Hi,
I am having problems with mp3enc (not a Debian package - commercial
product) which wants libc5 libraries:
ldd mp3enc31
libm.so.5 = not found
libc.so.5 = not found
I am not mad enough to mess with libc versions lightly :-)
I decided to see if asking APT to install the
Liam Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to see if asking APT to install the libc5 package in
simulate mode would suggest the removal of libc6 and it doesn't,
which suggests I could simply install the libc5 package. However, I'm
too scared to do it without checking that I'm not going
Hi,
Just a few q's about why I should upgrade to hamm (Debain 2.0).
Are there any issues on what software I can and can't run when doing the
libc5-libc6 upgrade? I know this is an old subject, but i've never
really got a plain english answer as to what are the issues.
I tried
Hello, I'm trying to install JDK 1.1.
To install the JDK 1.1 I need to install libc6.
My question: Will this affect previously installed
packages depending on libc5 in a negative way?
/Tomas Petersson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Folks,
I was considering upgrading to hamm, but my wonderfull ISP just decided
that it was going to charge $0.25 for every Meg over 300M downloaded
each month. Given that I almost use that anyway, it'll take me about a
year to download hamm without it costing me a fortune...
Anyway, I would
On Thu, 7 May 1998, Damon Muller wrote:
Hi Folks,
I was considering upgrading to hamm, but my wonderfull ISP just decided
that it was going to charge $0.25 for every Meg over 300M downloaded
each month. Given that I almost use that anyway, it'll take me about a
year to download hamm
Hola otra vez:
Siguiendo con los problemillas de libc5--libc6.
Instale el paquete libforms0.88_0.88.1-1.deb + el -dev y el -bin y ahora
al ejecutar el programa News-peruser me dice can't load library
'libforms.so.0.88' y si que la tengo en /usr/X11R6/lib y, obviamente, la
ruta esta en el fichero
Hola a todos:
Pues que resulta que haciendo el cambio de la libc5 a la libc6, me han surgido
una serie de problemillas.
He realizado el cambio con el script autoup.sh y he seguido al pie de la
letras las intrucciones cambiando todos los ficheros que solicita; el sistema
funciona excepto algunos
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 01:58:29PM -0600, Jeff Noxon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 02:01:10PM -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I just installed Raima's Velocis Server 2.0 on an up-to-date hamm
machine. The binaries do not run (segfault), and when I run ldd I
get this:
This means that
On Tue, Mar 10, 1998 at 09:32:48AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 01:58:29PM -0600, Jeff Noxon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 02:01:10PM -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I just installed Raima's Velocis Server 2.0 on an up-to-date hamm
machine. The binaries do not
On Tue, Mar 10, 1998 at 08:44:33AM -0600, Jeff Noxon wrote:
There is no rpath. This is a message I got back from their tech support
people. Can anyone think of a workaround? I hate to go back to bo.
-- cut here --
[...
However, because libpthread.0.5 and libpthread.0.6 cannot usefully
Thanks for your comments!
I was able to fix the problem by installing libpthread.so.5 in a special
directory and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Jeff
--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
I just installed Raima's Velocis Server 2.0 on an up-to-date hamm machine.
The binaries do not run (segfault), and when I run ldd I get this:
teljenpc:~/bin$ ldd rds
lib_exif.so = /home/velocis/bin/lib_exif.so (0x4000a000)
lib_adm.so = /home/velocis/bin/lib_adm.so (0x4000c000)
I just installed Raima's Velocis Server 2.0 on an up-to-date hamm machine.
The binaries do not run (segfault), and when I run ldd I get this:
This means that there is an upstream problem. If you do not sources,
there is nothing you can do but complain.
--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 02:01:10PM -0500, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I just installed Raima's Velocis Server 2.0 on an up-to-date hamm machine.
The binaries do not run (segfault), and when I run ldd I get this:
This means that there is an upstream problem. If you do not sources,
there is
Remco Blaakmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 30 Jan 1998, William R. Ward wrote:
I'm running hamm and I can't get Netscape to work. I know it's
probably a problem with libc5 vs libc6, and that I probably need to
reinstall one or more libc5 files, but I don't know which ones! I ran
ldd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William R. Ward) writes:
I'm running hamm and I can't get Netscape to work. I know it's
probably a problem with libc5 vs libc6, and that I probably need to
reinstall one or more libc5 files, but I don't know which ones! I ran
ldd and strace and the output is attached here.
On 30 Jan 1998, William R. Ward wrote:
I'm running hamm and I can't get Netscape to work. I know it's
probably a problem with libc5 vs libc6, and that I probably need to
reinstall one or more libc5 files, but I don't know which ones! I ran
ldd and strace and the output is attached here. I
I'm running hamm and I can't get Netscape to work. I know it's
probably a problem with libc5 vs libc6, and that I probably need to
reinstall one or more libc5 files, but I don't know which ones! I ran
ldd and strace and the output is attached here. I just don't know how
to read the output of
the latest version of the auto-upgrade script is available from
http://www.taz.net.au/autoup
changes since the last public release (v0.11):
v0.12: (Robert D. Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- modified to fix errors encountered when upgrading a rex filesystem:
- force removal of
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Ian Gill Watkins wrote:
I want to upgrade one or two of the packages on my system beyond the
stable distribution. The newer packages are all requiring libc6, but
that conflicts (in DSELECT) with libc5 which is a dependence to a _very_
large number of programs. =:|
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Scott Ellis wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
* I am downloading the entire hamm binary-i386, contrib and non-free
tree to a directory (actually, my home directory) on an NFS server. Is
there a possibility that NFS might stop working during
Hi,
Thanks to the help of the fine folks in this mailing list, I was able to
upgrade to hamm reasonably easily. I am still poking around my system
to find out problems with the upgrade.
After the upgrade, I am unable to log into my machine with a username in
YP.
$ cat /etc/passwd
...some
On Tue, Jan 13, 1998 at 09:26:27PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
After the upgrade, I am unable to log into my machine with a username in
YP.
$ cat /etc/passwd
...some stuff...
+::0:0:::
OK
$ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: db files
group: db files
shadow:
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 1998 at 09:26:27PM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
After the upgrade, I am unable to log into my machine with a username in
YP.
$ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: db files
group: db files
shadow: db files
For these
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
Also, I am in Panic Mode now.
* If I am unable to log in as root, how do I fix what I did to
nsswitch.conf? I was sensible enough to backup the old file before
making the changes. I am unable to locate my emergency disk (or
whatever
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 09:18:55AM -0800, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
passwd: db files
group: db files
shadow: db files
For these three replace db files with compat and you should be done.
How should it read? The HOWTO mentions this
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Nils Rennebarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for documentation try the command
info libc
then look at the section
* Name Service Switch
Well you could also just read the /usr/doc/nis/nis.debian.howto.gz
file which explains everything in detail.
Mike.
--
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
I tried to be clear but... anyway, my /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like this:
#---cut here to damage your monitor--
# /etc/nsswitch.conf
#
# Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch functionality.
#
passwd: compat
safe directory such as /usr/local.
The source is enormous (for a slow FTP link anyway g) and I just
haven't the time to fight my way through that. I had enough fun
recompiling the kernel, but it's working now.
I have had one or two scares moving from libc5 - libc6, but it seems
relatively OK
I read the mini HOWTO and reports in this mailing list about unstable
being stable enough. My machine is kind of a production server. The
world would not end if it goes down for a day or so. But still it is
important to have it up and running ASAP. I am planning on upgrading to
hamm later
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
* I am downloading the entire hamm binary-i386, contrib and non-free
tree to a directory (actually, my home directory) on an NFS server. Is
there a possibility that NFS might stop working during the upgrade
process?
Why don't you just use
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote:
I read the mini HOWTO and reports in this mailing list about unstable
being stable enough. My machine is kind of a production server. The
world would not end if it goes down for a day or so. But still it is
important to have it up and
I want to upgrade one or two of the packages on my system beyond the stable
distribution. The newer packages are all requiring libc6, but that conflicts
(in DSELECT) with libc5 which is a dependence to a _very_ large number of
programs. =:|
What should I do? Forget it and wait?
Ian W
--
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Ian Gill Watkins wrote:
I want to upgrade one or two of the packages on my system beyond the stable
distribution. The newer packages are all requiring libc6, but that conflicts
(in DSELECT) with libc5 which is a dependence to a _very_ large number of
programs. =:|
kernel-source package that libc6-dev depends on is going to be
available
this week, or alternatively, can I *safely* force the libc6-dev to
install with 2.0.32_2.0.32-1 kernel source?
Yeah, sure, just make sure /usr/include/linux is a symlink pointing to
/usr/src/linux/include/linux, and that
On Fri, Jan 09, 1998 at 02:13:41AM +0200, Neilen Marais wrote:
But IMHO its silly keeping seperate headers... Why not just leave the
links to /usr/src/linux/include? /usr/src/linux is anyway the standard
location for the kernel, and it makes sense to always use your current
kernel's
Yes, I did exactly that: put both packages on the same dpkg --install
line (thanks to Scott Ellis for responding within an hour of my original
post). Everything installed cleanly and the system works as expected.
Next hurdle seems to be installing of the libc6-dev to be able to
compile my own
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Damir J. Naden wrote:
Yes, I did exactly that: put both packages on the same dpkg --install
line (thanks to Scott Ellis for responding within an hour of my original
post). Everything installed cleanly and the system works as expected.
Next hurdle seems to be installing of
go and get the latest 2.0.32-3 from dists/unstable/main/binary/devel
and give you a nice install
good luck
kusuma
Damir J. Naden wrote:
Yes, I did exactly that: put both packages on the same dpkg --install
line (thanks to Scott Ellis for responding within an hour of my original
post).
ok, I do it this way, after the ldso_1.9.6-2.deb, I do
dpkg -i libc5_5.4.38-0.1.deb, of couse it is complaining about libc6,
just ignore it, and leave it unconfigure..., then do a dpkg for
libc6_2.0.6-2.deb, I am sure you will be able to do it this time, then
you can go back to dpkg -i
ok, I do it this way, after the ldso_1.9.6-2.deb, I do
dpkg -i libc5_5.4.38-0.1.deb, of couse it is complaining about libc6,
just ignore it, and leave it unconfigure..., then do a dpkg for
libc6_2.0.6-2.deb, I am sure you will be able to do it this time, then
you can go back to dpkg -i
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Wiria A Kusuma wrote:
ok, I do it this way, after the ldso_1.9.6-2.deb, I do
dpkg -i libc5_5.4.38-0.1.deb, of couse it is complaining about libc6,
just ignore it, and leave it unconfigure..., then do a dpkg for
libc6_2.0.6-2.deb, I am sure you will be able to do it this
Yes Remco is right, I have not tried it thou.., give it a try... and
good luck
kusuma
Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Wiria A Kusuma wrote:
ok, I do it this way, after the ldso_1.9.6-2.deb, I do
dpkg -i libc5_5.4.38-0.1.deb, of couse it is complaining about libc6,
just
Hi, everyone --
I have spent last hour going thru the mailing list archives and still
came out empty-handed:
I have installed a base system froma the current base disks from hamm
which point to the current bo disks. Those include libc5_5.4.33-6
library. Next step was to try and upgrade to
On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Damir J. Naden wrote:
I have spent last hour going thru the mailing list archives and still
came out empty-handed:
I have installed a base system froma the current base disks from hamm
which point to the current bo disks. Those include libc5_5.4.33-6
library. Next step
.
- is it worth it to have both libc5 libc6 at the same time?
Yes.
- in other words, if I have only libc6, do I get to run libc5-based
packages? (I think not)
You can have installed both versions simultanously. However, I think
you can have only one development version installed, the people who
. Could the
knowledgeable people answer some of the questions below, w/ private email if
possible, as I'm not subscribed to the list and can only look up the webified
archives. I will summarize any useful info I get and post to the list.
- is it worth it to have both libc5 libc6 at the same time
Ave
I did not succeeded upgrading my perl 4.003
that comes with my debian 1.3.0 to a .tgz
perl4.004.
When I start the set up with Configure -d the
set up program stops complaining an error:
-
cc -O2 -Dbool=char -DHAS_BOOL
49 matches
Mail list logo
