On 22.Mär 2005 - 23:47:05, Bernd Schwendele wrote:
Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
On 22.Mär 2005 - 20:51:04, Bernd Schwendele wrote:
Aha! Dann werde ich das mal Probieren... Nun die Geschwindigkeit ist das
eine, der Resourcenhunder das andere Problem. Jedoch, wer sagt mir, dass
der 2.2er nicht
Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
On 22.Mär 2005 - 20:51:04, Bernd Schwendele wrote:
Hallo Liste,
[...]
Hmm, Sarge hat KDE3.3.2, das hat eigentlich eine deutlich hoehere
Geschwindigkeit als KDE2.X. Jedenfalls hatte ich damit auf
meinem PIII/500 keine grossen Probleme, allerdings hab ich auch die
Gruesse!
* Bernd Schwendele [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [22.03.05 23:47]:
Aber ich wuerde bezweifeln wollen, dass XFCE4 keinen Desktop hat -
sonst waere der Name fuer xfdesktop4 doch ziemlich schlecht gewaehlt...
Naja, es zeigt mir ein Hindergrundbild...
Allerdings gibts wohl keine
Gruesse!
* Bernd Schwendele [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [22.03.05 23:47]:
Ich weiß, ich habe ihn bis vor kurzem auch gehabt. XFCE4 ist ne feine
Sache, könnte man eben nur noch Icons auf den Desktop machen...
Uups, bei meiner vorigen Mails sollte eigentlich noch die Paket-Quelle
für den xfce4
Am Dienstag, den 22.03.2005, 23:47 +0100 schrieb Bernd Schwendele:
Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
[..]
Aber ich wuerde bezweifeln wollen, dass XFCE4 keinen Desktop hat -
sonst waere der Name fuer xfdesktop4 doch ziemlich schlecht gewaehlt...
Naja, es zeigt mir ein Hindergrundbild...
Daniel González Gasull wrote:
Hi!
Yep, I know. This is a old flame war. But I don't
want your personal opinions. What I want is some
links about comparisons between GNOME and KDE.
Please send me some links about this comparisons.
And do not begin a flame war. Thank you in advance.
Ed Cogburn wrote:
Daniel González Gasull wrote:
What I want is some
links about comparisons between GNOME and KDE.
http://kitenet.net/~joey/pkg-comp/
Huh? Read the question again.
It's not about package formats.
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 01:59:00 +0200
Daniel González Gasull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, I know. This is a old flame war. But I don't
want your personal opinions. What I want is some
links about comparisons between GNOME and KDE.
Hope I'm not just being trolled...
IMHO KDE is a little more
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
Ed Cogburn wrote:
Daniel González Gasull wrote:
What I want is some
links about comparisons between GNOME and KDE.
http://kitenet.net/~joey/pkg-comp/
Huh? Read the question again.
It's not about package formats.
Hi!
Yep, I know. This is a old flame war. But I don't
want your personal opinions. What I want is some
links about comparisons between GNOME and KDE.
Please send me some links about this comparisons.
And do not begin a flame war. Thank you in advance.
--
Daniel González Gasull
This is not meant to start a debate on which is better but I just want to
find some facts about each one.
1. Is Debian more leaning towards KDE or is this just 'news' from the
Corel folks? Is there a reason why they chose KDE and not GNOME?
2. Which is faster?
3. Which uses less
In a message dated 5/21/99 8:57:15 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1.Is Debian more leaning towards KDE or is this just 'news' from the
Corel folks? Is there a reason why they chose KDE and not GNOME?
Debian doesn't lean toward either of them - in fact, it is staying
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 08:54:51 -0500, Nadarajah, Dinesh wrote:
1.Is Debian more leaning towards KDE or is this just 'news' from the
Corel folks?
There is still a license problem with KDE (due to interaction between KDE's
license and Qt's) that prevents Debian from distributing KDE
1.Is Debian more leaning towards KDE or is this just 'news' from the
Corel folks? Is there a reason why they chose KDE and not GNOME?
We don't lean either way. Corel is creating their own distribution based
on Debian -- they'll take stock Debian and stuff to it. They picked KDE
(you'd have
On Fri, 21 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Enlightenment is currenlty the only window-manager that fully supports
GNOME).
this might be true to a degree, but it is a gross overstatement to say
that GNOME requires one to use Enlightenment. I'm using Gnome with icewm,
and it runs well enough
In a message dated 5/21/99 3:13:29 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Enlightenment is currenlty the only window-manager that fully supports
GNOME).
this might be true to a degree, but it is a gross overstatement to say
that GNOME requires one to use Enlightenment.
Sami Dalouche wrote:
I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
KDE is not free or not fully free.
It's worse than Gnome :
- it takes more memory
- it's not GTK ( I'm a GTk fan)
- I will have less apps because Gnome is newer and has, I think,
First of all, don't post your message twice.
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:59:51 -0500, John Foster wrote:
Wake up and smell the money! The KDE folks have the right to SELL or
Liscense their desktop for commercial purposes if they want to.
At the moment, KDE is GPLed. Of course they have the
I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
KDE is not free or not fully free.
It's worse than Gnome :
- it takes more memory
- it's not GTK ( I'm a GTk fan)
- I will have less apps because Gnome is newer and has, I think,
already a lot of apps compared
Oh, no. Let's not start another GNOME-vs-KDE thread. Please!
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 08:47:47PM +0200, Sami Dalouche wrote:
I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
[ Rest deleted ]
, I think,
already a lot of apps compared to KDE which is older.
- I don't remember other reasons but GNOME is greater !
Perhaps we can leave the GNOME vs. KDE flames on slashdot. However, I am
using GNOME because I want to. Howevere, I acknowledge that KDE is
relatively stable now and more
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Philip Lehman wrote:
How enlightening. KDE bashing is pretty trendy at the moment, isn't
it?
i think it'll be nice to have the choice of either. commercial adoption
of debian as a base can only lead to good things, i think (judging by what
corel's saying).
Please, let's
In a message dated 4/22/99 3:27:48 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
KDE is not free or not fully free.
As stated in the release that came out a few days ago - it had to do with the
fact that KDE has been around
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Sami Dalouche wrote:
I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
[ etc. deleted ]
Please stop right here! If you don't understand it then just keep
quiet instead of provoking yet another flame war on this subject.
Corel made a choice with regards to
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
: - I don't remember other reasons but GNOME is greater !
:
: We could argue that... ;)
Please do so somewhere other than debian-user.
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to figure out how to get both gnome and kde working on the
same computer. I already have a working gnome desktop (pretty outdated
though... should see to it) and I'd like to check out KDE too. What's
the best way to do it? Ideally, I'd be adding another Xserver running.
Something
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 02:51:49AM +, Christian Lavoie wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to get both gnome and kde working on the
same computer. I already have a working gnome desktop (pretty outdated
though... should see to it) and I'd like to check out KDE too. What's
the best way
27 matches
Mail list logo
