On 23 Jun 2023 17:56, Fred wrote:
Or you could try Devuan which is Debian without systemd.
I did, when I didn't know Debian still had sysv.
But since you can do it on Debian directly, I don't see the point now.
Maybe more polished packages, ie. no surprises like "if you install this
package,
On 6/23/23 08:12, zithro wrote:
On 23 Jun 2023 16:41, mick.crane wrote:
On 2023-06-23 11:58, Nicolas George wrote:
Andy Smith (12023-06-23):
It seemed fine the way it was. The only reason why I didn't answer
is that I don't know anything about removing systemd!
Me I know just a little about
On 23 Jun 2023 16:41, mick.crane wrote:
On 2023-06-23 11:58, Nicolas George wrote:
Andy Smith (12023-06-23):
It seemed fine the way it was. The only reason why I didn't answer
is that I don't know anything about removing systemd!
Me I know just a little about it, enough to know that
On 2023-06-23 11:58, Nicolas George wrote:
Andy Smith (12023-06-23):
It seemed fine the way it was. The only reason why I didn't answer
is that I don't know anything about removing systemd!
Me I know just a little about it, enough to know that discussion with
people who want to remove it but
Andy Smith (12023-06-23):
> It seemed fine the way it was. The only reason why I didn't answer
> is that I don't know anything about removing systemd!
Me I know just a little about it, enough to know that discussion with
people who want to remove it but are not already capable of doing it by
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:06:04AM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> I though it would have been easier to read if I had forwarded it.
> In hindsight, I could have just copied it over.
It seemed fine the way it was. The only reason why I didn't answer
is that I don't know anything about
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:24:47PM -0700, Manphiz wrote:
> Personally I don't have a strong preference either way, but would like
> to hear more opinions on this.
The complaint about a top-posted forwarded message just because it
had a contextual hint at the top, seemed excessive to me. I
David Christensen writes:
> On 6/22/23 03:28, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
>> Am 21/06/2023 um 15:46 schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
>
>>> ... top posting ...
>
>> ... When the message is forwarded ("Weitergeleitet", ... you have no
>> other choice than to top post because the forwarded message is not
>>
On 6/22/23 03:28, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Am 21/06/2023 um 15:46 schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
... top posting ...
... When the message is forwarded ("Weitergeleitet", ... you have no
other choice than to top post because the forwarded message is not
indented. It would make no sense to bottom
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:09:28PM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Am 22/06/2023 um 10:46 schrieb Reco:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:28:42AM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> >
> > > > don't appreciate top posting around here)
> > >
> > > You've managed to be pedantic and patronising yet wrong.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:09:28PM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> You have never heard of user agent spoofing have you?
Sounds like yet another reason to discontinue communications with
someone who has already raised many other red flags.
Ottavio Caruso (12023-06-22):
> You've managed to be pedantic and patronising yet wrong.
You expect help with that attitude?
Not from me at least. Goodbye.
--
Nicolas George
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:28:42AM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > don't appreciate top posting around here)
>
> You've managed to be pedantic and patronising yet wrong. When the
> message is forwarded ("Weitergeleitet", you should know this, since
> you use a *.de domain), you have no other
13 matches
Mail list logo
