On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:54:32 -0500
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jack Schneider
p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
I think I found a significant glitch.. I appears that mdadm is
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
I think I found a significant glitch.. I appears that mdadm is
confused. I think it happened when I created the /dev/md2 array from
the new disks. It looks like the metadata 1.2 vs 0.90 configs is the
culprit...
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:54:32 -0500
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jack Schneider
p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
I think I found a significant glitch.. I appears that mdadm is
confused. I think it happened when I created the /dev/md2 array
from the new
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:31:29 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
It booted to the correct grub menu then to Busy Box. I am thinking
it goes to BB because it can't find /var and or /usr on the
md1/sda5 LVM partition.
Very likely.
I checked /proc/mdstat and
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:43:16 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
mdadm --stop /dev/md125
mdadm --assemble /dev/md0
--update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
mdadm --stop /dev/126
mdadm --assemble /dev/md1
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:43:16 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
mdadm --stop /dev/md125
mdadm --assemble /dev/md0
--update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
mdadm --stop /dev/126
mdadm --assemble /dev/md1
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
Both /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab show entries for /dev/md126..
What the ... ?
After you modified thei files in the real filesystem, did you update the
initramfs?
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:19:11 -0200
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
Both /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab show entries for /dev/md126..
What the ... ?
After you modified thei files in the real filesystem, did you update
the
Jack Schneider wrote:
It booted to the correct grub menu then to Busy Box. I am thinking it
goes to BB because it can't find /var and or /usr on the md1/sda5 LVM
partition.
Very likely.
I checked /proc/mdstat and lo behold there was md1:active
with correct partitions and md0: active also
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:42:49 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack,
With your pastebin information and the mdstat information (that last
information in your mail and pastebins was critical good stuff) and
I found this old posting from you too: :-)
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:19:03 -0600
Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:42:49 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack,
With your pastebin information and the mdstat information (that last
information in your mail and pastebins was critical good
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the new disk
array to the LVM volume group on the above array? If so then you are
not done yet. The LVM volume group won't be able to assemble without
the new disk. If you did then you
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote: will be well..
I have my fingers crossed for you that it will all be okay.
I have not done the things you have suggested above. I'll wait for
your response and then go!!!
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Note that if you add new disk to the lvm root volume group then you
also need to rebuild the initrd or your system won't be able to
assemble the array at boot time and will fail to boot. (Saying that
mostly for people who find this in the archive
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the new
disk array to the LVM volume group on the above array? If so
then you are not done yet. The LVM volume group
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:50:12 -0600
Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:48:29 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
But, and this is an important but, did you previously add the
new disk array to the LVM
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
mdadm --stop /dev/md125
mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --update=super-minor /dev/sda1 /dev/sdc1
mdadm --stop /dev/126
mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 --update=super-minor /dev/sda5 /dev/sdc5
Bob, a small glitch. mdadm:/dev/sda1 exists but is not
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:57:46 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I
Jack,
With your pastebin information and the mdstat information (that last
information in your mail and pastebins was critical good stuff) and
I found this old posting from you too: :-)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/10/msg00808.html
With all of that I deduce the following:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:37 -0500
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
[BIG SNIP]
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
will change the mdX designations.
Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
a
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
will change the mdX designations.
Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your partitions.
Whatever you do, NEVER
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:06:11 -0200
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the
kernel will change the mdX
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
a
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:37 -0500
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
[BIG SNIP]
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
will change the mdX
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never
Jack Schneider wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
a live Ubuntu CD. That's
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Tom H wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:43:53 -0500
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I
Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from a
live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end result was the
names
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:06:17 -0600
Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:43:53 -0500
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Jack Schneider p...@dp-indexing.com wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:43:53 -0500
Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago)
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from a
live Ubuntu CD. That's where I screwed up... The end result was the
names of the arrays were
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from a
live Ubuntu CD. That's where I
38 matches
Mail list logo
