Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Note that apt-show-versions is not able to find installed packages
which are no longer available in the suite/release, e.g. on a
testing/sid system, the packages libtiff4 or xlockmore.
Works in Wheezy.
Wheezy$ apt-show-versions | grep xlockmore
xlockmore 1:5.31-1
On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 10:50:04 AM UTC+5:30, Rusi Mody wrote:
Running testing
While trying to upgrade, listbugs was giving a bunch of
critical/grave errors.
Ran
$ aptitude hold
on all these packages then did upgrade.
One of these packages was dpkg
Now after upgrade tried
Running testing
While trying to upgrade, listbugs was giving a bunch of
critical/grave errors.
Ran
$ aptitude hold
on all these packages then did upgrade.
One of these packages was dpkg
Now after upgrade tried running
aptitude unhold dpkg
However still...
synaptic shows it as 1.17.13 both
Fredrik Jonson wrote:
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote on 01/14/2015 06:25:
Fredrik Jonson wrote:
I'm trying to find obsolete packages on a system that's been
dist-upgraded. How would you [do that without using] aptitude?
Try this:
apt-show-versions | grep
Hi,
Bob Proulx wrote on 01/14/2015 06:25:
Fredrik Jonson wrote:
Here's a small challenge. I'm trying to find obsolete or orphaned packages
on a system that's been dist-upgraded.
...
How would you accomplish that assuming you cannot use aptitude?
Try this:
apt-show-versions | grep -v
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote on 01/14/2015 06:25:
Fredrik Jonson wrote:
I'm trying to find obsolete packages on a system that's been
dist-upgraded. How would you [do that without using] aptitude?
Try this:
apt-show-versions | grep -v uptodate
This doesn't
Bob Proulx wrote:
Try this:
apt-show-versions | grep -v uptodate
Or read my answer posted here Saturday:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/01/msg00358.html
Thanks, excellent. I'll try to improve the variety of my search phrases,
and digging deeper in the archive before
Fredrik Jonson wrote:
Here's a small challenge. I'm trying to find obsolete or orphaned packages
on a system that's been dist-upgraded.
...
How would you accomplish that assuming you cannot use aptitude?
Try this:
apt-show-versions | grep -v uptodate
Or read my answer posted here Saturday
Hi All,
Here's a small challenge. I'm trying to find obsolete or orphaned packages
on a system that's been dist-upgraded. Aptitude can give me list with this
query:
aptitude search ?obsolete
The definition of that query is: This term matches any installed package
which is not available in any
On 2015-01-03 16:25 +0100, Harry Putnam wrote:
I get this from 2 separate debian installs of jessie
host1
aptitude full-upgrade
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
gnome-icon-theme sgml-base sgml-data
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0
I get this from 2 separate debian installs of jessie
host1
aptitude full-upgrade
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
gnome-icon-theme sgml-base sgml-data
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0
Hello.
I'm trying to view only installed and not 'A'uto packages. I limit view
in aptititude to ~i(!~A).
It shows empty list. Why?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
. '' doesn't have any special meaning in this case, so you're looking
for installed packages that contain '' in the name :)
2. ~A is the short version of ?archive (e.g. unstable), not
?automatic.
You might want to read the aptitude reference manual, section Search
patterns. See the package aptitude-doc-en
When I use aptitude to install something, it reports
errors on emacs and emacs24-nox. I says:
systemtap-mode.el:62:1:Error: Symbol's function
definition is void: cl-macroexpand-all
$ sudo aptitude install iamerican-insane
...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
iamerican
El Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:57:21 -0400, Richard Díaz Rodríguez escribió:
Hola Amigos de la lista monte mi server mirror en debian 7.5 y primero
lo udatee y todo bien pero al pasar de los dias que mi repositorio
actualizo y volvi a ivocar aptitude update y me esta dando este error
agradeceria
Hola Amigos de la lista monte mi server mirror en debian 7.5 y primero
lo udatee y todo bien pero al pasar de los dias que mi repositorio
actualizo y volvi a ivocar aptitude update y me esta dando este error
agradeceria alguna ayuda al respecto.
gracias d antemano.
este es mi error
root
El jue, 30-10-2014 a las 13:57 -0400, Richard Díaz Rodríguez escribió:
Hola Amigos de la lista monte mi server mirror en debian 7.5 y primero
lo udatee y todo bien pero al pasar de los dias que mi repositorio
actualizo y volvi a ivocar aptitude update y me esta dando este error
El jue, 30-10-2014 a las 13:57 -0400, Richard Díaz Rodríguez escribió:
Hola Amigos de la lista monte mi server mirror en debian 7.5 y primero
lo udatee y todo bien pero al pasar de los dias que mi repositorio
actualizo y volvi a ivocar aptitude update y me esta dando este error
On Ma, 14 oct 14, 21:57:30, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Whenever I do an
aptitude update
it seems to work OK, except for a series of messages at the end:
...
Notice that this happens with *two* mirrors.
Is there something I should do to stop this?
You could try reporting this to debian-mirrors
Whenever I do an
aptitude update
it seems to work OK, except for a series of messages at the end:
W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/contrib/
source/SourcesIndex: Hash Sum mismatch
W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/contrib/
binary
Hi Michael. You got that right, exactly. I had followed some instructions from
a blog post to install Oracle database on the system, but it was long,
incomplete instructions, requiring a fair amount of mucking around in the
system for me to try to get it right. I didn't quite get it running
Hi Don,
Hmm, I tried to figure out what group id might be required to replace...
'vm.hugetlb_shm_grop dba_group_gid'
...with, in...
/etc/sysctl.conf and /etc/sysctl.d/* (and I have no idea where or which
package 'dba_group_gid' came from--something standard and maintained I'm
99.9% sure). I
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014, Sentientmeat Net wrote:
Hmm, I tried to figure out what group id might be required to replace...
'vm.hugetlb_shm_grop dba_group_gid'
...with, in...
/etc/sysctl.conf and /etc/sysctl.d/* (and I have no idea where or which
package 'dba_group_gid' came from--something
Am 07.10.2014 um 19:53 schrieb Don Armstrong:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014, Sentientmeat Net wrote:
Hmm, I tried to figure out what group id might be required to replace...
'vm.hugetlb_shm_grop dba_group_gid'
...with, in...
/etc/sysctl.conf and /etc/sysctl.d/* (and I have no idea where or which
That solved it!
I tried the 'getent' command and it found nothing, so I resolved to just
find anything mentioning dba_group_gid... turned out that some lines I
added to /etc/sysctl.conf while trying to install Oracle (working from a
fairly informative blog posting about installing Oracle on
Hi,
I've Googled around for where to start to solve this problem, and I can't
even begin.
I confess, I don't grok systemd or systemctl at all. Suddenly my breezy
aptitude updates have broken, and I can't make even the smallest change
with apt-get or aptitude. I've tried the -f switch to fix
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Sentientmeat Net wrote:
# journalctl -b _PID=7477
-- Logs begin at Sun 2014-10-05 10:05:14 PDT, end at Mon 2014-10-06
20:11:54 PDT. --
Oct 06 19:46:43 sinova systemd-sysctl[7477]: Failed to write
'dba_group_gid' to '/proc/sys/vm/hugetlb_shm_group': Invalid argument
#deb http://apt.insynchq.com/debian wheezy non-free
#Java 7 (Oracle)
#deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/java/ubuntu precise main
#deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/java/ubuntu precise main
resultado do aptitude update
Hit http://dl.google.com stable Release.gpg
Hit http
/updates main
#deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
#deb http://apt.insynchq.com/debian wheezy non-free
#Java 7 (Oracle)
#deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/java/ubuntu precise main
#deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/java/ubuntu precise main
resultado do aptitude
thanks
Hi,
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
2014-10-01 3:30 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org:
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like
severity 647001 important
thanks
Hi,
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
2014-10-01 3:30 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org:
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having
with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available:
NO_PUBKEY 498F1DF0598C5C38
Hmm, all the keys
.org:
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public
2014-09-27 18:10 GMT+04:00 Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com:
NO_PUBKEY 54422A4B98AB5139
removing contents of /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/*.gpg, /etc/apt/trusted.gpg and
manual adding missing keys didn't work.
Only third-party repositories are affected.
--
Best regards,
Valery Mamonov.
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 11:14:52 Valery Mamonov wrote:
Only third-party repositories are affected.
You have added the third party keys?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2014-09-30 14:24 GMT+04:00 Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 11:14:52 Valery Mamonov wrote:
Only third-party repositories are affected.
You have added the third party keys?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public
2014-10-01 3:30 GMT+04:00 Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org:
Valery Mamonov valerymamo...@gmail.com writes:
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease
Hi!
I'm experiencing some troubles with updating my debian machine.
After aptitude update i'm having multiple errors like these:
W: GPG error: http://deb.ianod.es unstable InRelease: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 498F1DF0598C5C38
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:15:00 +0200
maderios mader...@gmail.com wrote:
Est-ce que synaptic, comme le fait aptitude, mémorise quels paquets ont
été installés pour satisfaire des dépendances et propose de les enlever
quand on enlève lesdites dépendances? Auquel cas j' accepte de
rejoindre
On 09/21/2014 09:24 AM, Vincent Besse wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:15:00 +0200
maderios mader...@gmail.com wrote:
Est-ce que synaptic, comme le fait aptitude, mémorise quels paquets ont
été installés pour satisfaire des dépendances et propose de les enlever
quand on enlève lesdites
Le Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 10:40:50AM +0200, maderios a écrit :
dpkg - apt -- frontaux (synaptic, aptitude etc...)
synaptic et aptitude font tout ce que peut faire apt/apt-get
Bonjour,
Aptitude n'utilise pas le même résolveur que apt. Cela peut être utile dans
certaines situation où apt
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:40:50 +0200
maderios mader...@gmail.com wrote:
dpkg - apt -- frontaux (synaptic, aptitude etc...)
synaptic et aptitude font tout ce que peut faire apt/apt-get
Mais ils peuvent en faire plus. D' après
http://debian-handbook.info/browse/fr-FR/stable/sect.apt-get.html
:
— apt-get : installer un ou deux paquets sans beaucoup de
dépendances ou faire une màj « en aveugle » ;
— aptitude : maîtriser les màjs.
Et Synaptic pour gérer les paquets en 3 clics avec les avantages
cumulés
de apt-get et aptitude sans leurs inconvénients. Le seul problème de
Synaptic
les paquets en 3 clics avec les avantages cumulés
de apt-get et aptitude sans leurs inconvénients. Le seul problème de
Synaptic, c'est qu'il est trop facile de s'en servir, donc mal accepté
par ceux qui prennent plaisir à se compliquer la vie... :-) :-)
Et pour les systèmes GNU/Linux qui n'ont
On 09/21/2014 03:33 PM, Stéphane GARGOLY wrote:
Et pour les systèmes GNU/Linux qui n'ont pas de X Window (voir note a),
comment fait-on pour utiliser un gestionnaire de paquet de type graphique
(comme Synaptic) ? ;-)
La réponse est contenue dans ta question...
--
Maderios
--
Lisez la FAQ
Bonjour à tous les utilisateurs et développeurs de Debian :
Le dimanche 21 septembre 2014 à 17:03, maderios mader...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 09/21/2014 03:33 PM, Stéphane GARGOLY wrote:
Et pour les systèmes GNU/Linux qui n'ont pas de X Window (voir note a),
comment fait-on pour utiliser un
Re,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 06:04:58PM +, Stéphane GARGOLY wrote:
[...]
Donc, dans ce cas de figure, soit on s'encombre d'un environnement
graphique - uniquement pour utiliser un gestionnaire de paquets de
type graphique - ou soit on se passe dudit gestionnaire de paquets
de type
PO avec apt-get et/ou apt-cache ?
Non. Les tags ne sont utilisés que par debtags et aptitude (et
synaptic…). apt-cache search ne regarde que les champs nom et
description.
[…]
Puisque le PO a eu sa réponse, je me permets de prolonger un
peu ce fil avec cette simple question : qu'en est-il
Le 20/09/2014 12:16, Sylvain L. Sauvage a écrit :
[...]
Donc, pour résumer :
— apt-get : installer un ou deux paquets sans beaucoup de
dépendances ou faire une màj « en aveugle » ;
— aptitude : maîtriser les màjs.
Merci bien pour toutes ces explications. :)
À+
--
François Lafont
On 09/20/2014 02:09 PM, Francois Lafont wrote:
Le 20/09/2014 12:16, Sylvain L. Sauvage a écrit :
[...]
Donc, pour résumer :
— apt-get : installer un ou deux paquets sans beaucoup de
dépendances ou faire une màj « en aveugle » ;
— aptitude : maîtriser les màjs.
Et Synaptic pour gérer
une màj « en aveugle » ;
— aptitude : maîtriser les màjs.
Et Synaptic pour gérer les paquets en 3 clics avec les avantages cumulés
de apt-get et aptitude sans leurs inconvénients. Le seul problème de
Synaptic, c'est qu'il est trop facile de s'en servir, donc mal accepté
par ceux qui
une màj « en aveugle » ;
— aptitude : maîtriser les màjs.
Et Synaptic pour gérer les paquets en 3 clics avec les avantages cumulés
de apt-get et aptitude sans leurs inconvénients. Le seul problème de
Synaptic, c'est qu'il est trop facile de s'en servir, donc mal accepté
par ceux qui
sans beaucoup de
dépendances ou faire une màj « en aveugle » ;
— aptitude : maîtriser les màjs.
Et Synaptic pour gérer les paquets en 3 clics avec les avantages cumulés
de apt-get et aptitude sans leurs inconvénients. Le seul problème de
Synaptic, c'est qu'il est trop facile de s'en servir
sans beaucoup de
dépendances ou faire une màj « en aveugle » ;
— aptitude : maîtriser les màjs.
Et Synaptic pour gérer les paquets en 3 clics avec les avantages cumulés
de apt-get et aptitude sans leurs inconvénients. Le seul problème de
Synaptic, c'est qu'il est trop facile de s'en servir
mader...@gmail.com a écrit:
On 09/20/2014 02:09 PM, Francois Lafont wrote:
Le 20/09/2014 12:16, Sylvain L. Sauvage a écrit :
[...]
Donc, pour résumer :
--- apt-get : installer un ou deux paquets sans beaucoup de
dépendances ou faire une màj « en aveugle » ;
--- aptitude : maîtriser
aptitude, j'ai
toujours entendu tout et son contraire. Au final, en lisant
ceci :
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch02.fr.html#_literal_apt_get_literal_literal_apt_cache_literal_vs_literal_aptitude_literal
j'en avais plus ou moins conclu que, pour des mises à jour et des
On Du, 03 aug 14, 13:00:27, John Bleichert wrote:
On 08/03/2014 12:44 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-08-03 18:04 +0200, John Bleichert wrote:
snip
root@boogie:~# aptitude upgrade
...
Current status: 9 updates [-24].
24 packages have been upgraded, presumably the same 24 that became
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 05:13:36AM -0700, teddymwas wrote:
Commands to use when mounting ISO and installing packages from ISOs.
1. copy over all the ISO images over to the server you want to use
2. Create a directory in /media/ call it mountpoint1 i.e mkdir
/media/mountpoint1
3. edit
:
http://debian.2.n7.nabble.com/How-to-use-the-debian-installation-iso-for-installing-packages-using-aptitude-tp3026058p3324000.html
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
After running update/upgrade, I always get the usual status messages:
root@boogie:~# aptitude update
...
Current status: 33 updates [+24], 25530 new [+24].
root@boogie:~# aptitude upgrade
...
Current status: 9 updates [-24].
root@boogie:~#
Is the meaning of this status line documented anywhere
On 2014-08-03 18:04 +0200, John Bleichert wrote:
After running update/upgrade, I always get the usual status messages:
root@boogie:~# aptitude update
...
Current status: 33 updates [+24], 25530 new [+24].
It means there are 33 upgradable packages, 24 more than before you ran
aptitude update
On 08/03/2014 12:44 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-08-03 18:04 +0200, John Bleichert wrote:
snip
root@boogie:~# aptitude upgrade
...
Current status: 9 updates [-24].
24 packages have been upgraded, presumably the same 24 that became
upgradable by aptitude update, and 9 packages have been
On Monday 21 July 2014 01:46:07 Ric Moore wrote:
What
is worse, I'm running in my Ubuntu partition to have a working desktop.
That cuts a fella. :( Ric
:-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 08:39:16AM -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
Note: I'd probably have the same problem with nvidia-driver, but my
aptitude is not suggesting removals as first option anymore due to:
// tweak Aptitude to not suggest
On 07/20/2014 11:53 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 08:39:16AM -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
Note: I'd probably have the same problem with nvidia-driver, but my
aptitude is not suggesting removals as first option anymore due
El Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:19:31 -0700, Aristobulo Pinzon escribió:
El Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:08:06 -0700, Aristobulo Pinzon escribió:
Saludo Señores de la lista.
Haciendo la actualización con aptitude upgrade me sale:
Preconfigurando paquetes ...
dpkg: aviso: `ldconfig' no se ha encontrado en
2014-07-14 21:08 GMT+02:00 Aristobulo Pinzon aristobulopin...@yahoo.com:
Saludo Señores de la lista.
Haciendo la actualización con aptitude upgrade
me sale:
Preconfigurando paquetes ...
dpkg: aviso: `ldconfig' no se ha encontrado en el PATH o no es ejecutable
dpkg: aviso: `start-stop
El día 15 de julio de 2014, 10:25, fernando sainz
fernandojose.sa...@gmail.com escribió:
2014-07-14 21:08 GMT+02:00 Aristobulo Pinzon aristobulopin...@yahoo.com:
Saludo Señores de la lista.
Haciendo la actualización con aptitude upgrade
me sale:
Preconfigurando paquetes ...
dpkg: aviso
El lunes, 14 jul 2014 a las 21:08 horas (UTC+2),
Aristobulo Pinzon escribió:
Saludo Señores de la lista.
Haciendo la actualización con aptitude upgrade
me sale:
Preconfigurando paquetes ...
dpkg: aviso: `ldconfig' no se ha encontrado en el PATH o no es ejecutable
dpkg: aviso: `start-stop-daemon
El Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:08:06 -0700, Aristobulo Pinzon escribió:
Saludo Señores de la lista.
Haciendo la actualización con aptitude upgrade me sale:
Preconfigurando paquetes ...
dpkg: aviso: `ldconfig' no se ha encontrado en el PATH o no es
ejecutable
(...)
Si preguntas a Google (en
El Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:08:06 -0700, Aristobulo Pinzon escribió:
Saludo Señores de la lista.
Haciendo la actualización con aptitude upgrade me sale:
Preconfigurando paquetes ...
dpkg: aviso: `ldconfig' no se ha encontrado en el PATH o no es
ejecutable
(...)
Si preguntas a Google (en
El Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:25:22 +0200
fernando sainz fernandojose.sa...@gmail.com escribió:
2014-07-14 21:08 GMT+02:00 Aristobulo Pinzon aristobulopin...@yahoo.com:
Saludo Señores de la lista.
Haciendo la actualización con aptitude upgrade
me sale:
Preconfigurando paquetes ...
dpkg
Saludo Señores de la lista.
Haciendo la actualización con aptitude upgrade
me sale:
Preconfigurando paquetes ...
dpkg: aviso: `ldconfig' no se ha encontrado en el PATH o no es ejecutable
dpkg: aviso: `start-stop-daemon' no se ha encontrado en el PATH o no es
ejecutable
dpkg: error: no se ha
I have seen this before, but I saw it the other day, and was just curious.
Why is aptitude so eager to uninstall packages instead of simply opting to
install a supporting package rather than upgrade it? I was upgrading
libssl1.0.0 the other day as a result of a security finding, and did the
whack
, and the -dev package is installed, then it's going to need to
be upgraded too.
#570377: aptitude chooses to remove packages instead of upgrading
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't see anything in the documentation about this.
If aptitude cannot be used, what am I supposed to do?
I'm sorry, I don't see anything in the documentation about this.
If aptitude cannot be used, what am I supposed to do?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https
Am 07. Mai, 2014 schwätzte Charles Blair so:
moin moin Charles,
all of the apt tools, including aptitude, depend on what sources you have
added.
man sources.list
There are certainly good web pages as well, but the manpage has an example
that includes contrib and non-free.
ciao,
der.hans
On Du, 06 apr 14, 00:20:34, Dalios wrote:
Is this a problem because of using gdebi? Is this because I used apt-get to
uninstall and aptitude didn't get the memo?
A quick look through aptitude's bugs found this, but there may be others
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648313
On 04/07/2014 03:51 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
A quick look through aptitude's bugs found this, but there may be others
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648313
Kind regards,
Andrei
It's always a relief when it's not my fault!
Thank you all for you replies.
Dalios
--
To
Hi all,
A few weeks back while I was still following Stable (wheezy) I used
gdebi to install a package (minitube if that matters). Later I upgraded
to Testing (jessie) and now I used the command apt-get purge minitube
to uninstall the package but when I use the command aptitude search
the package but when I use the command
aptitude search minitube the return i get is:
pi minitube - Native YouTube client
...
Is this a problem because of using gdebi? Is this because I used
apt-get to uninstall and aptitude didn't get the memo?
There probably has been some
Dalios writes:
What does that the package will be installed mean? When will it be
installed?
It means that if you were to run aptitude install with no target
minitube would be installed. You've somehow confused Aptitude into
thinking that you asked it to install Minitube and then interrupted
On 29/03/14 02:01, Michael Biebl wrote:
Please install network-manager-dbg and send me a back trace. If you need help
with that please contact me off list
Got the same issue on two boxes, one a Lenovo T60, the other a
VirtualBox. Both running SID, one i386, the other amd64.
The common
On 30/03/14 06:52 AM, Klaus wrote:
On 29/03/14 02:01, Michael Biebl wrote:
Please install network-manager-dbg and send me a back trace. If you need help
with that please contact me off list
Got the same issue on two boxes, one a Lenovo T60, the other a
VirtualBox. Both running SID, one i386,
-manager
root@frank-debian:/var/cache/apt/archives#
It's unpacking over itself because it was already installed but not
configured by aptitude.
Anybody else with the problem ?
--
When the rich get richer they get more powerful
and that puts them in the position to lobby for policies
triggers for man-db (2.6.6-1) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
network-manager
root@frank-debian:/var/cache/apt/archives#
It's unpacking over itself because it was already installed but not
configured by aptitude.
Anybody else with the problem ?
Job for NetworkManager.service
On 28/03/14 09:21 PM, Robin wrote:
systemctl status
NetworkManager.service
root@frank-debian:/home/frank# systemctl status NetworkManager.service
NetworkManager.service - Network Manager
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service; enabled)
Active: failed (Result: signal)
Please install network-manager-dbg and send me a back trace. If you need help
with that please contact me off list
On 29. März 2014 02:47:59 MEZ, Frank McCormick debianl...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 28/03/14 09:21 PM, Robin wrote:
systemctl status
NetworkManager.service
On 2014-03-07 Paul E Condon wrote:
There is, new to me, a new feature in Aptitude. Some time in the past
within the past 18 months, I lost the ability to adjust the colors on
the text display. Now all I get is a white letters on a black
background. I get this in both gnome-terminal
On 10/03/14 19:58, Paul E Condon wrote:
When in look in /usr/share/terminfo, I don't find plain xterm. It only
comes with more characters after the 'm'. I don't know what to make of
this, since I've never before had to look into how the terminal
works.
There is a short explanation in the
.
There is a short explanation in the terminfo manpage.
Information in manpage convinced me that the problem is a bug in
Aptitude, and search of bug reports shows that it is already
reported. In bug reports, what I called 'interactive', is referred to
as 'visual'. I'm sure it will be fixed soonish
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 17:01:27 Paul E Condon wrote:
In the meantime, I'll
use deselect, or apt-get in situations where I can't see important
details because of inappropriate visual rendering in Aptitude.
Or even aptitude at the CLI?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:01:27AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
Information in manpage convinced me that the problem is a bug in
Aptitude, and search of bug reports shows that it is already
reported. In bug reports, what I called 'interactive', is referred to
as 'visual'. I'm sure
On 20140311_185125, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 17:01:27 Paul E Condon wrote:
In the meantime, I'll
use deselect, or apt-get in situations where I can't see important
details because of inappropriate visual rendering in Aptitude.
Or even aptitude at the CLI?
I had grown
On 20140311_205250, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:01:27AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
Information in manpage convinced me that the problem is a bug in
Aptitude, and search of bug reports shows that it is already
reported. In bug reports, what I called 'interactive
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 07:02:46PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20140311_205250, Tom Furie wrote:
how often do you see that purple when you aren't in aptitude? If it
^^^
Every single time I do whatever makes it happen, I cannot
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:48:03PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
There is, new to me, a new feature in Aptitude. Some time in the past
within the past 18 months, I lost the ability to adjust the colors on
the text display. Now all I get is a white letters on a black
background. I get
On 20140310_35, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:48:03PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
There is, new to me, a new feature in Aptitude. Some time in the past
within the past 18 months, I lost the ability to adjust the colors on
the text display. Now all I get is a white
601 - 700 of 6306 matches
Mail list logo
