Code of Conduct reminder [WAS Re: Alpine/Gmail/Imap expert needed.]

2023-11-28 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:37:53PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:26 PM Karen Lewellen > wrote: > > > > You are entitled to your opinion, which I respect. > > Given how some choose to answer, speaking personally, If they wanted to be > > here, they would already be

Re: Code of conduct reminder.

2023-06-21 Thread paulf
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:43:46 + Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:52:20PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:18:18AM -0400, David Peacock wrote: > > > I'm seeing a shocking and disappointing amount of disrespect and > > > vulgarity of late

Re: Code of conduct reminder.

2023-06-21 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:51 PM Andy Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 06:52:57PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > Could we please finish the package managers thread at this point? > > Do you include in that the sub-thread of that where the OP is > (still) attempting to get Synaptic to

Re: Code of conduct reminder.

2023-06-21 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 06:52:57PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Could we please finish the package managers thread at this point? Do you include in that the sub-thread of that where the OP is (still) attempting to get Synaptic to work, and also the sub-threads this generates as the

Re: Code of conduct reminder.

2023-06-21 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 05:52:20PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:18:18AM -0400, David Peacock wrote: > > I'm seeing a shocking and disappointing amount of disrespect and vulgarity > > of late from several parties. If there is no active moderation possible, >

Re: Code of conduct reminder.

2023-06-21 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:18:18AM -0400, David Peacock wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just a friendly reminder of the code of conduct that we agree to be bound > by when we participate in this list, pasted below for convenience, but > originally from here [0]. > As a semi-moderator of the list and the

Re: Code of conduct reminder.

2023-06-21 Thread zithro
On 21 Jun 2023 17:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: Since "shocking", "disrespect" and "vulgarity" are pretty subjective measures (they are still very legitimate, though), it would be nice and constructive if you gave people the chance to understand what you are taking issue with. Otherwise, we have

Re: Code of conduct reminder.

2023-06-21 Thread tomas
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:18:18AM -0400, David Peacock wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just a friendly reminder of the code of conduct that we agree to be bound > by when we participate in this list, pasted below for convenience, but > originally from here [0]. No need to quote the thing in full. It

Code of conduct reminder.

2023-06-21 Thread David Peacock
Hi folks, Just a friendly reminder of the code of conduct that we agree to be bound by when we participate in this list, pasted below for convenience, but originally from here [0]. I'm seeing a shocking and disappointing amount of disrespect and vulgarity of late from several parties. If there

Code of Conduct reminder [WAS Re: ipv6 maybe has arrived.]

2023-02-15 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:07:29PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:30:57AM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > > True. But I'd also suggest that if you do not want to support /etc/hosts > > files name resolution methods > > /etc/hosts works and has worked fine on debian for

Re: [CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:50:45AM -0800, RP wrote: > > > This whole thread has turned into a violation of the very first rule.  By that, I presume you are referring to "The mailing lists exist to foster the development and use of Debian. Non-constructive or off-topic messages, along with other

Re: [CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
On 2022-01-24 12:50, RP wrote: > On 1/24/22 09:33, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:55:25PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: max wrote: > For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and

Re: [CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread RP
On 1/24/22 09:33, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:55:25PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: max wrote: For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and Debian developers voted not to censure him.

Re: [CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:55:25PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: > > max wrote: > > > > > For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and Debian > > > developers voted not to censure him. > > >

[CODE OF CONDUCT REMINDER - WAS Re: Re: Why did Norbert Preining (having maintained KDE) left Debian?]

2022-01-24 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: > max wrote: > > > For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and Debian > > developers voted not to censure him. > > https://stallman.org/articles/genderless-pronouns.html Seems like a double > > standard, but whatever. > >