||
|| There is only 1 program which provides cc
|| (/usr/bin/gcc). Nothing to configure.
|| #
||
||
|| la cuestión es que al hacer apt-cache search gcc aparecen, entre otros
||
|| gcc-2.95 - The GNU C compiler
|| gcc-2.95-doc - Documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc
arkadalar meraba,
dn anakartn ethernet ve ses kartlar iin nvidia'nn nforce
srcsnn ihtiyac olan hereyi kurdum, srcnn kurulumu devam
ederken yle bir hata aldm.
./nvsound/main/conftest.sh: line 9: cc: command not found
Could not compile gcc-version-check.c
byle olunca haliyle devam etmedi. src
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 10:50 +0200, Azer Demir wrote:
yalnz bunlar grdkten gcc ve cc'yi de bir altmak istedim. ve
ikisi de bulunamad. command not found hatas aldm. bunun anlam
ne? gcc paketi ykl, ama nasl komut satrndan gcc yada cc yaznca
komut bulunamad hatas alyorum?
apt-get install build
hola gente de la lista!
estoy intentando instalar una webcamlogitech, y he encontrado unos drivers.
el instalador es un .sh que me dice que el gcc con el que se compiló el kernel
y el actual no cpinciden, por lo que la cosa no puede funcionar. de modo que
necesito instalar el gcc versión 3.3.2
El Jueves, 17 de Marzo de 2005 18:32, Emilio escribió:
|| si hago apt-get install y le doy al tabulador me salen varias opciones, y
Qué curioso, a mí esto no me ocurre, pensaba que lo del tabulador sólo servía
con archivos locales.
|| sólo en una en la que sólo pone gcc (en las demás sale gcc
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Santiago Vila wrote:
Para usar gcc-3.4 en Debian, simplemente instala el paquete gcc-3.4,
pon CC=gcc-3.4 en tus Makefiles y luego usa $(CC) como compilador.
Disculpame pero la verdad que no entendi muy bien lo que me dijiste
El vie, 11-03-2005 a las 22:03 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola lista!!!
Tengo un pequeño problema, que por mi parte no pude solucionar, asi que
como ultimo recurso me vi obligado a preguntar.
Tengo Debian sid, con gcc-3.3. Me quiero mudar a uno mas actual porque
voy a instalar un par
] escribió:
Hola lista!!!
Tengo un pequeño problema, que por mi parte no pude solucionar, asi que
como ultimo recurso me vi obligado a preguntar.
Tengo Debian sid, con gcc-3.3. Me quiero mudar a uno mas actual porque
voy a instalar un par de cosas que dependen del nuevo.
El problema es que
Tengo mas problemas :(
Estuve intentando leer el info make, pero debido a qe esta en ingles es
casi y nada lo que esntendi. Buscando en internet encontre una pagina que
me decia mas o menos como tenia que tener mi Makefile, per tbm estaba en
ingles y no entendi demasiado, lo que me fije es
exactamente el mensaje de error que te da, no solamente no podremos
ayudarte, sino que estaremos todos perdiendo el tiempo.
Así que por favor, aprende a preguntar.
Una cosa que no entiendo, por ejemplo, es por qué alguien que no sabe
escribir un Makefile parece estar muy seguro de que gcc-3.3 no le
tiempo.
Así que por favor, aprende a preguntar.
Una cosa que no entiendo, por ejemplo, es por qué alguien que no sabe
escribir un Makefile parece estar muy seguro de que gcc-3.3 no le
sirve y necesita gcc-3.4. ¿Nos podrías explicar esto para empezar?
Te cuento:
Que no se editar un Makefile es
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Estoy seguro que tengo que cambiar de gcc porque quiero instalar un juego,
(glest), que me lo pide, sólo por eso quiero cambiar mi gcc.
Por curiosidad, ¿cómo te lo pide? ¿puedes poner el mensaje exacto?
No me tira ningun error, solo es que no se
Por curiosidad, ¿cómo te lo pide? ¿puedes poner el mensaje exacto?
Error: You gcc version is too old. netpanzer needs at least gcc 3.2.0.
Si no da ningún error, ¿por qué sabes que no funciona?
No, no es que no funciona, es que no se como hacerlo andar, es cuestion de
ignorancia. (anda
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Por curiosidad, ¿cómo te lo pide? ¿puedes poner el mensaje exacto?
Error: You gcc version is too old. netpanzer needs at least gcc 3.2.0.
Ahí no dice en ningún momento que necesites gcc 3.4.
Dice que necesitas al menos gcc 3.2.0, pero es que el
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Santiago Vila wrote:
Vale, vas a necesitar al menos los siguientes paquetes:
libvorbis-dev
libogg-dev
jam
libxerces26-dev
libsdl1.2-dev
libopenal-dev
Si no es suficiente, intenta averiguar qué paquete necesitas con ayuda
del readme.txt que viene con el programa y
Mando este mail para avisar que el problema ya esta solucionado :D:D:D:D
Al final lei el readme.txt pero no decia mucho, asiq instale las lib que
me dijiste y funciono!!
Muchisimas gracias, no se como decirte lo mucho que te agradezco.
PD: el juego tiene pinta de ser buenisimo, se esta compilando
Hola lista!!!
Tengo un pequeño problema, que por mi parte no pude solucionar, asi que
como ultimo recurso me vi obligado a preguntar.
Tengo Debian sid, con gcc-3.3. Me quiero mudar a uno mas actual porque
voy a instalar un par de cosas que dependen del nuevo.
El problema es que no se como. Estube
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tengo un pequeño problema, que por mi parte no pude solucionar, asi que
como ultimo recurso me vi obligado a preguntar.
Tengo Debian sid, con gcc-3.3. Me quiero mudar a uno mas actual porque
voy a instalar un par de cosas que dependen del nuevo
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Santiago Vila wrote:
.
Para usar gcc-3.4 en Debian, simplemente instala el paquete gcc-3.4,
pon CC=gcc-3.4 en tus Makefiles y luego usa $(CC) como compilador.
Disculpame pero la verdad que no entendi muy bien lo que me dijiste.
Podrias decirme bien como son los dos
Kör Debian testing och installerade gcc 3.3.5 för ett tag sedan men gcc3
verkar bara föra med sig en del problem så jag undrar om det finns nått
sätt att nergradera till 2.x igen?
Hallo zusammen,
hab mal wieder eine ausgefallene Frage: Gibt es irgendwo ein
(verstaendliches) Howto, wie man den gcc als Crosscomplier bauen kann?
Folgendes Problem: ich habe einen gcc als Crosscompiler, der allerdings
unter Windows laeuft und bei einer Entwicklungsumgebung dabei war. Der
Jan Kesten schrieb:
So, nun die Frage(n): Was brauche ich, damit ich gcc dazu ueberreden
kann, Programme fuer eine andere Architektur zu uebersetzen? Und wie
uebersetzt man dafuer den gcc und die binutils? Bin schon eine Weile
am probieren, aber den Durchbruch hatte ich noch nicht *g* Und es
On 24.Feb 2005 - 11:34:45, Marc Meyer wrote:
Jan Kesten schrieb:
So, nun die Frage(n): Was brauche ich, damit ich gcc dazu ueberreden
kann, Programme fuer eine andere Architektur zu uebersetzen? Und wie
uebersetzt man dafuer den gcc und die binutils? Bin schon eine Weile
am probieren
ja hallo erstmal,..
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 08:46:17AM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
Hallo zusammen,
hab mal wieder eine ausgefallene Frage: Gibt es irgendwo ein
(verstaendliches) Howto, wie man den gcc als Crosscomplier bauen kann?
Folgendes Problem: ich habe einen gcc als Crosscompiler, der
Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
On 24.Feb 2005 - 11:34:45, Marc Meyer wrote:
Du möchtest nochmal nachlesen was Cross-Compiling bedeutet. distcc ist
Distributed Compiling.
Andreas
Jo, I mixed it up, sorry ;O/
Aber vielleicht hilft des (mit Gruß von einem Ex - Debianer):
und wurde bisher mit einem
mitgelieferten gcc (2.7) bersetzt. Alles unter Windows - aber ohne
Quellen fr den gcc etc. Die Touchpanel benutzen einen SuperH Prozessor
und das ist schon eine andere Architektur (sh3) :-)
Ich mchte also mir einen gcc bauen, mit dem ich die vorhandenen
C-Quelltexte fr
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:00:10 +0100
Jan Kesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ich möchte also mir einen gcc bauen, mit dem ich die vorhandenen
C-Quelltexte für die Software des Touchpanels übersetzen und Linken
kann - aber die Ausgaben sollen halt eben nicht auf die x86
Architektur passen sondern
Moin,
ich sehe folgende Zeilen in der Ausgabe von memtest:
57980k: PID 638 (/lib/libgcc_s.so.1)
222520k: PID 893 (/lib/libgcc_s.so.1)
222520k: PID 895 (/usr/lib/libtasn1.so.2.0.10)
Das ist ein halbes Gig für Prozesse, die für mich danach aussehen, nur
bei der Entwicklung von Software
1. Welches Quellpaket versuchst du zu übersetzen: das von ATI oder die
Stanchina-Pakete [1]?
Ich benutze die Sourcen von 2.6.10 (Kernel.org) und das ATI Paket von
der ATI-Homepage mit pci_get_class/pci_find_class replace und ein
Nitro Patch. [1] kannte ich noch nicht.
2. Mit welcher GCC
Nitro Patch. [1] kannte ich noch nicht.
Probiere es mal mit [1]. Die Pakete sind ziemlich gut und haben
gegenüber dem originalen ATI-Treiber-Paket einige Vorteile.
BTW: Wofür ist eigentlich der Nitro Patch gut?
2. Mit welcher GCC-Version hast du deinen Kernel gebaut? Die
GCC-Version, mit der
Stanchina-Pakete
enthalten AFAIK ein gepatchtes Makefile. Evtl. kannst du dir eine Lösung
abschauen.
Ja, so ist es. Ich kann die Pakete wegen QT Ärger nicht übersetzen.
Aber aus dem Makefile wird:
GCC_VER_MAJ = $(shell gcc --version | head -n 1 | sed -e
's/[^0-9. ]//g;s/^ *//;s/^\(.\)\..*$$/\1
Hallo, Liste !
Ich habe auf meinem Rechner mehrere Pakete erneuert. Dabei war auch
gcc. Nun konnte ich aber nicht mehr den ATI Treiber übersetzen. Um das
Problem einzukreisen habe ich meine Installation mit einem 2. Rechner,
auf dem die Übersetzung geht, überprüft und folgendes festgestellt:
1
Am Sonntag, den 16.01.2005, 19:24 +0100 schrieb Klaus Kocher:
Ich habe auf meinem Rechner mehrere Pakete erneuert. Dabei war auch
gcc. Nun konnte ich aber nicht mehr den ATI Treiber übersetzen. Um das
Problem einzukreisen habe ich meine Installation mit einem 2. Rechner,
auf dem die
I posted a little while ago a message here, Kernel Compilation error,
because I was facing difficulties with re-compiling correctly my kernel.
It seems that gcc is the cause of my problems. It ends with a segmentation
fault, always, even the simple command 'gcc -v' gives me :
Reading specs
Yes Rem, everything is working fine, except gcc... I don't get it... I'm
using sid yes...
_
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 the mental interface of
Alex Papadopoulos told:
[...]
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.8.1/specs
^
Segmentation fault
It seems, that you are using gcc-2.8.1. A proper dir for 3.3 must
look like /usr/lib/gcc
I reinstalled gcc but it didn't work. I changed myself the link to
/usr/bin/gcc-3.3 still segfault.
But you're right :)
I linked /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.8.1 to
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5 and it worked !
Now what I need to know is WHY does my gcc try to access 2.8.1 and not
3.3.5
Ok, two friends of mine tried 'gcc -v'. They have the exact same error. The
funny thing is that one of them seems to have a functionnal gcc (he managed
to compile shfs module, I couldn't (that's why I found out of this bug))..
Anyway, I'm sending a mail to the package maintainer
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 9:18 pm, Rem wrote:
Hi;
Is your computer overclocked ?
No. It is running at 350MHz as it is designed to. Also, gcc works fine on my
Fedora Core 1 installation on the same computer so I very much doubt that
this is a hardware problem.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +1300
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:19 pm, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +1300, Andrew Walbran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I
am unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program
gives
Le 05/01/05 à 16:43, Frédéric Bothamy écrivait:
Visiblement la compilation se passe bien, donc gcc n'est pas en cause.
Par contre, le problème vient de là :
/usr/bin/install -c -d /etc/eagle-usb/dsp \
/usr/bin/install -c -m 0664 dsp_code_pots.bin /etc/eagle-usb/dsp
/usr/bin/install: ne
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:20:35 +1300, Andrew Walbran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I am
unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program gives a
number of 'undefined reference' errors:
$ cat test.c
int
kompilieren geht nicht aus selbigem
grund.
nachdem ich auf der suche nach einem precompiled gcc oder
dhcp-relayjetzt zweieinhalb stunden googlen und manpages lesen hinter
mir habe, gebe ich für heute auf und frage, ob jemand von euch hier für
sowas einen tipp hat
vielen dank im voraus
precompiled gcc
apt-get install gcc?
Natürlich musst du dann hinterher remastern...
Andreas
--
You would if you could but you can't so you won't.
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL
usb
2.0 (qui marche avec ma suse, ma mandrake et debian sarge sur un vieil
ordi) mais à la fin du ./configure il me dit :
note: current gcc should be the same version as the one used to compile
kernel.
je continue, jusqu'au make ou là il me sort une erreur:
debian:/opt/eagle-usb
Hi
I have recently started using Debian GNU / Linux, and have found that I am
unable to compile anything with GCC. Compiling even a trivial program gives a
number of 'undefined reference' errors:
$ cat test.c
int main() {
return 0;
}
$ gcc test.c
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
[EMAIL
sarge sur un vieil
ordi) mais à la fin du ./configure il me dit :
note: current gcc should be the same version as the one used to compile
kernel.
je continue, jusqu'au make ou là il me sort une erreur:
debian:/opt/eagle-usb-2.0.0# make install
make -C driver install \
make -C pppoa install
2.0 (qui marche avec ma suse, ma mandrake et debian sarge sur un vieil
ordi) mais à la fin du ./configure il me dit :
note: current gcc should be the same version as the one used to compile
kernel.
je continue, jusqu'au make ou là il me sort une erreur:
debian:/opt/eagle-usb-2.0.0# make
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o hello hello.c
hello.c:1:19: stdio.h: No such file or directory
If one package (namely: gcc-3.3) recommends another package (namely:
libc6-dev), you probably should install second together with the first
unless you have seriuos reasons not to do so :).
If you
David Purton wrote:
Usually development headers and import libraries are not installed by
default. You want libc6-dev.
dc
Thanks for all the help. libc6-dev wasn't installed.
I've used potato, woody, and sarge forever, and I
never had to install libc6-dev by hand. I guess it
is part of the base
I just installed the latest amd64 netboot on my Sun
SunFire V20z, and I tried to compile a simple C program:
#include stdio.h
int main(void)
{
printf(Hello World!\n);
return (0);
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o hello hello.c
hello.c:1:19: stdio.h: No such file or directory
I have
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:22:33PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
I just installed the latest amd64 netboot on my Sun
SunFire V20z, and I tried to compile a simple C program:
#include stdio.h
int main(void)
{
printf(Hello World!\n);
return (0);
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:22:33PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o hello hello.c
hello.c:1:19: stdio.h: No such file or directory
install build-essential, and devscripts if you want to be able to
build debian packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Dec 23 2004, Michael Madden wrote:
#include stdio.h
int main(void)
{
printf(Hello World!\n);
return (0);
The parentheses here are superfluous. The return word in C is a command,
not a function.
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o hello hello.c
hello.c:1:19: stdio.h: No such file
Olá pessoal,
Tenho uma dúvida quanto ao gcc... quando é instalado o gcc o c++ já vem
junto na instalação?
Alguém já teve algum problema abaixo utilizando o gcc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Clonal$ gcc -O3 Clonal-fitness.cpp -o teste -lm
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Fernando Sato wrote:
Olá pessoal,
Tenho uma dúvida quanto ao gcc... quando é instalado o gcc o c++ já vem
junto na instalação?
não. Você deve instalar o g++
O programa está escrito em c++ porém no man gcc diz que ele compila c
++. Já ouvi dizer que o c
Em Sex, 2004-12-17 às 11:02 -0200, Thadeu Penna escreveu:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Fernando Sato wrote:
Olá pessoal,
Tenho uma dúvida quanto ao gcc... quando é instalado o gcc o c++ já vem
junto na instalação?
não. Você deve instalar o g++
OK!
O programa está escrito
Seguinte, para compilar códigos em C++ você precisa do
G++.
O GCC compila C, e o G++ que é uma extensão do GCC
para compilar C++.
flw,
Condector
--- Fernando Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Olá pessoal,
Tenho uma dúvida quanto ao gcc... quando é
instalado o gcc o c++ já vem
Fernando Sato wrote:
O g++ é o compilador c++ para o nosso debian?
Na verdade g++ é o gcc, porém já com as opções para compilação em c++
passadas para o gcc, ou seja, é um atalho para compilar em c++ com o gcc.
Abraços.
--
jupercio juliano
Jabber: jupercio at jabber.org
Debian-BR
Hello,
We sent you an email a while ago, because you now qualify for a new mortgage.
You could get $300,000 for as little as $600 a month!
Bad credit is no problem, you can pull cash out or refinance.
Please click on this link for free consultation by a mortgage broker:
Start Saving Here
Best
All
Estou tentando intalar o vmware e chega em uma etapada da instalacao
que esta acontecendo uma incompatibilidade entre a versao do gcc e a do
kernel, vide abaixo. Por acaso alguem saberia me dizer como eh que eu
posso resolver esse problema ?!?!?
Using compiler /usr/bin/gcc. Use
Em Ter, 2004-12-14 às 00:07 -0200, Caio Abreu Ferreira escreveu:
All
Estou tentando intalar o vmware e chega em uma etapada da instalacao
que esta acontecendo uma incompatibilidade entre a versao do gcc e a do
kernel, vide abaixo. Por acaso alguem saberia me dizer como eh que
Olá pessoal,
No meu debian sarge quanto tento compilar um programa em c assi:
gcc -o exemplo.c ele dá a menssagem no input file como se o
programa não existisse, o que está falatando? será que é algun
pacote?
obrigado
welington
Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima wrote:
Olá pessoal,
No meu debian sarge quanto tento compilar um programa em c assi:
gcc -o exemplo.c ele dá a menssagem no input file como se o
programa não existisse, o que está falatando? será que é algun
pacote?
obrigado
welington
Quando você
Hi all,
I have a Athlon XP 1400 box. And after installing Debian, i find i
can never successfully compile the new kernel, there are always
internal compile error reported by gcc.
Following is the ouput from gcc -v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lian Liming wrote:
| Hi all,
| I have a Athlon XP 1400 box. And after installing Debian, i find i
| can never successfully compile the new kernel, there are always
| internal compile error reported by gcc.
I believe I had the same problem
PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lian Liming wrote:
| Hi all,
| I have a Athlon XP 1400 box. And after installing Debian, i find i
| can never successfully compile the new kernel, there are always
| internal compile error reported by gcc.
I believe I had the same problem. To successfully compile
the nVidia
kernel-patch with _the_same_version_ of gcc that was used to
compile my
kernel. I'm using kernel-image-2.4.26, and the nVidia installer
reports
this was built with
gcc-3.2.
You surely refer to the official nvidia driver. Why not just try to
install the precompiled nvidia module
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mon but de est compiler noyau + Apache pour que celui-ci soit le plus
rapide possible pour un Pentium IV.
Même avec les options
CFLAGS=-march=pentium3 -mcpu=pentium4 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
de gcc je ne trouve pas de gain.
Si je comprend
beaucoup. A moins que certaines options Gcc soit plus performmantes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mon but de est compiler noyau + Apache pour que celui-ci soit le plus
rapide possible pour un Pentium IV.
Même avec les options
CFLAGS=-march=pentium3 -mcpu=pentium4 -O3 -pipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
La machine est un bi-pross Xeon, avec 2Go de RAM sur des disques SCSI.
La carte Ethernet est une gigabit, niveau matériel ca devrait aller.
Cela ne veut rien dire... *tout* le réseau est en gigabit ? C'est
toujours le maillon le plus faible qui est le plus bloquant...
Je sais que je vais peut-être dépenser bcp d'énergie pour rien, c'est
pour cela que je me renseigne et que je fais des tests.
Le nombre de requêtes est actuellement vers 2000/s, je désire le passer
vers 4000.
La carte est eth est en Gigabit.
Je vais après améliorer les perfs réseaux à
mailing == mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] net [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mailing Je sais que je vais peut-être dépenser bcp d'énergie pour
mailing rien, c'est pour cela que je me renseigne et que je fais
mailing des tests.
mailing Le nombre de requêtes est actuellement vers 2000/s, je
Bonjour à tous,
Quelqun a t'il essayé de compiler avec le compilateur Intel?
Est-ce plus performants par rapport à Gcc si oui de combien?
Je sais qu'il est possible de compiler le noyau 2.6.9 avec Icc sans
Patch quelqun a t'il un retour à ce sujet.
Merci.
Merci rixed, le problème de license c'est à voir également.
Mon but de est compiler noyau + Apache pour que celui-ci soit le plus
rapide possible pour un Pentium IV.
Même avec les options
CFLAGS=-march=pentium3 -mcpu=pentium4 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
de gcc je ne trouve pas de gain
-frame-pointer
| de gcc je ne trouve pas de gain.
Il est totalement décommandé de compiler le noyau avec un autre
compilo que gcc (dixit la doc du répertoire Documentation/) : en
effet, le noyau est codé dans l'optique d'une compilation avec
gcc. Avec ses qualités et
Le 24.11.04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
| Bonjour à tous,
Bonjour,
| Quelqun a t'il essayé de compiler avec le compilateur Intel?
Ah non.
| Est-ce plus performants par rapport à Gcc si oui de combien?
Aucune idée : il ne compile pas pour sparc :)
| Merci
40% avec un proc
AMD ... et oui en fait c'est plus utile d'utiliser le
compilo Intel quand on a un proc AMD...
Ah non.
| Est-ce plus performants par rapport à Gcc si oui de
combien?
J'ai marqué 2 lignes plus haut, mais bon il faut savoir que
même si GCC est bien, mais ICC reste LA référence en
with _the_same_version_ of gcc that was used to
compile my
kernel. I'm using kernel-image-2.4.26, and the nVidia installer
reports
this was built with
gcc-3.2.
You surely refer to the official nvidia driver. Why not just try to
install the precompiled nvidia module provided in non-free. I am
After five months of struggling ( I had connectivity very briefly before
an upgrade make my whole installation useless and sent me back to the
CD's ), it appears that I need to be able to build the nVidia
kernel-patch with _the_same_version_ of gcc that was used to compile my
kernel. I'm
), it appears that I need to be able to build the nVidia
kernel-patch with _the_same_version_ of gcc that was used to compile my
kernel. I'm using kernel-image-2.4.26, and the nVidia installer reports
this was built with
gcc-3.2.
OK, I go to install gcc-3.2. Including the Fortran, which I
to the
CD's ), it appears that I need to be able to build the nVidia
kernel-patch with _the_same_version_ of gcc that was used to compile my
kernel. I'm using kernel-image-2.4.26, and the nVidia installer reports
this was built with
gcc-3.2.
OK, I go to install gcc-3.2. Including the Fortran, which I
(though i did add an extra version tag), so
the config file is essentially as it was.
after booting with the new kernel, gcc seems to sporadically give
internal compiler error: segmentation fault errors. i've tried going
up to gcc-3.4 but that doesn't change anything. the problem is most
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 08:10 -0600, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:35 -0500, homeless wrote:
[snip]
there *is* some bug with the 2.6.9 kernel. i can fully compile a 2.6.9
kernel while running a 2.6.8 kernel, but my machine crashes (really
badly too, power off and all, not even
is essentially as it was.
after booting with the new kernel, gcc seems to sporadically give
internal compiler error: segmentation fault errors. i've tried going
up to gcc-3.4 but that doesn't change anything. the problem is most
prevalent with kernel compilation.
system is debian unstable
relevant appeared (though i did add an extra version tag), so
the config file is essentially as it was.
after booting with the new kernel, gcc seems to sporadically give
internal compiler error: segmentation fault errors. i've tried going
up to gcc-3.4 but that doesn't change anything
implémenter et le gain en performance est d'un
autre ordre de grandeur.
Non effectivement puisque GCC gère aussi SSE2...
ICC doit mieux optimiser son code que GCC ce qui explique la
diffèrence.
Ce qui est curieux c'est de voir que le gain de performances du
copilateur Intel est plus important avec
se
limitent à l'utilisation de sse2, d'abord, parce que ça me paraît
assez trivial à implémenter et le gain en performance est d'un
autre ordre de grandeur.
Non effectivement puisque GCC gère aussi SSE2...
ICC doit mieux optimiser son code que GCC ce qui explique la
diffèrence.
Ce qui
se
limitent à l'utilisation de sse2, d'abord, parce que ça me paraît
assez trivial à implémenter et le gain en performance est d'un
autre ordre de grandeur.
Non effectivement puisque GCC gère aussi SSE2...
ICC doit mieux optimiser son code que GCC ce qui explique la
diffèrence.
Ce qui
selamlar
debian sarge/sid karisimi bir sistemim var.sistemde 2.6.3 , 2.6.7 ve
2.6.8 cekirdekler var.vmware konfigure etmeye calisirken bana kerneliniz
gcc 3.3.4 ile derlenmis ama sizde gcc 3.3.5 var ,yine de devam edeyimmi
diyor, ben de evet diyorum.
ancak ilerleyen asamalarda kerneliniz
Merhabalar.
Downgrade icin pin koymaniz gerekmektedir. Bunun icin
/etc/apt/preferences dosyasi olusturup
icine
Package: gcc-3.3
Pin: version 1:3.3.4-9
Pin-Priority: 1001
bunu ekle sonra update et ve paketi tekrar yukle
Kolay gelsin.
koray wrote:
selamlar
debian sarge/sid
A better option I found when having two version of gcc is this.
When two version are installed, gcc is a symbolic link to one of it.
So whenever you need to switch between the versions, simply change the
symbolic link to the specific compiler. That should work, atleast for
me on x86
I have 2 debian powerpc machines with testing and stable installed.
gcc-2.95.4 is installed on stable and gcc-3.3.4 on testing.
I want to compile with the same compiler on both so I installed gcc-2.95
on the testing machine.
i.e. I have 3.3.4 and 2.95.4 installed simulataneously.
Problem: I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Brendan Simon wrote:
I have 2 debian powerpc machines with testing and stable installed.
gcc-2.95.4 is installed on stable and gcc-3.3.4 on testing.
I want to compile with the same compiler on both so I installed gcc-2.95
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Brendan Simon wrote:
I have 2 debian powerpc machines with testing and stable installed.
gcc-2.95.4 is installed on stable and gcc-3.3.4 on testing.
I want to compile with the same compiler on both so I
Brendan Simon said on Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:11:49PM +1000:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Unfortunately this is not practicle on a multi user machine where
different users may want to use different versions of the compiler.
gcc is designed to have multiple versions installed and be able to call
cuando correo gcc #gcc -c archivo.c para compilar
me da error de stdio.h y y otros includes, no se instalan con la instalacion del
gcc.
como los instalo?
gracias
obrigado gente
eu dei uma lida, realmente não entendi muito... o que eu queria saber, que
não explica de uma forma mais detalhada, é porque tenho que dar um
./configure, make e make install... de todos acho que só tenho mais idéia do
que seja o make install
bom gente, deu outro pau, se vocês
oi lista
Gente, o gcc nunca dá certo quando eu preciso. Estou tentando compilar o
lufs(para poder acessar outras partições, preciso mesmo) e ele me retorna o
seguinte erro quando eu dou o ./configure :
supserservidor://root/firefox-downloads/lufs-0.9.7# ./configure
checking build system type
Tente instalar o build-essential.
Em Seg, 2004-09-20 às 19:27, Danilo Balarini escreveu:
oi lista
Gente, o gcc nunca dá certo quando eu preciso. Estou tentando compilar o
lufs(para poder acessar outras partições, preciso mesmo) e ele me retorna o
seguinte erro quando eu dou o ./configure
801 - 900 of 2377 matches
Mail list logo
