On Sat, 24 May 2014 15:20:01 +0200
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
There are uncountable illegal copies of Madonna's noise
pollution, she still owns too much money, while other people die of
hunger.
That's not Madonna's fault Ralf, that's just bad government. There's a lot of
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 17:33 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Please continue on d-community-offtopic.
True, but I have to clarify something, see below.
On 5/23/14, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014 22:31:18 -0400
Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 13:58 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Being against DRM isn't clownery :(. I made a living from artwork many
times in my live, without the need of idiotic copy protections. If the
people who like your work don't like to pay you, consider for what
people you're making your
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 14:07 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 13:58 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Being against DRM isn't clownery :(. I made a living from artwork many
times in my live, without the need of idiotic copy protections. If the
people who like your work don't like to
On 05/24/2014 08:49 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 14:07 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 13:58 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Being against DRM isn't clownery :(. I made a living from artwork many
snip
PS: A pirate copy, shared cracked software could be good
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 08:55 -0400, Jeff Bauer wrote:
lulz intellectual piss
Try a different translator, Ralf.
I guess the context is good enough to understand, that I tried to say
intellectual work that is not more helpful than a bottle of piss would
be, when you want to barter this
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 08:55 -0400, Jeff Bauer wrote:
intellectual piss
Ok, it's not my native language and possibly it could be misinterpreted
in a way, as advertisings give things human features, e.g. the engine
oil that is able to think. However, even piss might be able to think
more
Ralf Mardorf grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 17:33 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Please continue on d-community-offtopic.
True, but I have to clarify something, see below.
Then how about clarifying it on off-topic as requested, rather than
stirring it up over here? Or is
On 5/24/14, Ric Moore wayward4...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/23/2014 03:33 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Please continue on d-community-offtopic.
...and, it's more fun there. :) Ric
Shhh! Don't let too many know :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Please continue on d-community-offtopic.
Thanks
Zenaan
On 5/23/14, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014 22:31:18 -0400
Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
...
Copyright violations are rampant on the web.
Thank you for refraining from calling that
On 05/23/2014 03:33 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Please continue on d-community-offtopic.
...and, it's more fun there. :) Ric
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be
On Sun, 18 May 2014 22:31:18 -0400
Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
...
Copyright violations are rampant on the web.
Thank you for refraining from calling that piracy.
OK, since you insist, I'll call it what it is - piracy.
I didn't think you were _such_ a contrarian.
On Monday 19 May 2014 04:15:06 Richard Hector wrote:
BTW I'd also like to see evidence for what law prevents linking to
someone else's work.
Copyright law is not internationally agreed world-wide. It does not hold
identically and equally in all countries. So it is not an absolute.
Lisi
--
On Monday 19 May 2014 03:50:38 Lee Winter wrote:
Note that the _statutory_ penalty for a purposeful violation of copyright
law is USD$150,000.00 plus fees and legal costs. Per violation.
***In the ***United States***. This is an international list.
Are you really going to admit in this
On 5/19/14, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 19 May 2014 03:50:38 Lee Winter wrote:
Note that the _statutory_ penalty for a purposeful violation of copyright
law is USD$150,000.00 plus fees and legal costs. Per violation.
***In the ***United States***. This is an
On 19/05/14 20:07, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 19 May 2014 04:15:06 Richard Hector wrote:
BTW I'd also like to see evidence for what law prevents linking to
someone else's work.
Copyright law is not internationally agreed world-wide. It does not hold
identically and equally in all
On 5/19/2014 4:12 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Monday 19 May 2014 03:50:38 Lee Winter wrote:
Note that the _statutory_ penalty for a purposeful violation of copyright
law is USD$150,000.00 plus fees and legal costs. Per violation.
***In the ***United States***. This is an international list.
On 5/18/2014 11:15 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 19/05/14 14:10, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
But if I catch you violating my copyright, I will have everything you own.
I don't think the law goes quite that far ...
Maybe not if you're Bill Gates or Warren Buffet. But I can get a lot.
More than
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net
wrote:
On 5/18/2014 10:26 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
I don't care. But if I catch you violating my copyright,
I will have everything you own.
Jerry.
You
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
[...] he's a bit of a time-bomb and carries an intense anger or
something about him, [...]
Oh, he's not always a time-bomb.
Don't know what's got his back up today.
--
Joel Rees
Be careful where you see conspiracy.
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/18/2014 11:15 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
...
endless pseudo-legal mumbo jumbo
The law.
Well that ought only be relevant to you if you had something
intellectual to actually
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net wrote:
On 18/05/14 08:42 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
[...]
So Gary, how do we handle this problem of lack of educated thinkers?
Cause that's the real problem as I see it.
Regards
Zenaan
That problem is not solvable, I'm
On 5/19/2014 7:40 AM, Joel Rees wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:31
AM, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/18/2014 10:26 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
I don't care. But if I catch you violating my copyright,
I will have
On 5/19/2014 7:42 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/18/2014 11:15 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
...
endless pseudo-legal mumbo jumbo
The law.
Well that ought only be relevant to you
On 5/18/2014 11:58 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Richard Hector rich...@walnut.gen.nz wrote:
On 19/05/14 15:28, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Oh Richard, bless you. Now you've taken away my excuse to pretend I
didn't really know what Jerry was saying and continue to mock his lack
of
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/18/2014 11:15 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 19/05/14 14:10, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
But if I catch you violating my copyright, I will have everything you
own.
I don't think the law goes quite that far ...
Maybe not if you're Bill
On 19/05/14 23:11, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
BTW I'd also like to see evidence for what law prevents linking to
someone else's work.
Who said anything about preventing linking? I never did.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/05/msg00931.html
From: Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net
On 5/19/2014 8:09 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/18/2014 11:15 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 19/05/14 14:10, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
But if I catch you violating my copyright, I will have everything you
own.
I don't think the law goes
On 20/05/14 00:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
You cannot link to an image on my site. But you can provide a link to
that image. An important difference.
I confess I don't see that difference.
Are you saying that the link must be visible and not clickable?
Again, I'd still like to see a reference
On 20/05/14 00:23, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
You cannot link to an image on my site. But you can provide a link to
that image. An important difference.
I confess I don't see that difference.
Are you saying that the link must be visible and not
On 5/19/2014 8:13 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 19/05/14 23:11, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
BTW I'd also like to see evidence for what law prevents linking to
someone else's work.
Who said anything about preventing linking? I never did.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/05/msg00931.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/18/2014 10:31 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/18/2014 10:21 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
Actually, you have NO RIGHTS. You can do only what the content
creators say you can do.
On 5/19/2014 8:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
You cannot link to an image on my site. But you can provide a link to
that image. An important difference.
I confess I don't see that difference.
Are you saying that the link must be visible and not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/05/14 00:32, The Wanderer wrote:
What is your basis for claiming this?
As far as I can see, there is no basis in the law for the claim
that copyright grants any control whatsoever over the end user's
*use* of the copyrighted thing.
On 5/19/2014 8:32 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/18/2014 10:31 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/18/2014 10:21 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
Actually, you have NO RIGHTS. You can do only what
On 20/05/14 00:37, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Linking to an image on my site makes it look like the image is a part of
your site. If I own the copyright on that image, that is a violation of
the copyright.
That appears to be still a subject of debate. My view: If I haven't
copied it, how can I be
On 5/19/2014 8:33 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:23, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
You cannot link to an image on my site. But you can provide a link to
that image. An important difference.
I confess I don't see that difference.
Are you saying
On 5/19/2014 8:46 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:37, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Linking to an image on my site makes it look like the image is a part of
your site. If I own the copyright on that image, that is a violation of
the copyright.
That appears to be still a subject of debate. My
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/19/2014 8:33 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:23, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
You cannot link to an image on my site. But you can provide a link to
that image. An important difference.
I
On 20/05/14 00:49, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/19/2014 8:33 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:23, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
You cannot link to an image on my site. But you can provide a link to
that image. An important difference.
I confess I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/19/2014 08:42 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/19/2014 8:32 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 05/18/2014 10:31 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Yes, I understand the difference. The license I grant you to use
my copyrighted material says what you MAY
On 5/19/2014 9:00 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/19/2014 8:33 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:23, Richard Hector wrote:
On 20/05/14 00:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
You cannot link to an image on my site. But you can provide a
People, this off-topic thread has dragged on WAY too long. There's a
Debian off-topic mailing list, which exists specifically for that
purpose - to let Debian users discuss things that aren't directly
related to Debian.
PLEASE, for the love of $DEITY and to have some compassion for the
people
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:13:35AM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
..snip..
Once again you can't discuss the facts to you make personal attacks.
I see no ad hom attack. As a matter of fact, the only one(s) I've seen
have been made by you, calling someone a socialist,
On Friday 16 May 2014 19:13:11 Brian wrote:
The iplayer offerings can be viewed on all platforms. It uses Flash.
Now, yes. But not initially. And the BBC wasn't put off by the fact that
only one browser could read their content. It was put off by the large
volume of loud complaints from
Debian is based on freedom.
Yes.
Freedom to choose.
Free will - have you heard of the concept? Or is that redundant in the
new world where someone will tell me what to think and ensure laws and
protests against bad weather and sharp corners on furniture?
Yes, pretty well redundant. Of
On 5/16/14, Gary Dale garyd...@torfree.net wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
To not remove digital restrictions support undermines a
major strength of Debian. If people want DRM, they can always download
Firefox but they should
On 5/15/14, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why not
use it?
Debian is based on freedom.
On 5/16/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to
provide
content that uses DRM. After all,
On 5/18/2014 8:54 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/16/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people
On 5/16/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/15/2014 1:53 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser
On 5/18/2014 10:00 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/16/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/15/2014 1:53 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14,
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/18/2014 8:54 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/16/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
I don't care. But if I catch you violating my copyright,
I will have everything you own.
Jerry.
You speak loudly.
Zenaan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 5/18/2014 10:21 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/18/2014 8:54 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/16/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On
On 5/18/2014 10:26 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
I don't care. But if I catch you violating my copyright,
I will have everything you own.
Jerry.
You speak loudly.
Zenaan
And truthfully. Ask your attorney.
Jerry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
Those who (...whatever...) create content get to decide HOW THEY
DISTRIBUTE or otherwise SELL that content.
No more. No less.
Wrong.
Once it's on my computer, on in my brain, it's mine. I can do with it
as I
On 19/05/14 14:10, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
But if I catch you violating my copyright, I will have everything you own.
I don't think the law goes quite that far ...
BTW I'd also like to see evidence for what law prevents linking to
someone else's work.
Overall, though, this argument seems fairly
On 18/05/14 08:42 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 5/15/14, Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why not
On 5/19/14, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
...
endless pseudo-legal mumbo jumbo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 5/19/14, Lee Winter lee.j.i.win...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
Those who (...whatever...) create content get to decide HOW THEY
DISTRIBUTE or otherwise SELL that content.
No more. No less.
Wrong.
Once it's on my computer,
On 19/05/14 15:15, Gary Dale wrote:
So Gary, how do we handle this problem of lack of educated thinkers?
Cause that's the real problem as I see it.
Regards
Zenaan
That problem is not solvable, I'm afraid. That's why people who do think
about issues have a duty to speak up about them.
On 5/19/14, Richard Hector rich...@walnut.gen.nz wrote:
On 19/05/14 14:10, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
But if I catch you violating my copyright, I will have everything you
own.
I don't think the law goes quite that far ...
:)
I'm glad I drew him out that far, personally.
BTW I'd also like to
On 19/05/14 15:28, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Oh Richard, bless you. Now you've taken away my excuse to pretend I
didn't really know what Jerry was saying and continue to mock his lack
of precision :)
I'm one of those you mentioned that has trouble resisting reading every
email. Deliberate
On 5/19/14, Richard Hector rich...@walnut.gen.nz wrote:
On 19/05/14 15:28, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Oh Richard, bless you. Now you've taken away my excuse to pretend I
didn't really know what Jerry was saying and continue to mock his lack
of precision :)
I'm one of those you mentioned that has
Sent to list, where it ought to have gone in the first place. Sorry, Gary.
On Thursday 15 May 2014 20:59:22 Gary Dale wrote:
If only one browser supports DRM,
I'll think twice before doing it.
And having though twice you'll go ahead and use it.
BBC iPlayer did this for some while. But they
On 16/05/14 05:01 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Sent to list, where it ought to have gone in the first place. Sorry, Gary.
On Thursday 15 May 2014 20:59:22 Gary Dale wrote:
If only one browser supports DRM,
I'll think twice before doing it.
And having though twice you'll go ahead and use it.
BBC
On Fri 16 May 2014 at 10:49:50 -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
On 16/05/14 05:01 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
BBC iPlayer did this for some while. But they had a problem. They were
refusing people access to content for which they had paid.
Not 100% familiar with the BBC situation, but I recall reading
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why not use
it?
Debian is based on freedom. Iceweasel exists because Firefox contained
proprietary parts.
they've been letting everyone know for the last
year. Hardly a secret.
I trust that it will be removed in
Iceweasel.
DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel doesn't make the web proprietary, lack
of DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel makes them partial web browsers.
Cut off nose to spite face much?
Tim
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why not use
it?
Debian is based on freedom. Iceweasel exists
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:16:07PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree again. The presence of DRM material is an affront to the
open nature of the web. Mozilla's decision to cave in to the DRM
crowd doesn't need to be echoed by Debian. DRM isn't a user's
choice. It's the choice of the site
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to
provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every browser supports it, why
not use
it?
Debian is
in Firefox.
So did Mozilla - in fact they've been letting everyone know for
the last year. Hardly a secret.
I trust that it will be removed in Iceweasel.
DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel doesn't make the web
proprietary, lack of DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel makes
them partial web browsers
and Adobe
have signed a deal to support DRM in Firefox.
So did Mozilla - in fact they've been letting everyone know for
the last year. Hardly a secret.
I trust that it will be removed in Iceweasel.
DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel doesn't make the web
proprietary, lack of DRM support in Firefox
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to
provide
content that uses DRM. After all, if every
just let everyone know that Mozilla and
Adobe have signed a deal to support DRM in Firefox.
So did Mozilla - in fact they've been letting everyone know
for the last year. Hardly a secret.
I trust that it will be removed in Iceweasel.
DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel doesn't make the web
On 14May15:1830+0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
I guess this is going to be a debated topic. Having seen this [1], I do not
think there is any way to implement meaningful (for the companies) CDMs
without
having them in non-free.
[1]
On 5/15/2014 1:53 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM makes it easier for people to
provide
content
On 15/05/14 02:31 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 1:53 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I disagree. Browser support for DRM
On 16/05/14 05:59, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 02:31 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 1:53 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 01:33 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 5/15/2014 12:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 15/05/14 04:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 15 mai 14, 00:27:08, Gary Dale wrote:
I
The FSF has just let everyone know that Mozilla and Adobe have signed a
deal to support DRM in Firefox. I trust that it will be removed in
Iceweasel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 15/05/14 13:09, Gary Dale wrote:
The FSF has just let everyone know that Mozilla and Adobe have signed a
deal to support DRM in Firefox.
So did Mozilla - in fact they've been letting everyone know for the last
year. Hardly a secret.
I trust that it will be removed in
Iceweasel.
DRM
that it will be removed in
Iceweasel.
DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel doesn't make the web proprietary, lack
of DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel makes them partial web browsers.
Cut off nose to spite face much?
Tim Berners-Lee and many others support *implementing* DRM. They don't
support DRM
year. Hardly a secret.
I trust that it will be removed in
Iceweasel.
DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel doesn't make the web proprietary, lack
of DRM support in Firefox/Iceweasel makes them partial web browsers.
Cut off nose to spite face much?
Tim Berners-Lee and many others support
85 matches
Mail list logo
