Re: How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-29 Thread Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
Josip Rodin wrote: When you install from scratch you lose the configuration file changes on the old installation. It is not a problem, since most of the configs are default anyway. Set the debconf level to critical and you'll only get the most important questions. May I know how/ what/

Re: How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:20:08AM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: When you install from scratch you lose the configuration file changes on the old installation. It is not a problem, since most of the configs are default anyway. Maybe for you... Set the debconf level to critical

RE: How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-26 Thread Brooks R. Robinson
| However, | - may I know what happened during the slink-potato switch period? I had a slink box that upgraded to potato just fine. | - was there a sufficient grace period before slink was deleted | from the mirrors? IIRC, potato will be moved to archive.debian.org and remain there like other

Re: How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-26 Thread Preben Randhol
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim rms46@vlsm.org wrote on 26/04/2002 (07:53) : Hello: I have just tested this following: - get a packet copy using dpkg --get-selections - put it to a new installed system using dpkg --set-selections - after installing potato, I changed the sources.list dist to woody

Re: How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-26 Thread Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
Hello Again: Apology for my poor english. Let me try again to express my concerns: I believe that most packages will be upgraded when stable is changed from potato to woody. I guess that that process will be relatively slower since it has to delete/ replace the old packages first before

Re: How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-26 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:23:14PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote: - what is better: to use potato or stable in the production systems' sources.list? isn't potato = stable? Sure it is. Today. Next month, though, if all goes as planned, stable will point to woody. potato will, of course,

Re: How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-26 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:00:32PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: I believe that most packages will be upgraded when stable is changed from potato to woody. I guess that that process will be relatively slower since it has to delete/ replace the old packages first before installing the

Re: How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:00:32PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: I believe that most packages will be upgraded when stable is changed from potato to woody. I guess that that process will be relatively slower since it has to delete/ replace the old packages first before installing the

How was the slink -- potato switch? How will be potato -- woody? When?

2002-04-25 Thread Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
Hello: I have just tested this following: - get a packet copy using dpkg --get-selections - put it to a new installed system using dpkg --set-selections - after installing potato, I changed the sources.list dist to woody - besides very slow, it was not straight forward since many packages were