Re: AMD-K6-2 processor for Lenny

forman...@email.cz wrote: > > From: Stan Hoeppner >> Simple. In 'make menuconfig' select K6-II under Processor Type. >> >> And read this if you haven't already: >> > href="http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html";>http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.ht

Re: AMD-K6-2 processor for Lenny

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:31:36 +0100 (CET) forman...@email.cz wrote: > > Yes - I have read it. > menuconfig on Lenny - kernel 2.6.26-2 says only 4 options (if .config in > place or not): > > ( ) Opteron/Athlon64/Hammer/K8 > ( ) Intel P4 / older Netburst based Xeon > ( ) Core 2/newer Xeon > ( )

Re: AMD-K6-2 processor for Lenny

From: Stan Hoeppner > Simple. In 'make menuconfig' select K6-II under Processor Type. > > And read this if you haven't already: > href="http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html";>http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html > > -- > Stan Yes - I have read

Re: AMD-K6-2 processor for Lenny

forman...@email.cz put forth on 11/29/2009 6:44 PM: > How to configure & compile the kernel for AMD-K6-2 procesor ? Simple. In 'make menuconfig' select K6-II under Processor Type. And read this if you haven't already: http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-comm

AMD-K6-2 processor for Lenny

How to configure & compile the kernel for AMD-K6-2 procesor ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: workaround for: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

On 2007-09-03 03:38:13 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote: > Sarge uses S02mountvirtfs, and Etch uses S04mountdevsubfs.sh. > > Probably there's a bug in one of Sid's startup scripts. My machine is sid and has no problems. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% accessible

Re: workaround for: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

On 09/03/2007 12:56 AM, Paul Scott wrote: Takehiko Abe wrote: (snip) Note that I've never had to do it myself. My /etc/fstab on a Sarge system has this entry: none/dev/ptsdevptsgid=5,mode=62000 I will try putting this in my fstab after I send this email. But my lenny

workaround for: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Takehiko Abe wrote: > Paul Scott wrote: > > > $ stat /dev/ptmx > > [...snip...] > > ptmx looks fine to me. > > > mountpoint says /dev/pts is not a mount point > > You need to mount devpts filesystem at /dev/pts. > pts(4) manpage says: > > ;; The Linux support for the above (known as Unix98 pty nami

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Paul Scott wrote: > $ stat /dev/ptmx > [...snip...] ptmx looks fine to me. > mountpoint says /dev/pts is not a mount point You need to mount devpts filesystem at /dev/pts. pts(4) manpage says: ;; The Linux support for the above (known as Unix98 pty naming) is ;; done using the devpts filesyst

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Takehiko Abe wrote: Paul Scott wrote: >> looks different from the previous pty error. Have you fixed that? > > I don't know enough to know why it should have changed with all > stock updates or enough to fix it at this point. You reported that legacy pty support is turned off in the new kernel.

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Paul Scott wrote: >> looks different from the previous pty error. Have you fixed that? > > I don't know enough to know why it should have changed with all > stock updates or enough to fix it at this point. You reported that legacy pty support is turned off in the new kernel. That is one change f

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Paul Scott wrote: Takehiko Abe wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Here's the end of the strace. It doesn't tell me anything we don't already know. Maybe someone else will see more: So what do you already know? For instance, this [...] write(2, "xterm Xt error: Can\'t open disp

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Takehiko Abe wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Here's the end of the strace. It doesn't tell me anything we don't already know. Maybe someone else will see more: So what do you already know? For instance, this [...] write(2, "xterm Xt error: Can\'t open displ"..., [...] looks different from the

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Paul Scott wrote: Here's the end of the strace. It doesn't tell me anything we don't already know. Maybe someone else will see more: So what do you already know? For instance, this [...] write(2, "xterm Xt error: Can\'t open displ"..., [...] looks different from the previous pty error. H

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2007-08-30 23:46:39 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > >> Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> >>> I have no problems with this recent change on my x86 machine. >>> Also, if I understand correctly, most programs no longer use >>> "legacy" pty's. And ttyrec, which still uses them, f

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

On 2007-08-30 23:46:39 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> I have no problems with this recent change on my x86 machine. >> Also, if I understand correctly, most programs no longer use >> "legacy" pty's. And ttyrec, which still uses them, fails with >> the new kernel. The fact that

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2007-08-29 20:40:28 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: So have I been missing the main point? Is the recent change in CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS the problem? I have no problems with this recent change on my x86 machine. Also, if I understand correctly, most programs no longer

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Wayne Topa wrote: OK from your Aug 26 post CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS=Y CONFIG_LEGACY_PTY_COUNT+256 ^ That should be = Not + That should not have happend, unless you ignored the warning at the top of the file. " # Automatically generated make config: don't edit" These are bot

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Paul Scott([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Wayne Topa wrote: >> Paul Scott([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: >> >>> Laptop with AMD K6 running Debian sid >>> >>> xterm works w/ stock 2.6.17-2-486 >>> >>

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

On 2007-08-29 20:40:28 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: > So have I been missing the main point? Is the recent change in > CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS the problem? I have no problems with this recent change on my x86 machine. Also, if I understand correctly, most programs no longer use "legacy" pty's. And ttyrec

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Wayne Topa wrote: Paul Scott([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: Laptop with AMD K6 running Debian sid xterm works w/ stock 2.6.17-2-486 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 attempting to start xterm gives: xterm: Error 32, errno 2: No such file or directory Reason: get_pty: not enough ptys

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Wayne Topa wrote: Paul Scott([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: Laptop with AMD K6 running Debian sid xterm works w/ stock 2.6.17-2-486 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 attempting to start xterm gives: xterm: Error 32, errno 2: No such file or directory Reason: get_pty: not enough ptys

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Paul Scott([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Laptop with AMD K6 running Debian sid > > xterm works w/ stock 2.6.17-2-486 > > with stock 2.6.22-1-486 attempting to start xterm gives: > > xterm: Error 32, errno 2: No such file or directory > Reason: get_pty: no

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Paul Scott([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Laptop with AMD K6 running Debian sid > > xterm works w/ stock 2.6.17-2-486 > > with stock 2.6.22-1-486 attempting to start xterm gives: > > xterm: Error 32, errno 2: No such file or directory > Reason: get_pty: no

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

On 08/29/2007 06:51 AM, Mumia W.. wrote: Could someone please e-mail me (or post to http://pastebin.mozilla.org ) a copy of /boot/config-2.6.22-1-486 ? I want to see if I have this problem with 2.6.22 also, but I need to use the default config file. I apologize for bothering the list. I ha

Re: xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

On 08/28/2007 11:22 PM, Paul Scott wrote: Laptop with AMD K6 running Debian sid xterm works w/ stock 2.6.17-2-486 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 attempting to start xterm gives: xterm: Error 32, errno 2: No such file or directory Reason: get_pty: not enough ptys I have upgraded almost anything that

xterm won't start on AMD K6 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 kernel

Laptop with AMD K6 running Debian sid xterm works w/ stock 2.6.17-2-486 with stock 2.6.22-1-486 attempting to start xterm gives: xterm: Error 32, errno 2: No such file or directory Reason: get_pty: not enough ptys I have upgraded almost anything that needed it that would have come after the

Re: Is the AMD K6 a 686?

On 1/26/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/26/07 10:21, celejar wrote: > In a previous post [0], I claimed that the AMD K6 isn't a 686 - I had > gotten that from the Archlinux website. A followup agreed with me. I >

Re: Is the AMD K6 a 686?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/26/07 10:21, celejar wrote: > In a previous post [0], I claimed that the AMD K6 isn't a 686 - I had > gotten that from the Archlinux website. A followup agreed with me. I > see these sites [1] claim otherwise, and th

Is the AMD K6 a 686?

In a previous post [0], I claimed that the AMD K6 isn't a 686 - I had gotten that from the Archlinux website. A followup agreed with me. I see these sites [1] claim otherwise, and they seem fairly authoritative. Anyone with more info? Celejar [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/20

Re: kernel 2.6 and amd K6-II

celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > I believe that the k6 is NOT a 686. I think you're right : someone on l.d.u.french has explained to me it's more than a 586 (586 + MMX if i did'nt misunderstand) but not a 686. I also was told it is possible to compile the kernel with : CONFIG_MK6

Re: kernel 2.6 and amd K6-II

On 11/5/06, Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Second i said myself : "Dummy, amd k6-II is not a 486 processor but a 686". So i got linux-image-2.6-686. It's not written on it that it works on AMD K6-II. But i tried and ... nothing append. After loading I believe

Re: kernel 2.6 and amd K6-II

On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:55:11AM +0100, Bernard Adrian wrote: > > Till yesterday, i was using linux-image-2.4-27-2-k6 on my amd k6-II > (64 Mo RAM). > > I decided to upgrade the kernel. In a first time i tried > linux-image-2.6-486. No problem. Really. > > Second i s

kernel 2.6 and amd K6-II

Hi all, Till yesterday, i was using linux-image-2.4-27-2-k6 on my amd k6-II (64 Mo RAM). I decided to upgrade the kernel. In a first time i tried linux-image-2.6-486. No problem. Really. Second i said myself : "Dummy, amd k6-II is not a 486 processor but a 686". So i got linux-ima

Re: 2.6 kernel image for AMD-K6-2

> You got it wrong. That's about the linux-image-... kernel packages which > have only few profiles, not including -k5, -k6 and many others. > > Eduard. > I could not help to tease a little. The 1st thing I did after my Debian basic install was simply to compile my own kernel. Seemed the most logic

Re: 2.6 kernel image for AMD-K6-2

#include * Joop [Wed, Jul 12 2006, 03:47:18AM]: > Maybe I got it wrong since I am a bit new to the scene. > But this is what I did. You got it wrong. That's about the linux-image-... kernel packages which have only few profiles, not including -k5, -k6 and many others. Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: 2.6 kernel image for AMD-K6-2

2.6.17.X on my K6-2 box Joop - Original Message - From: "Eduard Bloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 18:52 Subject: Re: 2.6 kernel image for AMD-K6-2 #include * Andrew Sackville-West [Mon

Re: 2.6 kernel image for AMD-K6-2

#include * Andrew Sackville-West [Mon, Jul 10 2006, 09:34:17AM]: > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:09:41AM -0700, Helen Easthope wrote: > > Debian users, > > > > Is there a straightforward way to get a 2.6 kernel image for an > > AMD-K6 machine? The 2.4 image wo

Re: 2.6 kernel image for AMD-K6-2

On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:09:41AM -0700, Helen Easthope wrote: > Debian users, > > Is there a straightforward way to get a 2.6 kernel image for an > AMD-K6 machine? The 2.4 image works fine but the 2.6 AMD-K7 > image fails on this Compaq Presario 5330. I think you want t

2.6 kernel image for AMD-K6-2

Debian users,   Is there a straightforward way to get a 2.6 kernel image for an AMD-K6 machine?  The 2.4 image works fine but the 2.6 AMD-K7 image fails on this Compaq Presario 5330.   Thanks,   Peter Easthope shark at gulfnet sd64 bc ca

Re: Amd K6 machine - advice please

Don writes: > I am running Debian 3.0 r2 on a 200Hz K6 on 4GB harddrive. ^ > A little slow I should think so. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Amd K6 machine - advice please

Robert Storey wrote: > I believe that K6 is compatible with 486 and even 586. >hasler/~ uname -a >Linux hasler.dhh.gt.org 2.2.12 #1 Mon Oct 4 22:06:49 CDT 1999 i586 unknown >hasler/~ cat /proc/cpuinfo >processor       : 0 >vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD >cpu family      : 5 >model           : 6 >m

Re: Amd K6 machine - advice please

Robert Storey wrote: > I believe that K6 is compatible with 486 and even 586. hasler/~ uname -a Linux hasler.dhh.gt.org 2.2.12 #1 Mon Oct 4 22:06:49 CDT 1999 i586 unknown hasler/~ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 5 model : 6 model nam

Re: Amd K6 machine - advice please

Robert Storey wrote: I believe that K6 is compatible with 486 and even 586. However, I don't have one here to test it, so you'll have to try it yourself. I would second this, K6 implements pentium instructions (586) and I'll raise you a pentium pro :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Re: Amd K6 machine - advice please

I believe that K6 is compatible with 486 and even 586. However, I don't have one here to test it, so you'll have to try it yourself. regards, Robert On Tuesday 07 June 2005 06:34, Marc Auslander wrote: > I'm running a now out of date stable system - the sarge prerelease. > > When I upgraded to

Re: Amd K6 machine - advice please

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:02:44PM -0600, Cam wrote: > Just compile your own. 386, K6, etc. are all still avaliable in the > standard kernel, even if they're not in the packages (if you're scared > of configuring your own, you could probably just copy the config file > from a (more recent) older k

Re: Amd K6 machine - advice please

Marc Auslander wrote: I'm running a now out of date stable system - the sarge prerelease. When I upgraded to the 2.6 kernel, k6 was no longer available. I found that 386 worked. I am using kernels 2.6.8 and 2.6.11 compiled for my K6. The only issue I had was the system clock slowing down due

Amd K6 machine - advice please

Just compile your own. 386, K6, etc. are all still avaliable in the standard kernel, even if they're not in the packages (if you're scared of configuring your own, you could probably just copy the config file from a (more recent) older kernel. Good luck, Cameron Matheson On 6/6/05, Marc Auslande

Amd K6 machine - advice please

I'm running a now out of date stable system - the sarge prerelease. When I upgraded to the 2.6 kernel, k6 was no longer available. I found that 386 worked. Now I see that 386 is gone. Does anyone know if 486 or some other kenrel will run on my machine. I suspect not. I'm not up to building a

AMD k6 in sid/sarge.

I have an ?old? AMD k6(3d). My mother uses this PC for surfing(printing web pages) and e-mail. I have recently had problems with the new mozilla, bug #226358. > I realy do HATE it when gcc makes asm like this. Whatever can loop will loop. > 0x080714f0 <_ZN12nsStrPrivate12GrowCapacity

Re: Ftp downloads for Linux running AMD K6

said: > Could somebody please send me the URL of an FTP site from where I > can download binaries (/bin variety and /sbin variety) for Linux > running AMD K6 ? > > My machine shows up as i586 . that is normal and expected. it will work fine(i have a K6-3 thats been running for

Ftp downloads for Linux running AMD K6

Could somebody please send me the URL of an FTP site from where I can download binaries (/bin variety and /sbin variety) for Linux running AMD K6 ? My machine shows up as i586 . Regards, ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Shyam

Installing and running problem with an AMD-K6 CPU

be the newest ) 2. an AMD K6-233 CPU 3. 96 MB RAM (32MB x 2 and 16 MB x 2 ) 4. A VGA card with S3Trio64V+ chip and 2MB RAM . 5. Two SCSI harddisk dirves . But since the first time I tried to install the OS on my mechine, it always reboot over and over . I've tried installing from floppie

Re: AMD K6 2 - 350. New install. Some doubts...

l.gov): > On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 18:18:42 -0300 > > From: Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Oleg Krivosheev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.org >

Re: AMD K6 2 - 350. New install. Some doubts...

Hi, first thanks for your time. Oleg Krivosheev wrote: > Hi, > >Hi all. >I bought an AMD K6 250 and it seems to come with a lot of hardware >within it: >a sound board, modem, video, ... >but the software is for Windows and w

Re: AMD K6 2 - 350. New install. Some doubts...

Hi, thanks for your time... " Raymond A. Ingles" wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote: > > > Hi all. > > I bought an AMD K6 250 and it seems to come with a lot of hardware > > within it: > > a sound

Re: AMD K6 2 - 350. New install. Some doubts...

On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote: > Hi all. > I bought an AMD K6 250 and it seems to come with a lot of hardware > within it: > a sound board, modem, video, ... > but the software is for Windows and with few documentation... >

AMD K6 2 - 350. New install. Some doubts...

Hi all. I bought an AMD K6 250 and it seems to come with a lot of hardware within it: a sound board, modem, video, ... but the software is for Windows and with few documentation... I have some doubts: 1) My old modem worked only with isapnp and then setserial. How to

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Peter Bartosch wrote: > > On 19-Jan-99, Peter Bartosch took time to write : > > >> bogomips should only depend on hardware no ? > > > > > > only on cpu (and clock) > > > > that's what i thought too, but it doesn't seem true in my case > > as with exactly the same hardware an

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

Hi! > On 19-Jan-99, Peter Bartosch took time to write : > >> bogomips should only depend on hardware no ? > > > > only on cpu (and clock) > > that's what i thought too, but it doesn't seem true in my case > as with exactly the same hardware and no change in bios > i have > 700 bogomips with ker

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

On 19-Jan-99, Peter Bartosch took time to write : >> bogomips should only depend on hardware no ? > > only on cpu (and clock) that's what i thought too, but it doesn't seem true in my case as with exactly the same hardware and no change in bios i have 700 bogomips with kernel 2.2.0pre7 and 350bog

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

Hi! > i have : > processor : 0 > cpu : 586 > model : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > stepping: M < difference !!! what is it ? it's a production-revision! higher stepping - newer cpu because of n

Re: AMD-K6 Bogomips problem solved (sort of)

On 18-Jan-99, Tino Schwarze took time to write : > REMEMBER: BogoMIPS, are bogus only - they DO NOT tell you anything about > your processors real performance. So, I guess, the calibration loop used but they at least tell you if you have something badly misconfigured > for calculation BogoMI

Re: AMD-K6 Bogomips problem solved (sort of)

On 19-Jan-99, James Pollard took time to write : > i've not messed around with BogoMIPS really, but i do have one question. > your BogoMIPS count went up dramatically, but did it really feel like you > had a performance increase? if so, why switch back? if not, why care > about them unless it w

[Fwd: AMD-K6 Bogomips problem solved (sort of)]

; > > -- > > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null The speed-up might be caused by an improved hardware-level loop-function which has been used in time-sensitive code. Maybe the new kernel handles tha piece wrongly. The problem is known that i.e Borl

Re: AMD-K6 Bogomips problem solved (sort of)

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Thanks all for your input. > > The problem is solved in a way. > > Before mucking with hardware i tried few software things. > > With 2.0.36 compiled as 686 and as 586 i had only 350Bogomips with a 350MHz > K6-2 > > BUT (!) with 2.2.0pre7 compile

Re: AMD-K6 Bogomips problem solved (sort of)

Mark Wagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > REMEMBER: BogoMIPS, are bogus only - they DO NOT tell you anything about > > your processors real performance. > Would you happen to know of any Linux benchmarking utilities that will > measure a system's ability to perform various tasks so I and others

Re: AMD-K6 Bogomips problem solved (sort of)

Tino Schwarze wrote: > > REMEMBER: BogoMIPS, are bogus only - they DO NOT tell you anything about > your processors real performance. So, I guess, the calibration loop used for > calculation BogoMIPS is somehow broken if you compile 2.0.36 for 686 instead > of 586 (as advised in Help to "Processor

Re: AMD-K6 Bogomips problem solved (sort of)

Hi Patrick, > With 2.0.36 compiled as 686 and as 586 i had only 350Bogomips with a 350MHz > K6-2 > > BUT (!) with 2.2.0pre7 compiled with CONFIG_M586TSC=y i have my full 700 > bogomips ! > with it /proc/cpuinfo shows everything right (CPU clock,etc...) > > That's strange isn't it ? Probably a str

AMD-K6 Bogomips problem solved (sort of)

Thanks all for your input. The problem is solved in a way. Before mucking with hardware i tried few software things. With 2.0.36 compiled as 686 and as 586 i had only 350Bogomips with a 350MHz K6-2 BUT (!) with 2.2.0pre7 compiled with CONFIG_M586TSC=y i have my full 700 bogomips ! with it /proc

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 11:13:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think i have a problem with one of my new K6-2 box. > I have two boxes : same motherboard (ASUS P5A) , same amount of memory > (128Mo). > Same output of /proc/cpuinfo for both > > *except* for bogomips. > > One is a 350MHz and

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I think i have a problem with one of my new K6-2 box. > > I have two boxes : same motherboard (ASUS P5A) , same amount of memory > (128Mo). > Same output of /proc/cpuinfo for both > > *except* for bogomips. > > One is a 350MHz and it gives me ~350 Bogomips

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

On Sun, 17 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > otherwise the 'compile as [386/486/Pentium/PentiumPro]' option in kernel > compilation could change the bogomips rating or not ? > i compiled it as a 686. > should i compile it as a 586 ? >From Configure.help: - "Pentium" for the AMD K5, K6 and K

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

On 17-Jan-99, Phillip Deackes took time to write : >> so my AMD K6-2 at 350Mhz should have 700Bogomips isn't it ? > > I think I would be concerned too. I have an AMD K6-2 3D 350 MHz I am ! > processor, overclocked to 400MHz and I get the following from cat > /proc/

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

gt;> and it lists K6 at 166Mhz having already ~330Bogomips ! >> >> so my AMD K6-2 at 350Mhz should have 700Bogomips isn't it ? > > I don't know what -2 means at K6-2. it's the new generation of K6 chips. also known as K6-3D >> so next part of my questio

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > besides the fact it seems outdated (1997-12-13), it says like me: > AMD K5/K6 clock * (2.00 plusminus 0.010) 11.1 > > and it lists K6 at 166Mhz having already ~330Bogomips ! > > so my AMD K6-2 at 350Mhz should have 700Bogomi

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 03:34:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > besides the fact it seems outdated (1997-12-13), it says like me: > AMD K5/K6 clock * (2.00 plusminus 0.010) 11.1 > > and it lists K6 at 166Mhz having already ~330Bogomips ! > > so

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

should i check first ? > > Read the Bogomips mini-Howto. > > /usr/doc/HOWTO/mini/BogoMips.gz besides the fact it seems outdated (1997-12-13), it says like me: AMD K5/K6 clock * (2.00 plusminus 0.010) 11.1 and it lists K6 at 166Mhz having already ~330Bogomips ! so my

Re: AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 11:13:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One is a 350MHz and it gives me ~350 Bogomips > the other is a 400MHz and it gives me ~800 Bogomips > > I think there is a problem. What do you think ? No. > What should i check first ? Read the Bogomips mini-Howto. /usr/doc/

AMD K6-2 / Bogomips problem

Hi, I think i have a problem with one of my new K6-2 box. I have two boxes : same motherboard (ASUS P5A) , same amount of memory (128Mo). Same output of /proc/cpuinfo for both *except* for bogomips. One is a 350MHz and it gives me ~350 Bogomips the other is a 400MHz and it gives me ~800 Bogomip

Re: AMD K6-2 3D Now 300 MHz

Darko Martic wrote: > > Hi ! > > Are there any problems about using the processor from the subject with > Debian linux ? I'm buying a new processor and I think I'll buy that one. > > Thanx ! I am using that processor on two boxen with no problems. One is a server that has been up continuously s

Re: AMD K6-2 3D Now 300 MHz

Darko Martic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi ! > > Are there any problems about using the processor from the subject with > Debian linux ? I'm buying a new processor and I think I'll buy that > one. Hi. I have a K6-2 3D Now 350 MHz and have overclocked it to 400 MHz. Works great - I have compiled

Re: AMD K6-2 3D Now 300 MHz

On 1 Jan, Darko Martic wrote: > Hi ! > > Are there any problems about using the processor from the subject with > Debian linux ? I'm buying a new processor and I think I'll buy that one. > > Thanx ! > > This processor works like a charm for me, and really flys.

AMD K6-2 3D Now 300 MHz

Hi ! Are there any problems about using the processor from the subject with Debian linux ? I'm buying a new processor and I think I'll buy that one. Thanx !

Re: And what processor type for CeleronA ? was: AMD K6-2 kernel compile ?

>> "HH" == Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: HH> As far as I know, the celeron is a pentium II with no cache. The HH> celeronAis a pentium II with some cache. So compile for pentium HH> II if that is an option, or pentium pro if not. OK, thanks. IIRC there is just Pentium Pro, so I sti

Re: And what processor type for CeleronA ? was: AMD K6-2 kernel compile ?

As far as I know, the celeron is a pentium II with no cache. The celeronAis a pentium II with some cache. So compile for pentium II if that is an option, or pentium pro if not. Helge Hafting

And what processor type for CeleronA ? was: AMD K6-2 kernel compile ?

Hi, no that we got the answer to the K6-2 question, what about CeleronA ? What is the processor type to choose for this CPU for kernel compilation ? Anyone got a clue? Ciao, Martin

AMD K6-2 kernel compile ?

>Hi group readers, > >I was wondering what CPU I should select for compiling >the kernel. I >have a >AMD K6-2 300MHz. Should I compile for a regular >pentium, or do the newer >kernels have K6 as a selectable CPU ? The K6 should work fine on a kernel compiled as pentiu

Re: AMD K6-2 kernel compile ?

On Sun, Nov 15, 1998 at 17:03 +0100, Marc van der Vossen wrote: > > Wowie, just a bit of time and my PC won't have any Intel, nor Microshit on > it. ;-))) Didn't you hear? Intel is now one of the good guys :) Cheers Dave -- Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: AMD K6-2 kernel compile ?

"Marc van der Vossen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was wondering what CPU I should select for compiling the kernel. I have a > AMD K6-2 300MHz. Should I compile for a regular pentium, or do the newer > kernels have K6 as a selectable CPU ? The development (2.1.x)

AMD K6-2 kernel

Hi group, Sorry if this appeared earlier, but I didn't see it within about 3 hours, so I just posted it again. --- I was wondering what CPU I should select for compiling the kernel. I have a AMD K6-2 300MHz. Should I compile for a regular pentium, or do the newer kernels have K6

AMD K6-2 kernel compile ?

Hi group readers, I was wondering what CPU I should select for compiling the kernel. I have a AMD K6-2 300MHz. Should I compile for a regular pentium, or do the newer kernels have K6 as a selectable CPU ? Wowie, just a bit of time and my PC won't have any Intel, nor Microshit on it. ;-)))

Abit TX5 and AMD K6-200 OK for Linux?

Any negative or positive feedback on running Linux on an Abit TX5 main board with an AMD K6-200 cpu? I have the chance to upgrade my work PC (Win95) , and I will be adding a Linux partition.

Re: AMD K6

I am running a AMD K6 233, and have had no problems at all. as was mentioned in the thred, check the serial. Rick -Original Message- From: Matt Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: 22 May 1998 07:35 Subject: AMD K6 >I just bought the above

Re: AMD K6

The only problem with the K6 I've read about is with some made before September of last year, they occasionally bomb in large compiles with over 32 MB of RAM in the machine. Do a web search and you should be able to find out if your K6 is one of the broken ones by looking at the serial #. AMD will

AMD K6

I just bought the above and when attempting to compile a kernel, I get a message along the lines of "internal compiler exited with error 4" or some such. Sorry for not copying down the error exactly. I just re-installed my P166 and the compile finished fine. Is anyone familiar with this? Is thi

AMD K6/233 again

I didn't read all your postings before previous message, but my second question about the P166+ was based on rumours I heard here. I didn't quite believe it, but just to be sure... By the way, it was about one of the first P166+ , no mmx , no nothing processors. (As far as I knew -before some told

Re: AMD K6 233 (2)

Well, thanks to all, I'm gonna buy it (at least as soon as I have enough money together, but that should be quite soon) Greetings, Maarten Bezemer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AMD K6 233

On 03/28/98 at 11:25 AM, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >On Fri, Mar 27, 1998 at 01:18:08PM +0100, M.C. Bezemer wrote: > PS I also >heard that linux also doesn't work 100% correct with a Cyrix > P166+ >(messing up disks etc) . What is true about that? >Not very much, I think. Do you mea

Re: AMD K6 233

On Fri, Mar 27, 1998 at 01:18:08PM +0100, M.C. Bezemer wrote: > PS I also heard that linux also doesn't work 100% correct with a Cyrix > P166+ (messing up disks etc) . What is true about that? Not very much, I think. Do you mean the Cyrix 6x86 (M1), or the 6x86MX, or maybe even just 6x86L? I've ha

  1   2   >