On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 20:49:25 -0800, Steve Lamb (g...@dmiyu.org) wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Which is why if you want privacy *and* address independence, you need to
spend the extra effort to get a dynamic DNS address and run your own
IMAPS server, and probably a web server, too, with
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:23:32AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 23:15, Chris Bannister wrote:
I'm now running full amd64 and notice there is no crafty package[1] I
normally compile crafty from source anyway (to get the latest version)
but am getting errors even doing that. On i386 on
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:49:25PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Which is why if you want privacy *and* address independence, you need to
spend the extra effort to get a dynamic DNS address and run your own
IMAPS server, and probably a web server, too, with squirrelmail.
Bob Cox wrote:
So long as you have a static IP which is from a block recognised as such
(which amongst other things means it is not listed in dul.dnsbl) AND
have valid a valid rDNS (PTR record) in place then you can send to these
people ok. I've been doing it for years.
That's the
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:13:29PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Bob Cox wrote:
So long as you have a static IP which is from a block recognised as such
(which amongst other things means it is not listed in dul.dnsbl) AND
have valid a valid rDNS (PTR record) in place then you can send to these
On Friday 09 January 2009 07:35:48 Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:31:23 -0800
Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Personally, I don't see a reason to use gmail if you
don't use the web interface.
A decent free email provider, POP / IMAP, more than seven GB of
On Fri January 9 2009, Kelly Clowers wrote:
Personally, I don't see a reason to use gmail if you
don't use the web interface.
I use it like a better S P A M filter, and for convenience. I use gmail with
kmail when I am home, but I also use it on the road. And I use it for those
web places
Personally, I don't see a reason to use gmail if you
don't use the web interface.
Gmail offers free imap/pop service and thats enough for me, i don't
use the web login.
--
Koh Choon Lin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On 01/09/09 01:35, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:31:23 -0800
Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Personally, I don't see a reason to use gmail if you
don't use the web interface.
A decent free email provider, POP / IMAP, more than seven GB of
storage, and one can be
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:23:55 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 01/09/09 01:35, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:31:23 -0800
Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Personally, I don't see a reason to use gmail if you
don't use the web interface.
On 01/09/09 13:50, Celejar wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:23:55 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 01/09/09 01:35, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:31:23 -0800
Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Personally, I don't see a reason to use gmail if you
don't use
Ron Johnson wrote:
Which is why if you want privacy *and* address independence, you need to
spend the extra effort to get a dynamic DNS address and run your own
IMAPS server, and probably a web server, too, with squirrelmail.
DynDNS has problems since you will get blocked on outbound mail.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 15:42, Celejar cele...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:03:19 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
...
Or ditch Gmail for something sane.
Or use the service, but without the web interface.
Personally, I don't see a reason to use gmail if you
don't
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:31:23 -0800
Kelly Clowers kelly.clow...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Personally, I don't see a reason to use gmail if you
don't use the web interface.
A decent free email provider, POP / IMAP, more than seven GB of
storage, and one can be pretty sure that they'll be there
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:55:42PM +, thveillon.debian wrote:
Never had problem with w64codecs (debian-multimedia), but yes I forgot
about acroread plug-in which still requires nspluginwrapper (should be
working OK though, not too intensive), but i don't use it and never came
across a pdf
On 01/06/09 23:15, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:55:42PM +, thveillon.debian wrote:
Never had problem with w64codecs (debian-multimedia), but yes I forgot
about acroread plug-in which still requires nspluginwrapper (should be
working OK though, not too intensive), but i
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
Please reply to the list, not personally to me.
Sorry. I use GMail. It doesn't use reply to it seems. I searched google to
use that reply-to in lists mail. But I am not successful.
L.V.Gandhi escreveu:
On Monday 2009 January 05 11:01:05 Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon January 5 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
If you have some extra diskspace, you can even do the install in a chroot
(debootstrap FTW!) and only reboot once it is complete, minimizing
downtime.
so, in theory, if I had a
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 06:47, L. V. Gandhi lvgan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
Please reply to the list, not personally to me.
Sorry. I use GMail. It doesn't use reply to it seems. I searched google to
use that
On Monday 2009 January 05 10:16:22 Jochen Schulz wrote:
Paul Cartwright:
# uname -a
Linux paulandcilla 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Mon Dec 15 18:15:07 UTC 2008 i686
GNU/Linux
so what would I need to do to run amd64 ??
Re-install.
It is, in theory, possible to start from a x86 system, build
On 01/05/09 11:41, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 06:47, L. V. Gandhi lvgan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
Please reply to the list, not personally to me.
Sorry. I use GMail. It doesn't use reply to it
On 01/05/09 10:07, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon January 5 2009, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
As mentioned in the thread, you certainly can. As if you should, it
depends. I'd use the 64-bit system.
that is about what I have on my system..
# uname -a
Linux paulandcilla 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Mon
On Monday 2009 January 05 12:03:19 Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/05/09 11:41, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 06:47, L. V. Gandhi lvgan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
Please reply to the list, not
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:17:01 +0530
L.V.Gandhi lvgan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
Please reply to the list, not personally to me.
Sorry. I use GMail. It doesn't use reply to it seems. I searched google to
use
On Mon January 5 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
so what would I need to do to run amd64 ??
Re-install.
It is, in theory, possible to start from a x86 system, build an amd64
kernel, reboot and then walk your userland up to amd64 gradually. However,
I've never seen/heard of it done
Please reply to the list, not personally to me.
L.V.Gandhi escreveu:
My processor is Intel E4500, 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo. I have 2GB ram.
Should I use amd64 kernel?
As mentioned in the thread, you certainly can. As if you should, it
depends. I'd use the 64-bit system.
--
Eduardo M Kalinowski
Paul Cartwright:
# uname -a
Linux paulandcilla 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Mon Dec 15 18:15:07 UTC 2008 i686
GNU/Linux
so what would I need to do to run amd64 ??
Re-install.
J.
--
It is not in my power to change anything.
[Agree] [Disagree]
Ron Johnson wrote:
acroread still has some features that the FLOSS alternatives don't,
and w32codecs is still most simply available in 32 bit mode.
debian-multimedia has a package of acroread. I believe it's a 32-bit
version, but the package pulls all required 32-bit libs, and it works
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 01/05/09 11:41, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 06:47, L. V. Gandhi lvgan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br wrote:
Please reply to the
Aneurin Price wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
Or ditch Gmail for something sane
I'm puzzled as to why you consider Gmail's behaviour to be erroneous.
Using 'reply' (as opposed to 'followup'/'reply to all') should correctly
address
a mail
PPaul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon January 5 2009, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
As mentioned in the thread, you certainly can. As if you should, it
depends. I'd use the 64-bit system.
that is about what I have on my system..
# uname -a
Linux paulandcilla 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Mon Dec 15 18:15:07
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Monday 2009 January 05 11:01:05 Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon January 5 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
If you have some extra diskspace, you can even do the install in a chroot
(debootstrap FTW!) and only reboot once it is complete, minimizing
downtime.
On Mon January 5 2009, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
As mentioned in the thread, you certainly can. As if you should, it
depends. I'd use the 64-bit system.
that is about what I have on my system..
# uname -a
Linux paulandcilla 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Mon Dec 15 18:15:07 UTC 2008 i686
GNU/Linux
so
On 2009-01-05 21:02 +0100, Aneurin Price wrote:
I'm puzzled as to why you consider Gmail's behaviour to be erroneous.
Using 'reply' (as opposed to 'followup'/'reply to all') should correctly
address
a mail to the reply-to address (which was not set in the mail which prompted
this
On Monday 2009 January 05 14:28:35 Mark Allums wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Usually, there's no data loss, but some settings might go away in OS X
each time you boot into OS Y (e.g. the name of the configuration option
changed and the newer version in OS Y keeps renaming it to the
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Monday 2009 January 05 14:28:35 Mark Allums wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Usually, there's no data loss, but some settings might go away in OS X
each time you boot into OS Y (e.g. the name of the configuration option
changed and the newer version in OS Y
Mark Allums wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Monday 2009 January 05 14:28:35 Mark Allums wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Usually, there's no data loss, but some settings might go away in
OS X
each time you boot into OS Y (e.g. the name of the configuration option
changed and the
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:03:19 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
...
Or ditch Gmail for something sane.
Or use the service, but without the web interface.
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
Just for the record, the i386 works fine on that. But
On 01/04/09 15:36, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
There is no good reason to install i386 on a Core 2. 64-bit is working
great, except for Flash. i386 has too many limits.
The correct distribution is AMD64. EMT64 (Intel) is virtually identical
to AMD64, and both are covered by the AMD64
Mark Allums a écrit :
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
Just for the record, the
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/04/09 15:36, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
There is no good reason to install i386 on a Core 2. 64-bit is
working great, except for Flash. i386 has too many limits.
The correct distribution is AMD64. EMT64 (Intel) is virtually
identical to AMD64, and both are
On 01/04/09 16:07, thveillon.debian wrote:
[snip]
Hi,
Just to push in the same direction, I have 2 C2duo, both running amd64
Debian, one with a custom kernel compiled with the c2duo - newer-xeon
arch instead of the generic x86-64 which is the defaut. (can't tell
the difference though...)
On 01/04/09 16:33, Mark Allums wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/04/09 15:36, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
There is no good reason to install i386 on a Core 2. 64-bit is
working great, except for Flash. i386 has too many limits.
The correct distribution is AMD64. EMT64 (Intel) is virtually
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:36:27 -0600
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the
Ron Johnson a écrit :
On 01/04/09 16:07, thveillon.debian wrote:
[snip]
Hi,
Just to push in the same direction, I have 2 C2duo, both running amd64
Debian, one with a custom kernel compiled with the c2duo - newer-xeon
arch instead of the generic x86-64 which is the defaut. (can't tell
the
On 01/04/09 17:53, Micha Feigin wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:36:27 -0600
[snip]
ia64 is *NOT* what you want.
ia64 is itanium systems (corporate servers mostly)
And even then, Xeons/Opterons are now powerful enough that systems
that we once hosted on Linux/ia64 now are on Linux/amd64.
On 01/04/09 17:55, thveillon.debian wrote:
[snip]
Never had problem with w64codecs (debian-multimedia), but yes I forgot
Well, I learn something new every year...
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
I like my women like I like my coffee - purchased at above-market
rates from eco-friendly
Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
Just for the record, the i386 works fine on that. But as others said, you
can
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
Thanks
Mirto
P.S. from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ I downloaded the
amd64 kde CD
But,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
amd64 (a.k.a x86_64). Intel came later
Tzafrir Cohen ha scritto:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
Thanks
Mirto
P.S. from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ I
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:56:43AM -0700, Mario wrote:
Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
You need the ia64.
ia64 is
Mario wrote:
Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this processor?
You need the ia64.
This is wrong. Amd64 is right choice.
--
Eugene
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:56:43 -0700
Mario morrellmarioc...@qwest.net wrote:
Mirto Silvio Busico wrote:
Hi all,
my new notebook is an Acer AS5930G which uses an Intel Core 2 Duo cpu.
I should like to install the 64 bit version of Lenny.
Which is the correct arch for this
56 matches
Mail list logo
