7fc000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
> Memory at dd80 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8M]
> Expansion ROM at [disabled]
> Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1
Has anyone seen this bug with this driver and/or have any ideas I could try?
Regard
On Fri,27.Mar.09, 10:58:25, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Oh, and forgot to say, it is a bug you found, but since you are
> running etch (which is now oldstable) it might have been found (and
> fixed) a long time ago. If I don't forget I'll look into it...
Ok, as far as I can tell the bug is only pre
On Fri,27.Mar.09, 00:07:36, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu,26.Mar.09, 07:47:58, Joey L wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Before you go file a bug, could you please show the output of:
> > >
> > > apt-cache policy
>
> [snip normal looking output from an etch system]
>
> > The settings for this package an
On Thu,26.Mar.09, 17:33:10, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Do I not get to file bugs with my setup? ;)
Nope, too boring ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
In <20090325170307.gm10...@think.homelan>, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>Before you go file a bug, could you please show the output of:
>apt-cache policy
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
300 http://localhost experimental/main Packages
release o=Debian,a=experimental,l=Deb
On Thu,26.Mar.09, 07:47:58, Joey L wrote:
> >
> >
> > Before you go file a bug, could you please show the output of:
> >
> > apt-cache policy
[snip normal looking output from an etch system]
> The settings for this package and all packages are pretty standard. I do
> not know what these all me
On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Joey L wrote:
> serv:/usr/share/man/man1# apt-get upgrade tagcoll
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libtagcoll-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and
>
>
> Dw is just a man page run
> dpkg -i --force-overwrite
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libtagcoll-dev_1.6.3-2_amd64.deb
>
> after that rerun the upgrade.
>
Thanks..that took care of the issue
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 18:12:13 Joey L wrote:
> serv:/usr/share/man/man1# apt-get upgrade tagcoll
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libtagcoll-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remo
>
>
> Before you go file a bug, could you please show the output of:
>
> apt-cache policy
srvname:~# apt-cache policy
Package files:
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
release a=now
500 http://giss.tv ./ Packages
origin giss.tv
500 http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile/non-free Packages
On Tue,24.Mar.09, 18:54:27, Joey L wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Andrei Popescu
> wrote:
>
> > The relevant part is this:
> >
> > > dpkg: error processing
> > > /var/cache/apt/archives/libtagcoll-dev_1.6.3-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> > > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/tagcoll
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> The relevant part is this:
>
> > dpkg: error processing
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/libtagcoll-dev_1.6.3-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/tagcoll.1.gz', which is also in
> > package tagcoll
>
> You have a
The relevant part is this:
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libtagcoll-dev_1.6.3-2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/tagcoll.1.gz', which is also in
> package tagcoll
You have a file conflict. If both packages are from Debian (and not from
some o
serv:/usr/share/man/man1# apt-get upgrade tagcoll
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
libtagcoll-dev
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need
.. oh: specifically, it was the ootrace method that turned up
the issue. Didn't check xsession errors.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:30:23 -0400
AJ Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Confirming: that was it; was choking on a specific type 1 font.
> Not sure why, but for now, I'm leaving it out of the ac
Confirming: that was it; was choking on a specific type 1 font.
Not sure why, but for now, I'm leaving it out of the active
fonts; might look into it more a bit later.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:03:25 +0200
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Please try to wrap your lines at 72-80 character
Thanks; good suggestion. There's a segfault in there... working on it
now. Looks like it might be choking on a font metrics file.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:03:25 +0200
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Please try to wrap your lines at 72-80 characters. ]
>
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:4
[ Please try to wrap your lines at 72-80 characters. ]
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:47:40 -0400, AJ Milne wrote:
> ... no errors in the console if I run it from there instead.
>
> Particulars: I'm running lenny, x86_64 binaries, the 2.6.24 kernel,
> and KDE. I tried installing the KDE integration
Yeah. Process isn't there. Goes away pretty much instantly.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:31 +0100
"Nuno Magalhães" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you checked ps -A?
>
> --
> Nuno Magalhães
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Have you checked ps -A?
--
Nuno Magalhães
... and to clarify, when I say 'no errors', I mean it doesn't report any
errors. Just fails silently. But it still doesn't start. Splash screen, then
nothing.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:47:40 -0400
AJ Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... no errors in the console if I run it from there instead.
>
... no errors in the console if I run it from there instead.
Particulars: I'm running lenny, x86_64 binaries, the 2.6.24 kernel, and KDE. I
tried installing the KDE integration package, uninstalling the whole thing,
reinstalling (twice), got the same symptoms. Running from the KDE launcher or
John Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> process to delete that pid file. Once I did a dumb thing and did a
> "chown -fR someuser:someuser /" and my entire disk was then owned by
Glad I'm not the only one. I didn't do it. The student I was
training at the time must have, and it was quite a shock f
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:34:11AM -0500, John Mason wrote:
> unlink is not really a "link"... it's the name of the command. The
> "unlink" command really just means delete. Not a clue why they call it
> unlink and not delete but basically calling unlink on a file OR a
> hard link OR a symbolic
unlink is not really a "link"... it's the name of the command. The
"unlink" command really just means delete. Not a clue why they call it
unlink and not delete but basically calling unlink on a file OR a
hard link OR a symbolic link will remove the link/file.
Anyhow, the error means that the p
After successfully installing (or successfully removing and reinstalling from
scratch!) clamav (all four packages), I get from 2nd day onwards:
/etc/cron.daily/clamav-data:
ERR: /usr/share/clamav-data/databasedate does not exist.
This should not happen since that file is part of the
cla
(I apologize for the length of this message)
Versions:
svgatextmode: 1.8-5.2
xserver-svga: 3.3.2.3a-1
svgalibg1 1.3.0.19980916
Matrox Millennium II 8mb PCI video card
Awhile back, I loaded svgatextmode to try the 112x40 (very nice) text
mode th
27 matches
Mail list logo
