On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:30:41AM +0100, Lisi wrote:
Hello, all!
I have searched Wikipedia and the Debian wiki. I have Googled. I am clearly
using the wrong search terms, although I tried rewording in sundry different
ways.
Approximately, in round terms, how may packages are available
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:36:43PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 14:00:10, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
$ aptitude search ~Astable | wc -l
43004
$ aptitude search ~Astable~scontrib | wc -l
271
$ aptitude search ~Astable~snon-free | wc -l
583
Oups, 'stable' will also
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Andrei POPESCU
andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 08:01:59, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk
wrote:
According to my reading of the manual:
aptitude search '~smain'
and
aptitude search
Hello, all!
I have searched Wikipedia and the Debian wiki. I have Googled. I am clearly
using the wrong search terms, although I tried rewording in sundry different
ways.
Approximately, in round terms, how may packages are available in Debian
(Squeeze?)
1. in main
2. in main, contrib and
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 11:30:41 Lisi wrote:
Approximately, in round terms, how may packages are available in Debian
(Squeeze?)
1. in main
2. in main, contrib and non-free
many, not may :-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:30:41 +0100
Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, all!
I have searched Wikipedia and the Debian wiki. I have Googled. I am
clearly using the wrong search terms, although I tried rewording in
sundry different ways.
Approximately, in round terms, how may packages
On Tue 16 Oct 2012 at 11:30:41 +0100, Lisi wrote:
I have searched Wikipedia and the Debian wiki. I have Googled. I am clearly
using the wrong search terms, although I tried rewording in sundry different
ways.
Approximately, in round terms, how may packages are available in Debian
This can be answered (by a developer) using UDD -
http://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase
The answer today is
udd= select count(*),release from public.packages group by release;
count | release
+--
2 | wheezy-security
272170 |
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:46:01PM +0200, Titanus Eramius wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:30:41 +0100
Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, all!
I have searched Wikipedia and the Debian wiki. I have Googled. I am
clearly using the wrong search terms, although I tried rewording in
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 11:30:41, Lisi wrote:
Hello, all!
I have searched Wikipedia and the Debian wiki. I have Googled. I am clearly
using the wrong search terms, although I tried rewording in sundry different
ways.
Approximately, in round terms, how may packages are available in Debian
On 16/10/12 11:30, Lisi wrote:
Approximately, in round terms, how may packages are available in Debian
(Squeeze?)
From doing:
for i in main contrib non-free; do echo $i:; curl -s
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/$i/binary-amd64/Packages.bz2 |
bunzip2 -c | grep Package: | sort -u | wc
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 11:56:34, Jon Dowland wrote:
This can be answered (by a developer) using UDD -
http://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase
The answer today is
udd= select count(*),release from public.packages group by release;
count | release
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 11:46:01 Titanus Eramius wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:30:41 +0100
Lisi lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, all!
I have searched Wikipedia and the Debian wiki. I have Googled. I am
clearly using the wrong search terms, although I tried rewording in
sundry
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 11:55:55 Brian wrote:
On Tue 16 Oct 2012 at 11:30:41 +0100, Lisi wrote:
I have searched Wikipedia and the Debian wiki. I have Googled. I am
clearly using the wrong search terms, although I tried rewording in
sundry different ways.
Approximately, in round
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 14:00:10, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
$ aptitude search ~Astable | wc -l
43004
$ aptitude search ~Astable~scontrib | wc -l
271
$ aptitude search ~Astable~snon-free | wc -l
583
Oups, 'stable' will also match 'unstable', so the correct search (also
excluding non-Debian sources)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote:
According to my reading of the manual:
aptitude search '~smain'
and
aptitude search '~smain|~scontrib|~snon-free'
should give you the answers you seek, however, I seem to get 0 for the
first and only 626 for
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:01:59AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk
wrote:
According to my reading of the manual:
aptitude search '~smain'
and
aptitude search '~smain|~scontrib|~snon-free'
should give you the answers you
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:01:59AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk
wrote:
According to my reading of the manual:
aptitude search '~smain'
and
On Tue 16 Oct 2012 at 12:06:17 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 11:55:55 Brian wrote:
Edit your /etc/apt/sources.list to have only the line
deb your_mirror squeeze non-free
Then
apt-get update
and look at the output.
Add contrib to the line above and
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 13:59:21 Brian wrote:
On Tue 16 Oct 2012 at 12:06:17 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 11:55:55 Brian wrote:
Edit your /etc/apt/sources.list to have only the line
deb your_mirror squeeze non-free
Then
apt-get update
and
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:59:21 +0100
Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
Without the faffing about with getting a root prompt and using an
editor:
cat /var/lib/dpkg/available | grep '^Section:' | wc -l
cat /var/lib/dpkg/available | grep '^Section: non-free' | wc -l
cat
FWIW tons of packages doesn't mean tons of apps etc., since of the
strange policy to split some packages in an insane way, e.g. the jackd
packages are split really insane. Or does any package depend to libjack
without jackd? And if so, why?
There often is the argument that shared libs will keep a
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 08:01:59, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk
wrote:
According to my reading of the manual:
aptitude search '~smain'
and
aptitude search '~smain|~scontrib|~snon-free'
should give you the answers you seek,
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 17:34:19, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
FWIW tons of packages doesn't mean tons of apps etc., since of the
strange policy to split some packages in an insane way, e.g. the jackd
packages are split really insane. Or does any package depend to libjack
without jackd? And if so, why?
Why
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 18:56 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 17:34:19, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
FWIW tons of packages doesn't mean tons of apps etc., since of the
strange policy to split some packages in an insane way, e.g. the jackd
packages are split really insane. Or does any
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 18:44:20, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Why should every application *capable* of outputting to jackd force one
to install jackd?
Jackd could be a suggested dependency, if you don't use jackd, why
should the app link against the lib? The app should link against it, as
soon as
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 20:10 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 18:44:20, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Why should every application *capable* of outputting to jackd force one
to install jackd?
Jackd could be a suggested dependency, if you don't use jackd, why
should the app
On Ma, 16 oct 12, 19:22:22, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
No, compiling shouldn't be needed. This is a discussion we very often
had on jack mailing list, when split packages failed.
I don't know why an app should crash, as long as it doesn't try to
access the missing lib. It might crash, I don't know,
28 matches
Mail list logo
