Re: Re: Adobe Flash Player on Debian Buster

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:55:58PM -0700, Berkhan Berkdemir wrote: > We have an internal system that uses Adobe Flash Player, so I had needed to > install FP on a Debian workstation. However, I already did install it and > will > publish a blog post (and/or update Debian Wiki

Re: Re: Adobe Flash Player on Debian Buster

We have an internal system that uses Adobe Flash Player, so I had needed to install FP on a Debian workstation. However, I already did install it and will publish a blog post (and/or update Debian Wiki) about "How to Install FP **Before 2020**". The magic was behind that script if any

Re: Adobe Flash Player on Debian Buster

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 04:48:24AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Fortunately the days of /really/ needing Adobe Flash Player, due to > the saturation of websites requiring it are long gone. Tell that to Kronos. Please.

Re: Adobe Flash Player on Debian Buster

As Andrew expressed it, using Flash Player is a bad idea but if you really want to use it, take a look there: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/why-do-i-have-click-activate-plugins

Re: Adobe Flash Player on Debian Buster

ome soon enough. I don't want ANY product from Adobe on any computer that I use. Fortunately the days of /really/ needing Adobe Flash Player, due to the saturation of websites requiring it are long gone. Anything you would have been able to play with the Adobe product will likely play within VLC.

Adobe Flash Player on Debian Buster

Yesterday I was looking away to install Flash Player for Firefox on Debian Buster and followed a Debian Wiki page [0]; however, I didn't make Flash Player work. I also found this script [1], which is recommended in the Wiki page, but instead downloading it, the script just confirmed that I have

Re: A new HOWTO page for the Adobe Flash Player plugin under chromium under Linux

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Stephen Powell <zlinux...@fastmail.com> wrote: > It seems to me that there is much confusion out there for how to install the > Adobe > Flash Player plugin for chromium for Linux. Since fools rush in where angels > fear > to tread, I have c

A new HOWTO page for the Adobe Flash Player plugin under chromium under Linux

It seems to me that there is much confusion out there for how to install the Adobe Flash Player plugin for chromium for Linux. Since fools rush in where angels fear to tread, I have created a new web page on my web site for how to do this. I'd appreciate any comments, positive and negative

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On 2015-11-16 13:41, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:41:33AM +0100, Staszek wrote: >> >> It seems to have been a problem with sound. The videos didn't play at >> all, but once I configured pulseaudio for multiple users (enabling sound >> for the Flash Player user): >>

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 09:43:37PM +0300, moxalt wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 10:05:44 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > > According to you. Not according to "The design of the unix operating > > system", Maurice >> J. Bach, Prentice/Hall, 1986, page 4: > > > > Now that I have

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/21/2015 06:50 PM, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: El 18/11/15 a las 17:39, Ric Moore escribió: On 11/18/2015 02:24 PM, moxalt wrote: I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux.

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sunday 22 November 2015 13:02:02 Curt wrote: > The best lack all conviction, while the worst >  Are full of passionate intensity. :-) Thank you for reminding me of this poem. I hadn't reread it for a while. Lisi

Re: Adobe Flash

On 2015-11-22, moxalt wrote: >> >> I truly hope that Hurd becomes all that it can be. :) Ric > > Alas, I fear it is too late... Hurd is basically where Linux was in 1991. > The important thing is to avoid yielding to the Hurd mentality. What was that poem already by W.B.?

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 10:05:44 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On 11/21/2015 06:50 PM, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > > El 18/11/15 a las 17:39, Ric Moore escribió: > >> On 11/18/2015 02:24 PM, moxalt wrote: > >> > >>> I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 09:53:28 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On 11/20/2015 11:06 PM, moxalt wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 05:19:46 -0300, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI > > > I understand that everyone's rallying against the outsider here, but really > > guys? 'Should'? > > > >> *

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/21/2015 12:02 PM, moxalt wrote: On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:10:49 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: On 11/21/2015 08:54 AM, John Hasler wrote: Renaud writes: but following the precept wisely given by the Fathers of the American Constitution, never try to impose your religion

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/21/2015 08:54 AM, John Hasler wrote: Renaud writes: but following the precept wisely given by the Fathers of the American Constitution, never try to impose your religion on others ! It bars the state from using its power to forcibly impose a religion. It has been explicitly interpreted

Re: Adobe Flash

> But telling them what they "should" do, unless it relates to behaviour that > affexts you directly(*) is the first step on the road to intolerance, > persecution, the Talibans and the Inquisition, etc. Other people using flash (or Windows, or iPads, ...) does affect me directly, and I think it

Re: Adobe Flash

Renaud writes: > but following the precept wisely given by the Fathers of the American > Constitution, never try to impose your religion on others ! It bars the state from using its power to forcibly impose a religion. It has been explicitly interpreted as protecting the right to tell others that

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:20:07 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On 11/21/2015 06:21 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Friday 20 November 2015 12:35:34 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >> OTOH we woldn't be here were > >> it not for one very vociferous preacher, RMS > > > > And there was I

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/21/2015 06:21 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Friday 20 November 2015 12:35:34 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: OTOH we woldn't be here were it not for one very vociferous preacher, RMS And there was I thinking I was here because of Linus and Ian. ;-) Me too. Where would be be without Linus? Ric --

Re: Adobe Flash

Lisi Reisz wrote: > The problem is well highlighted by these dictionary offerings. "Should" > expresses obligation and duty, not a recommendation or preference. Still, when I say "You should not try to stop others from saying things you find uncomfortable" I am expressing *my opinion* as to

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/20/2015 11:06 PM, moxalt wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 05:19:46 -0300, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI I understand that everyone's rallying against the outsider here, but really guys? 'Should'? * Of course there is the difference between "You should avoid punching me in the nose" and "You should

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/21/2015 03:57 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Saturday 21 November 2015 06:23:02 Glenn English wrote: On Nov 20, 2015, at 9:48 PM, moxalt wrote: "Should" http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/should http://www.thefreedictionary.com/should

Re: Adobe Flash

Hi, Special thanks to the first sea squirt larva, who refused to become sessile and digest its own brain. The price for life-time achievement goes to The Big Bang who loaded our stockpile of low entropy which we can use up for being a problem between keyboard and chair. Have a nice day :)

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:10:49 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On 11/21/2015 08:54 AM, John Hasler wrote: > > Renaud writes: > >> but following the precept wisely given by the Fathers of the American > >> Constitution, never try to impose your religion on others ! > > > > It

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/21/2015 11:59 AM, moxalt wrote: On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:20:07 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: On 11/21/2015 06:21 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Friday 20 November 2015 12:35:34 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: OTOH we woldn't be here were it not for one very vociferous preacher, RMS

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 07:31:00 -0600, John Hasler wrote: > Lisi Reisz wrote: > > The problem is well highlighted by these dictionary offerings. "Should" > > expresses obligation and duty, not a recommendation or preference. > > Still, when I say "You should not try to

Re: Adobe Flash

El 19/11/15 a las 18:01, Ric Moore escribió: On 11/19/2015 11:55 AM, moxalt wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:34:38 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: That's a bit arrogant - saying that other people shouldn't watch the news on their computers because you would choose not to do so.

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 17:50:07 -0600, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > El 18/11/15 a las 17:39, Ric Moore escribió: > > On 11/18/2015 02:24 PM, moxalt wrote: > > > >> I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as > >> Linux, is > >> in fact,

Re: Adobe Flash

El 18/11/15 a las 17:39, Ric Moore escribió: On 11/18/2015 02:24 PM, moxalt wrote: I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Depends who's version of the definition of OS you use:

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:54:27 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On 11/21/2015 11:59 AM, moxalt wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:20:07 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > > > >> On 11/21/2015 06:21 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >>> On Friday 20 November 2015 12:35:34

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 01:00:43PM -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On 11/21/2015 12:02 PM, moxalt wrote: > >Prison or sanatorium? > > Treated properly, as I see it, prison could be much more of a sanitarium. Life is like a box of breakfast cereal ... *ducks*. -- "If you're not careful, the

Re: Adobe Flash

On Saturday 21 November 2015 04:06:49 moxalt wrote: > I understand that everyone's rallying against the outsider here, but really > guys? 'Should'? Oh dear! lets all weep. "Outsider"? What on earth are you talking about? Why are you an outsider anymore than anyone else? It isn't the word

Re: Adobe Flash

On Friday 20 November 2015 12:35:34 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > OTOH we woldn't be here were > it not for one very vociferous preacher, RMS And there was I thinking I was here because of Linus and Ian. ;-) Lisi

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 07:06:49 +0300 moxalt wrote: > > * Of course there is the difference between "You should avoid punching me in > > the nose" and "You should use only FLOSS". > > Not really. Both are actions I would engage in, and would like others to do > the > same. I

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:53:39 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Saturday 21 November 2015 04:06:49 moxalt wrote: > > I understand that everyone's rallying against the outsider here, but really > > guys? 'Should'? > > Oh dear! lets all weep. "Outsider"? What on earth are

Re: The word 'should'. (was: Adobe Flash)

On Saturday 21 November 2015 04:44:26 moxalt wrote: > Even when I complied with this, you made it clear that it doesn't matter > what words I use anyway, because by having opinions and expressing them I > am doing something akin to the Inquisition. No, by imposing them on others etc. Lisi

Re: Adobe Flash

Hi, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > OTOH we woldn't be here were > > it not for one very vociferous preacher, RMS [Richard Matthew Stallman] Lisi Reisz wrote: > And there was I thinking I was here because of Linus and Ian. ;-) Standing on the shoulders of Dennis M. Ritchie, Ken Thompson, S.R.

Re: The word 'should'. (was: Adobe Flash)

at case, I am doing nothing wrong. I am not burning people at the stake for using Adobe Flash, merely saying telling them they shouldn't. I am not forcing anyone to do anything, unless expression of opinion is considered by you a use of force.

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 23:23:02 -0700 Glenn English wrote: > Chill a bit, folks. There's no question that vi is better than emacs :-).. Of course it is; yet we do not go round preaching to all and sundry "You should use vi"... Cheers, Ron. -- You do ill if

Re: The word 'should'. (was: Adobe Flash)

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 07:44:26 +0300 moxalt wrote: > Even when I complied with this, you made it clear that it doesn't matter what > words I use anyway, because by having opinions and expressing them I am doing > something akin to the Inquisition. Not at all; it is only when

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:53:44 +0100, "Thomas Schmitt" wrote: > > > OTOH we woldn't be here were > > > it not for one very vociferous preacher, RMS [Richard Matthew Stallman] > > > And there was I thinking I was here because of Linus and Ian. ;-) > > Standing on the

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:24:52 +0300, moxalt wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:53:39 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Saturday 21 November 2015 04:06:49 moxalt wrote: > > > I understand that everyone's rallying against the outsider here, but > > > really

Re: Adobe Flash

On Saturday 21 November 2015 06:23:02 Glenn English wrote: > On Nov 20, 2015, at 9:48 PM, moxalt wrote: > >> "Should" > > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/should > http://www.thefreedictionary.com/should > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/should > > Chill a bit, folks.

Re: Adobe Flash

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 08:57:56 + Lisi Reisz wrote: > The problem is well highlighted by these dictionary offerings. "Should" > expresses obligation and duty, not a recommendation or preference. Absolutely, Lisl, there is a mort of difference between on one hand "I like

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:35:34PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:37:06PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > [...] > > > Please stop preaching. > > (Darn. Seems I was too subtle last time) > > Now you're preaching. Preachers preach... and they're important too Ummm, no.

Re: Adobe Flash

On Friday 20 November 2015 06:43:49 moxalt wrote: > >  Especially on this forum > > on occasions where people are only using the Debian repositories. > > I don't understand this. This is the Debian users mailing list. It is in my opinion very inappropriate to chastise people on the Debian

Re: Adobe Flash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:37:06PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: [...] > Please stop preaching. (Darn. Seems I was too subtle last time) Now you're preaching. Preachers preach... and they're important too (preaching is not really my thing, but OTOH we

Re: Adobe Flash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 02:56:53AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:35:34PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:37:06PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Please stop preaching. > >

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:02:41PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 02:56:53AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:35:34PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:37:06PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > >

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:43:49 +0300 moxalt wrote: > Should (there it is again!) I simply deliver my opinions > in terms of imperatives- do this and do that? You could, without trying to impose your opinions on others, just tell tell them what you do, and let them decide

Re: Adobe Flash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 07:01:49PM -0500, Ric Moore wrote: [...] > It's arrogant as soon as you use the word "should". You should not should (there, now we have a mess ;-P I get your both's point. Uh, whatever. Cheers - -- tomás -BEGIN PGP

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:53:09 +0300 moxalt wrote: > Very well. I shall reformulate my earlier posts. Here is the first instance of > my vicious and triggering usage of the word 'should': > For those websites which still require Flash, IMHO it would be better if you > found

Re: The word 'should'. (was: Adobe Flash)

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 05:28:25 -0300, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:53:09 +0300 > moxalt wrote: > > > Very well. I shall reformulate my earlier posts. Here is the first instance > > of my vicious and triggering usage of

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 05:19:46 -0300, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:43:49 +0300 > moxalt wrote: > > > Should (there it is again!) I simply deliver my opinions > > in terms of imperatives- do this and do that? > > You

Re: Adobe Flash

On Nov 20, 2015, at 9:48 PM, moxalt wrote: >> "Should" http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/should http://www.thefreedictionary.com/should https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/should Chill a bit, folks. There's no question that vi is better than emacs :-).. -- Glenn

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:28:39 -0600, John Hasler wrote: > moxalt writes: > > Not really. Both are actions I would engage in, and would like others > > to do the same. I never thought the word 'should' was such a big > > issue. > > Right. "Should" is just an opinion. If

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 05:19:46 -0300, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:43:49 +0300 > moxalt wrote: > > > Should (there it is again!) I simply deliver my opinions > > in terms of imperatives- do this and do that? > > You

Re: Adobe Flash

moxalt writes: > Not really. Both are actions I would engage in, and would like others > to do the same. I never thought the word 'should' was such a big > issue. Right. "Should" is just an opinion. If you don't like it ignore it. Or express your own contrary opinion. -- John Hasler

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/19/2015 07:01 PM, Ric Moore wrote: On 11/19/2015 11:55 AM, moxalt wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:34:38 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: That's a bit arrogant - saying that other people shouldn't watch the news on their computers because you would choose not to do so.

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/19/2015 11:55 AM, moxalt wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:34:38 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: That's a bit arrogant - saying that other people shouldn't watch the news on their computers because you would choose not to do so. Lisi I don't think advocating that others

Re: Adobe Flash

On Thursday 19 November 2015 16:55:43 moxalt wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:34:38 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 19:24:31 moxalt wrote: > > > > The OP is currently watching the > > > > news on Doze.  Hardly more secure than flash > > > > > > And

Re: Adobe Flash

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:02:55 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Thursday 19 November 2015 16:55:43 moxalt wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:34:38 +, Lisi Reisz > > wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 19:24:31 moxalt wrote: > > > > > The OP

Re: Adobe Flash

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:01:49 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On 11/19/2015 11:55 AM, moxalt wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:34:38 +, Lisi Reisz > > wrote: > > >> That's a bit arrogant - saying that other people shouldn't watch the news > >> on

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:34:38 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 19:24:31 moxalt wrote: > > > The OP is currently watching the > > > news on Doze.  Hardly more secure than flash > > > > And OP should do neither. > > That's a bit arrogant - saying

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:33:55 +0100 Siard wrote: ... > BTW: the version of youtube-dl in jessie is not recent enough, so it > won't work. Instead of an 'apt-get install youtube-dl' in jessie you'd > better download and install it from https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/ >

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:05:33 +,Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > > To watch , first install > > youtube-dl: $ apt-get install youtube-dl > > Or just install flashplugin-nonfree with Iceweasel, or watch with > Google

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:50:18 moxalt wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:05:33 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Next time please send your email to for > > > user

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Next time please send your email to > > for user questions, thanks! (You can also CC me since I don't > > subscribe the debian-user

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:05:33 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Next time please send your email to for > > user questions, thanks! (You can also CC me since I don't subscribe > >

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:33:55 Siard wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:05:33 +,Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > > > To watch , first install > > > youtube-dl: $ apt-get install youtube-dl > > I just watched

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:55:47 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:50:18 moxalt wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:05:33 +, Lisi Reisz > > wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > > > > Hi, >

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 19:24:31 moxalt wrote: > > The OP is currently watching the > > news on Doze.  Hardly more secure than flash > > And OP should do neither. That's a bit arrogant - saying that other people shouldn't watch the news on their computers because you would choose not to do

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 18:41:14 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:33:55 Siard wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:05:33 +,Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > > > > To watch , first install

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/18/2015 01:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: Hi, Next time please send your email to for user questions, thanks! (You can also CC me since I don't

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > Hi, > > Next time please send your email to for > user questions, thanks! (You can also CC me since I don't subscribe > the debian-user list.) > > To watch , first install

Re: Adobe Flash

Hi, Next time please send your email to for user questions, thanks! (You can also CC me since I don't subscribe the debian-user list.) To watch , first install youtube-dl: $ apt-get install youtube-dl I suggest you to install vlc

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/18/2015 06:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Wednesday 18 November 2015 15:59:45 Tom Ashley wrote: On 11/18/2015 01:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: Hi, Next time please send your

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 20:21:26 Tom Ashley wrote: > On 11/18/2015 06:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 15:59:45 Tom Ashley wrote: > >> On 11/18/2015 01:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:37:45 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 18:41:14 Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:33:55 Siard wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:05:33 +,Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote:

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 23:55:02 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 15:59:45 Tom Ashley wrote: > > On 11/18/2015 01:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > >

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 23:46:51 Gene Heskett wrote: > Whats an iPLayer?  Sounds like something from Apple? Yes, I know. :-( It is the BBC's paid-for* television and radio output. It is only available in some parts of the world. In its entirety it is available only in the UK.

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 20:59:45 Tom Ashley wrote: > On 11/18/2015 01:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote: > >> On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Next time please send your email to

Re: Adobe Flash

On 11/18/2015 02:24 PM, moxalt wrote: I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Depends who's version of the definition of OS you use: Here's a quote from "The design of the unix

Re: Adobe Flash

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 15:59:45 Tom Ashley wrote: > On 11/18/2015 01:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 10:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote: > >> On Wednesday 18 November 2015 14:24:17 Alex Vong wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Next time please send your email to

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:41:33AM +0100, Staszek wrote: > > It seems to have been a problem with sound. The videos didn't play at > all, but once I configured pulseaudio for multiple users (enabling sound > for the Flash Player user): > http://billauer.co.il/blog/2014/01/pa-multiple-users/ it

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On 2015-08-03 12:40, Staszek wrote: > Hi > > I have upgraded from Wheezy to Jessie and my Adobe Flash Player in > Iceweasel stopped working: > > $ iceweasel > > (process:6255): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion > 'sys_page_size == 0' failed > &g

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On Wednesday 09 September 2015 14:56:54 Brian wrote: > I've just did a completely new installation of flashplugin-nonfree on a > machine which had never seen it. Your eternally turning white circle is > what I get. My feeling is that this has something to do with protected > video on 4od. > >   >

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

gt; HYPRA, progressons ensemble >>>> >>>> Tél.: 01 84 73 06 61 >>>> >>>> Mail: cont...@hypra.fr >>>> >>>> Site Web: http://www.hypra.fr >>>> >>>> - Staszek <stf.list.ot...@eisenbits.com> a écrit

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On 9/13/2015 1:01 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: The packages in Debian are good tested with eachother. I don't think the packages in deb-multimedia are tested that good. And Debian can change things what gives problems with deb-multimedia. I run unstable so expect issues are going to happen

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On Sunday 13 September 2015 05:46:15 Himanshu Shekhar wrote: > I tried pepper-flash for chromium but it didn't work..neither did > deb-multimedia. > The only thing which worked was Google Chrome and it really works. Not for everything. None of them works for everything. You just have to mix

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On Sun 13 Sep 2015 at 11:19:08 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 13 September 2015 05:46:15 Himanshu Shekhar wrote: > > I tried pepper-flash for chromium but it didn't work..neither did > > deb-multimedia. > > The only thing which worked was Google Chrome and it really works. > > Not for

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On Sun 13 Sep 2015 at 01:04:27 +, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2015-09-12, Brian wrote: > > On Sat 12 Sep 2015 at 20:21:40 +, Liam O'Toole wrote: > > > >> On 2015-09-11, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > >> > Op 09-09-15 om 23:43 schreef Liam O'Toole: > >>

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On Sunday 13 September 2015 16:40:00 Brian wrote: > On Sun 13 Sep 2015 at 01:04:27 +, Liam O'Toole wrote: > > On 2015-09-12, Brian wrote: > > > On Sat 12 Sep 2015 at 20:21:40 +, Liam O'Toole wrote: > > >> On 2015-09-11, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On 2015-09-13, Brian wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/09/msg00444.html > > there is > >All the ones you mention plus hal-trinity. But so has my husband's > computer. >He has only the one libflashplayer.so, the mozilla one. > >I, on the

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On Sun 13 Sep 2015 at 16:24:19 +, Curt wrote: > On 2015-09-13, Brian wrote: > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/09/msg00444.html > > > > there is > > > >All the ones you mention plus hal-trinity. But so has my husband's > > computer. > >He

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

Op 12-09-15 om 21:51 schreef Liam O'Toole: > On 2015-09-11, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >> Op 10-09-15 om 11:33 schreef Liam O'Toole: >>> On 2015-09-09, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 09 September 2015 20:46:42 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > When I

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

Op 12-09-15 om 22:21 schreef Liam O'Toole: > On 2015-09-11, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >> Op 09-09-15 om 23:43 schreef Liam O'Toole: >>> On 2015-09-09, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Op 09-09-15 om 12:20 schreef Liam O'Toole: > If you use

Re: adobe flash player in iceweasel does not work anymore in jessie

On Sun 13 Sep 2015 at 17:08:28 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 13 September 2015 16:40:00 Brian wrote: > > > > It still disturbs me a little that Lisi's machine doesn't play 4od with > > HAL and flashplugin-nonfree. At > > I need to try some time on a fresh install, Brian. For now, I still

  1   2   3   4   5   >