berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 08.10.2013 16:15, Richard Owlett a écrit :
[snip]
I'm experimenting with a very lean idiosyncratic install. It
sounds
as aptitude will be appropriate for me. Off to read man pages
etc ;)
Don't copy me! xD
More seriously, without aptitude, I would
Le 09.10.2013 15:39, Richard Owlett a écrit :
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 08.10.2013 16:15, Richard Owlett a écrit :
[snip]
I'm experimenting with a very lean idiosyncratic install. It
sounds
as aptitude will be appropriate for me. Off to read man pages
etc ;)
Don't copy me
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 09.10.2013 15:39, Richard Owlett a écrit :
The lesson learned? That whether or not something is a dependency is
in eyes of beholder. LOL
I apologize, but I have no idea about what does means eye of the
beholder.
Florian Lindner mailingli...@xgm.de writes:
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or
aptitude? Last time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better
dependency checking. What is the current state? apt-get or aptitude?
Does it matter? What about using both?
I should
Le 09.10.2013 19:11, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit :
I met situations when aptitude completly broke functioning of
APT. APT utilities in their turn are simpler, and they are more
preferred to manage packages.
Just curious here, how could aptitude break apt? AFAIK, both uses dpkg
for packages
Kent West wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:04 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
mailto:berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 09.10.2013 15:39, Richard Owlett a écrit :
The lesson learned? That whether or not something is a
dependency is
in eyes of beholder. LOL
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 09.10.2013 15:39, Richard Owlett a écrit :
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 08.10.2013 16:15, Richard Owlett a écrit :
[snip]
I'm experimenting with a very lean idiosyncratic install. It
sounds
as aptitude will be appropriate for me. Off
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:24:57 -0500
Richard Owlett rowl...@cloud85.net wrote:
Being retired, I've no aspirations of being a sysadmin.
If you run Linux, you already are. You don't get to choose.
--
Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hello,
Since I'm about to setup a new server using current stable wheezy, I want to
recheck some of debian knowledge.
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or aptitude? Last
time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better dependency checking. What
is the current
On 2013-10-08 Florian Lindner wrote:
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or
aptitude? Last time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better
dependency checking. What is the current state? apt-get or aptitude?
Does it matter? What about using both?
Both use libapt
On 10/08/2013 08:57 AM, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
On 2013-10-08 Florian Lindner wrote:
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or
aptitude? Last time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better
dependency checking. What is the current state? apt-get or aptitude?
Does
Le 08.10.2013 13:33, Florian Lindner a écrit :
Hello,
Since I'm about to setup a new server using current stable wheezy, I
want to
recheck some of debian knowledge.
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or
aptitude? Last
time I read about it, it was aptitude, due
Le 08.10.2013 15:28, Whit Hansell a écrit :
On 10/08/2013 08:57 AM, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
On 2013-10-08 Florian Lindner wrote:
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or
aptitude? Last time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better
dependency checking. What
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 08.10.2013 13:33, Florian Lindner a écrit :
Hello,
Since I'm about to setup a new server using current stable
wheezy, I want to
recheck some of debian knowledge.
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or
aptitude? Last
time I
These days, it's apt-get: aptitude's resolver has some awkward bugs that
haven't been stamped on yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
on the CLI? apt-get or
aptitude? Last
time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better dependency
checking. What
is the current state? apt-get or aptitude? Does it matter? What
about using
both?
Thanks!
Florian
Both are front-end for dpkg, so there will be no real difference
on the system
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Florian Lindner wrote:
Since I'm about to setup a new server using current stable wheezy, I want to
recheck some of debian knowledge.
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or aptitude? Last
time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:33:41PM +0200, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
Since I'm about to setup a new server using current stable wheezy, I want to
recheck some of debian knowledge.
What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or aptitude?
Last
time I read about
or aptitude?
Last
time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better dependency checking.
What
is the current state? apt-get or aptitude? Does it matter? What about using
both?
you might find this worth a look:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch02.en.html
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Stephen Allen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:35:57AM -0400,
david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Florian Lindner wrote:
Since I'm about to setup a new server using current stable wheezy,
I want to recheck some of debian knowledge.
[snip]
you might
Le Sun, 29 Sep 2013 00:52:41 +0200,
Jacques Lav!gnotte. jacq...@lavignotte.org a écrit :
sudo aptitude full-upgrade, dist-upgrade c'était autrefois ;)
dist-upgrade ça ne provoque pas d'erreur, et ça traine encore dans pas
mal de docs.
Certes, mais ça n'en reste pas moins deprecated, donc
:
sudo aptitude update
sudo aptitude upgrade
sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
J.
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists
Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ
Le 28/09/2013 20:42:44, Jacques Lav!gnotte. a écrit :
sudo aptitude update
sudo aptitude upgrade
C’est maintenant aptitude safe-upgrade
sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
Idem : aptitude full-upgrade
Et sans sudo. Bouh.
nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial
--
RÉALISME
M : Qu'est-ce qu'il nous
Le Sat, 28 Sep 2013 20:42:44 +0200,
Jacques Lav!gnotte. jacq...@lavignotte.org a écrit :
sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
sudo aptitude full-upgrade, dist-upgrade c'était autrefois ;)
--
Haricophile
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists
Le 28/09/2013 22:57, Haricophile a écrit :
sudo aptitude full-upgrade, dist-upgrade c'était autrefois ;)
dist-upgrade ça ne provoque pas d'erreur, et ça traine encore dans pas
mal de docs.
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists
Pour
On 9/22/13, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Du, 18 aug 13, 21:22:59, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Also if I generate my own gpg key and sign the repository using that
key,
will it get authenticated?
Yes, if you add the key correctly.
But gpg-signing a 30GiB repo, package by
On Du, 18 aug 13, 21:22:59, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Also if I generate my own gpg key and sign the repository using that key,
will it get authenticated?
Yes, if you add the key correctly.
But gpg-signing a 30GiB repo, package by package, just to avoid
warning messages?
/shudder
You
to mention how many pkgs
are on my system before and after...
More interesting to you, perhaps. But not more reasonable. As you say, it is
easy to find out how many packages you have got installed. I don't see that
as any more erasonable than what we have.
Just for the archives:
aptitude
with /etc/cron.daily/apt or
/etc/cron.daily/aptitude.
However, this feature is nice, but when was this change implemented. I could
not remember, heard abouit it, yet.
Would be nice, if someone could enlighten me.
Related to this thing another question: Is there already a debian way, to
force those
it is installed), I
guess it has something to do with /etc/cron.daily/apt or
/etc/cron.daily/aptitude.
However, this feature is nice, but when was this change implemented. I could
not remember, heard abouit it, yet.
Have you looked in the apt and aptitude changelogs?
Related to this thing another question
not. It is one of the worst features of Windows.
You could easily set it going to achieve that, I would imagine. E.g.:
# aptitude update aptitude -y full-upgrade shutdown -h now
That would run, if it hit no snags. But I would never risk running it!!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Dom to...@rpdom.net wrote:
On 15/09/13 08:58, thunders...@loop.de wrote:
Related to this thing another question: Is there already a debian way, to
force those new downloaded packages to install, when the system is being
shutdown by the user? (Similar like
On 15/09/13 20:26, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Domto...@rpdom.net wrote:
On 15/09/13 08:58, thunders...@loop.de wrote:
Related to this thing another question: Is there already a debian way, to
force those new downloaded packages to install, when the system is being
shutdown
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 10:54:56AM +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
root@Innovator:~# apt-key update
gpg: key B98321F9: Squeeze Stable Release Key
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org not changed
gpg: key 473041FA: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze)
ftpmas...@debian.org not changed
OK, So because of that I'm guessing you need an entry like:
gpg: key cxdfddey: Local Repository Key
blah blah blah.
So following the adage -- teach a man to fish ...
Googling how to authenticate a local repository Debian
(leave off the quotes in the search box.)
Returns, e.g.:
On 8/18/13, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, So because of that I'm guessing you need an entry like:
gpg: key cxdfddey: Local Repository Key
blah blah blah.
So following the adage -- teach a man to fish ...
Googling how to authenticate a local repository Debian
(leave off
That would of course defeat the purpose of having an official key, if
anyone could sign packages officially.
Your key only.
I found a key on this page?
Can you help me now, by telling me how to add that particular key into my
repository.
I have mounted the iso in /media/dvd1-mountpoint/
Having trouble sending some mail -- trying again.
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:26:00 +1200
From: Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to use the debian installation iso for installing packages
using aptitude
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 04:31
Just a small update.
I uncommented out everything in sources.list so all my offline and
online repositories are enabled.
Ran apt-get update
Commented out only my dvd-mountpoints, so no offline repository.
Ran apt-key update
Gave me the following output
root@Innovator:~# apt-key update
gpg:
On Aug 16, 2013 10:24 AM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Anubhav Yadav wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Do you have noauto there? That is the only thing that makes sense.
Remove it. Look for a noauto option and remove it.
yes it is noauto
What options do you have? For mounting an
Okay list!! Thanks a lot for your help! Just a little update, only a
small part is remaining.
Everything now works as desired.
Only thing when I run apt-get install for eg,
apt-get install audacity
I get the following output
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
On 8/17/13, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
apt-get install audacity
I get the following output
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
libflac++6 libsbsms10 libwxbase2.8-0 libwxgtk2.8-0 audacity-data
libid3tag0 libportsmf0 libvamp-hostsdk3 audacity
Install
Anubhav Yadav wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
# dpkg -i
/media/dvd-mountpoint1/pool/main/d/debian-archive-keyring/debian-archive-keyring_2012.4_all.deb
Then update again to clear the error.
# apt-get update
After that you should not be getting that authentication error again.
Because
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 07:34:22PM +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
but still I get that warning. Still I am almost there!
Try running
apt-key update
and then try installing the software.
Greg
--
web site: http://www.gregn..net
gpg public key: http://www.gregn..net/pubkey.asc
skype: gregn1
On 8/17/13, Gregory Nowak g...@gregn.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 07:34:22PM +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
but still I get that warning. Still I am almost there!
Try running
apt-key update
and then try installing the software.
It did apt-key update and still I see the warnings!
Greg
On 8/17/13, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
On 8/17/13, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
apt-get install audacity
I get the following output
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
libflac++6 libsbsms10 libwxbase2.8-0 libwxgtk2.8-0 audacity-data
On Thursday 15 August 2013 05:14:34 Anubhav Yadav wrote:
It's working nicely (atleast for the first DVD). Now since I have added the
entry in the fstab file, will it get auto mounted on startup?
Suck it and see?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 15 August 2013 14:14, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
It's working nicely (atleast for the first DVD). Now since I have added the
entry in the fstab file, will it get auto mounted on startup?
You could test this by unmounting it and then run 'mount -a'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
mount -a isn't mounting /media/dvd1-mountpoint
On 2013-08-15, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 August 2013 05:14:34 Anubhav Yadav wrote:
It's working nicely (atleast for the first DVD). Now since I have added the
entry in the fstab file, will it get auto mounted on startup?
Suck it and see?
What?
Lisi
--
To
On Thursday 15 August 2013 16:56:45 Curt wrote:
Suck it and see?
What?
If you want to know whether a lemon is sour, suck it and see. I.e. try it
out. It is quite frequently used, but is a bit too colloquial for an
international list. I apologise.
But simply rebooting would have given the
I got it, but I thought before that adding entry to fstab and automounting
at boot are not related to each other.
I restarted but I had to mount all the three iso manually.
mount -a won't work too.
So I did suck it :-)
Anubhav Yadav wrote:
I got it, but I thought before that adding entry to fstab and automounting
at boot are not related to each other.
They are exactly related to each other. The /etc/fstab file defines
what file systems are mounted at boot time.
I restarted but I had to mount all the three
On 8/16/13, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Anubhav Yadav wrote:
I got it, but I thought before that adding entry to fstab and
automounting
at boot are not related to each other.
They are exactly related to each other. The /etc/fstab file defines
what file systems are mounted at boot
Anubhav Yadav wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Do you have noauto there? That is the only thing that makes sense.
Remove it. Look for a noauto option and remove it.
yes it is noauto
What options do you have? For mounting an iso you probably only want
loop and ro and no other options.
Anubhav Yadav wrote:
created a new folder /media/dvd1-mountpoint and mounted the iso using
the command
mount path/to/iso /media/dvd-mountpoint1 -o loop
Looks okay.
then in etc/fstab added the line
/home/neo1691/iso-files/debian-7.1.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso /media/apt1 iso9660
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 00:38 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
if it is an official Debian image then there won't be non-free
there since the DFSG (Debian Free Software Guidelines) do not allow
nonfree.
At least for the firmware there are packages:
https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware
On 8/14/13, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is my sources.list
#Added for making the repository from iso
deb file:/media/dvd1-mountpoint debian main contrib non-free
My deb file... entries look like this:
deb file:///media/debian/... wheezy main contrib
ie. 3 forward slashes; I
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
To verify that your /etc/fstab line is correct you should mount using
it instead of doing all of it above.
# umount /media/dvd-mountpoint1
# mount /media/dvd-mountpoint1
Yes it works!!
deb
On 8/14/13, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
To verify that your /etc/fstab line is correct you should mount using
it instead of doing all of it above.
# umount /media/dvd-mountpoint1
# mount
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
On 8/14/13, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
To verify that your /etc/fstab line is correct you should mount using
it instead of doing all
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 15:49 +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
deb file:/media/dvd-mountpoint1 wheezy main contrib
^^^
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 15:49 +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
deb file:/media/dvd-mountpoint1 wheezy main contrib
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 16:47 +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
root@Innovator:/home/# apt-get update
Ign file: wheezy Release.gpg
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 7.1.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 DVD
#Binary-1 20130615-23:06] wheezy Release.gpg
Ign cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux 7.1.0 _Wheezy_ - Official
I am still getting used to handling mailing list from Gmail. Pretty hard
with the new ui of Gmail.
Anyways tried genisoimage and it worked.
The only problem was I needed to search what I wanted to download.
Now I have to do the same with the other two dvds.
And then I have to make a provision
On 8/14/13, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyways tried genisoimage and it worked.
The only problem was I needed to search what I wanted to download.
Now I have to do the same with the other two dvds.
And then I have to make a provision that these disks get auto mounted at
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 23:17 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
If you have no need for the images otherwise, a local mirror might be
what you want? Eg using debmirror, apt-move etc.
And this does work without downloading completely everything by the
Internet ;)? IIUC the ISOs should be used to avoid
On 8/14/13, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 23:17 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
If you have no need for the images otherwise, a local mirror might be
what you want? Eg using debmirror, apt-move etc.
And this does work without downloading completely
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 00:38 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
if it is an official Debian image then there won't be non-free
there since the DFSG (Debian Free Software Guidelines) do not allow
nonfree.
At least for the firmware there are packages:
Anubhav Yadav wrote:
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Anubhav Yadav wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
And if it is an official Debian image then there won't be
non-free there since the DFSG (Debian Free Software Guidelines)
do not allow nonfree.
deb file:/media/dvd-mountpoint1 wheezy main
It's working nicely (atleast for the first DVD). Now since I have added the
entry in the fstab file, will it get auto mounted on startup?
Hi.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:36:44 +0530
Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
root@Innovator:/home/neo1691# apt-cdrom -d=/media/apt1 add
Using CD-ROM mount point /media/cdrom/
...
Any help? I want to say some bandwidth as it is not cheap here, and is very
slow
Thanks!
According
On Aug 13, 2013 3:29 PM, recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
According to apt-cdrom(8), '-d' means:
Mount point; specify the location to mount the CD-ROM. This mount point
must be listed in /etc/fstab and properly configured. Configuration
Item: Acquire::cdrom::mount.
Note /etc/fstab part.
say for example apt-get install xchat
This time it never ask me to insert the cd rom it will search the mirrors.
I guess I am close to achieving what I want.
Did you run 'apt-get update' or 'aptitude update'?
Also, if you really want apt not to use public Debian mirrors, you
should comment out
dvd1-mountpoint is a folder where I mount the iso and /media/apt1 is a
symbolic link to dvd1-mountpoint.
So now what I will do is I will just mount the iso directly into
/media/apt1 where apt1 is a directory not a link. Will this work?
This is what I did.
deleted the symbolic link on /media/apt1
unmounted dvd1
deleted the folder /home/neo1691/dvd1-mountpoint
created a new folder /media/dvd1-mountpoint and mounted the iso using
the command
mount path/to/iso /media/dvd-mountpoint1 -o loop
then in etc/fstab added the line
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:26:36 +0530
Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what I did.
skip
Different roads lead to the same roads I guess! Well you must have
guessed by now why I want to use CDROM for installation of packages.
On 8/13/13, Anubhav Yadav anubhav1...@gmail.com
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 15:56:36 Anubhav Yadav wrote:
Get:1 http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release.gpg [836 B]
Hit http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release
99% [Waiting for headers] [Waiting for headers] [Waiting for headers]
132 B/s 0s^
Last line indicates that it
On 8/13/13, recovery...@gmail.com recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, try it like this:
1) Add to sources.list:
deb file:/media/apt1 debian main contrib non-free
2) Comment out anything else in sources.list.
3) Run apt-get update.
This is my output
Ign file: debian Release.gpg
Ign file:
On 8/13/13, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 15:56:36 Anubhav Yadav wrote:
Get:1 http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release.gpg [836 B]
Hit http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release
99% [Waiting for headers] [Waiting for headers] [Waiting for
Greetings all.
This is what I am trying to do.
I have the three dvd iso of debian. I installed debian without
internet connection using the first iso image. Now I want to use these
iso files to download and installing any packages that can be done
through aptitude without using interent. I have
asociar este listado txt con aptitude
aptitude remove --set-selections paquete.txt ???
aptitude remove --get-selections paquete.txt ???
ambos no funcionan :(
entre otros sitios me encontre repetidamente con esto
http://magarto.com/blog/archivo/2007/07/30/howto-generar-una-lista-de-paquetes
logicamente un txt; ahora bien no encontre forma de
asociar este listado txt con aptitude
aptitude remove --set-selections paquete.txt ???
aptitude remove --get-selections paquete.txt ???
ambos no funcionan :(
entre otros sitios me encontre repetidamente con esto
http://magarto.com/blog/archivo/2007/07
esto me genera logicamente un txt; ahora bien no encontre forma de
asociar este listado txt con aptitude
aptitude remove --set-selections paquete.txt ???
aptitude remove --get-selections paquete.txt ???
ambos no funcionan :(
entre otros sitios me encontre repetidamente con esto
esto me genera logicamente un txt; ahora bien no encontre forma de
asociar este listado txt con aptitude
aptitude remove --set-selections paquete.txt ???
aptitude remove --get-selections paquete.txt ???
ambos no funcionan :(
(...)
http://debian-handbook.info/browse/wheezy/sect.apt
aptitude remove $(cat listado.txt)
de maravillas.
seguire leyendo ;) man
gracias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/ca+0kpa3stox8-m+qz0pr
Can anyone explain what the final line from an
aptitude update (After setting sources.list to testing)
aptitude full-upgrade
This very last line from aptitude seems like its probably full of
meaning, but not much use if I cannot find out what the heck it means.
It apparently sums up what
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:21:14AM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
Can anyone explain what the final line from an
aptitude update (After setting sources.list to testing)
aptitude full-upgrade
This very last line from aptitude seems like its probably full of
meaning, but not much use
Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk writes:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:21:14AM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
Can anyone explain what the final line from an
aptitude update (After setting sources.list to testing)
aptitude full-upgrade
This very last line from aptitude seems like
On Monday 05 August 2013 13:54:54 Harry Putnam wrote:
I guess I'm having a bit of trouble seeing why that is something I
need to know... In the context of a `Current Status' report following
a `full-upgrade', it would seem more reasonable to mention how many pkgs
are on my system before and
On 12/07/13 22:07, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Er is me gevraagd een machine te beheren die wellicht gedeeltelijk is
geupgraded naar Jessie. In sources.list stond testing, ik heb daar nu
wheezy van gemaakt. De machine lijkt al enige tijd niet geupgraded.
Weet iemand hier misschien een methode
On 14-07-13 12:47, Jelle de Jong wrote:
On 12/07/13 22:07, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Er is me gevraagd een machine te beheren die wellicht gedeeltelijk is
geupgraded naar Jessie. In sources.list stond testing, ik heb daar nu
wheezy van gemaakt. De machine lijkt al enige tijd niet geupgraded.
On 12-07-13 22:18, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On Friday 12 July 2013 22:07:22 Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Weet iemand hier misschien een methode om uit te vinden welke
geinstalleerde pakketten van Jessie zijn?
Ik denk aan een aptiude commando, zoiets: aptitude search
'?and(~V jessie,~i
On 12-07-13 22:37, Serge Kroes wrote:
Paul
wat ook kan is alles zoeken wat niet uit stable komt (aangezien het een
nog vrij onbekende machine voor je is) met:
aptitude search '?installed?not(?archive(stable))'
Hmm, dit bevalt me. Ook de manier van schrijven is duidelijker dan met
die
Paul
wat ook kan is alles zoeken wat niet uit stable komt (aangezien het een nog
vrij onbekende machine voor je is) met:
aptitude search '?installed?not(?archive(stable))'
deze vind ik zelf heel handig; query packages welke niet van origin Debian
komen (security wise zou ik extra oog open
Hi,
I administer a remote server running testing and updated it yesterday (apt
history and dpkg log below). After that the system wouldn't reboot. I have
access through the hosting companies rescue system and can rummage around,
but am at a loss how to trouble shoot this, as messages,dmesg etc
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Johannes Graumann
johannes_graum...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
I administer a remote server running testing and updated it yesterday (apt
history and dpkg log below). After that the system wouldn't reboot. I have
access through the hosting companies rescue system and
I just tried to do an upgrade on my 6.0.7 system, and got the following
response:
# aptitude safe-upgrade
Resolving dependencies...
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After
On Mi, 26 iun 13, 07:55:03, David Guntner wrote:
So, what's with the 1 not upgraded message, and how do I find out
which one it thinks needs upgrading but isn't acting on?
aptitude full-upgrade will take care of the second part, for the first
part we'd need to see its output.
Kind reagards
Andrei POPESCU grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On Mi, 26 iun 13, 07:55:03, David Guntner wrote:
So, what's with the 1 not upgraded message, and how do I find out
which one it thinks needs upgrading but isn't acting on?
aptitude full-upgrade will take care of the second part, for the first
1001 - 1100 of 6307 matches
Mail list logo
