From: Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:26:11PM -0800, Richard Taylor wrote:
And... then, you got the Gnome Office stuff... www.gnome.org
The most recently is at Ximian, www.ximian.com. Abiword is maturing but
it's got a ways to go yet.
Staroffice 5.2
From: Joris Lambrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the ignorance but how does this template system work ?
I can't imagine the benefits from this kind of approach.
I thought you knew Dreamweaver.
It's just copy and paste... you build a basic form for the page.
When you want a new page you
From: Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote:
Would that be the Latext system? Considered professionally acceptable?
LaTeX is nice, but it is *not* a desktop publishing programming like
Quark.
There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the
From: Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve wrote:
It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as
good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now most
pros use a professional page layout app like Quark because it truly is
WYSIWYG and almost
From: Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 09:24:04PM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote:
Richard Taylor wrote:
There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect
and so forth.
On Linux? I didn't know. Same name?
WordPerfect, yes, but Adobe has
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, William Leese wrote:
mmm, i'll give it a try. Just hope someone will come along with a good
WYSIWYS-editor for linux (GPL-ed.. ofcourse, unlike Bluefish) some time.
Give Amaya a tryout, done by the w3 folks.
Amaya's really good... it's got
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Richard Taylor wrote:
Nothing in opensource is going to be close to DreamWeaver of course -yet
anyways.
That depends on whether you hand write your code or let a
wysiwyg editor approximate it for you.
Most pros will tell you
This may help you as well.
http://www.securityportal.com/lasg/
http://www.cert.org/
Steve here,
Well first, I repent of calling Linux 7: Redhat 7. Yes I am new. I have
been maintaining my own box from a su level for about 3 months. That is why
I was calling in an expert to install Debian
From: Bud Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The s1834
is a little faster and uses the via apollo pro133a chipset. The
s1832 uses the intel 440bx chipset.
I just ordered an 1834 for a box at work. I looked around for a while
and it seemed the best choice for what I wanted to do.
I'm using one
-- Original Email --
Bye
Romain
PS in case you encounter a problem here is a patch: format c: :-)
Wouldn't that be d:?
...
Ok... where did I put my damnable cigarettes!
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
If you can't be helpful, be silent.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Veit Waltemath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:49:06PM -, Pat Woolley wrote:
I use mandrake 7 and I am very happy with it. However I
} would like to be able to install debian packages on my system
} As I see it
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:31:30AM -0700, Rando Christensen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Richard Taylor wrote:
ObDisclaimer: IANADD
First off, I would like to apologize if this is not the right list to ask
this question, and secondly, I would like to apologize
Sorry folks, my brain must have suffered a power-outage,
I have posted the preceding message to the wrong list.
Sorry.
for that matter? I mean, being stuck to 2.2.17 is not
going to be satisfactory for much longer.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Richard Taylor
-
Richard Taylor: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 16952744
-
Pardon me for being dense, folks, but due to some advice that I
received from this list I decided to try Woody out. Now: where are
the install floppy images. I tried
ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/disks-i386
and a couple of the mirror sites just to check, and well, came up
dry. So
before, so all this setting up the internet, and apt-get is very new to
me...
-
Richard Taylor: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 16952744
-
.
-
Richard Taylor: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 16952744
-
. So back to my original point: Am I being dense, or how do you
install woody? Do ya have to do an upgrade from potato?
-
Richard Taylor: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 16952744
-
Nick Croft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: staroffice:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, David Teague wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
StarOffice is a bloated stuck pig. It handles MS file formats fairly
well though.
It may be the only use for SO, take a Word .doc and
Jonathan Markevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I think the best comment over the emacs thing was; someone said it's
not an
editor, it's a virtual machine Now that makes great sense! Now
someone
needs to come up with something as clever to explain vi... :)
It's just an editor?
Lance Hoffmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding finding which
packages installed:
What package can I use to determine which packages I have installed
and
a description of what they do? How would I use this package?
Use dselect.
{Which reminds me... How does one patent copyrighted
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: Emacs - was Re: Mail/news
software:
Richard == Richard Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Win hasn't required an autoexec.bat since '95. -- My
Richard other computer's running Debian. {www.debian.org}
I think you need
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Pat == Pat Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pat For me, Linux makes me think. For others, windows may make
Pat them think. For still others, something else (not computer
Pat related) may make them think. If linux makes you think,
Pat good.
Graeme Mathieson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: Re[2]:
Emacs
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ snipped ... ]
Simply stated, anything which requires Emacs to run
is instantly lower than something that requires Windows to run because
at
least it /IS/ an OS and not an editor
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Monday, May 01, 2000, 11:59:24 AM, Richard wrote:
Emacs is far more useful than that... It's still the best
mailer/newsreader/text based office program in existence.
That is highly debated, esp. for people who prefer not to have
huge
I've had
Kovacs Istvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(snip)
Emacs, vi, development tools are fine for developers (I also decided
to
learn Emacs and vi -- not at the wizard level, but to be able to use
them when needed), and it's reasonable not to expect the masses to use
them, but it's not the same case
tristan misseri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
You told about mounting different fs on both systems : linux and
win98. How
can U mount ext2 partitions on win98?
http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/
--
My other computer's running Debian. {www.debian.org}
Felix Natter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding
Re: are there any good free 3d modeling tools?:
Chris Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blender (www.blender.nl) is a very good tool for
3D-modelling/animation.
It is free (as in beer) and not open-source, but version 2.0 will
probably
be.
Felix Natter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding
Re: are there any good free 3d modeling tools?:
Chris Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blender (www.blender.nl) is a very good tool for
3D-modelling/animation.
It is free (as in beer) and not open-source, but version 2.0 will
probably
be.
On 4/21/2000, 1:27:40 PM, Irish, Jon D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Is there a comprehensive list somewhere, of all of the available
Debian
packages, that describes them in detail? Being new, sometimes I am not
too
sure what exactly I need to install to acomplish what I want to do
(vague, I
On 4/7/2000, 10:56:59 PM, loki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding
Re: no wonder...:
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 08:48:18AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Richard Taylor wrote:
My mileage varies. I find that the program simplifies what can be a
vastly more difficult process
On 4/7/2000, 10:00:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: no
wonder...:
What could be more intuitive?
Something that works. Your statement highlights the reason that when I
ask
for directions on how to drive somewhere, I will NOT ask someone that has
lived there all their life but a
On 4/6/2000, 9:03:41 PM, Oki DZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re:
no
On 5 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No wonder people say that Debian is the most difficult
Unix-clone distro to install and use...
...
Another thing, is the dselect program: it is quite
difficult to use...
As
On 4/6/2000, 7:31:18 PM, Chanop Silpa-Anan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
Once upon a time, I heard Viktor Rosenfeld say
I recently switched my working environment from Windows to Debian only
and I've been using Netscape Mail so far. And I *hate* it!
Me too, it's too slow!
:} Tried 6?
On 4/7/2000, 5:26:43 AM, Chanop Silpa-Anan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding Re: Mutt questions
Once upon a time, I heard Richard Taylor say
On 4/6/2000, 7:31:18 PM, Chanop Silpa-Anan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once upon a time, I heard Viktor Rosenfeld say
I recently switched my working
On 4/7/2000, 1:41:56 PM, Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: no
wonder...:
Richard Taylor wrote:
On 4/6/2000, 9:03:41 PM, Oki DZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re:
On 5 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No wonder people say that Debian is the most difficult
Unix
On 4/4/2000, 8:55:45 PM, Eric G . Miller egm2@jps.net wrote
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 06:41:30PM -0700, Bart Friederichs wrote:
Hi,
While reading a page on X, I was wondering, should it be possible to
kick out Microsoft's window system and run Windows (??) 98 with X? It
says it is
39 matches
Mail list logo
