Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian]

2024-04-18 Thread Nicolas George
rtnetz...@windstream.net (12024-04-18): > As I understand what he wrote, the SPAM tag is added after the message leaves > his control. I very much doubt it, we would see “*SPAM* Re:” rather than “Re: *SPAM*”. And his recent “Sorry” mail was not tagged.

Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian]

2024-04-18 Thread rtnetz...@windstream.net
As I understand what he wrote, the SPAM tag is added after the message leaves his control. - Original Message - From: "Nicolas George" To: "debian-user" Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 11:13:44 AM Subject: Re: *SPAM* Marking as spam [was: *SPAM***** Re:

Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian]

2024-04-18 Thread Nicolas George
Hans (12024-04-18): > As I can not fix it You can manually remove “*SPAM*” from the mail when you reply. You could even automate it on your end. -- Nicolas George

Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian]

2024-04-18 Thread Hans
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2024, 11:53:38 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: Hi Tomas, this is by debian servers, I talked about this for a while. Because the debian servers mark some things in the header, megamailservers.eu mark them as spam and add SPAM to the headline. As I can not fix it

Re: On user expectations (Was Re: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian)

2024-04-18 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:35:58 + Andy Smith wrote: Hello Andy, >I suspect that your text above has come out sounding more entitled >than you intended, as English is not your first language. In fairness to Hans, he did go on to explain as much. -- Regards _ "Valid sig separator is

On user expectations (Was Re: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian)

2024-04-18 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Hans, On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Hans wrote: > I only hope, it will not happen the same fate like usermin and webmin > happened > to: It was once removed from the repoi with th ereason "spagehetti code, bad > code" and then no one ever took a look again to it, although many,

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-18 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:38:18 +0200 Hans wrote: Hello Hans, >I only hope, it will not happen the same fate like usermin and webmin >happened to: It was once removed from the repoi with th ereason >"spagehetti code, bad code" and then no one ever took a look again to Which, no doubt, makes it

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-18 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 18 Apr 2024 11:38 +0200, from hans.ullr...@loop.de (Hans): > And for libreoffice I suppose, it is planned, to change from 7.6 to 24.4, > which will be a major jump. LibreOffice recently changed the version numbering scheme from X.Y (relatively arbitrary numbering) to YY.M (release year and

Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian]

2024-04-18 Thread tomas
Hi, Hans is it your mail setup adding that *SPAM* decoration to the subject? Just curious... cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-18 Thread Hans
I only hope, it will not happen the same fate like usermin and webmin happened to: It was once removed from the repoi with th ereason "spagehetti code, bad code" and then no one ever took a look again to it, although many, many years of coding passed by. And webmin and usermin are still

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-18 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:55:26 +0200 Erwan David wrote: Hello Erwan, >What scares me is seeing part of 18 ongoing transition, and 4 "coming >soon transitions" with "please do not upload if it is not related to >the transition". Several (well, lots of) transitions have landed at pretty the same

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-18 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 18 Apr 2024 09:55 +0200, from er...@rail.eu.org (Erwan David): >> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice > > What scares me is seeing part of 18 ongoing transition, and 4 "coming soon > transitions" with "please do not upload if it is not related to the > transition". Why does that scare

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-18 Thread Marco Moock
Am 18.04.2024 schrieb Erwan David : > What scares me is seeing part of 18 ongoing transition, and 4 "coming > soon transitions" with "please do not upload if it is not related to > the transition". That is Debian unstable. There will be changes that break things and it is intended to find and

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-18 Thread Erwan David
Le 17/04/2024 à 15:26, Brad Rogers a écrit : On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:12:39 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: Hello Vincent, Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice Has all the info you need, and more. Expect it to be removed

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Actually, if I understand correctly, LibreOffice will really be > removed on some architectures (armhf ppc64el s390x mips64el riscv64).  Stefan

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed Apr 17, 2024 at 4:31 PM BST, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > That's not what I see here. Perhaps share one of your affected bug > numbers? Ah (from elsewhere in the thread) explains it. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed Apr 17, 2024 at 2:30 PM BST, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Not just mine. It seems that *all* bug reports against > libreoffice have been closed: > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=0;ordering=normal;repeatmerged=0;src=libreoffice > > Only bug 883734 is open, but this

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:18:23 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: Hello Vincent, >Actually, if I understand correctly, LibreOffice will really be >removed on some architectures (armhf ppc64el s390x mips64el riscv64). >Fortunately, I am not concerned by this removal (only by the fact >that my bug

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-04-17 16:13:30 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I've sent a message to bug 1069123 (which requested the removal). > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069123#20 and > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069123#25 say > that the request was correct, but the

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-04-17 14:59:18 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:35:57 +0200 > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Hello Vincent, > > >If this is not permanent, why have all the bugs been closed? > > That I have no answer for. I've sent a message to bug 1069123 (which requested the removal).

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:35:57 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: Hello Vincent, >If this is not permanent, why have all the bugs been closed? That I have no answer for. I was basing my "this is not permanent" on the fact that there are a large number of auto-transitions currently ongoing, and many

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Sarunas Burdulis
On 4/17/24 09:12, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? Seems still to be included in unstable and experimental: $ apt policy libreoffice libreoffice: Installed: 4:24.2.2-3+b1 Candidate: 4:24.2.2-3+b1 Version table: *** 4:24.2.2-3+b1

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-04-17 14:26:12 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:12:39 +0200 > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Hello Vincent, > > >Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice > > Has all the info you need, and more.

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice says The dependencies of libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3=4:24.2.0-1 cannot be satisfied in unstable on arm64, s390x, i386, ppc64el, armel, amd64, and

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-04-17 15:24:47 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2024-04-17 15:19:26 +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > > Am 17.04.2024 um 15:12:39 Uhr schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > > > > > Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice > >

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:12:39 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: Hello Vincent, >Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice Has all the info you need, and more. Expect it to be removed from testing, too. This is not permanent. --

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-04-17 15:19:26 +0200, Marco Moock wrote: > Am 17.04.2024 um 15:12:39 Uhr schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > > > Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice > According to the tracker, it specific release got removed from >

Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Marco Moock
Am 17.04.2024 um 15:12:39 Uhr schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libreoffice According to the tracker, it specific release got removed from experimental. This is a special repo for testing and should only

LibreOffice removed from Debian

2024-04-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Is there any reason why LibreOffice has been removed from Debian??? -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)