Hi. Please do not cc me. I read the list. Thanks.
Art Edwards wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
Hm, well, I understand that you're having a problem, but I don't really
see it as a problem with testing, or that testing is broken; but rather,
it seems more like a problem with the idea that
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is its
intended pupose, wouldn't it be a good idea to try to assure that
large
scale problems are kept to a minimum?
No, because that isn't its intended purpose.
This being the case, is it possible (and relatively easy) for me to set
up my own
Joseph Haig wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
(and that's without even getting into the subject that testing does
not get direct security updates. Stable does. Unstable effectively
gets them through uploads. Testing doesn't get them until the
packages
trickle down from unstable, which could
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:08:55AM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2005 12:15 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
To
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:38:14 -0500
Jason Clinton wrote:
In the past two days, etch (testing) has been updated with a kde meta
package which apparently depends on packages from unstable which, in
turn, has caused aptitude to suggest removing KDE when performing a
system-wide upgrade. I have
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:38:14 -0500
Jason Clinton wrote:
In the past two days, etch (testing) has been updated with a kde meta
package which apparently depends on packages from unstable which, in
turn, has caused aptitude to suggest removing KDE when
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:34:34AM -0600, Art Edwards wrote:
I have to say that during the time between Woody and Sarge (a long time)
people
were encouraged to use testing as a nearly stable platform. Without it,
Debian
may have been abandoned by a significant part of its user base. Isn't
- Original Message
From: Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Someone is breaking etch (testing)?
Date: 27/09/05 23:55
Hm, well, I understand that you're having a problem, but I don't really
see
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:15:51PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
Marc, how can people know which 24 hours to skip?
--
Carl Fink
On Monday 26 September 2005 10:37, Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:15:51PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
Marc, how
On Monday 26 September 2005 12:15 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
I am reporting the issue.
Why are you always such a troll?
--
I use
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:08:55AM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2005 12:15 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
I
Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:15:51PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
Marc, how can people know which 24 hours to
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Marc, how can people know which 24 hours to skip?
The ones for which you have no backup...
but ... update/upgrade is updating the system .. not user data
and there's gazillion ways to update/restore/recreate the system
to be able to recover
On Monday 26 September 2005 01:40 pm, Marc Wilson wrote:
When did disagreeing with the clueless majority automatically make someone
a troll?
From Jargon File (4.3.1, 29 Jun 2001) [jargon]:
troll 1. v.,n. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a
posting on {Usenet}
Hi everyone;
In the past two days, etch (testing) has been updated with a kde meta package
which apparently depends on packages from unstable which, in turn, has caused
aptitude to suggest removing KDE when performing a system-wide upgrade. I
have been able to hold it back by following the
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 04:38:14PM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
In the past two days, etch (testing) has been updated with a kde meta package
which apparently depends on packages from unstable which, in turn, has caused
aptitude to suggest removing KDE when performing a system-wide upgrade. I
17 matches
Mail list logo
