Re: Difficulties with Firefox/iceweasel

- Original Message - From: "Felix Miata" <mrma...@earthlink.net> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:26:23 PM Subject: Re: Difficulties with Firefox/iceweasel Alan McConnell composed on 2016-09-17 13:05 (UTC-0400): > I'll have to l

Re: Difficulties with Firefox/iceweasel

Alan McConnell composed on 2016-09-17 13:05 (UTC-0400): During my experimentation with Iceweasel, described in another post, I have received warnings from the OS that /tmp was filling up. It seems that when running a video a buffer is opened in /tmp, and /tmp fills up rapidly. At the moment,

Difficulties with Firefox/iceweasel

During my experimentation with Iceweasel, described in another post, I have received warnings from the OS that /tmp was filling up. It seems that when running a video a buffer is opened in /tmp, and /tmp fills up rapidly. At the moment, df /tmp tells me that 3% of /tmp is used. When I'm trying

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

On 2/25/2016 12:39 PM, H Kyu wrote: ​Hello - Recently, Mozilla's Firefox browser introduced a few new features that got me to remove Firefox on my Windows PC altogether. The features were Hello, Camera Access (Android), and screen-sharing. Every single one of those features did not sit

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 04:42:12 +0100 Jerome BENOIT wrote: >Hello Charlie: > >On 26/02/16 03:53, Charlie Kravetz wrote: >> if Iceweasel incorporates those Firefox features, I would have to also >> switch away from

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

gt;> >> > While not relevant to Debian, Pale Moon for Windows is neat. >> >> >> >> > From: H Kyu [mailto:henry.s@gmail.com] >> > Sent: 26 February, 2016 7:40 AM >> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org; secur...@debian.org >> >

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

On 2016-02-26, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Thursday 25 February 2016 20:39:59 H Kyu wrote: >> But if Iceweasel incorporates those Firefox features, I would have >> to also switch away from Debian. > > You are confusing Debian with Gnome. Debian is the distro. Gnome is the >

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

> Sent: 26 February, 2016 7:40 AM > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org; secur...@debian.org > > Subject: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel > > > > > ​Hello - > > > Recently, Mozilla's Firefox browser introduced a few new features that got > > me to rem

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:39:59 -0800 H Kyu wrote: > ​Hello - > > Recently, Mozilla's Firefox browser introduced a few new features > that got me to remove Firefox on my Windows PC altogether. The > features were Hello, Camera Access (Android), and screen-sharing. > Every

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

some flavor of webkit for the like of displaying help pages. Which is what IE also does or at least did on Windows. To clarify, IE is tightly integrated into Windows so that it can't be fully removed. Firefox/Iceweasel doesn't have that integration. If you don't like a browser, don't use it. Since

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

Hello Charlie: On 26/02/16 03:53, Charlie Kravetz wrote: > if Iceweasel incorporates those Firefox features, I would have to also switch > away from Debian. Is it not an extreme attitude ? There are plenty of web browser around: https://wiki.debian.org/WebBrowsers Be aware that the list

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

ary, 2016 7:40 AM >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org; secur...@debian.org >Subject: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel > > > >​Hello - > >Recently, Mozilla's Firefox browser introduced a few new features that got me >to remove Firefox on my Windows PC altogether. The features were Hello,

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

H Kyu writes: > Would Iceweasel also be incorporating those bothersome features in the > near future? If so, would it be possible to use Debian without > Iceweasel or any Mozilla product? GNOME does not require Iceweasel and Debian requires neither GNOME nor Iceweasel. There are many desktop

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

H Kyu [mailto:henry.s@gmail.com] > Sent: 26 February, 2016 7:40 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org; secur...@debian.org > Subject: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel > > > > ​Hello - > > Recently, Mozilla's Firefox browser introduced a few new features that got > me to remove

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

On Thursday 25 February 2016 20:39:59 H Kyu wrote: > But if Iceweasel incorporates those Firefox features, I would have > to also switch away from Debian. You are confusing Debian with Gnome. Debian is the distro. Gnome is the Desktop environment. I believe that Gnome uses Iceweasel by

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

MY QUESTION: Would Iceweasel also be incorporating those bothersome > features in the near future? If so, would it be possible to use > Debian without Iceweasel or any Mozilla product? It might. And, of course. Feel free to use any Linux compatible browser you wish. There are more than just

Re: Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

ble to ditch firefox/iceweasel and the other mozilla products, there are plenty of other browsers: # aptitude show www-browser No current or candidate version found for www-browser Package: www-browser State: not a real package Provided by: chimera2 (2.0a19-8+b2), chromium (47.0.2526.80-1~deb8u

Debian and Firefox/Iceweasel

​Hello - Recently, Mozilla's Firefox browser introduced a few new features that got me to remove Firefox on my Windows PC altogether. The features were Hello, Camera Access (Android), and screen-sharing. Every single one of those features did not sit well with me from a security perspective.

Firefox / Iceweasel displays math formulas in the wrong size

I use up-to-date Debian stable, amd64 port. Until recently, Firefox /Iceweasel would display mathematical formulas with the size and shape wrong. Repeated reloads would fix the problem. See the Terry Tao blog at http://terrytao.wordpress.com/;. Recently, the formula sizing has been working

firefox/iceweasel - (XFCE) large cursors overlap tooltips

On sid, XFCE (perhaps unrelated) and using iceweasel (appears to be v24.1.0, but this happened with previous versions): tooltip popups (eg showing the url behind links and images etc) is consistently UNDER my (48 point) mouse cursor. I move the mouse, to try to read the popup text and the popup

Re: Firefox Iceweasel

Anyway to run it as two sessions? ie. both simultaneously. On 31 Jan 2013 10:55, Marc Shapiro marcns...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/30/2013 06:58 PM, അഖിൽ കൃഷ്ണൻ എസ്. wrote: How can i install Firefox along with iceweasel in Debian wheezy? ~Akhilan You can get the tarball from the Mozilla

Re: Firefox Iceweasel

On 01/30/2013 09:58 PM, അഖിൽ കൃഷ്ണൻ എസ്. wrote: How can i install Firefox along with iceweasel in Debian wheezy? ~Akhilan search for a firewall - apt-cache search firewall decide which one you want to install - apt-cache show package name to install, as root, aptitude install firewall

Re: Firefox Iceweasel

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:33 AM, അഖിൽ കൃഷ്ണൻ എസ്. akhilkrishn...@gmail.com wrote: Anyway to run it as two sessions? ie. both simultaneously. Please do not top post, it breaks the flow of the thread, and is contrary to list conventions. You can run both at the same time if you use separate

Firefox Iceweasel

How can i install Firefox along with iceweasel in Debian wheezy? ~Akhilan

Re: Firefox Iceweasel

On Wednesday 30 January 2013 5:58:43 pm you wrote: How can i install Firefox along with iceweasel in Debian wheezy? ~Akhilan You can use both, they share the same directory in your home directory. No problems here with that. Firefox is a .tar.gz file so you have lots of options in

Re: Firefox Iceweasel

On 01/30/2013 06:58 PM, അഖിൽ കൃഷ്ണൻ എസ്. wrote: How can i install Firefox along with iceweasel in Debian wheezy? ~Akhilan You can get the tarball from the Mozilla site. I move it to /usr/local/lib and untar it from there. Note that since Iceweasel pretends to be firefox, you need to

Re: Adobe flash is dead (now Firefox/Iceweasel/Mozilla)

On 11/11/11 11:47, Bob Proulx wrote: Robert Holtzman wrote: Bob Proulx wrote: A .deb package for firefox? Where? The Debian Mozilla team makes Firefox deb packages available for Stable that tracks the current release. http://mozilla.debian.net/ Nothing about FF here or in any of the

Re: firefox iceweasel

El 24/08/11 19:41, waldo li escribió: 4) baje firefox de su pagina oficial y lo instale en /opt Bien, en ese caso, lo borrás a mano en esa carpeta como root y listo, luego deberás borrar a mano las entradas al menú inicio y nada más. respuesta a SM Baby Siabef: Leyendo lista de

Re: firefox iceweasel

El Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:51:55 -0300 Sergio Bessopeanetto serpeane...@yahoo.com escribió: El 24/08/11 19:41, waldo li escribió: 4) baje firefox de su pagina oficial y lo instale en /opt Bien, en ese caso, lo borrás a mano en esa carpeta como root y listo, luego deberás borrar a mano las

Re: Is Firefox/Iceweasel leaking?

Kelly Clowers wrote: I dunno. I myself have never had serious memory problems with Mozilla or Firefox. In old versions of Mozilla (~0.9-1.7) and FF 1 and 2 there where definite limits to how many tabs I could open without crashing. With current versions, though, I can run over a hundred tabs

Re: Is Firefox/Iceweasel leaking?

On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:58:26 +0200 Merciadri Luca wrote: I noticed on many computers with Debian, whatever the kernel (2.6.xx, xx = 26), that, once ``too much'' tabs have been opened, Firefox/Iceweasel becomes sluggish, slower and slower, and often stalls after some time. I also noticed

Re: Is Firefox/Iceweasel leaking?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Girish Kulkarni gir...@athene.org.in writes: On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:58:26 +0200 Merciadri Luca wrote: I noticed on many computers with Debian, whatever the kernel (2.6.xx, xx = 26), that, once ``too much'' tabs have been opened, Firefox/Iceweasel

Is Firefox/Iceweasel leaking?

Hi, I noticed on many computers with Debian, whatever the kernel (2.6.xx, xx = 26), that, once ``too much'' tabs have been opened, Firefox/Iceweasel becomes sluggish, slower and slower, and often stalls after some time. I also noticed that, when becoming more and more sluggish, it takes more

Re: Is Firefox/Iceweasel leaking?

On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:58:26 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote: I noticed on many computers with Debian, whatever the kernel (2.6.xx, xx = 26), that, once ``too much'' tabs have been opened, Firefox/Iceweasel becomes sluggish, slower and slower, and often stalls after some time. I also noticed

Re: Is Firefox/Iceweasel leaking?

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:58, Merciadri Luca luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be wrote: Hi, I noticed on many computers with Debian, whatever the kernel (2.6.xx, xx = 26), that, once ``too much'' tabs have been opened, Firefox/Iceweasel becomes sluggish, slower and slower, and often stalls after

Re: Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

Dennis Wicks wrote: Thanks for that tip, but what is the secret incantation needed to figure out which add-on is causing the problem? I don't think there is one. You can run iceweasel through strace and try to find a solution from the output. You can also try installing iceweasel-dbg and get

Re: Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

Ron Johnson wrote: On 12/23/08 17:32, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Dennis Wicks wrote: Greetings; Everytime, which is often, Iceweasel crashes it runs Bug Buddy but B-B doesn't know where to send the dump, etc. snip My iceweasel [1] never crashes. It's your addons. [1] Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U;

Re: Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

On 12/24/08 06:17, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 12/23/08 17:32, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Dennis Wicks wrote: Greetings; Everytime, which is often, Iceweasel crashes it runs Bug Buddy but B-B doesn't know where to send the dump, etc. snip My iceweasel [1] never crashes. It's

Re: Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

On 12/23/08 17:32, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Dennis Wicks wrote: Greetings; Every time, which is often, Iceweasel crashes it runs Bug Buddy but B-B doesn't know where to send the dump, etc. snip My iceweasel [1] never crashes. It's your addons. Thanks for that tip, but what is the secret

Re: Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 14:27:50 -0600, Dennis Wicks (w...@mgssub.com) wrote: Thanks for that tip, but what is the secret incantation needed to figure out which add-on is causing the problem? If Iceweasel crashed withing a minute or two after starting it would be relatively easy, but it

Re: Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

Bob Cox wrote the following on 12/24/2008 02:46 PM: On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 14:27:50 -0600, Dennis Wicks (w...@mgssub.com) wrote: Thanks for that tip, but what is the secret incantation needed to figure out which add-on is causing the problem? If Iceweasel crashed withing a minute or two

Re: Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

Dennis Wicks wrote: Greetings; Everytime, which is often, Iceweasel crashes it runs Bug Buddy but B-B doesn't know where to send the dump, etc. snip My iceweasel [1] never crashes. It's your addons. [1] Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092816 Iceweasel/3.0.4

Re: Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

On 12/23/08 17:32, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Dennis Wicks wrote: Greetings; Everytime, which is often, Iceweasel crashes it runs Bug Buddy but B-B doesn't know where to send the dump, etc. snip My iceweasel [1] never crashes. It's your addons. [1] Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;

Bug Buddy doesn'r know about firefox/iceweasel

Greetings; Everytime, which is often, Iceweasel crashes it runs Bug Buddy but B-B doesn't know where to send the dump, etc. Anybody else seeing this? What do you do with the report? What do you do about Iceweasel crashing? The application firefox-bin has crashed. Information about the

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 18:26:57 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I'm wondering if it has something to do with the socket selection at the server end. Normally TCP will listen on port 80 and if a connection is requested it picks an ephemeral (unused, vacant, high

Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

Hi there, If I click on the following URLs: * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4628view=rev * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4627view=rev I can get a 404 error on the second one, however if I copy/paste them directly in the URL bar, both appears to be working fine. I can

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Could someone please try and report ? Windows XP Pro SP3, Firefox 3.0.3 The first link usually works, not always though. The second one is just the opposite, it usually doesn't work but sometimes it does. Random generator? -- Juha Tuuna -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Brad Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:05:17 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Mathieu, * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4628view=rev * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4627view=rev I can get a

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:05:17 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Mathieu, * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4628view=rev * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4627view=rev I can get a 404 error on the second one, however if I copy/paste them directly in

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:14:03 +0300, Juha Tuuna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Could someone please try and report ? Windows XP Pro SP3, Firefox 3.0.3 The first link usually works, not always though. The second one is just the opposite, it usually doesn't work

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Hi there, If I click on the following URLs: * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4628view=rev ii iceweasel 3.0.1-1 OK * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4627view=rev Not Found. Hugo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

Both work fine from here five times in a row. Iceweasel 3.0.1 on Debian/Sid. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

On 10/17/08 03:14, Juha Tuuna wrote: Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Could someone please try and report ? Windows XP Pro SP3, Firefox 3.0.3 The first link usually works, not always though. The second one is just the opposite, it usually doesn't work but sometimes it does. Random generator?

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:05:17 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, If I click on the following URLs: * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4628view=rev * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4627view=rev I can get a 404 error on the second one,

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

Brad Rogers wrote: On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:05:17 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Mathieu, * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4628view=rev * http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/gdcm/?rev=4627view=rev I can get a 404 error on the second one, however if I

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

John Hasler wrote: Both work fine from here five times in a row. Iceweasel 3.0.1 on Debian/Sid. No problem here with iceweasel-3.0.3 Lenny -- mess-mate May you do Good Magic with Perl. -- Larry Wall's blessing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:27:48 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Mathieu, ok, at least I am not going nuts :) :-) After Marc Shapiro replied, I realised that my one shot test was probably not good enough so, like him, I tried several more times. More often than not, I got

Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel)

Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Issue with URL and firefox (iceweasel) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:12:58 +0100 On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:27:48 +0200 Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Mathieu, ok, at least I am

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my case, a reboot was required to load the new versions of about a dozen libraries. (Killing and restarting X did not do it.) Once I did that, weird rendering problems in Gecko went away. It can't hurt. You don't have to reboot to restart the X

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:30:54AM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my case, a reboot was required to load the new versions of about a dozen libraries. (Killing and restarting X did not do it.) Once I did that, weird rendering problems in Gecko went away.

Re: Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Jim McCloskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly slow---10-12 seconds between clicking `Bookmarks' in the Toolbar

Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly slow---10-12 seconds between clicking `Bookmarks' in the Toolbar and the display of the menu. Scrolling through: http://lists.debian.org/debian

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 00:24:33 -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote: An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly slow---10-12 seconds between clicking `Bookmarks' in the Toolbar and the display

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

Florian Kulzer wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 00:24:33 -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote: An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly slow---10-12 seconds between clicking `Bookmarks' in the Toolbar

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/08 09:46, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Florian Kulzer wrote: [snip] I suspect that this might have something to do with your video driver and the acceleration method that is used. Please post the output of these two commands: grep -B1 -A4

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

Jim McCloskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly slow---10-12 seconds between clicking `Bookmarks' in the Toolbar and the display of the menu. Scrolling

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:24:33AM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote: An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly slow---10-12 seconds between clicking `Bookmarks' in the Toolbar and the display

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/08 11:44, Carl Fink wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:24:33AM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote: An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Jim McCloskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly slow---10-12 seconds between clicking `Bookmarks' in the Toolbar

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:59:22 -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: Jim McCloskey writes: An upgrade to testing this afternoon unexpectedly brought me Firefox/Iceweasel 3.0, which was fairly exciting. Here, though, it is just agonizingly slow---10-12 seconds between clicking `Bookmarks

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, our mini-survey so far: nvidia driver using nvidia's RenderAccel: fine (Hugo, Ron) radeon driver with XAA: fine (Bill) My experience with Intel 82Q963/Q965 and the Xorg intel driver: with EXA: not as bad as what

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

Ron Johnson wrote: Most of you will yawn, and think, there he goes again, but this why I don't like display managers. Can you elaborate? With a display manager one cannot kill X to make new changes, like the aforementioned libraries, to take effect? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/08 12:44, Florian Kulzer wrote: [snip] OK, our mini-survey so far: nvidia driver using nvidia's RenderAccel: fine (Hugo, Ron) Actually, I do *not* have RenderAccel enabled. $ grep 'Accel\|XAA\|EXA' /var/log/Xorg.0.log (II) NVIDIA(0):

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/08 13:01, Nick Lidakis wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: Most of you will yawn, and think, there he goes again, but this why I don't like display managers. Can you elaborate? With a display manager one cannot kill X to make new changes,

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

* Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008 Jul 20 13:02 -0500]: On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:59:22 -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: Nope. $ grep -B1 -A4 'drivers/' /var/log/Xorg.0.log (II) LoadModule: radeon [...] (==) RADEON(0): Using XAA acceleration architecture (II)

Re: Firefox/Iceweasel 3: agony of the snail

* Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008 Jul 20 14:20 -0500]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/08 13:01, Nick Lidakis wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: Most of you will yawn, and think, there he goes again, but this why I don't like display managers. Can you

iceweasel 3 font size (was: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?)

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 18:38:08 -0700, Paul Scott wrote: [...] That page looks fine here on IW3 but it still renders fonts too large on some other sites. What do you mean by too large - larger than in iceweasel 2, or did you really check the absolute font size? Which sites are we talking

Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

I have 3.0~rc2-2 on my Testing system. This page: http://savethecracker.blogspot.com/ among others comes out as repetitive 1-inch graphical segments of various parts of the page jumbled together. It's apparently a Gecko problem, because Epiphany does the same thing now that I've got Iceweasel

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 3.0~rc2-2 on my Testing system. This page: http://savethecracker.blogspot.com/ among others comes out as repetitive 1-inch graphical segments of various parts of the page jumbled together. It's apparently a Gecko

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

Carl Fink wrote: I have 3.0~rc2-2 on my Testing system. This page: http://savethecracker.blogspot.com/ among others comes out as repetitive 1-inch graphical segments of various parts of the page jumbled together. It's apparently a Gecko problem, because Epiphany does the same thing now that

RE: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

-Original Message- From: Carl Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 8:05 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly? I have 3.0~rc2-2 on my Testing system. This page: http://savethecracker.blogspot.com

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

Carl Fink wrote: I have 3.0~rc2-2 on my Testing system. This page: http://savethecracker.blogspot.com/ among others comes out as repetitive 1-inch graphical segments of various parts of the page jumbled together. It's apparently a Gecko problem, because Epiphany does the same thing now that

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) despite installing several upgrades? -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Read my blog at

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/08 09:25, Carl Fink wrote: OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) despite installing several

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:25:35 -0400, Carl Fink wrote: OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? Epiphany is also based on the Gecko rendering engine, isn't it? If you use an Intel integrated graphics card with XAA

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

The Friday 18 July 2008 18:07:41 Florian Kulzer, you wrote : On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:25:35 -0400, Carl Fink wrote: OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? Epiphany is also based on the Gecko rendering engine, isn't it?

checkrestart (was Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/08 11:50, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: The Friday 18 July 2008 18:07:41 Florian Kulzer, you wrote : [snip] as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The checkrestart command from debian-goodies is supposed to do

Re: checkrestart (was Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?)

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:20:34 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On 07/18/08 11:50, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: The Friday 18 July 2008 18:07:41 Florian Kulzer, you wrote : [snip] as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The checkrestart command from debian-goodies is

Re: checkrestart (was Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/08 15:12, Florian Kulzer wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:20:34 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On 07/18/08 11:50, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: The Friday 18 July 2008 18:07:41 Florian Kulzer, you wrote : [snip] as root. This should list all

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 06:07:41PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:25:35 -0400, Carl Fink wrote: OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? Epiphany is also based on the Gecko rendering engine, isn't

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

Carl Fink wrote: OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) despite installing several upgrades? That page looks fine here on IW3 but it still renders fonts

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

Carl Fink wrote: as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The checkrestart command from debian-goodies is supposed to do the same thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment (see bug #491235). There were lots, and restarting X didn't

Re: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 06:40:31PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote: Carl Fink wrote: as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The checkrestart command from debian-goodies is supposed to do the same thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment

Re: son dans firefox (iceweasel)

Remys Morrissette wrote: Remys Morrissette wrote: Essais-de brancher tes écouteurs, haut-parleur, dans l'autre sortie lors de l'écoute de la dites vidéo. mess-mate a écrit : Merci mais j'ai qu'une carte son en PCI donc pas de module sur la carte mère. C'est bizarre que le problème vient

Re: son dans firefox (iceweasel)

mess-mate a écrit : j'ai des machines toutes avec la 'etch' installé ainsi que les mêmes plugins dans iceweasel, mais je n'arrive pas à avoir du son avec une de ces machines. Je précise que ce n'est que dans iceweasel que le son ne marche pas lors d'une vidéo sur le net. Resalut, Est-ce

son dans firefox (iceweasel)

Bonjour, j'ai des machines toutes avec la 'etch' installé ainsi que les mêmes plugins dans iceweasel, mais je n'arrive pas à avoir du son avec une de ces machines. Voici les plugins installés : flashplayer.xptlibtotem-basic-plugin.so mozplugger.so nphelix.so

Re: son dans firefox (iceweasel)

mess-mate a écrit : Je précise que ce n'est que dans iceweasel que le son ne marche pas lors d'une vidéo sur le net.Bonjour, Salut une piste peut-être (?) ... (car j'ai déjà eu un problème semblable.) As-tu 2 cartes de son, une externe (pci ou autre) et une intégrée sur ta carte mère ?

Re: son dans firefox (iceweasel)

Le samedi 23 février 2008 16:25, mess-mate a écrit : Bonjour, j'ai des machines toutes avec la 'etch' installé ainsi que les mêmes plugins dans iceweasel, mais je n'arrive pas à avoir du son avec une de ces machines. $ cat /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc # which /dev/dsp wrapper to use

Re: son dans firefox (iceweasel)

Bulot Grégory wrote: Le samedi 23 février 2008 16:25, mess-mate a écrit : Bonjour, j'ai des machines toutes avec la 'etch' installé ainsi que les mêmes plugins dans iceweasel, mais je n'arrive pas à avoir du son avec une de ces machines. $ cat /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc # which

Re: son dans firefox (iceweasel)

Remys Morrissette wrote: mess-mate a écrit : Je précise que ce n'est que dans iceweasel que le son ne marche pas lors d'une vidéo sur le net.Bonjour, Salut une piste peut-être (?) ... (car j'ai déjà eu un problème semblable.) As-tu 2 cartes de son, une externe (pci ou autre) et une

  1   2   >