all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
. . . why? What's the purpose of making everything on machines
running stable un-upgradable until some obscure Perl bug is worked
out? I just don't follow.
Which reminds me, building source packages is really not as easy as
one would hope it to be.
I had to go through some contortions to
,
these files can be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
and xfree86-common?
-N.
--
These download files are in Microsoft Word 6.0 format. After unzipping,
these files can be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
Montreal Wed Apr 14 15:36:19 1999
Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can't install Emacs on a
Debian system without first install X?! That's quite
Montreal Wed Apr 14 15:44:38 1999
Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote:
Hmmm, according to
http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/editors/emacs20.html emacs20
does depend on xlib which depends
,
these files can be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
files are in Microsoft Word 6.0 format. After unzipping,
these files can be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
6.0 format. After unzipping,
these files can be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
can be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
files are in Microsoft Word 6.0 format. After unzipping,
these files can be viewed in any text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
text editor, including all versions of
Microsoft Word, WordPad, and Microsoft Word Viewer. [Microsoft website]
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/editors/
Montreal Thu Feb 18 07:48:14 1999
Is it just me or is the archive for this list dead?
-N.
Montreal Thu Feb 18 08:42:46 1999
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*- On 18 Feb, Navindra Umanee wrote about list archive
Montreal Thu Feb 18 07:48:14 1999
Is it just me or is the archive for this list dead?
-N.
It must be you.
http://www.debian.org/Lists
Montreal Thu Feb 18 17:21:22 1999
George Richard Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Navindra Umanee wrote:
Personally, I recommend that you don't use the .debs because you won't
find debs for any of the many other KDE applications available. I
think it is better that you keep KDE separate
Montreal Thu Feb 18 18:30:36 1999
Kirk Hogenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Navindra Umanee wrote:
Does Debian 2.1 come with a Window Maker deb compiled with
--enable-kde?
Probably not. Debian is lame.
2.1, No. That's because the WindowMaker version in 2.1 is 0.20,
which
Montreal Tue Feb 16 18:22:18 1999
Does anyone know why the default TERM for xterm under Hamm is
xterm-debian? No other remote system has this term type defined and
when I ssh from an xterm to such a remote system, I always get errors.
(I'm aware of solutions like if TERM == xterm-debian then
Montreal Tue Feb 9 22:17:18 1999
Why do GNOME binaries go to /usr/bin/ instead of /usr/bin/X11/? Just
curious.
Thanks,
Navin.
Montreal Wed Feb 3 15:37:50 1999
My bo system used to say System halted. everytime I halted the
system but since I upgraded to hamm it sez Power down.. Where has
this changed? I grepped for Power in /etc/init.d/* and /etc/*/* but
couldn't find where to configure this.
Please enlighten and Cc:
Montreal Wed Feb 3 17:18:14 1999
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*- On 3 Feb, John Goerzen wrote about Re: [whine] Power down. vs System
halted.
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 02:26:44PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I belive we now use the POWER_OFF mechanism by default as
,
[asimov] [/home/navindra/debian/upgrade] sudo ./cd_autoup.sh
ldso_1.9.9-1.deb libc5_5.4.38-1.1.deb libc6_2.0.7t-1.deb timezones_2.0.7t-1.deb
locales_2.0.7t-1.deb ncurses3.0_1.9.9e-2.1.deb ncurses3.4_1.9.9g-8.8.deb
libreadline2_2.1-10.1.deb libreadlineg2_2.1-10.1.deb bash_2.01.1-3.1.deb
libg
24 matches
Mail list logo
