could get off their butts, get an education and improve
>> their own lives.
>>
> Saying that poor people are poor because they are lazy is like saying
> that rich people are rich because they are hard working.
I've found the opposite tend
s. keeling wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>
>> > Paul Johnson wrote:
>> >> Totalitarianism and socialism aren't mutually exclusive, but neither
>> >> is
>> > any
>> >> oth
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:09:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Being rom the rest of the world, I have been losing respect for the
>> United States because it fails to ensure a minimum standard of living
>> for its people, and sends out armies to interfere in
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 07:46:30PM -0800, Michael M. wrote:
>
> [ snip some stats ]
>
>>> Sure looks like socialized medicine is sucking there, huh?
>
>> So what? The US also has the highest levels of obesity in the world. I
>> *highly doubt* t
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Totalitarianism and socialism aren't mutually exclusive, but neither is
> any
>> other economic and political model combination. Correlation without
> causation.
>
> They're not mutually exclusive because they
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 16:33 -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>>
>>> Greg Folkert wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 10:16 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
Greg Folkert wrote:
>> True, but it still doesn't work out rationally: Unless you make a lot of
>> money or gas is unbelievably cheap, that few minutes saved will cost you
>> more wage-hours than it's worth...
>
> Unless you lose you job being late and you don't want to leave any
> earlier. Its
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> You won't know until you go to the transit planning meetings and ask.
>
> I don't have to go to the transit planning meetings to know what is and
> is not possible based simply on the distance invovled and how public
> t
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/02/07 12:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/01/07 19:16, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> O
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:22:16 -0800
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:44:52 -0800
>> > Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>&
Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:51:11 -0800
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 01:21:46PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Firestarter and ot
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:48:06PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> > But USA is not the entire world.
>>
>> No, it's not. So why is the rest of the world trying to tell the US
>> what
>> would work for them when most rational people in the
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/01/07 19:25, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> Mitja Podreka wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Who's rich enough to afford to waste gas driving faster than 60 MPH, much
>> less more on a regular basis? Fuel economy on mos
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/01/07 15:58, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 03/01/07 08:12, [EMAIL PROTECTE
Celejar wrote:
> I'm trying to use a simple (cheap) PS/2 keyboard with a laptop which
> has no PS/2 ports. There are various PS/2 - USB available all over the
> internet; I bought a cheap one on Ebay.
Is it green or purple? There are two kinds, ones for keyboards and ones for
mice. The green o
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Would be half that if LA had not destroyed it's public transport in the
>> 1940s and 1950s. 45 minutes is a long commute by anybody's standards.
>
> Uh, no, Paul it wouldn't. It is pretty much physically impossible
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:44:52 -0800
> Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> > You're confusing socialism with totalitarianism. Please see my
>> > previous posts about this.
>>
>>
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/01/07 19:16, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/01/07 15:51, Joe Hart wrote:
>>>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>>>> Joe Hart wrote:
>>>
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 10:55 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 06:37:34PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> >> On 02/28/07 14:37, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> >> >>
&g
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> But USA is not the entire world.
>
> No, it's not. So why is the rest of the world trying to tell the US
> what would work for them when most rational people in the US could tell
> you it won't?
Because we all use the same energy sources and breath
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/01/07 13:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>>
>>> Another liberal wanting to decide for everyone else what they should
>>> drive, how they should live, etc You ought to be using Windows, not
>>> an OS
Curt Howland wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 01 March 2007 15:40, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
>> You realize that GNU and socialism have more in common than in
>> difference, right?
>
> Fals
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Mitja Podreka wrote:
>> What I meant is: "why do you need a car which can go 250km/h if your
>> country doesn't allow you to go faster than 130km/h."
>
> Uhm, because maybe you'll drive it somewhere other than where speed is
> limited? That not everyone just putters along
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> GNU/Linux has more in common with freedom of choice than anything else.
> It's originators my not see that, or have had it in mind, but the fact
> is it does. It doesn't require coercion or attempt to force anyone to
> do things exactly the same as everyone else. It is
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:35:00AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>>
>> > Another liberal wanting to decide for everyone else what they should
>> > drive, how they should live, etc You ought to be using
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/01/07 15:51, Joe Hart wrote:
>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> Joe Hart wrote:
> [snip]
>> However, I was exaggerating a bit. To go the 26 km from here to
>> Amsterdam, it takes about a half of an hour with the car or the bus.
>> The difference is I have to find a place to park
Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/28/07 12:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 27 Feb, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
It's not stupid if you haven't been there.
>>> I thought you were smarter than that.
>>>
>>> Presuming you're not:
>>>
>>> Mountains and v
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 06:37:34PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 02/28/07 14:37, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> >>
>> > Except that they all come in unskilled. All the commercials for the
>> > Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines talk about joining up and they will
>>
>>
801 - 900 of 5605 matches
Mail list logo
