On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:41:30AM -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 21:15, stan wrote:
>
> > How did you get it upgraded to testing, given all teh current breakeage in
> > testing?
> >
>
> Interesting question. We are running a production computer lab that has
> recently
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:41:55AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:15:56PM -0400, stan wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:47:49AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:01:47PM -0400, stan wrote:
> > > > Is sound still also broken in testing?
> > >
>
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 05:08, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:41:30AM -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 21:15, stan wrote:
> > > How did you get it upgraded to testing, given all teh current breakeage in
> > > testing?
> >
> > Interesting question. We are r
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:41:30AM -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 21:15, stan wrote:
> > How did you get it upgraded to testing, given all teh current breakeage in
> > testing?
>
> Interesting question. We are running a production computer lab that has
> recently been upg
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 21:15, stan wrote:
> How did you get it upgraded to testing, given all teh current breakeage in
> testing?
>
Interesting question. We are running a production computer lab that has
recently been upgraded to testing. Am I to expect that it is going to
start to fall apart soo
Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:15:56PM -0400, stan wrote:
I don't know the problem you're referring to, so I have no idea ...
smokey:~# apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back
aspell aspell-en audaci
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:15:56PM -0400, stan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:47:49AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:01:47PM -0400, stan wrote:
> > > Is sound still also broken in testing?
> >
> > [Please don't send me private copies of list mail. I read the list.]
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 12:47:49AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:01:47PM -0400, stan wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:27:26PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > If it's filed in the bug tracking system, at the moment you just have to
> > > look at the bug every so often
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 01:09:24PM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> Another trivia question for someone out there--
>
> I noted the following bug types. Is the "pending upload" essentially a
> fixed bug not in the dist yet?
See the description of the pending tag under
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/D
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:01:47PM -0400, stan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:27:26PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > If it's filed in the bug tracking system, at the moment you just have to
> > look at the bug every so often, although there's some work outstanding
> > on letting you subscribe
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:27:26PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 08:51:06AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> > Silly question, perhaps, but I'm very unfamiliar with how one monitors
> > whether a known problem still exists.
>
> If it's filed in the bug tracking system, at the
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:27:26PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 08:51:06AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> > Silly question, perhaps, but I'm very unfamiliar with how one monitors
> > whether a known problem still exists.
>
> If it's filed in the bug tracking system, at the
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 08:51:06AM -0700, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> Silly question, perhaps, but I'm very unfamiliar with how one monitors
> whether a known problem still exists.
If it's filed in the bug tracking system, at the moment you just have to
look at the bug every so often, although there'
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:09:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:51:36AM -0400, stan wrote:
> > I've got a new laptop that I'm trying to set up. It's set up to use the
> > testing distribution. I apt-get dist-upgraded today, and now Gnome (Gnome
> > 2, I suppose) won't sta
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:51:36AM -0400, stan wrote:
> I've got a new laptop that I'm trying to set up. It's set up to use the
> testing distribution. I apt-get dist-upgraded today, and now Gnome (Gnome
> 2, I suppose) won't start.
GNOME is partially broken in testing. (Haven't we covered this se
I've got a new laptop that I'm trying to set up. It's set up to use the
testing distribution. I apt-get dist-upgraded today, and now Gnome (Gnome
2, I suppose) won't start. That is I cna't log in using gdm. I carefully
rm'd all traces of .g* config files in the user I'm testing with's home
director
16 matches
Mail list logo
