Mario Marietto (12023-06-21):
> A rude behavior like yours
The rude person here is you and only you.
--
Nicolas George
@Nicolas George : what about if I don't understand what ? I presume that
between us before all there are some relevant cultural differences. A rude
behavior like yours is not tolerable,since I haven't offended you
personally. I have only expressed opinions based on the cultural view of
the place
Mario Marietto (12023-06-20):
> Or am I missing something ?
Yes, a lot.
--
Nicolas George
@nicolas george : you consider yourself a democratic person ? Do you fight
every day for the freedom of speech of other people ? I don't see any
insult from myself. The fact that you see it does not make it is. And what
about your invitation to the other people to ignore me ? I consider this
Mario Marietto (12023-06-21):
> Probably you call troll what you find difficult to understand ? I'm a
> psychologist,not a troll.
Troll is a behavior, like entitled brat or asshole.
Psychologist is a profession.
They are not incompatible.
I thought a psychologist would know the difference
Mario Marietto (12023-06-20):
> ---> Second, you are asking for help: that means your time is less valuable
> than the time of people who might help you, and the most effort comes from
> you.
>
> it's not a matter of effort : not everything is under our control : If I
> don't know something,I
Probably you call troll what you find difficult to understand ? I'm a
psychologist,not a troll. Try to read and understand. This is the right
method to understand more than what you understand now. If you talk about
troll,you close the door to a lot of interesting topics. Ok,they probably
aren't
Mario Marietto wrote:
> ---> Second, you are asking for help: that means your time is less
> valuable than the time of people who might help you, and the most
> effort comes from you.
>
> it's not a matter of effort : not everything is under our control :
> If I don't know something,I COULD
---> Second, you are asking for help: that means your time is less valuable
than the time of people who might help you, and the most effort comes from
you.
it's not a matter of effort : not everything is under our control : If I
don't know something,I COULD learn MORE,but if I don't know that
Mario Marietto (12023-06-20):
> What about if I don't know which kind of information you need ? I'm the
> hobbyist,you are the developer. It's better that you ask what you want to
> know and I try to reply with my limited knowledge.
You are doubly mistaken here.
First, this is a users mailing
What about if I don't know which kind of information you need ? I'm the
hobbyist,you are the developer. It's better that you ask what you want to
know and I try to reply with my limited knowledge.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 4:48 PM Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> > ok,do you have some workaround to
> ok,do you have some workaround to propose to me,boys ?
Not before you give more info, no.
Stefan
ok,do you have some workaround to propose to me,boys ? Thank you.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:18 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 8:48 PM Stefan Monnier
> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > of=/dev/mmcblk1 status=progress bs=2M but very rarely it wants to
> boot. I
> > > don't
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 8:48 PM Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> [...]
> > of=/dev/mmcblk1 status=progress bs=2M but very rarely it wants to boot. I
> > don't understand where the error is. When I insert the sd card into the
> > slot it beeps and it prepares itself to boot chrome OS from the internal
>
[...]
> of=/dev/mmcblk1 status=progress bs=2M but very rarely it wants to boot. I
> don't understand where the error is. When I insert the sd card into the
> slot it beeps and it prepares itself to boot chrome OS from the internal
> memory,not Linux from the sd card.
>
> The problem could be
t chrome OS from the internal
memory,not Linux from the sd card.
The problem could be systemd or whatever does that,to check and fix disk
errors because it does not support natively chrome os disk partitions
flags. So it may break those flags after the first boot. So,I want to ask
if there is a method th
On jeudi 14 janvier 2021 00:14:16 CET Michael Stone wrote:
> A more likely source of problems is the fact that the SATA connector is
> actually spec'd for a really low number of cycles.
I also had trouble on an Olimex card. I got error when the cable is not coming
straight in the connector.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:45:56PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
I agree - probably not a disk error - though it never hurts to check
one's drives every once in a while.
I can think of a very long list of things that are good to do or can't
hurt on a debian system. Enumerating them in response
Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:45:25AM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Dennis Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
I am getting very frequent disk errors and I can't figure out which
drive they are occurring on. I get two messages:
[174384.704895] sata_sil :05:00.0: Event logged
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:45:25AM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Dennis Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
I am getting very frequent disk errors and I can't figure out which
drive they are occurring on. I get two messages:
[174384.704895] sata_sil :05:00.0: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT
domain
Dennis Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
I am getting very frequent disk errors and I can't figure out which
drive they are occurring on. I get two messages:
[174384.704895] sata_sil :05:00.0: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT
domain=0x address=0xcf99c100 flags=0x]
[174384.705153] AMD
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:14:16 -0500
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 02:53:58PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> >I used to think "a cable is a cable, color does not matter", but I
> >have experienced many storage hardware issues over the years that
> >were caused by red SATA
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 07:03:54PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 05:46:03PM -0600, Dennis Wicks wrote:
Well, this is all very interesting! I have *two* SATALink/SATARaid
expansion cards and neither of them have any red cables! They are at
pci addresses 05:00 and 05:01!
Dennis Wicks composed on 2021-01-13 18:46 (UTC-0500):
> I have *two*
> SATALink/SATARaid expansion cards and neither of them have
> any red cables! They are at pci addresses 05:00 and 05:01!
> How do I tell which is which?
With similar devices on the same bus, that closer to the CPU tends to
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:55:37 -0800
David Christensen wrote:
> Download the manufacturer diagnostic utility for whatever brand
> disk(s) you own and run it. I prefer tools that run on bootable
> media (e.g. USB flash drive); Windows may be required.
The OP may also find package smartmontools
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:14:16 -0500
Michael Stone wrote:
> And I've had a heck of a lot of hard drives connected with red SATA
> cables without issues, to the point that I'm more than confident to
> not jump on SATA cable color as the answer to any question as well as
> being reasonably
On Wednesday 13 January 2021 18:46:03 Dennis Wicks wrote:
> Spam detection software, running on the system "coyote.coyote.den",
> has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
> message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
> similar future email. If you have
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 05:46:03PM -0600, Dennis Wicks wrote:
Well, this is all very interesting! I have *two* SATALink/SATARaid
expansion cards and neither of them have any red cables! They are at
pci addresses 05:00 and 05:01! How do I tell which is which?
Pull one out. :-)
On 2021-01-13 15:46, Dennis Wicks wrote:
Well, this is all very interesting! I have *two* SATALink/SATARaid
expansion cards and neither of them have any red cables!
Okay. Are you confident the cables are good?
They are at pci
addresses 05:00 and 05:01! How do I tell which is which?
Do
On 2021-01-13 13:55, David Christensen wrote:
Download the manufacturer diagnostic utility for whatever brand disk(s)
you own and run it. I prefer tools that run on bootable media (e.g. USB
flash drive); Windows may be required.
Felix Miata wrote on 1/13/21 5:21 PM:
Michael Howard composed on 2021-01-13 22:57 (UTC):
David Christensen wrote:
Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:55:37PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
If you have any red SATA cables, replace them with new black SATA 6
Make sure
On Wednesday 13 January 2021 16:55:37 David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-13 11:07, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> > Greetings;
> >
> > I am getting very frequent disk errors and I can't figure out which
> >
> > drive they are occurring on. I get two messages:
> >
Michael Howard composed on 2021-01-13 22:57 (UTC):
> David Christensen wrote:
>> Michael Stone wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:55:37PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
If you have any red SATA cables, replace them with new black SATA 6
>>> Make sure you wear a beaded neckless while
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 02:53:58PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
I used to think "a cable is a cable, color does not matter", but I
have experienced many storage hardware issues over the years that were
caused by red SATA cables. Other readers on this list have had
similar experiences. The
On 13/01/2021 22:53, David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-01-13 14:34, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:55:37PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
If you have any red SATA cables, replace them with new black SATA 6
Make sure you wear a beaded neckless while doing that under a full
On 2021-01-13 14:34, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:55:37PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
If you have any red SATA cables, replace them with new black SATA 6
Make sure you wear a beaded neckless while doing that under a full moon.
I used to think "a cable is a cable,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 01:55:37PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-01-13 11:07, Dennis Wicks wrote:
I am getting very frequent disk errors and I can't figure out which
drive they are occurring on. I get two messages:
[174384.704895] sata_sil :05:00.0: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT
On 2021-01-13 11:07, Dennis Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
I am getting very frequent disk errors and I can't figure out which
drive they are occurring on. I get two messages:
[174384.704895] sata_sil :05:00.0: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT
domain=0x address=0xcf99c100 flags=0x
Greetings;
I am getting very frequent disk errors and I can't figure
out which drive they are occurring on. I get two messages:
[174384.704895] sata_sil :05:00.0: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT
domain=0x address=0xcf99c100 flags=0x]
[174384.705153] AMD-Vi: Event logged
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 23:40:10 -0400
Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net wrote:
On 27/07/15 10:08 PM, Celejar wrote:
Hi,
I have a fairly new external USB disk that frequently throws errors.
When these occur, the disk becomes partially or totally inaccessible.
Even worse, when I try to umount
Hi,
I have a fairly new external USB disk that frequently throws errors.
When these occur, the disk becomes partially or totally inaccessible.
Even worse, when I try to umount it, the umount hangs indefinitely,
using 100% of one of my cpu cores. I haven't yet found any way to
recover short of
On 27/07/15 10:08 PM, Celejar wrote:
Hi,
I have a fairly new external USB disk that frequently throws errors.
When these occur, the disk becomes partially or totally inaccessible.
Even worse, when I try to umount it, the umount hangs indefinitely,
using 100% of one of my cpu cores. I haven't
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:47:32 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 31/12/11 16:59, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 30/12/11 17:15, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Can anyone please enlighten me to what it means; Am I about to lose a
disk?
It seems to be localized in just one of the disks (the one
On 31/12/11 16:59, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 30/12/11 17:15, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:37:53 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
I'm getting irrregular reports on a Squeeze software raid1 array with
two 500GB disks like this:
Dec 30 09:53:39 tony-lx kernel: [143496.872684]
Tony van der Hoff (t...@vanderhoff.org on 2011-12-31 18:21 +):
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x003e 200 199 000Old_age
Always - 455
This is your problem (well, symptom). The disk isn't failing
hardware-wise, but it is seeing a lot of transmission errors. The ATA
bus errors in
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:04:06 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/31/2011 12:21 PM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Well, Stan, I did. Unfortunately I didn't understand the reports, which
contain a plethora of information, for which I haven't been able to
locate an authoritative explanation, but seem
Thanks for your time Stan.
On 31/12/11 23:04, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/31/2011 12:21 PM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
/dev/sda
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 243530983
7 Seek_Error_Rate 18363743
/dev/sdb
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 138763088
7 Seek_Error_Rate 1374378
On 01/01/12 13:00, Camaleón wrote:
You better run a long test (smartctl --test=long /dev/sdx) if you want
to full check the disks SMART status or even better yet, get the SeaTools
from Seagate website (it's a LiveCD) and run the manufacturer's own
utilities to check the SMART health of your
On 12/30/2011 4:37 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
I'm getting irrregular reports on a Squeeze software raid1 array with
two 500GB disks like this:
Dec 30 09:53:39 tony-lx kernel: [143496.872684] ata3.00: exception Emask
0x10 SAct 0x3 SErr 0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Dec 30 09:53:39 tony-lx
On 30/12/11 17:15, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:37:53 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
I'm getting irrregular reports on a Squeeze software raid1 array with
two 500GB disks like this:
Dec 30 09:53:39 tony-lx kernel: [143496.872684] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x10
SAct 0x3 SErr
On 31/12/11 08:55, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/30/2011 4:37 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
I'm getting irrregular reports on a Squeeze software raid1 array with
two 500GB disks like this:
Dec 30 09:53:39 tony-lx kernel: [143496.872684] ata3.00: exception Emask
0x10 SAct 0x3 SErr 0x40 action
On 12/31/2011 12:21 PM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Well, Stan, I did. Unfortunately I didn't understand the reports, which
contain a plethora of information, for which I haven't been able to
locate an authoritative explanation, but seem to indicate that the
drives are OK:
/dev/sda
1
I'm getting irrregular reports on a Squeeze software raid1 array with
two 500GB disks like this:
Dec 30 09:53:39 tony-lx kernel: [143496.872684] ata3.00: exception Emask
0x10 SAct 0x3 SErr 0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Dec 30 09:53:39 tony-lx kernel: [143496.872694] ata3.00: irq_stat
0x0800,
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:37:53 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
I'm getting irrregular reports on a Squeeze software raid1 array with
two 500GB disks like this:
Dec 30 09:53:39 tony-lx kernel: [143496.872684] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x10
SAct 0x3 SErr 0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Dec 30
On Jul 20, 2009, at 22:26 , Siggy Brentrup wrote:
I'm willing to accept some sectors as lost, but it would really
help if
there were a way to do so quickly. Is there?
I'd skip to about 63G (dont forget to seek), yielding a hole in your
image using noerror. As soon as you have saved the
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:43:13AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I have a bad drive in a laptop and am attempting to salvage what I can
with (roughly)
dd conv=noerror,sync if=/dev/sda3 of=/nfs/backup
where the of is NFS mounted from another system.
This keeps trying when it encounters a disk
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 23:27 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:43:13AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I have a bad drive in a laptop and am attempting to salvage what I can
with (roughly)
dd conv=noerror,sync if=/dev/sda3 of=/nfs/backup
where the of is NFS mounted from another
I have a bad drive in a laptop and am attempting to salvage what I can
with (roughly)
dd conv=noerror,sync if=/dev/sda3 of=/nfs/backup
where the of is NFS mounted from another system.
This keeps trying when it encounters a disk read error, but there are
lots of errors and it is very slow (only
i have never used any of them, but I think ddrescue, gddrescue and
myrescue (apt packages) are made for what you're doing.
good luck,
Tiago Saboga.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2009-07-20 at 09:43 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I have a bad drive in a laptop and am attempting to salvage what I can
with (roughly)
dd conv=noerror,sync if=/dev/sda3 of=/nfs/backup
where the of is NFS mounted from another system.
This keeps trying when it encounters a disk read error,
If your bad sectors are local to a particular area of the disk, you
could read sections starting at the end, and moving towards the
beginning after each section is completed.
Later you would concatenate the sections that were recoverable.
Give either iseek=n or skip=n to dd to skip over a
[testing/sarge; 2.4.26-1-686-smp]
Suddenly, I'm seeing the following error messages in /var/log/syslog:
Dec 27 11:59:34 acme kernel: hda: dma_intr: \
status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Dec 27 11:59:34 acme kernel: hda: dma_intr: \
Kenneth Jacker wrote:
[testing/sarge; 2.4.26-1-686-smp]
Suddenly, I'm seeing the following error messages in /var/log/syslog:
Dec 27 11:59:34 acme kernel: hda: dma_intr: \
status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Dec 27 11:59:34 acme kernel: hda: dma_intr: \
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Kenneth Jacker wrote:
[testing/sarge; 2.4.26-1-686-smp]
Suddenly, I'm seeing the following error messages in /var/log/syslog:
Dec 27 11:59:34 acme kernel: hda: dma_intr: \
status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Dec 27 11:59:34 acme
When I get to this stage in the installation, the system *appears* to hang-
when I check the alt-F3 console, there are two error messages:
modprobe: failed to load module floppy
eval: 3: Syntax error: newline unexpected (expected ))
Also, is there a good reference on using logical partitions,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:08:59 -0400, Allen Williams wrote:
and, on console alt-F4, I am getting these error messages:
June 20 00:58:56 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hdc: media error (bad sector):
status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Is there anyplace that tells me how to decode
20, 2004 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sarge install: Install base system bombs and disk
errors (?)
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:08:59 -0400, Allen Williams wrote:
and, on console alt-F4, I am getting these error messages:
June 20 00:58:56 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hdc: media
]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sarge install: Install base system bombs and disk
errors (?)
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:08:59 -0400, Allen Williams wrote:
and, on console alt-F4, I am getting these error messages:
June 20 00:58:56 (none) syslog.warn klogd
with either of these would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Allen
-Original Message-
From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sarge install: Install base system bombs and disk
errors (?)
Allen Williams wrote
West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sarge install: Install base system bombs and disk
errors (?)
Allen Williams wrote:
This is a brand new system- no data to worry about, but would like to get
the system installed
Thanks, but I'm still getting the base install error, and also the disk
errors associated with my cdrom. My cdrom is a DVD-RW, but the CD in it was
written on my Windows (old) CD burner, so should be OK. I burned it with
Joliet file specified, as ISO 9660 only allows 8 char file names. I have
, June 20, 2004 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sarge install: Install base system bombs and disk
errors(?)
Allen,
Having just installed sarge on my laptop I think I may be able to help.
I initially attempted to install sarge from a cd I burned using jigdo.
This failed repeatedly
-
From: Gregory Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sarge install: Install base system bombs and disk
errors(?)
Allen,
Having just installed sarge on my laptop I think I may be able to help.
I initially attempted
Gregory Pierce wrote:
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 20:20, Allen Williams wrote:
Lots and lots and lots of stuff without snippage.
Folks, trim your posts, please.
Thanks!
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Gregory Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sarge install: Install base system bombs and disk
errors(?)
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 20:20, Allen Williams wrote:
Greg,
Thanks for the help. What do you mean, you used jigdo? I
Sorry...:( from now on...
-Original Message-
From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sarge install: Install base system bombs and disk
errors(?)
Gregory Pierce wrote:
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 20:20, Allen
Allen Williams wrote:
From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks, trim your posts, please.
Sorry...:( from now on...
No problem. 'ppreciate the cooperation.
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hullo there,
After installing Linux (slink), I'm having hard disk errors such as: EXT2-fs
error (device 03:03) ext2-find-entry: bad entry across blocks - offset = 1316,
inode 2852811149, rec_len = 60588 name-len = 4073.
Please read below for a rather lengthy explanation of exactly what
Hullo there,
After installing Linux (slink), I'm having hard disk errors such as: EXT2-fs
error (device 03:03) ext2-find-entry: bad entry across blocks - offset = 1316,
inode 2852811149, rec_len = 60588 name-len = 4073.
Please read below for a rather lengthy explanation of exactly what
Hullo there,
After installing Linux (slink), I'm having hard disk errors such as:
EXT2-fs error (device 03:03) ext2-find-entry: bad entry across blocks -
offset = 1316, inode 2852811149, rec_len = 60588 name-len = 4073.
Please read below for a rather lengthy explanation of exactly what
happened
George - with all those things disabled, does the UDMA disk perform
faster than if you just don't use the UDMA in the first place? I'm
assuming that you can choose a UDMA driver or the regular IDE driver?
George Bonser wrote:
Pretty tired at this point but I got it fixed. It is a combination
81 matches
Mail list logo
